以動態系統取向探討母親後設情緒理念、母子情緒互動彈性與青少年內、外向問題行為之關聯

The Relationship Among Mothers' Meta-Emotion Philosophy, Mother-Adolescent Emotion Flexibility, and Adolescents' Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors

10.6251/BEP.202106_52(4).0010

劉奕蘭(Yih-Lan Liu)；童懿辰(Yi-Chen Tong)

動態系統 ； 情緒互動彈性 ； 後設情緒理念 ； 內、外向問題行為 ； dynamic system ； emotional flexibility ； metaemotion philosophy ； internalizing and externalizing problematic behavior

教育心理學報

52卷4期（2021 / 06 / 01）

963 - 984

繁體中文

本研究以動態系統取向探討母親後設情緒理念、母子情緒互動彈性與青少年內、外向問題行為之關聯。研究對象為118對臺灣北、中部地區自願參與之國中生及其母親。本研究觀察青少年與母親在討論雙方意見不一致話題時，雙方進行問題解決時的情緒互動反應。研究工具採用錄影編碼及「狀態空間網格」方法分析母子在衝突情境互動時的情緒互動歷程，並使用國內外學者所編製的「母親後設情緒理念量表」與「青少年自陳報告」－母親評量版vs. 青少年自陳版進行問卷調查法。 研究結果顯示，母親摒棄型的後設情緒理念對青少年外向問題行為有直接的影響效果，但是母子情緒互動的彈性、母親後設情緒理念與青少年內、外向問題行為之中介模式未得到驗證。再者，母子情緒互動高彈性組較低彈性組之青少年呈現較低程度的外向問題行為。另外，研究樣本之動態系統具有「母親負向參與－子女負向脫離」與「母親正向參與－子女正向參與」兩個吸引因子之互動模式特色。

