突破合作學習困境：得獎教師教學策略分析之研究

Challenges of Cooperative Learning in Taiwan: Strategies for Improving the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning

10.6251/BEP.202106_52(4).0004

林秀玲(Hsiu-Ling Lin)；張聖翎(Sheng-Ling Chang)；吳相儀(Hsiang-Yi Wu)

得獎老師 ； 合作學習 ； 教學策略 ； successful teachers ； cooperative learning ； teaching strategies

教育心理學報

52卷4期（2021 / 06 / 01）

807 - 827

繁體中文

合作學習（cooperative learning）是近二十餘年蔚為風潮的一種創新教學策略，臺灣中小學也陸續採用，然而卻面臨不少實踐困境。本研究旨在探討採用合作學習教學的得獎教師，在面臨教學困境時如何採取最有效的教學策略。共分成兩個研究，研究一目的在搜集一般教師帶領合作學習之困境，以立意抽樣選取30位國中小學教師做為參與者，歸納在課堂中進行合作學習時，最令教師困擾的情境。而研究二目的在搜集得獎教師面對合作困境的教學策略，透過訪問12位採用合作學習而得獎的教師進行內容分析，研究一結果發現，最令一般教師感到困擾的三種困境分別為：（1）合作前期之對話困境；（2）合作中期之共事困境；（3）合作後期之共識困境。根據研究一結果，研究二訪談12位得獎老師面臨困境的策略，結果發現有5個主類目：（1）教師示範營造互信互賴；（2）組內成員互助回饋成長；（3）小組內明確分工分責；（4）加強良性溝通達成共識；（5）教師鼓勵促成共享共榮。最後整理出一套「合作學習的困境與主要策略圖」，提出具體建議供未來研究及實務之參考。

Cooperative learning is one of the most innovative teaching methods developed in the past 20 years. Numerous primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan use this method, but they face many practical challenges. Of the many teaching methods that have been proposed to increase students' learning motivation and efficiency, cooperative learning has been relatively successful in Taiwan. Cooperative learning involves asking students to cooperate in a group to achieve one or more specific learning goals (Chang, 2003). Most classrooms in junior and elementary schools in Taiwan follow traditional teaching methods, which involve one-way, teacher-student instruction. By contrast, cooperative learning encourages students to take control in the learning process. Cooperative learning elevates students' learning interests, willingness, and achievement through group cooperation (Johnson & Johnson, 1994). Thus, numerous studies (Chang, 2005; Wang & Chang, 2003) have demonstrated the positive results of applying cooperative learning in Taiwanese classrooms. Many such studies have focused on demonstrating the strengths and weaknesses of cooperative learning or examining the concept of cooperative learning in a Taiwanese context. Few studies have proposed methods for successfully applying cooperative learning. Applying cooperative learning is challenging for teachers because of its dynamic and unpredictable nature. Typically, teachers who employ cooperative learning methods must group students according to their strengths and characteristics and design appropriate tasks to achieve the overall learning goal of the lesson. Moreover, teachers guide students to allocate and share learning responsibilities and instruct group members to communicate and support each other during the learning process. The entire teaching process requires fully understanding each student's ability and potential, which further requires managing the interactive process and interpersonal conflicts among students. Few Taiwanese teachers have shared experiences of successfully applying cooperative learning by using teaching materials prepared in advance. Cooperative learning is a challenging teaching method that can often be frustrating, which leads teachers to avoid implementing it. This study explored the most common challenges involved in implementing cooperative learning in classroom settings. In addition, this study identified effective and successful strategies that can help teachers succeed in implementing cooperative learning. Accordingly, this study was divided into two parts. First, the potential challenges of cooperative learning were identified through surveys and interviews with 30 teachers who had experiences using cooperative learning in elementary or junior high schools. Second, practical strategies were determined through surveys and interviews with 12 teachers who had successfully applied cooperative learning in the classroom. Cooperative learning challenges were defined as challenging situations that occur during the cooperative learning process. All challenging situations were categorized into three stages of learning, namely early, middle, and late. Through calculation of the frequency that challenging situations arose in each stage, situations representing the typical challenges of cooperative learning were identified. First, during the early stage, the typical challenge was that students were unable to conduct a smooth discussion immediately after groups had been formed. For example, team members did not like or did not want to discuss the learning topics, did not want to state their opinions, or could not clearly understand other members' speech. Second, during the middle stage, the typical challenge was that students were unable to work together when teamwork was required. Specifically, the team could not effectively assign work to each member, or some team