题名

微課程對注意力與學習保留之影響

并列篇名

Effect of Micro-Courses on Learners' Attention and Memory Retention

DOI

10.6251/BEP.202106_52(4).0007

作者

陳姿安(Zih-An Chen);黃博聖(Po-Sheng Huang)

关键词

注意力 ; 片段式課程 ; 學習保留 ; 微課程 ; 傳統線上課程 ; attention ; fragmented course ; learning retention ; micro-course ; traditional online course

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

52卷4期(2021 / 06 / 01)

页次

885 - 907

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在探討微課程的簡短課程特性對於學習者的影響,並以不同課程切割方式與課程總長度之差異,設計出傳統線上課程、片段式課程與微課程三種不同課程方式,比較三個組別中的注意力與學習保留效果。本研究採實驗設計,以社會心理學課程中的從眾行為做為課程主題,使用量化為主、質性為輔的方式,招募90位大學生作為參與者,隨機分派至傳統線上課程、片段式課程與微課程三個不同課程方式的組別當中進行實驗。研究結果顯示:(1)於客觀之注意力再認表現上,片段組參與者之表現會顯著高於傳統組;而主觀之自陳式注意力表現上,微課組參與者之表現顯著高於傳統組。(2)於學習保留上,三個組別無顯著差異;不過根據不同時段之課程內容分析結果發現,相較於傳統組與片段組,微課組參與者於課程中、後段之學習保留具有更高之上升幅度。

英文摘要

With the development of science and technology, the generation and spread of knowledge has accelerated. Peoples' attention spans have decreased as intelligent technological devices have been developed. In addition, modern people continue to receive excessive amounts of information due to the high frequency of Internet use, but a large amount of information cannot be effectively stored in the brain (Small et al., 2009). Scholars have claimed that, given the massive amounts of information and the learning style of digital natives, designing effective learning units that avoid cognitive overload and optimizing students' learning patterns have become important issues in education (Fyfe, 2016; Wang & Fan, 2016). Micro-learning is a new type of learning based on micro-content and micro-media. It was first proposed by Martin Lindner in 2006. Micro-learning is a general term for all short and small learning models, and it is not limited to any form. Micro-courses for micro-learning were proposed by David Penrose, a senior instructional designer in the United States (Wen & Zhang, 2015). He defined a micro-course as a form of curriculum with short films. A previous study noted that the length of the video is related to the participation rate of learners; that is, the shorter the video length, the higher the participation rate (Guo et al., 2014). The short-film characteristics of micro-courses likely increase the focus of learners, thereby increasing their participation rate. Some of the early conventional online courses were derived from the digitization of in-person courses, and the online videos lasted for approximately 40 to 50 minutes, which would make it difficult for learners to maintain their attention (Wen & Zhang, 2015). Therefore, scholars have divided the long-term online course videos into small-scale fragmentary course videos. This increased learning retention effects (e.g., Cheng et al., 2014), showing that attention plays an important role in online video learning. In summary, micro-courses are characterized by short videos, and their content is more streamlined compared with conventional online courses and small-scale fragmentary courses. The use of short films helps students to maintain attention in the learning process, improves learner participation, and enhances learning retention. The development of micro-courses is of great importance in the current learning environment due to the rapid increase in information and the advancement of media technology. However, past studies on micro-courses have focused on learners' affective attitudes toward micro-courses, including learning motivation and learning satisfaction (e.g., Frydenberg & Andone, 2016; Yu, 2016) or have surveyed willingness to use micro-courses among teachers (e.g., Fang & Liu, 2017). Rigorously designed experimental studies examining the learning process for micro-courses are lacking; studies evaluating the learning effectiveness of micro-courses are required. This study explored the attention and learning retention effects of micro-courses featuring simplified content. Based on the course segmentation and total length, three types of courses were designed. In this study, "conformity", a topic in social psychology, was the subject of the course. A conventional online course video of approximately 24 minutes was produced (traditional course group); this video was then cut into four fragmented course videos of approximately 6 minutes each according to theme units (fragmented course group), and a micro-course video of approximately 9 minutes was produced after by condensing the original material (micro-course group). Attention and learning retention were compared between these three groups. This study adopted an experimental design. In total, 90 college students were recruited as participants and randomly assigned to one of the three groups (traditional course, fragmented course, and micro-course). Approximately 3 to 6 participants who were assigned to the same group watched the video together. Before the experiment, participants were reminded that mobile phones and other communication devices must be turned off during the class. The experimental procedure was divided into two phases. At the beginning of the first phase of the formal experiment, participants in the traditional course group watched the video of 24 minutes with no break. Participants in the fragmented course group watched the four 6-minute videos with a 1-minute break between each video. Participants in the micro-course group watched the 9-minute video without any breaks. When they had finished watching the film(s), participants in the micro-course group were allowed to rest for 1 minute, after which they completed questionnaires. The results of this study showed that (1) participants in the fragmented course group had higher performance in the attention recognition test than participants in the traditional course group. Moreover, participants in the micro-course group reported higher levels of attention than those in the traditional course group. (2) No significant difference was found in the learning retention effect between these three groups. However, in further analysis, compared with the traditional course group and fragmented course group, the learning retention effect in the micro-course group increased in the later stages of the course. The qualitative data showed that although the three groups of participants all indicated that their attention gradually declined as the course video progressed, they paid attention when introducing real-life cases. However, these three groups of participants reported diverse reasons for attention changes. Participants in the traditional course group reported that the video included too much information, with no room for distraction. In the fragmented course group, although the length of the course was the same as that of the traditional online course, participants were allowed rest periods in between. Some participants reported that during the rest period, they could recall and reorganize what they have learned and could refocus their attention. Some participants in the micro-course group reported that their attention can be maintained during the learning process. In addition, based on the qualitative data from participants, the average time of video that most participants were willing to watch was approximately 10-15 minutes. Few participants could pay attention to videos more than 30 minutes. Moreover, all three groups of participants mentioned that the inclusion of real-life events in the design of the course would be helpful for their comprehension. The presentation of vivid animation and images in the course is not only interesting but also helpful for improving memory. The results of this study imply that through well-designed course content, even a short online learning video can achieve the same learning effect as a longer online learning video. It also allows learners to maintain a higher level of attention in the learning process. In other words, compared with the courses with long online videos, the micro-course could yield greater learning efficiency. Therefore, when designing online learning videos in the future, teachers should use the format of well-designed micro-courses. By shortening the learning time and reducing individuals' attention loads, micro-courses can achieve the same learning effect as courses with long videos.

