题名

科學競賽選手的合作態度、知識分享與持續分享意願之關係分析

并列篇名

Analysis of Relationships Among Science Contestants' Cooperation Attitude, Knowledge Sharing, and Continuous Sharing Intention

DOI

10.6251/BEP.202012_52(2).0009

作者

洪榮昭(Jon-Chao Hon)；葉建宏(Jian-Hong Ye)；何雅娟(Ya-Jiuan Ho)；林逸茜(I-Chien Lin)

关键词

持續意願 ； 合作態度 ； 知識分享 ； 動手做科學競賽 ； continuous intention ； cooperative attitude ； knowledge sharing ； hands-on science competition

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

52卷2期（2020 / 12 / 01）

页次

437 - 458

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

時值國際教育發展趨勢及國內進行108十二年國民基本教育課程綱要之興革，其重視學生探究與實作、培養主動探索與團隊合作之際，經由競賽活動最能激勵團隊探究，而在團隊探究中成員的成功與有效的知識分享，可以直接促進知識的創造，進而幫助團體維持競爭優勢。以科學競賽而言，知識分享是可提升學習者科學探究與實踐能力。然而，在科學競賽中對於學習者的知識分享行為相關研究之比例相對較少，故本研究特基於Kahneman（2003）的思考雙重歷程理論（自動回饋及反思回饋兩個歷程）的基礎下，建構一個三種不同推理類型（快速回饋、認知反思、情感反思）的知識分享行為，以特質活化理論來探討在科學競賽中參與者合作態度的特質、知識分享與持續分享意願之關係。本研究屬於一項驗證性研究，以立意抽樣方式，邀請所有參與2018年點子科學競賽參賽者進行問卷填寫，並刪除無效樣本及填答不完整的數據資料。本研究共收集169份有效問卷，有效回收率為77.2%，其中男性計有102人（60.4%），女性計有67人（39.6%），平均年齡為12.189歲（標準差為1.554歲）。本研究採驗證性分析，數據資料經由研究工具的信度與效度及整體適配度檢驗後。最後以結構方程模型方法進行路徑分析。研究結果顯示，合作態度與三種類型的知識分享（快速回饋、認知反思、情感反思）呈現正相關；但僅有認知反思與持續分享意願呈現正相關，而快速回饋與持續分享意願呈現無相關，且情感反思與持續分享意願呈現負相關。同時本研究更進一步，應用四個理論來解釋分析結果，分別從期望價值理論解析，快速回饋的知識分享類型與持續分享意願呈現無相關之因素；從思考雙重歷程理論、特質活化理論及社會動機理論，說明認知反思與持續分享意願呈現正相關之因素；從焦慮不確定感管理理論及社會相互依賴理論探討，情感反思與持續分享意願呈現負相關的因素。而本研究貢獻在於理解知識分享的型態與持續意願，將有助於科學競賽中團隊探究中轉化情感反思及快速回饋為認知反思的知識分享型態，增進持續分享意願；進而提升競爭優勢。
英文摘要

