重度與極重度肢體障礙者輔助科技長期介入成果研究

Effects of Long-term Interventions with Assistive Technology on Life and Development of Individuals with Severe and Profound Physical Disabilities

10.6251/BEP.20100503

林淑玟(Shu-Wen Lin)；羅錦興(Ching-Hsing Luo)

長期介入成果 ； 肢體障礙者 ； 跨專業團隊 ； 輔助科技延伸服務 ； 輔助科技設備與服務 ； Assistive Technology Devices and Services ATDS ； Assistive Technology Extended Services ATES ； long-term interventions and outcomes ； persons with physical disabilities ； transdisciplinary team

教育心理學報

43卷1期（2011 / 09 / 01）

97 - 126

繁體中文

本研究透過跨專業輔助科技團隊，爲四位重度與極重度肢體障礙者（頸椎損傷、腦性麻痺各兩位），提供長達七年個別化電腦科技輔具研製、輔助科技設備與服務(ATDS)及輔助科技延伸服務（ATES，含生涯發展／轉銜服務、職業重建、心理復健等）。本文採多重個案研究法(multiple-case study)，探討前述AT介入之短期成果與長期影響。經提供一至三年ATDS 後，四位個案皆出現良好短期成果，包括：輔助科技設備(ATD)符合需求、訓練目標完全達成、持續且高頻率使用ATD。再經提供數年ATES後，出現之長期正面影響包括：ATD應用範圍擴增、活動能力增強、參與表現提高、正向心理感受與滿意度提昇。同時，四位個案生活品質皆大幅改善。此外，也發現若干心理社會因素（如家人態度與支持、人格特質、動機、致殘時期、接納傷殘、自我防衛機制等），會影響AT 介入成果。

The study examined the effects of a seven-year project, in which assistive technology (AT) developed by an interdisciplinary assistive technology team was used to assist individuals with severe and profound physical disabilities, on the life and development of the individuals. Four cases, including two persons with cervical spinal injuries and two persons with cerebral palsy were participants of the study. Customized high-tech devices, AT devices and services (ATDS), and AT extended services (ATES) designed for career development/transition services, vocational rehabilitation, or psychological rehabilitation were used as AT intervention to improve the individuals' abilities to actively participate in life events and their quality of life. The results indicated that positive shorter-term outcomes resulted from the AT interventions for the four cases, including ATD possessing features to meet users' needs, the completion of training goals ATD was designed to provide, and the persistence and frequency of usage of ATD by participants.. The study also showed positive long-term outcomes of the AT intervention, including extension of using ATD improved mobility and activity, increased participation performance, enhanced self-perception and satisfaction experienced by participants, and improved quality of life. Some psychosocial and social factors, such as family’s attitude and support, personal characteristics, motivation, time of onset, acceptance of impairment, and mechanisms of self-protection, could confound with the influence the AT intervention.