members did not agree with how the work was assigned, which caused conflicts among team members. Finally, in the late stage, the typical challenge was that students could not finish their work. For example, team members could not summarize and conclude their work effectively, could not reach a consensus, or did not sufficiently understand the group responsibilities and the importance of sharing credit for the work. In the second part of the study, the strategies that experienced teachers used to overcome these challenges were examined. Five basic strategies were identified: (1) Teachers demonstrate how team members should trust one other; (2) team members help each other and give positive feedback; (3) team members divide responsibilities; (4) team members communicate efficiently and draw conclusions; and (5) teachers encourage team members to share the results and credit for the work. These strategies can help bypass the typical challenges observed in the three cooperative learning stages. In each stage, all strategies or most of them could be identified. However, only two strategies (which accounted for the majority of the effective solutions developed to overcome the challenges observed in each learning phase) were investigated further in each stage. The results indicated that in the early stage, teachers must intervene in group discussions and demonstrate how team members should trust one another to overcome challenges during discussions. This strategy is crucial because most students in Taiwanese classrooms are accustomed to the one-way teaching method, which may make them hesitant to participate in discussions. However, when the teacher is actively involved and facilitating the discussion, students feel safer and are more willing to participate in discussions. The other critical strategy in the early stage was teaching team members how to properly help other team members during the discussion, which included giving positive feedback and clarifying discussion topics together. The results indicated that in the middle stage, solving interpersonal conflicts is essential for overcoming challenges involving teamwork. To successfully implement this strategy, teachers must continue to encourage team members to support each other (as in the aforementioned strategy) and help the group effectively allocate their work responsibilities. Teachers must monitor how tasks are assigned in the group because many unnecessary interpersonal conflicts can arise because of different workloads or because some team members want to avoid taking responsibility. Finally, the results indicated that in the late stage, teachers required two strategies to overcome the challenges involving concluding work. The first strategy involved helping team members efficiently communicate to reach a consensus and draw a conclusion. Within this strategy, teachers must manage their time effectively because students often waste time on aimless discussions or arguments. In addition, the group is expected to reach a consensus, and their conclusion is a critical index for teachers to evaluate whether the cooperative learning approach was successful. Therefore, the key strategy in the late stage is for teachers to actively facilitate efficient communication among groups. The second strategy is for team members to be encouraged to share credit for the work. Learning to share credit for group results and appreciate being recognized as a team can help students understand the aims of the entire cooperative learning experience, which may promote their participation in the next cooperative learning activity. Furthermore, the results of the first and second part of the study were combined to create a ＂cooperative learning challenges and key strategies for practice＂ flowchart, which illustrates the practical challenges of cooperative learning and the strategies Taiwanese teachers can used to mitigate these challenges. This study identified the difficult situations and challenges involved in three stages of the cooperative learning process. The results herein can help teachers address these challenges before substantial difficulties arise. In addition, this study provides effective strategies for addressing these challenges. The results, including the flowchart, can serve as a reference for teachers to determine effective strategies for addressing the challenges involved in different stages of cooperative learning. However, this study had two main limitations. The sample size was insufficient, and only teachers were surveyed and interviewed, which may have influenced the cogency of the study. Future studies should include data from more diverse resources to ensure that evaluations of cooperative learning practices are accurate.