With science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education in full swing worldwide, several science competitions based on STEAM have sprung up. One is Maker-Highlight-STEM&A, a competition sponsored by the Department of Education of the Taipei City Government, which involves STEAM learning and creativity through hands-on skills. In Maker- Highlight-STEM&A project making, knowledge sharing is crucial for seeking approaches to solve problems. Participants must know how to collaborate with each other and have a positive collective attitude to knowledge sharing to achieve the team's goals. In particular, in the competition, the project topic is given on the spot, which encourages participants to share their knowledge and discover new ideas while creating project functions and improving their project quality, thereby helping them win the competition. Extending Kahneman's (2003) dual process system, which states that automatic and reflective responses exist in knowledge sharing, we divided reflective responses into rational and emotional responses based on the cognition-affection model. To analyze the role of the three types of knowledge sharing, this study explored cooperative attitude as their antecedent and continuous intention as their predictor. In the highly competitive environment of Maker-Highlight-STEM&A, knowledge sharing in teamwork is crucial to win the competition; however, few studies have examined the correlation among cooperative attitude, knowledge sharing, and continuous intention to share knowledge. Because self-identity can foster attitudes toward a behavior in relation to the intention to perform that behavior, the present study considered the self-identity of participants in three types of knowledge sharing to predict their continuous intention to share knowledge in the competition. Group interactions can affect people's motivation to share their knowledge. Thus, this research built a research model extended from trait activation theory and social sharing motivation theory. With cooperative attitude as an independent variable, knowledge sharing as an intervening variable, and continuous sharing intention as a dependent variable, we proposed the following six research hypotheses: H1: Cooperative attitude is positively associated with autonomous response. H2: Cooperative attitude is positively associated with rational reflection. H3: Cooperative attitude is positively associated with emotional reflection. H4: Autonomous response is positively associated with continuous sharing intention. H5: Rational reflection is positively associated with continuous intention to share knowledge. H6: Emotional reflection is negatively associated with continuous sharing intention. The purposive sampling technique was used in this research wherein all participants in the 2018 Maker-Highlight- STEM&A were invited to fill out a questionnaire survey. A total of 219 questionnaires were collected, of which 50 invalid questionnaires (with incomplete data) were excluded, leaving 169 effective samples for an effective rate of 77.2% and including 102 male (60.4%) and 67 female (39.6%) respondents. By performing the first-order confirmatory factor analysis, questionnaire items with lower factor loadings were deleted. Then, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire constructs were tested to ensure they met the thresholds of statistical standards. Model fit and path analyses were performed to verify the research model. When performing the first-order confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the internal validity of items in each construct, items with residual values over 0.5 should be removed from the original questionnaire (Hair et al., 2018). In the original questionnaire, there were 11 items for cooperative attitude; five each for autonomous response, rational reflection, and emotional reflection; and five for the continuous sharing intention construct. Of the remaining items, those for cooperative attitude were reduced from 11 to six; those for autonomous response, rational reflection, and emotional reflection were reduced from five to four each; and those for continuous sharing intention were reduced from five to four. Exemplary items included ＂If my teammates have trouble shooting, I will help him or her right away＂ for measuring the cooperative attitude construct, with CR = .89 and Cronbach's α = .90; ＂If any idea comes to my mind, I speak out right away＂ for measuring the automatic response construct, with CR = .84 and Cronbach's α = .83; ＂If any idea comes to my mind, I determine whether it is rational before speaking out＂ for measuring the rational reflection response construct, with CR = .89 and Cronbach's α = .89; ＂If any idea comes to my mind, I think about whether it will be rejected before I speak out＂ for measuring emotional reflection, with CR = .86 and Cronbach's α = .86; and ＂I would like to continuously share knowledge in this type of contest in the