主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 李漢岳, H.-Y.,楊介銘, J.-M.,宋曜廷, Y.-T.(2017)。數位學習實驗研究品質評估與現況分析:以行動學習為例。教育科學研究期刊,62(2),31-60。
    連結:
  2. 林玉雯, Y.-W.,黃臺珠, T.-Z.,劉嘉茹, J.-R.(2010)。課室學習專注力之研究-量表發展與分析應用。科學教育學刊,18(2),107-129。
    連結:
  3. 洪儷瑜, L.-Y.,袁銀娟, Y.-J.(2020)。師資培育的創新-MOOCs 補救教學師資培育課程之初探。當代教育研究季刊,28(2),65-106。
    連結:
  4. Alipour, S.,Moini, A.,Jafari-Adli, S.,Gharaie, N.,Mansouri, K.(2012).Comparison of teaching about breast cancer via mobile or traditional learning methods in gynecology residents.Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention,13(9),4593-4595.
  5. Asch, S. E.(1951).Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment.Groups, leadership and men
  6. Atkinson, R. C.,Shiffrin, R. M.(1968).Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes.The psychology of learning and motivation
  7. Bunce, D. M.,Flens, E. A.,Neiles, K. Y.(2010).How long can students pay attention in class? A study of student attention decline using clickers.Journal of Chemical Education,87(12),1438-1443.
  8. Çeliköz, N.,Erisen, Y.,Sahin, M.(2019).Cognitive learning theories with emphasis on latent learning, gestalt and information processing theories.Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World,9(3),18-33.
  9. Cheng, P.-Y.,Huang, Y.-M.,Shadiev, R.,Hsu, C.-W.,Chu, S.-T.(2014).Investigating the effectiveness of video segmentation on decreasing learners’ cognitive load in mobile learning.New horizons in web-based learning
  10. Cowan, N.(2010).The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?.Current Directions in Psychological Science,19(1),51-57.
  11. Dessì, D.,Fenu, G.,Marras, M.,Recupero, D. R.(2019).Bridging learning analytics and cognitive computing for big data classification in micro-learning video collections.Computers in Human Behavior,92,468-477.
  12. Emerson, L. C.,Berge, Z. L.(2018).Microlearning: Knowledge management applications and competency-based training in the workplace.Knowledge Management & E-Learning,10(2),125-132.
  13. Fang, X.,Liu, R.(2017).Determinants of teachers’ attitude toward microlecture: Evidence from elementary and secondary schools.EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education,13(8),5597-5606.
  14. Fields, R. D.(2005).Making memories stick.Scientific American,292(2),75-81.
  15. Frydenberg, M.,Andone, D.(2016).Creating micro-videos to demonstrate technology learning and digital literacy.Interactive Technology and Smart Education,13(4),261-273.
  16. Fyfe, E. R.(2016).Providing feedback on computer-based algebra homework in middle-school classrooms.Computers in Human Behavior,63,568-574.
  17. Gabrielli, S.,Kimani, S.,Catarci, T.(2006).The design of microlearning experiences: A research agenda.Microlearning: Emerging concepts, practices and technologies after e-learning: Proceedings of microlearning conference 2005: Learning & working in new media
  18. Guo, P. J.,Kim, J.,Rubin, R.(2014).How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos.The Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference,Atlanta, Georgia, USA:
  19. Huang, L. H.,Gui, B.(2014).On the design and development of micro-course.Applied Mechanics and Materials,599-601,2052-2055.
  20. Hug, T.,Lindner, M.,Bruck, P. A.(2005).Microlearning: Emerging Concepts, Practices and Technologies after e-Learning. Proceedings of Microlearning~2005. Learning & Working in New Media
  21. Kahneman, D.(1973).Attention and effort.Prentice-Hall.
  22. Kamilali, D.,Sofianopoulou, C.(2015).Microlearning as innovative pedagogy for mobile learning in MOOCS.The 11th International Conference Mobile Learning,Funchal, Portugal:
