题名

發展二階段診斷工具探討學生之統計迷思概念:以「相關」為例

并列篇名

Developing Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument for Exploring Students' Statistical Misconceptions: Take "Correlation" as the Example

DOI

10.6251/BEP.20090805

作者

劉子鍵(Tzu-Chien Liu);林怡均(Yi-Chun Lin)

关键词

二階段診斷工具 ; 迷思概念 ; 相關 ; 統計教育 ; correlation ; misconception ; statistics education ; two-tier diagnostic instrument

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

42卷3期(2011 / 03 / 01)

页次

379 - 399

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

統計素養是當代公民的必備能力,然而學生在學習統計時,常會產生迷思概念。相較於其他科學領域已經發展二階段診斷工具來探究學生的迷思概念,在統計教育領域中罕有類似的工具。據此,本研究針對基礎統計學中重要的概念,「相關」,編製二階段診斷工具,Two-tier Diagnostic Instrument about Correlation Misconceptions (TDICM),並利用該工具對982名已修畢「相關」課程的高三學生之作答反應進行分析,以探討其「相關」理解情形,「相關」迷思概念的類型、普遍性與可能成因。研究結果顯示:(1)TDICM的試題難度分配平均,內部一致性信度與鑑別度均佳;(2)受測學生的相關概念理解情形不佳,部分受測學生雖然能答對TDICM的第一階段試題,卻因爲缺乏對相關概念的完全理解,而無法答對TDICM的第二階段試題;(3)根據受測學生的兩階段答案組型,顯示TDICM所診斷的14個相關迷思概念皆被學生所普遍擁有;(4)上述14個相關迷思概念中有7個是過去研究曾探討過,有7個是本研究於診斷工具發展過程中發現學生常具備的迷思概念。此外,本研究亦在研究結果與討論中探討這14個迷思概念的可能成因與教育意涵。最後,本研究針對「二階段診斷工具」與「相關」迷思概念在統計教育研究之應用提出建議。