future＂ for measuring continuous sharing intention, with CR = .94 and Cronbach's α = .94. The CR and Cronbach's α values were above the threshold suggested by Hair et al. (2018), indicating that the composite reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire were acceptable. In this research, having a cooperative attitude was the independent variable, the three different types of knowledge sharing were mediating variables, and continuous sharing intention was the dependent variable. Data were analyzed and tested using structural equation modeling with AMOS 20.0. The results of the data analysis revealed that cooperative attitude was positively associated with autonomous response, rational reflection, and emotional reflection. Moreover, autonomous response was negatively associated with continuous sharing intention; rational reflection was positively associated with continuous sharing intention; and emotional reflection was negatively associated with continuous sharing intention. Throughout the competition, there were numerous benefits for participants apart from the purpose of the competition itself, including teamwork and knowledge sharing. Despite the fact that it is important to know how to effectively improve students' knowledge sharing through such events, it has seldom been mentioned in research related to science competitions; hence, we conducted an empirical study targeting the 2018 science competition. The research results revealed that all three knowledge sharing types, namely autonomous response, rational reflection, and emotional reflection, played a positive predictive role in cooperative attitude. Emotional response and automatic reaction played a negative antecedent role in continuous intention to share knowledge. In line with the Chinese saying ＂thinking three times before taking action,＂ we should focus on knowledge sharing from rational reflection and deactivate knowledge sharing from emotional reflection and automatic response to improve knowledge transmission effects for participants to experience a more meaningful STEAM process. Remarkably little research has been conducted on learners' knowledge sharing behavior in school and even less on such behavior in competitions. This research revealed that a competition involving teamwork, the behavioral model of knowledge sharing, and the intention of continuous sharing can be expanded to understand cooperative learning in any other STEAM-related contests. In addition, this study proposed three different types of knowledge sharing (i.e., autonomous response, rational reflection, and emotional reflection) extended from Kahneman's dual-process theory (intuitive feedback and reflective feedback) to review continuous sharing intention. These three knowledge sharing types could be a reference for future research teams to improve knowledge-sharing effects in other cooperative settings. Onsite team competitions promote cooperative opportunities for participants to develop their attitude to collaborative work and knowledge sharing in rational reflection. Cooperative attitude development is essential for meeting the requirement of new 108 curricula. In line with this, other types of science or STEAM contests can integrate onsite activities to ensure that participants must work collaboratively to win the contest. In particular, National Science Fair or Science Olympic contests can be implemented with trouble shooting onsite, in which effective knowledge sharing can be embedded along with project making.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Wang, S.-J.,Huang, H.-C.,Yang, C.Y.-S.(2016).To say or not to say: The mediating role of psychological safety and self-efficacy on the influence of social capital on users’ knowledge sharing behavior in social network sites.NTU Management Review,26(2),37-72.
    連結：
  2. 符碧真, B.-J.(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，59-87。
    連結：
  3. 盧秀琴, C.-C.,馬士茵, S.-Y.(2019)。設計 STEAM 課程培養國小學生的 STEAM 素養：以「動物模仿獸」為例。教育科學研究期刊，64(3)，85-118。
    連結：
  4. Abedi, G.,Rostami, F.,Nadi, A.(2015).Analyzing the dimensions of the quality of life in hepatitis B patientsusing confirmatory factor analysis.Global Journal of Health Science,7(7),22-31.
  5. Ajzen, I.(1991).The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2),179-211.
  6. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Prentice Hall.
  7. Albarracin, D.,Shavitt, S.(2018).Attitudes and attitude change.Annual Review of Psychology,69,299-327.
  8. Alsharo, M.,Gregg, D.,Ramirez, R.(2017).Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust.Information & Management,54(4),479-490.
  9. Amoroso, D.,Lim, R.(2017).The mediating effects of habit on continuance intention.International Journal of Information Management,37(6),693-702.
  10. Asterhan, C. S. C.,Bouton, E.(2017).Teenage peer-to-peer knowledge sharing through social network sites in secondary schools.Computers & Education,110,16-34.