1. 洪榮昭, J.-C.,葉建宏, J.-H.,何雅娟, Y.-J.,林逸茜, I.-C.(2020)。科學競賽選手的合作態度、知識分享與持續分享意願之關係分析。教育心理學報，52(2)，437-458。
   連結：
2. 張景媛, C.-Y.,呂玉琴, Y.-C.,何缊琪, Y.-C.,吳青蓉, C.-J.,林奕宏, Y.-H.(2002)。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報，33(2)，1-22。
   連結：
3. 陳詠絜, Y.-C.,方德隆, D.-L.(2019)。以學習投入觀點探究不同數學程度國中生之分組合作學習經驗。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，47，31-62。
   連結：
4. 黃思華, T.-Z.,劉遠楨, Y.-C.,顏菀廷, W.-T.(2011)。互動式電子白板融入創新合作學習模式對國小數學科學習成效與動機之影響。課程與教學，14(1)，115-139。
   連結：
5. 黃美瑤, M.-Y.,盧秋如, C.-J.,蔡國權, K.-C.,周建智, C.-C.(2019)。團隊中自我迷戀人格對社會懈怠之影響：合作學習的調節效應。大專體育學刊，21(2)，140-155。
   連結：
6. 黃寶園, B.-Y.,林世華, S.-H.(2002)。合作學習對學習效果影響之研究：統合分析。教育心理學報，34(1)，21-42。
   連結：
7. 楊琬琳, W.-L.,蔡天怡, T.-I.(2018)。合作學習情境中師資培育生教案發展之協作資訊行為。圖書資訊學刊，16(1)，109-139。
   連結：
8. 劉冠辰, G.-C.,柯志祥, C.-H.(2020)。以資訊科技融入eduScrum 教學模式之課程設計及實施。數位學習科技期刊，12(1)，23-53。
   連結：
9. Der Pan, P. J.,Pan, G. H.-M.,Lee, C.-Y.,Chang, S. S. H.(2010).University students’ perceptions of a holistic care course through cooperative learning: Implications for instructors and researchers.Asia Pacific Education Review,11(2),199-209.
10. Gillies, R. M.,Boyle, M.(2010).Teachers’ reflec-tions on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(4),933-940.
11. Hennessey, A.,Dionigi, R. A.(2013).Implementing cooperative learning in Australian primary schools: Generalist teachers’ perspectives.Issues in Educational Research,23(1),52-68.
12. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.(Ed.),Kagan, S.(Ed.),Sharan, S.(Ed.),Slavin, R.(Ed.),Webb, C.(Ed.)(1985).Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn.Plenu.
13. Jacobs, G. M.,Power, M. A.,Loh, W. I.(2002).The teacher’s sourcebook for cooperative learning: Practical techniques, basic principles, and frequently asked questions.Corwin.
14. Johnson, R. T.,Johnson, D. W.(1994).Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.Allyn & Bacon.
15. Jolliffe, W.(2015).Bridging the gap: Teachers cooperating together to implement cooperative learning.Education 3-13,43(1),70-82.
16. Jolliffe, W.,Snaith, J.(2017).Developing cooperative learning in initial teacher education: Indicators for implementation.Journal of Education for Teaching,43(3),307-315.
17. Lan, Y.-J.,Chang, C.-M.,Sung, Y.-T.,Chang, K.-E.(2008).A wireless handheld system for supporting individual and cooperative learning in Chinese reading comprehension.The 16th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2008,Taipei, Taiwan:
18. Lincoln, Y. S.,Guba, E. G.(1985).Naturalistic inquiry.Sage Publications.
19. Roth, W. M.,Roychoudhiry, A.(1993).The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30,503-534.
20. Slavin, R. E.(1995).Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice.Prentice Hall.
21. Stevens, R. J.,Slavin, R.(1995).The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students’ achievement, sttitudes, and social relation.American Educational Research Journal,32(2),321-351.
22. Strom, P. S.,Strom, R. D.(2011).Teamwork skills assessment for cooperative learning.Educational Research and Evaluation,17(4),233-251.
23. Surian, A.,Damini, M.(2014)."Becoming" a cooperative learner-teacher.Anales De Psicología,30(3),808-817.
24. 王金國, C.-K.,張新仁, H.-J.(2003)。國小六年級教師實施國語科合作學習之研究。教育學刊，21，53-78。
25. 吳麗寬, L.-K.(2000)。國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua University of Education。
26. 坎貝爾‧琳達, L.,坎貝爾‧布魯斯, B.,迪金森‧蒂, D.,郭俊賢（譯）, C.-H.(Trans.),陳淑惠（譯）, S.-H.(Trans.)(2000).多元智慧的教與學遠流.遠流=Yuan-Liou Publishing.
27. 林雅雯, Y.-W.,江柏叡, P.-J.,曾志隆, C.-L.(2015)。應用合作學習於國中數學課程之前實驗研究。臺灣數學教師，36(2)，13-25。
28. 林瓊綺, C.-C.(2018)。中原大學=Chung Yuan University。
29. 邱美虹, M.-H.,林妙霙, M.-Y.(1996)。合作學習對國三學生學習「地層記錄地質事件」的影響。教育研究資訊，4(6)，108-128。
30. 紐文英, W.-Y.(2017).質性研究方法與論文寫作.雙葉=YehYeh Book Gollery.
31. 高啟順, C.-S.(2006)。合作學習在班級經營上的研究。師說，191，51-53。
32. 張世忠, S.-C.(2003).建構取向教學─數學與科學.五南=Wu-Nan.
33. 張正仁, C.-J.(2005)。屏東科技大學=National Pingtung University of Science and Technology。
34. 張芳全, F.-C.(2002)。合作學習在綜合活動應用。國民教育，43(1)，40-48。
35. 張新仁（編）, H.-J.(Ed.)(2003).學習與教學新趨勢.心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.
36. 黃政傑, Z.-J.,林佩璇, P.-X.(1996).合作學習.五南=Wu-Nan.
37. 黃敏慧, M.-H.(2017)。合作學習理論應用於英語教學之成效分析。南亞學報，37，140-156。
38. 黃詠仁, Y.-R.,王美芬, M.-F.(2002)。國小自然科合作學習教學策略之行動研究。科學教育研究與發展，28，1-19。
39. 錢富美, F.-M.,李裕民, Y.-M.,吳幸玲, H.-L.,任慶儀, C.-I.(2016)。合作學習法之「小組遊戲競賽法」與資訊融入之教學設計：以 Google Earth 融入國小社會領域「地區生活的差異」單元為例。區域與社會發展研究，7，29-59。
40. 簡梅瑩, M.-Y.(2015)。從做中學之「合作學習」概念建構與教學實施：一位國中教師的教學行動研究反思。教育學報，43(1)，129-151。
41. 魏宗明, T.-M.(1999)。合作學習在數學科之應用。嘉縣國教，33，18-20。
42. 蘇梅儀, M.-Y.(2011)。淡江大學=Tamkang University。

1. 郭勝煌(2021)。「後疫情時代」停課不停學之PBL遠距教學實踐研究。臺北海洋科技大學學報，12(2)，95-120。
2. 黃永和(2022)。「合作學習實施動機量表」的發展與信效度考驗。測驗學刊，69(4)，293-320。
3. 王明旭(2023)。協作學習理論發展團隊協作四部曲之跨域教學成效評估：以設計思考課程為例。教育實踐與研究，36(1)，73-120。
4. (2023)。體育課翻轉教學的合作學習成效驗證。德明學報，47，54-64。