英文摘要

Statistical literacy is essential to people of modern era. However, research has shown that students often hold misconceptions when they study statistics. Although two-tier diagnostic instruments have been developed for diagnosing and exploring students' misconceptions in other fields of science, few are availble in statistics education. Therefore, the main purpose of the current study was to develop a two tier diagnostic instrument: Two-tier Diagnostic Instrument about Correlation Misconceptions (TDICM). This instrument was adopted to analyze the responses of 982 12th-graders who had taken statistics courses to ”correlation”, and to explore the types, universality, and possible causes of such misconceptions in correlation. The research results showed that: (a) TDICM has satisfactory levels of difficulty, internal consistency reliability, and discrimination; (b) most participants do not have good comprehension of ”correlation” concepts. Although some were able to answer the questions correctly in the first tier of TDICM, they failed to do so in the second tier due to lack of comprehensive understanding of correlation; (c) students' responses in the two-tier model indicated that there are 14 correlation misconceptions universally held by the participants; (d) seven of the 14 misconceptions has been discussed in the literature, and others were identified in this study. Furthermore, the possible causes of these misconceptions and the implications in education were discussed. Finally, this study provided some suggestions to the application of two-tier diagnostic instrument and the correlation misconceptions in statistics education.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Liu, H. J.,Garfield, J. B.(2002).Sex differences in science statistical reasoning.Bulletin of Educational Psychology,34(1),123-138.
    連結:
  2. 教育部(1995):高級中學數學課程標準。取自教育部網站:http://www.find.org.tw/0105/news/0105_news_disp.asp?news_id=2735,2009年6月30日。
  3. Chang, H. P.,Chen, J. Y.,Guo, C. J.,Chen, C. C.,Chang, C. Y.,Lin, S. H.,Su, W. J.(2007).Investigating primary and secondary students? Learning of physics concepts in Taiwan.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),465-482.
  4. Chiu, M. H.,Guo, C. J.,Treagust, D. F.(2007).Assessing students' conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),379-390.
  5. Cohen, S.,Smith, G. A.,Chechile, R.,Burns, G.,Tasi, F.(1996).Identifying impediments to learning probability and statistics from an assessment of instructional software.Journal Educational and Behavioral Statistics,21(1),35-54.
  6. Ebel, R. L.,Frisbie, D. A.(1991).Essentials of educational measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  7. Estepa, A.,Batanero, C.(1996).Judgments of correlation in scatter plots: Students' intuitive strategies and preconceptions.Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education,4,25-41.
  8. Garfield, J.,Ben-Zvi, D.(2007).How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics.International Statistical Review,75(3),372-396.
  9. Garfield, J.,Chance, B.(2000).Assessment in statistics education: Issues and challenges.Mathematics Thinking and Learning,2(1&2),99-125.
  10. Gilbert, J. K.,Osborne, R. J.,Fensham, P. J.(1982).Children's science and its consequences for teaching.Science Education,66(4),623-633.
  11. Griffard, P. B.,Wandersee, J. H.(2001).The two-tier instrument on photosynthesis: What does it diagnose?.International Journal of Science Education,23(10),1039-1052.
  12. Hirsch, L. S.,O''Donnell, A. M.(2001).Representativeness in statistical reasoning: Identifying and assessing misconceptions.Journal of Statistics Education,9(2)
  13. Hodson, D.(1993).In search of a rationale for multicultural science education.Science Education,77(6),685-711.
  14. Konold, C.(1995).Issues in assessing conceptual understanding in probability and statistics.Journal of Statistics Education,3(1)
  15. Lee, S. J.(2007).Exploring students' understanding concerning batteries? Theories and practices.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),497-516.
  16. Lin, S. W.(2004).Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test for high school students' understanding of flowering plant growth and development.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,2(2),175-199.
  17. Liu, T. C.,Lin, Y. C.,Tsai, C. C.(2009).Identifying misconceptions about statistical correlation and their possible causes among high school students: An exploratory study using concept mapping with interviews.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,7(4),791-820.
  18. Morris, E.(2001).The design and evaluation of link: A computer-based learning system for correlation.British Journal of Educational Technology,32(1),39-52.
  19. Morris, E. J.(1997).An investigation of students' conceptions and procedural skills in the statistical topic correlation.UK:Centre for Information Technology in Education. Institute of Educational Technology. The Open University.
  20. Nicoll, G.(2001).A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions.International Journal of Science Education,23(7),707-730.
  21. Nisbett, R.,Ross, L.(1980).Human inference: Strategies and short-comings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  22. Novak, J. D.,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning how to learn.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  23. Nunally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric Theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  24. Odom, A. L.,Barrow, L. H.(1995).Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32(1),45-61.
  25. Osborne, R. J.,Gilbert, J. K.(1980).A technique for exploring students' view of the world.The Institute of Physics,15(6),376-379.
  26. Peterson, R.,Treagust, D.,Garnett, P.(1986).Identification of secondary students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic instrument.Research in Science Education,16(1),40-48.
  27. Roberts, L.(1999).Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,30(5),707-717.
  28. Taber, K. S.(1999).Ideas about ionisation energy: A diagnostic instrument.School Science Review,81(295),97-104.
  29. Tan, K. C. G.,Goh, N. K.,Chia, L. S.,Treagust, D. F.(2002).Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(4),283-301.
  30. Treagust, D. F.(1986).Evaluating students' misconception by means of diagnostic multiple choice items.Research in Science Education,16(1),199-207.
  31. Treagust, D. F.(1988).Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconception in science.International Journal of Science Education,10(2),159-169.
  32. Treagust, D. F.,Chandrasegaran, A. L.(2007).The Taiwan national science concept learning study in an international perspective.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),391-403.
  33. Tsai, C. C.,Chou, C.(2002).Diagnosing students' alternative conceptions in science.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,18(2),157-165.
  34. Tsai, C. H.,Chen, H. Y.,Chou, C. Y.,Lain, K. D.(2007).Current as the key concept of Taiwanese students' understandings of electric circuits.International Journal of Science Education,29(4),483-496.
  35. von Roten, F. C.(2006).Do we need a public understanding of statistics?.Public Understanding of Science,15(2),243-249.
  36. Voska, K. W.,Heikkinen, H. W.(2000).Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(2),160-176.
  37. Wiersma, W.,Jurs, S. G.(1985).Educational measurement and testing.Newton, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  38. 余文卿編、李白飛編(2002)。高級中學數學甲(上冊)。台北:龍騰。
  39. 余民寧(2005)。心理與教育統計學。台北:三民。
  40. 李虎雄、陳昭地、黃登源、李政貴、林礽堂、儲啓政(2002)。高級中學數學乙(上冊)。台北:康熙。
  41. 林清山(2003)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華。
  42. 林福來、李恭晴、徐正梅、陳冒海、陳順宇(2003)。高級中學數學乙(上冊)。台北:南一。
  43. 楊維哲、蔡聰明、吳隆盛(2001)。高級中學數學甲(上冊)。台北:三民。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡清斌、曾建維、許天維、永井正武(2014)。結合學習迷思學生區與迷思次序演算法的提案。測驗學刊,61(2),183-211。
  2. 蘇金豆(2015)。三階診斷工具的發展和應用―技職學生化學平衡迷思概念評量。科學教育學刊,23(4),321-352。