  11. Baker, M. J.(2010).Types of types of educational dialogue.Learning, Culture and Social Interaction
  12. Bidegaina, G.,Lukas Mujika, J. F.(2020).Exploring the relationship between attitudes toward science and PISA scientific performance.Revista de Psicodidáctica,25(1),1-12.
  13. Blöte, A. W.,Miers, A. C.,Van den Bos, E.,Westenberg, P. M.(2019).Negative social self-cognitions: How shyness may lead to social anxiety.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,63,9-15.
  14. Brown, G.(2013).The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: An empirical analysis.Ecosystem Services,5,58-68.
  15. Chang, C.-C.(2013).Examining users’ intention to continue using social network games: A flow experience perspective.Telematics and Informatics,30(4),311-321.
  16. Chang, C.-C.,Chou, P.-N.,Liang, C.(2018).Using ePortfolio-based learning approach to facilitate knowledge sharing and creation among college students.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,34(1),30-41.
  17. Chase, K.,Abrahamson, D.(2018).Searching for buried treasure: Uncovering discovery in discovery-based learning.Instructional Science,46(1),11-33.
  18. Cheung, C.-M.,Lee, M.-K.,Lee, Z.-W.(2013).Understanding the continuance intention of knowledge sharing in online communities of practice through the post knowledge sharing evaluation processes.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(7),1357-1374.
  19. Cummings, J. N.(2004).Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization.Management Science,50,352-364.
  20. Cunningham, W. A.,Luttrell, A.(2015).Attitudes.Brain Mapping,3,2235-239.
  21. De Paoli, D.,Ropo, A.(2015).Open-plan offices-the response to leadership challenges of virtual project work?.Journal of Corporate Real Estate,17(1),63-74.
  22. Dietrich, J.,Viljaranta, J.,Moeller, J.,Kracke, B.(2017).Situational expectancies and task values: Associations with students’ effort.Learning and Instruction,47,53-64.
  23. Dong, T.-P.,Hung, C.-L.,Cheng, N.-C.(2016).Enhancing knowledge sharing intention through the satisfactory context of continual service of knowledge management systems.Information Technology and People,29(4),807-829.
  24. Doury, M.(2019).Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation: A clear-cut opposition or two poles on a continuous line?.Argumentation in actual practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
  25. Er, S.,Ataç, B. A.(2014).The attitudes of students towards cooperative learning in ELT classes.International Online Journal of Education and Teaching,1(2),109-122.
  26. Evans, J. B. T.,Stanovich, K. E.(2013).Dual process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate.Perspectives on Psychological Science,8(3),223-241.
  27. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1977).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Wiley.
  28. Fishbein, M.,Ajzen, I.(1975).Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.Addison-Wesley.
  29. Foray, D.,Mowery, D. C.,Nelson, R. R.(2012).Public R & D; and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D; programs?.Research Policy,41,1697-1702.
  30. Fryer, M.(Ed.)(2004).Creativity & cultural diversity.Shipley Print Company.
  31. Goh, S. C.(2002).Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications.Journal of Knowledge Management,6(1),23-30.
  32. Gwinn, R.,Krajbich, I.(2020).Attitudes and attention.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,86,Article 103892.
  33. Haddock, G.,Maio, G. R.(2019).Chapter two - Inter-individual differences in attitude content: Cognition, affect, and attitudes.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,59,53-102.
  34. Hair, J. F.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Black, W. C.(2018).Multivariate data analysis.Cengage India.
  35. Hall, D. J.,Skipper, J. B.,Hazen, B. T.,Hanna, J. B.(2012).Inter organizational IT use, cooperative attitude, and inter organizational collaboration as antecedents to contingency planning effectiveness.The International Journal of Logistics Management,23(1),50-76.
  36. Hamdan, S.,Badrullah, B. B.,Shahid. M.(2011).Confirmatory factor analysis for testing validity and reliability instrument in the study of education.Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,5(12),1098-1103.
  37. Hasan, R.,Lukitasari, M.,Utami, S.,Anizar, A.(2019).The activeness, critical, and creative thinking skills of students in the Lesson Study-based inquiry and cooperative learning.Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia,5(1),77-84.
  38. Hashim, K. F.,Tan, F.-B.(2015).The mediating role of trust and commitment on members’ continuous knowledge sharing intention: A commitment-trust theory perspective.International Journal of Information Management,35(2),145-151.
  39. Hau, Y. S.,Kim, B.,Lee, H.,Kim, Y.-G.(2013).The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions.International Journal of Information Management,33(2),356-366.