  23. Kuo, Y.-C.,Chu, H.-C.,Tsai, M.-C.(2017).Effects of an integrated physiological signal-based attentionpromoting and English listening system on students’ learning performance and behavioral patterns.Computers in Human Behavior,75,218-227.
  24. Leach, M.,Hadi, S. M.(2017).Supporting, categorising and visualising diverse learner behaviour on MOOCs with modular design and micro-learning.Journal of Computing in Higher Education,29(1),147-159.
  25. Lindner, M.(2006).Use these tools, your mind will follow. Learning in immersive micromedia & microknowledge environments.ALT-C 2006: The Next Generation,Edinburgh, Scotland:
  26. Liu, X.,Wang, L.(2013).The analysis on systematic development of college microlecture.Higher Education Studies,3(6),65-70.
  27. Matheson, C.(2008).The educational value and effectiveness of lectures.The Clinical Teacher,5(4),218-221.
  28. Meissner, B.,Bogner, F. X.(2012).Science teaching based on cognitive load theory: Engaged students, but cognitive deficiencies.Studies in Educational Evaluation,38(3-4),127-134.
  29. Microsoft Canada. (2015). Microsoft attention spans research report. https://dl.motamem.org/microsoft-attention-spans-research-report.pdf
  30. Miller, G. A.(1956).The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review,63(2),81-97.
  31. Nakata, T.(2008).English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning.ReCALL,20(1),3-20.
  32. Nikou, S. A.,Economides, A. A.(2018).Mobile‐based micro‐learning and assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,34(3),269-278.
  33. Paul, K.(2008).Spaced learning: A harbinger of a paradigm shift in education.Education Today,59(2),3-6.
  34. Penrose, D. (2008). Micro lecture. Baike. https://baike.baidu.com/view/8495108.htm?fr=aladdin
  35. Schachter, S.(1951).Deviation, rejection, and communication.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,46(2),190-207.
  36. Shao, L.-N.,Qiu, L.-H.,Zhan, F.-L.,Xue, M.(2018).Application of micro-lecture in standardized training of endodontic residents.Shanghai Journal of Stomatology,27(2),221-224.
  37. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.
  38. Small, G. W.,Moody, T. D.,Siddarth, P.,Bookheimer, S. Y.(2009).Your brain on google: Patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching.The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,17(2),116-126.
  39. Souza, M. I. F.,Amaral, S. F.(2014).Educational microcontent for mobile learning virtual environments.Creative Education,5,672-681.
  40. Wang, L.,Fan, M.(2016).How micro-courses can improve the effectiveness of ideological and political theories curriculum teaching through teaching design in China.Asian Social Science,12(8),219-229.
  41. Wen, C.,Zhang, J.(2015).Design of a microlecture mobile learning system based on smartphone and web platforms.IEEE Transactions on Education,58(3),203-207.
  42. Yu, K.(2016).Design and application of micro-video course recording in "general city planning" course.International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning,11(5),16-21.
  43. Zhang, X.,Xu, J.(2015).Integration of micro lectures into the blended learning discourse in tertiary education.Asian Association of Open Universities Journal,10(2),13-28.
  44. Zhao, D.(2018).Teaching practice of internet information technology in college English course.IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,322,1-5.
  45. Zhu, Q.-T.,Zhu, M.(2017).The C programming micro lecture designing mode study in mobile learning circumstance.ITM Web of Conferences,12
  46. 王淳民, C.-M.(2018)。微學習時代的契機與反思。T & D 飛訊,244,1-17。
  47. 張振虹, Z.-H.,楊慶英, Q.-Y.,韓智, Z.(2013)。微學習研究:現狀與未來。中國電化教育,322,12-20。
  48. 陳嘉揚, J.-Y.(2018)。大學生微學習模式的研究與應用—以南昌市高校為例。現代信息科技,6,137-139。
  49. 蔡進雄, J.-X(2018)。微學習時代的來臨:淺談微學習對教育人員的專業成長。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(2),90-92。