1. 行政院國科會公關科( 2003 ) 國科會輔具研發覺服務成果展說明會。取自行政院國科會網站 http://webl.nsc.gov.tw/Cl.aspx?x llem=744 7&ctNode=39&mp=1， 2008 年8 月9 日。
2. 內政部統計處( 2010 ) 內政統計通報九十九年第七週。取自內政部統計處網站http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=3854， 2010 年4 月10 日。
3. Assistive Technology Act, 29 U. S. C. §3002 (2004)
4. Tech Connections (2002). ATolllcomes measllrement (Assistive Technology Quick Reference Series). Retrived January 29, 2006, from http://www.catea.gatech.edu/qui ckrefguides/guides/ATOutcomes-LP.pdf.
5. Burgstahler, S.(2003).The role of technology in preparing youth with disabilities for postsecondary education and employment.Journal of Special Education Technology,18(4),3-19.
6. Cook, A. M.,Hussey, S. M.(2002).Assistive technology: Principles and practice.Baltimore, MD:Mosby.
7. Copley, J.,Ziviani, J.(2004).Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities.Occupational Therapy International,11(4),229-243.
8. Edyburn, D.(2002).Measuring assistive technology outcomes: Key concepts.Journal of Special Education Technology,18(1),53-55.
9. Fuhrer, M. J.,Jutai, J. W.,Scherer, M. J.,Deruyter, F.(2003).A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes.Disability and Rehabilitation,25(22),1243-1251.
10. Gray, D. B.(ed.),Quatrano, L. A.(ed.),Lieberman, M. L.(ed.)(1998).Designing and using assistive technology.Baltimore, ML:Paul H. Brookes.
11. Huang, I-C.,Sugden, D.,Beveridge, S.(2009).Children's perception of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings.Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology,4(2),95-105.
12. Livneh, H.,Antonak, R. F.(2005).Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: A primer for counselors.Journal of Counseling and Development,83,12-20.
13. Miesenberger, K.(ed.),Klaus, J.(ed.),Zagler, W.(ed.)(2002).International conference on computers for handicapped persons.Berlin, Germany:Springer-Verlag.
14. Robson, C.(2002).Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers.Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
15. Scherer, M. J.(2005).Living in the state of stuck: How assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities.Cambridge, MA:Brookline.
16. Scherer, M. J.(ed.)(2002).Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation.Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
17. Scherer, M. J.,Glueckauf, R.(2005).Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation.Rehabilitation Psychology,50(2),132-141.
18. Shih, C. H.,Shih, C. T.(2009).Assisting people with multiple disabilities to use computers with multiple mice.Research in Development Disabilities,30,746-754.
19. World Health Organization(2001).International c1assification of functioning, disabilily and health-ICF.Geneva, Switzerland:World Health Organization.
20. Wressle, E.,Samuelsson, K.(2004).User statisfaction with mobility assistive devices.Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy,11,143-150.
21. Wright, B. A.(1983).Physical disability: A psychosocial approach.New York, NY:Harper & Row.
22. Yin, R. k.(ed.)(2004).The case study anthology.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
23. 吳雅萍(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。
24. 吳耀庭、曾智宏、吳明順、陳佳莉、施啟明、畢柳鶯(2004)。高位頸髓損傷患者輔具使用與日常生活功能調查。臺灣復健醫學雜誌，32(1)，19-24。
25. 周新富(2007)。教育研究法。台北:五南。
26. 林淑玟、羅錦興、陳世中、謝明哲、吳崇民、黃璨珣(2008)。跨專業輔助科技整合服務團隊之運作。台南:國立台南大學特殊教育中心。
27. 林雲龍(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系。
28. 林新凱(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台南大學特殊教育研究所。
29. 邵成麟(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。南台科技大學電機工程系。
30. 唐詠雯(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系所。
31. 翁慧盈(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學電機工程學系。
32. 張佳傑(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學醫學工程學研究所。
33. 陳明聰(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所。
34. 陳明聰、林莊富(2006)。小小改變大不同：一位國小重度多重障礙學生鍵盤使用的介入服務。特殊教育季刊，99，24-30。
35. 陳姿旭(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系。
36. 楊涵馨(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學醫學工程學研究所。
37. 劉淑美(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育學系。
38. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究理論與應用。台北:心理。
39. 蔡政哲(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學醫學工程研究所。
40. 蔡碩凱(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。大葉大學工業設計研究所。

1. 陳筱嵐,洪瑞成,Dave Edyburn(2019)。補救或補償－輔助科技介入前決策與判斷之思辨以自閉症手寫問題之個案為例。特殊教育季刊，150，13-24。
2. 周宇翔、李淑貞(2017)。輔具適配評估專業發展初探：兼論輔具評估人員專業倫理守則之建構。東吳社會工作學報，32，35-63。
3. (2017)。從身心障礙者權利公約談輔具權利的保障。社區發展季刊，157，200-219。