  40. Henker, N.,Sonnentag, S.,Unger, D.(2015).Transformational leadership and employee creativity: The mediating role of promotion focus and creative process engagement.Journal of Business and Psychology,30(2),235-247.
  41. High, A. C.,Caplan, S. E.(2009).Social anxiety and computer-mediated communication during initial interactions: Implications for the hyperpersonal perspective.Computers in Human Behavior,25(2),475-482.
  42. Hong, J.-C.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Szeto, E.,Tai, K.-H.,Tsai, C.-R.(2016).Positive affect relevant to epistemic curiosity to reflect continuance intention to join a hands-on making contest.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,12(9),2267-2279.
  43. Hong, J.-C.,Hwang, M.-Y.,Tsai, C.-R.(2021).The effect of object-free and object-related intelligences on hands-on making self-efficacy and attitude toward quality improvement.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,19,863-879.
  44. Hsu, M.-H.,Ju, T.-L.,Yen, C.-H.,Chang, C.-M.(2007).Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,65(2),153-169.
  45. Huang, E. Y.,Huang, T. K.(2012).Investigating the antecedents of users’ knowledge sharing intention.Journal of Computer Information Systems,53(2),93-102.
  46. Huang, N.-T.-N.,Chiu, L.-J.,Hong, J.-C.(2016).Relationship among students’ problem-solving attitude, perceived value, behavioral attitude, and intention to participate in a science and technology contest.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,14(8),1419-1435.
  47. Ipe, M.(2003).Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework.Human Resource Development Review,2(4),337-359.
  48. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(2009).An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning.Educational Researcher,38(5),365-379.
  49. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(2002).Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory.Theory and research on small groups
  50. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.,Smith, K.(2007).The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings.Educational Psychology Review,19(1),15-29.
  51. Jolaee, A.,Md Nor, K.,Khani, N.,Md Yusoff, R.(2014).Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff.International Journal of Educational Management,28(4),413-431.
  52. Jonason, P. K.,Zeigler-Hill, V.(2018).The fundamental social motives that characterize dark personality traits.Personality and Individual Differences,132,98-107.
  53. Kahneman, D(2003).A perspective on judgement and choice.American Psychologist,58(9),697-720.
  54. Kenny, D. A.,Kaniskan, B.,McCoach, D. B.(2015).The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom.Sociological Methods & Research,44(3),486-507.
  55. Keszey, T.(2018).Boundary spanners’ knowledge sharing for innovation success in turbulent times.Journal of Knowledge Management,22(5),1061-1081.
  56. Kim, Y. Y.(Ed.),Gudykunst, W. B.(Ed.)(1988).Theories in intercultural communication.Sage.
  57. Korzaan, M.,Morris, S. A.(2009).Individual characteristics and the intention to continue project escalation.Computers in Human Behavior,25(6),1320-1330.
  58. Li, Y. Q.,Liu, C.-H.(2018).The role of network position, tie strength and knowledge diversity in tourism and hospitality scholars’ creativity.Tourism Management Perspectives,27,136-151.
  59. Lim, K.-S.,Kim, H.-S.(2014).The effects of STEAM education on scientific inquiry skills of high school students.Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education,7(2),180-191.
  60. Lin, H.-F.(2007).Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions.Journal of Information Science,33(2),135-149.
  61. Llopis, O.,Foss, N. J.(2016).Understanding the climate knowledge sharing relation: The moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and job autonomy.European Management Journal,34(2),135-144.
  62. Mueller, J.(2014).A specific knowledge culture: Cultural antecedents for knowledge sharing between project teams.European Management Journal,32(2),190-202.
  63. Neel, R.,Kenrick, D. T.,White, A. E.,Neuberg, S. L.(2016).Individual differences in fundamental social motives.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,110(6),887-907.
  64. O’Neill, T. A,Hambley, L. A.,Chatellier, G. S.(2014).Cyberslacking, engagement, and personality in distributed work environments.Computers in Human Behavior,40,152-160.
  65. Oyemomi, O.,Liu, S.,Neaga, I.,Chen, H.,Nakpodia, F.(2019).How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach.Journal of Business Research,94,313-319.
  66. Pellegrino, M.,Musy, M.(2017).Seven questions around interdisciplinarity in energy research.Energy Research & Social Science,32,1-12.
  67. Presbitero, A.,Attar, H.(2018).Intercultural communication effectiveness, cultural intelligence and knowledge sharing: Extending anxiety-uncertainty management theory.International Journal of Intercultural Relations,67,35-43.
  68. Raviv, A.,Cohen, S.,Aflalo, E.(2019).How should students learn in the school science laboratory? The benefits of cooperative learning.Research in Science Education,49(2),331-345.