Adolescence is a developmental phase marked by changes in the mother-adolescent relationship. From early to middle adolescence, the number of mother-adolescent conflicts increases and maternal support and power decrease. Changes in the mother-adolescent relationship are accompanied by changes in the range of emotional states involved in these dyadic interactions (De Goede et al., 2009). From a dynamic system perspective, dyadic variability is regarded as an essential factor in relationship changes that allows for the reorganization of interaction patterns (Fogel, 1993). High levels of dyadic flexibility might facilitate relationship change adaptations in mother-child dyads as well as the provision of opportunities that arise during adolescence (Granic et al., 2003). By contrast, low levels of dyadic flexibility might be associated with problems in the mother-child relationship (Granic et al., 2007). Furthermore, dyadic variability in mother-adolescent interaction has been found to be related to both emotion regulation competence and behavioral adjustment in adolescents (Lougheed & Hollenstein, 2016; Van der Giessen et al., 2013). According to Gottman et al. (1996), how mothers interact with their children is strongly affected by their emotional socialization philosophy. In that study, the researchers introduced three types of parental metaemotion philosophy: emotion coaching, emotion dismissing, and emotional dysfunction. Yeh (2002) added a fourth type in a study of emotional uninvolvement among Taiwanese parents. Studies have demonstrated that children who grow up with supportive, emotion-coaching parents tend to have better self-regulation skills and fewer externalizing problems (Shortt et al., 2010; Stocker et al., 2007). By contrast, children with emotion-dismissing parents were more likely to have internalizing and externalizing behaviors as well as emotional regulation difficulties (Gottman et al., 1996). Through a dynamic system approach, this study explored the relationships among the flexibility of mother-adolescent emotional interactions, maternal metaemotion philosophy, and adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problematic behaviors. The first objective was to examine whether mothers' metaemotion philosophy was related to internalizing and externalizing behaviors in their adolescent children by way of emotional flexibility in mother-adolescent interactions. The second objective was to identify the characteristics of attractors in the system of emotional interaction between mothers and adolescents. Participants comprised 118 pairs of junior high school students and their mothers from northern and central Taiwan. Data collection proceeded either at a home visit or at the university's laboratory room. The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee for Human Subject Protection. Observation and questionnaire completion lasted approximately 120 minutes. Observation was performed on the basis of methods used in the study by Hollenstein and Lewis (2006) on dyadic parent-child interaction patterns in conflict-resolution situations. Before observation, the participants were instructed by a research assistant to resolve the conflict as best as they could within 6 minutes. After a discussion on their resolution, the participants completed a series of questionnaires, namely the parental meta-emotion philosophy scale (Yeh, 2002), child behavior checklist (Achenbach, 1991), and the youth self-report (YSR; Achenbach, 1991). Two trained assistants rated the emotional interactions within the pairs on the basis of the specific affect coding system (Gottman & Krokoff, 1989). State space grid analysis was conducted on the flexibility of emotional interactions between mothers and adolescents. The flexibility was defined by the combination of three flexibility indexes: total number of unique cells, total number of cell transitions, and dispersion. Adolescents' internalizing and externalizing behaviors were defined by using a combination of the mothers' reports on the CBCL and the adolescents' reports on the YSR. The results of the mediation analysis indicated that emotional flexibility did not mediate the relationships between maternal metaemotion philosophy and internalizing or externalizing behaviors. However, emotion-dismissing parenting predicted externalizing behaviors. To further examine whether internalizing and externalizing behaviors varied with emotional flexibility, the adolescent participants were divided into high flexibility and low flexibility groups (based on one standard deviation above and below the mean, respectively) and subjected to a t test. The adolescents in the high flexibility group exhibited lower levels of externalizing behaviors. To identify the characteristics of the attractors in the emotional interaction system, a winnowing procedure was conducted. Two significant attractors were established: mother negative engagement-adolescent negative disengagement and mother positive engagement-adolescent positive engagement. The results did not support the mediation hypothesis-that is, maternal metaemotion philosophy did not predict internalizing or externalizing behaviors by way of emotional flexibility. This can be partly explained by the relatively low variances of the flexibility indexes and the internalizing versus externalizing behaviors, which prevented the clarification of intervariable relationships. This might be due to the small size and unrepresentativeness of the sample. The participants, who were volunteers, might share specific characteristics. For example, they had a higher-than-average socioeconomic status; approximately 50% of the mothers had a university or graduate degree. The mothers also tended to participate actively in their children's lives and are concerned about their children's academic performance. Thus, coming from such a high socioeconomic family, the adolescents in this study displayed fewer behavioral problems. This may account for the similar interaction patterns observed in this study. Notably, emotional interactions were only observed in conflict-resolution situations; features of discussion topics (positive or negative), which may affect emotional flexibility, were not considered. In general, maternal metaemotion philosophy basically reflects the emotion socialization process, which is rooted in daily interactions. Given that the present observation was only 6 minutes long, we likely captured only part of the picture of emotional interactions between the pairs. In addition, we focused on emotional flexibility within mother-adolescent interactions. Maternal metaemotion philosophy might affect adolescents' behavioral adjustment through other interaction patterns within this relationship, but these were not addressed in the study. Mother negative engagement-adolescent negative disengagement and mother positive engagement-adolescent positive engagement were identified as salient attractors in the emotional interaction system, with mother negative engagement- adolescent negative disengagement being stronger. The mothers most frequently exhibited dominant attitudes and interest, and the adolescents most frequently exhibited defensive attitudes and interest. Further examination of the videos revealed that the majority of the mothers and adolescents were interested in their conversations. However, when disagreements occurred, the mothers often asked their children to obey them in either a tough or gentle manner. In general, the adolescents responded by either staying silent or passively protesting by saying ＂Yes, but......＂ In Taiwanese society, where filial piety is strongly emphasized, even as adolescents advocate for autonomy and independence, they tend to manage conflicts with their mothers passively or avoidantly instead of aggressively. In conclusion, we investigated mother-adolescent emotional interactions from a dynamic system perspective. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate relevant topics in Taiwan through this approach. Although our findings did not support the hypothesized mediation model, high dyadic flexibility in mother-adolescent interaction demonstrated a preventive effect on externalizing behaviors. Two implications for parenting are presented as follows: First, parents should be aware of their emotional socialization practices toward their children and understand its possible impacts on their children's behavioral adjustment. Second, parents should be more flexible but less rigid in emotional expression when interacting with their children.

