以歷史投標資料輔助異質採購決標模式分析之研究

DETERMINATION OF THE CONTRACTOR SELECTION METHOD FOR THE HETEROGENEOUS PROCUREMENT PROJECTS BASED ON HISTORICAL BIDDING DATA

徐源裕(Yuan-Yu Hsu)；鄭紹材(Shao-Tsai Cheng)；余文德(Wen-Der Yu)；張憲寬(Hsien-Kuan Chang)；王國武(Kuo-Wun Wang)

異質採購 ； 圖形分析 ； 標準化 ； 投標資料 ； heterogeneous procurement ； graphical analysis model ； standardization ； bidding data

技術學刊

34卷4期（2019 / 12 / 01）

173 - 185

繁體中文

選擇正確的決標方式對於後續專案執行成功與否，具有關鍵性影響。國內現行採購決標方式之選擇，大多由採購主管經綜合考量後決定。在無明確證據支持異質性採購情況下，採購單位多傾向採用最低價決標方式以避免圖利廠商之嫌。過去研究雖曾提出｢工程異質採購分析模式｣、｢異質採購圖形分析模式｣等模式以輔助採購人員選擇決標方式，然而上述模式必須依據廠商投標後之資料，無法於招標前進行分析，在實務應用上遭遇困難。為解決前述問題，本研究藉由歷史標案資料，應用標準化方法，提出了｢招標前異質採購圖形分析模式（Pre-tendering P/PAM-GAM, Pre-GAM）｣，以達到事前分析之目的。最後，本文以一個實際建築專案驗證所提出方法之可行性，並說明該方法之實用性。

The determination of the correct 'Contractor Selection Model (CSM)' is a critical decision affecting the successful delivery of a construction project. Most prevailing practices on the selection of the CSM for a procurement project have been determined by the top manager of the procurement agency via her/his comprehensive consideration of all affecting factors. Without clear evidence to support the adoption of the Heterogeneous Procurement Method (HPM), the procurement personnel usually tend to adopt the Lowest Tender (LT) for the CSM to avoid violating the regulation regarding the 'Abuse of Public Power for Private Profit.' Although there have been several decision support models to assist the adoption of the HPM proposed by previous researchers, such models use post-tendering data to construct the required analytic models. This is impossible to apply for the pre-tendering decision analysis for the CSM. To tackle the abovementioned problem, this paper proposes Pre-tendering P / PAM-GAM (Pre-GAM) that builds the required analytic model using a special design of the standardization method based on historical bidding data. The proposed Pre-GAM is able to resolve the problem of the requirement of post-tendering data and make the correct decision on the CSM. A real-world building construction project is used to show the applicability of the proposed Pre-GAM and to demonstrate its practical application.

1. Akintoye, A.,Hardcastle, C.,Beck, M.,Chinyio, E.,Asenova, D.(2003).Achieving Best Value in Private Finance Initiative Project Procurement.Construction Management and Economics,21(5),461-470.
2. Case, K. E.,Fair, R. C.(1999).Principles of Economics.New Jersey, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
3. Chamberlin, E. H.(1974).The Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Re-orientation of the Theory of Value.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
4. Dolan, R. J.,Simon, H.(1996).Power Pricing-How Managing Price Transforms the Bottom Line.New York, NY:Free Press.
5. Gransberg, D. D.,Ellicott, M. A.(1997).Best-Value Contracting Criteria.Cost Engineering,39(6),31-34.
6. Liang, H. Y.(2018).Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Death Rate in China.Tropical Geography,38(2),208-216.
7. Scherer, F. M.,Ross, D.(1990).Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
8. Trybus, M.(2006).Improving the Efficiency of Public Procurement Systems in the Context of the European Nion Enlargement Process.Public Contract Law Journal,35(3),409-425.
9. Wang, K. W.,Hsu, Y. Y.,Yu, W. D.,Cheng, S. T.(2018).Determination of Project Procurement Method with a Graphical Analytic Model.Sustainability,10(10),3583.
10. Wang, K. W.,Yu, W. D.(2011).Model for Analysis of Heterogeneity in Product Acquisition Procurement.Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers,34(7),877-887.
11. Yu, W. D.,Wang, K. W.(2012).Best Value or Lowest Bid? A Quantitative Perspective.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,138(1),128-134.
12. Yu, W. D.,Wang, K. W.,Wang, M. T.(2013).Pricing Strategy for Best Value Tender.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,139(6),675-684.
13. 王國武,余文德(2011)。工程異質採購分析模式之研究。中國土木水利工程學刊，23(1)，77-91。
14. 王國武,余文德(2014)。異質採購圖形分析模式之研究。技術學刊，29(1)，1-15。
15. 行政院公共工程委員會，2016，政府採購法，第 52 條，台北：行政院公共工程委員會。
16. 行政院公共工程委員會，2018，政府採購法施行細則，第 66 條，台北：行政院公共工程委員會。
17. 行政院公共工程委員會(2018)。行政院公共工程委員會，2018，「前言」，最有利標作業手冊（第 1 頁），台北：行政院公共工程委員會。
18. 林正平,蔡宗錡(2016)。統包工程異質採購最低標成效初探。營建知訊，398，48-54。

1. 劉仲矩,曾偉琳(2022)。企業採購文化重要性之分析。管理資訊計算，11(2)，91-102。
2. 鄭道明,張憲寬,余文德,王志磊(2022)。基於公共工程履約績效之最低價決標優化模式研究。中國土木水利工程學刊，34(6)，501-511。
3. (2024)。基於履約績效的雙參數決標模式在道路工程最低標採購的運用。技術學刊，39(2)，67-77。