  69. Rimé, B.(2009).Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review.Emotion Review,1,60-85.
  70. Salim, M.,Javed, N.,Sharif, K.,Riaz, A.(2011).Antecedents of knowledge sharing attitude and intentions.European Journal of Scientific Research,56(1),44-50.
  71. Scuotto, V.,Beatrice, O.,Valentina, C.,Nicotra, M.,Gioia, L. D.,Briamonte, M. F.(2020).Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer.Technological Forecasting & Social Change,152,Article 119906.
  72. Sergis, S.,Sampson, D. G.,Rodríguez-Triana, M. J.,Gillet, D.,Pelliccione, L.,de Jong, T.(2019).Using educational data from teaching and learning to inform teachers’ reflective educational design in inquiry-based STEM education.Computers in Human Behavior,92,724-738.
  73. Shadish, W. R.,Cook, T. D.,Campbell, D. T.(2002).Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference.Mifflin and Company.
  74. Shimazoe, J.,Aldrich, H.(2010).Group work can be gratifying: Understanding & overcoming resistance to cooperative learning.College Teaching,58(2),52-57.
  75. Spence, J. T.(Ed.)(1983).Achievement and achievement motivation.W. H. Freeman.
  76. Stroh, D. P.(2015).Systems thinking for social change: A practical guide to solving complex problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results.Chelsea Green Publishing.
  77. Tagliaventi, M. R.,Bertolotti, F.,Macrì, D. M.(2010).A perspective on practice in interunit knowledge sharing.European Management Journal,28(5),331-345.
  78. Tamjidyamcholo, A.,Baba, M. S. B.,Tamjid, H.,Gholipour, R.(2013).Information security-Professional perceptions of knowledge-sharing intention under self-efficacy, trust, reciprocity, and shared-language.Computers & Education,68,223-232.
  79. Tarricone, P.,Luca, J.(2002).Employees, teamwork and social interdependence-a formula for successful business?.Team Performance Management: An International Journal,8(3/4),54-59.
  80. Tett, R. P.,Burnett, D. D.(2003).A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,88,500-517.
  81. Tett, R. P.,Guterman, H. A.(2000).Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation.Journal of Research in Personality,34,397-423.
  82. Tormala, Z. L.,Rucker, D. D.(2018).Attitude certainty: Antecedents, consequences, and new directions.Consumer Psychology Review,1(1),72-89.
  83. Tsai, C.-Y.,Horng, J.-S.,Liu, C.-H.,Hu, D.-C.,Chung, Y.-C.(2015).Awakening student creativity: Empirical evidence in a learning environment context.Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education,17,28-38.
  84. Van Zalk, N.,Van Zalk, M.,Kerr, M.,Stattin, H.(2011).Social anxiety as a basis for friendship selection and socialization in adolescents’ social networks.Journal of Personality,79(3),499-526.
  85. Wang, S.,Noe, R.-A.(2010).Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research.Human Resource Management Review,20,115-131.
  86. Werstch, J. V.(Ed.)(1981).The concept of activity in soviet psychology.Sharp.
  87. Westland, J. C.(2010).Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling.Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,9(6),476-487.
  88. Willard, K.,Duffrin, M. W.(2003).Utilizing project-based learning and competition to develop student skills and interest in producing quality food items.Journal of Food Science Education,2(4),69-73.
  89. 馮桂莊, K.-C.(2006)。我國學生參加 2006 年英特爾國際科技展覽競賽。科學教育月刊，291，43-53。
  90. 臺北市國民教育輔導團（2018b）：「2018 臺北市第五屆國民小學學生點子科學競賽」實施計畫。取自臺北市立仁愛國民中學網站：http://web.tpes.tp.edu.tw/enable/uploads/183/ATT1.pdf [Taipei city compulsory education advisory group. (2018). The 5th Taipei city primary school students ideas and science competition in 2018” Implementation plan. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from Taipei Municipal RenAi Junior High School, website: http://web.tpes.tp.edu.tw/enable/uploads/183/ATT1.pdf]
  91. 臺北市國民教育輔導團（2018a）：「2018 臺北市第 5 屆點子科學競賽」實施計畫。取自臺北市立仁愛國民中學網站:http://163.21.179.4/data/reportdata/2018%E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E5%B1%86%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%B0%8F%E5%AD%B8%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E9%BB%9E%E5%AD%90%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E7%AB%B6%E8%B3%BD.pdf ，2019 年 10 月 15 日。[Taipei city compulsory education advisory group. (2018a). “The 5th Taipei city ideas and science competition in 2018”Implementation plan. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from Taipei Municipal RenAi Junior High School, website: http://163.21.179.4/data/reportdata/2018%E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E5%B8%82%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%94%E5%B1%86%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E5%B0%8F%E5%AD%B8%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E9%BB%9E%E5%AD%90%E7%A7%91%E5%AD%B8%E7%AB%B6%E8%B3%BD.pdf]
被引用次数
  1. 張聖翎,林秀玲,吳相儀(2021)。突破合作學習困境：得獎教師教學策略分析之研究。教育心理學報，52(4)，807-827。
print cancel