1. Liu, Y.-L.,Chao, H.-L.(2005).The relationships between perceived systemic family violence and children’s problematic behaviors.Bulletin of Educational Psychology,37,197-214.
   連結：
2. 王珮玲, P.-L.,邱貞瑜, C.-Y.,胡中凡, J.-F.,黃于庭, Y.-Y.(2015)。母親與子女對過去情緒經驗談話的性別差異。教育心理學報，46(3)，377-400。
   連結：
3. 林惠雅, H.-Y.,蕭英玲, Y.-L.(2017)。青少年時期親子關係滿意度的變化：生態脈絡的影響。教育心理學報，49(1)，95-111。
   連結：
4. 葉光輝, K.-H.(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，32，101-148。
   連結：
5. 葉光輝, K.-H.(2009)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，32，101-148。
   連結：
6. 葉光輝, K.-H.,鄭欣佩, S.-P.,楊永瑞, Y.-J.(2005)。母親的後設情緒理念對國小子女依附傾向的影響。中華心理學刊，47(2)，181-195。
   連結：
7. Achenbach, T. M.(1991).Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile.University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
8. Achenbach, T. M.,Rescorla, L.(2001).Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles.University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families..
9. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
10. Branje, S.(2018).Development of parent-adolescent relationships: Conflict interactions as a mechanism of change.Child Development Perspectives,12(3),171-176.
11. Branje, S. J. T.(2008).Conflict management in mother-daughter interactions in early adolescence.Behaviour,145,1627-1651.
12. Coan, J. A.(Ed.),Allen, J. J. B.(Ed.)(2007).Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (series in affective science).Oxford University Press.
13. De Goede, I. H.,Branje, S. J.,Meeus, W. H.(2009).Developmental changes in adolescents’ perceptions of relationships with their parents.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,38(1),75-88.
14. Dumas, J. E.,Lemay, P.,Dauwalder, J. P.(2001).Dynamic analyses of mother child interactions in functional and dysfunctional dyads: A synergetic approach.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,29(4),317-329.
15. Eisenberg, N.,Fabes, R. A.,Murphy, B. C.(1996).Parents’ reactions to children’s negative emotions: Relations to children’s social competence and comforting behavior.Child Development,67(5),2227-2247.
16. Fogel, A.(1993).Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture.University of Chicago.
17. Fogel, A.(Ed.),Valsiner, J.(Ed.)(1997).Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social process.Erlbaum.
18. Gottman, J. M.,Katz, L. F.,Hooven, C.(1997).Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Gottman, J. M.,Katz, L. F.,Hooven, C.(1996).Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data.Journal of Family Psychology,10(3),243-268.
20. Gottman, J. M.,Krokoff, L. J.(1989).Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,57,47-52.
21. Granic, I.(2009).The self-organization of parent-child relations: Beyond bidirectional models.Emotion, development, and self-organization
22. Granic, I.,Hollenstein, T.,Dishion, T. J.,Patterson, G. R.(2003).Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions.Developmental Psychology,39(3),606-617.
23. Granic, I.,Lamey, A. V.(2002).Combining dynamic systems and multivariate analyses to compare the mother-child interactions of externalizing subtypes.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,30(3),265-283.
24. Granic, I.,O’Hara, A.,Pepler, D.,Lews, M. D.(2007).A dynamic systems analysis of parent-child changes associated with successful "Real-world" interventions for aggressive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,35(5),845-857.
25. Granic, I.,Patterson, G. R.(2006).Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: A dynamic systems approach.Psychological Review,113(1),101-131.
26. Gunlicks‐Stoessel, M. L.,Powers, S. I.(2008).Adolescents’ emotional experiences of mother-adolescent conflict predict internalizing and externalizing symptoms.Journal of Research on Adolescence,18(4),621-642.
27. Hollenstein, T.(2013).State space grids.Springer.
28. Hollenstein, T.(2015).This time, it’s real: Affective flexibility, time scales, feedback loops, and the regulation of emotion.Emotion Review,7(4),308-315.
29. Hollenstein, T.(2007).State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development.International Journal of Behavioral Development,31(4),384-396.
30. Hollenstein, T.,Granic, I.,Stoolmiller, M.,Snyder, J.(2004).Rigidity in parent-child interactions and the development of externalizing and internalizing behavior in early childhood.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,32(6),595-607.
31. Hollenstein, T.,Lewis, M. D.(2006).A state space analysis of emotion and flexibility in parent-child interactions.Emotion,6,656-662.
32. Hollenstein, T.,Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A.,Potworowski, G.(2013).A model of socioemotional flexibility at three time scales.Emotion Review,5(4),397-405.
33. Hooven, C.,Gottman, J. M.,Katz, L. F.(1995).Parental meta-emotion structure predicts family and child outcomes.Cognition & Emotion,9,229-264.
34. Lamey, A., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare (Version 1.1) [Computer software]. Springer. https://statespacegrids.org
35. Lewis, M. D.,Lamey, A. V.,Douglas, L.(1999).A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development.Developmental Science,2(4),457-475.
36. Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A.,Kunnen, S. E.,van Geert, P. L. C.(2009).Here we go again: A dynamic systems perspective on emotional rigidity across parent-adolescent conflicts.Developmental Psychology,45,1364-1375.
37. Lougheed, J. P.,Hollenstein, T.(2016).Socioemotional flexibility in mother-daughter dyads: Riding the emotional rollercoaster across positive and negative contexts.Emotion,16,620-633.
38. Lunkenheimer, E. S.,Albrecht, E. C.,Kemp, C. J.(2013).Dyadic flexibility in early parent-child interactions: Relations with maternal depressive symptoms and child negativity and behaviour problems.Infant and Child Development,22(3),250-269.
39. Lunkenheimer, E. S.,Hollenstein, T.,Wang, J.,Shields, A. M.(2012).Flexibility and attractors in context: Family emotion socialization patterns and children’s emotion regulation in late childhood.Nonlinear Dynamics-Psychology and Life Sciences,16(3),269-291.
40. Lunkenheimer, E. S.,Olson, S. L.,Hollenstein, T.,Sameroff, A. J.,Winter, C.(2011).Dyadic flexibility and positive affect in parent-child coregulation and the development of child behavior problems.Development and Psychopathology,23(2),577-591.
41. Pandey, S.,Elliott, W.(2010).Suppressor variables in social work research: Ways to identify in multiple regression models.Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research,1(1),28-40.
42. Ramsden, S. R.,Hubbard, J. A.(2002).Family expressiveness and parental emotion coaching: Their role in children’s emotion regulation and aggression.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,30(6),657-667.
43. Robin, A. L.,Weiss, J. G.(1980).Criterion-related validity of behavioral and self-report measures of problem-solving communication-skills in distressed and non-distressed parent-adolescent dyads.Behavioral Assessment,2(4),339-352.
44. Shortt, J. W.,Stoolmiller, M.,Smith-Shine, J. N.,Eddy, J. M.,Sheeber, L.(2010).Maternal emotion coaching, adolescent anger regulation, and siblings’ externalizing symptoms.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,51(7),799-808.
45. Smetana, J. G.(2011).Adolescents, families, and social development-How teens construct their worlds.Wiley Blackwell.
46. Smith, L. B.,Thelen, E.(2003).Development as a dynamic system.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7(8),343-348.
47. Snyder, J.,Edwards, P.,McGraw, K.,Kilgore, K.,Holton, A.(1994).Escalation and reinforcement in mother-child conflict: Social processes associated with the development of physical aggression.Development and Psychopathology,6(2),305-321.
48. Song, L. Y.,Singh, J.,Singer, M.(1994).The youth self-report inventory: A study of its measurement fidelity.Psychological Assessment,6(3),236-245.
49. Stocker, C. M.,Richmond, M. K.,Rhoades, G. K.,Kiang, L.(2007).Family emotional processes and adolescents’ adjustment.Social Development,16(2),310-325.
50. Van der Giessen, D.,Branje, S. J.,Frijns, T.,Meeus, W. H.(2013).Dyadic variability in mother-adolescent interactions: Developmental trajectories and associations with psychosocial functioning.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,42,96-108.
51. Yap, M. B. H.,Allen, N. B.,Leve, C.,Katz, L. F.(2008).Maternal meta-emotion philosophy and socialization of adolescent affect: The moderating role of adolescent temperament.Journal of Family Psychology,22(5),688-700.
52. Youniss, J.,Smollar, J.(1985).Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friends.University of Chicago Press.
53. 王煥琛, H.-C.,柯華葳, H.-W.(1999).青少年心理學.心理=Psychological Publishing.
54. 周玉慧, Y.-H.,吳明燁, M.-Y.,黃朗文, L.-W.(2010)。當中年遇到青少年：親子關係類型與父母中年生活感受。臺灣社會學，20，1-37。
55. 周玉慧, Y.-H.,吳齊殷, C.-I.(2001)。教養方式、親子互動與青少年行為：親子知覺的相對重要性。人文及社會科學集刊，13(4)，439-446。
56. 葉光輝, K.-H.(2002)。父母的後設情緒理念類型及測量。情感、情緒與文化：臺灣社會的文化心理研究