勝任感與自我決定感：促進老人遊憩體驗滿意的主要因素

Perceived Competence and Self-Determination: Facilitators of Satisfaction of Older Adults' Recreational Experience

10.6130/JORS.2004.17(3)3

張樑治(Lian-Chih Chang)；陳朝圳(Chaur-Tzuhn Chen)；蔡志堅(Chih-Chien Tsai)

需求理論 ； 遊憩參與 ； Need theory ； recreational pursuit

戶外遊憩研究

17卷3期（2004 / 09 / 01）

37 - 50

繁體中文

It is very important to explore the cause of satisfaction of older adults' recreational experience in order to effectively promote their satisfied experience. The purpose of this study is to test the contingence hypothesis of satisfaction of recreational experience, resulted from compliance with the perspective of Need Theory, indicating that both perceived competence and self-determination simultaneously positively contribute to a satisfied experience in a recreational pursuit. The hypothesis was tested by means of one-group pretest/posttest design. Twenty-two women and 29 men (70.7 years of age on average) volunteered for the study. Data collected from a recreational experience scale were analyzed using paired-samples t-test with SPSS 10.0. The finding based upon the analysis showed that the quantitative scores of respondents' recreational experience after perceived competence and self-determination were higher than before (t=14.35; p＜0.01). Namely, competence and self-determination could significantly affect older adults' recreational experience. Implications of the finding are discussed in the study.

It is very important to explore the cause of satisfaction of older adults' recreational experience in order to effectively promote their satisfied experience. The purpose of this study is to test the contingence hypothesis of satisfaction of recreational experience, resulted from compliance with the perspective of Need Theory, indicating that both perceived competence and self-determination simultaneously positively contribute to a satisfied experience in a recreational pursuit. The hypothesis was tested by means of one-group pretest/posttest design. Twenty-two women and 29 men (70.7 years of age on average) volunteered for the study. Data collected from a recreational experience scale were analyzed using paired-samples t-test with SPSS 10.0. The finding based upon the analysis showed that the quantitative scores of respondents' recreational experience after perceived competence and self-determination were higher than before (t=14.35; p＜0.01). Namely, competence and self-determination could significantly affect older adults' recreational experience. Implications of the finding are discussed in the study.

1. Bammel, G.,Burrus-Bammel, L. L.(1992).Leisure and human behavior.Dubuque, IA:William C. Brown Publishers.
2. Deci, E. L.(1975).Intrinsic motivation.New York:Plenum Press.
3. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in humam behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
4. Ellis, G. D.,Voelkl, J. E.,Morris, C.(1994).Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model.Journal of Leisure Research,26,337-356.
5. Farrell, P.,Lundegren, H.(1991).Recreation programming.State College, PA:Venture Publishing, Inc..
6. Guinn, B.(1995).The importance of leisure satisfaction to the aging leisure repertoire.Journal of Wellness Perspectives,12,42-50.
7. Guinn, B.(1990).The importance of healthy behavior to leisure satisfaction of elderly recreational vehicle tourists.Wellness Perspectives,6,33-41.
8. Guinn, R.(1980).Elderly recreational vehicle tourists: Life satisfaction correlates of leisure satisfaction.Journal of Leisure Research,12,198-204.
9. Haberkost, M.,Dellmann-Jenkins, M.(1996).Importance of quality recreation activities for older adults residing in nursing homes: Considerations for gerontologists.Educational Gerontology,22,735-746.
10. Iso-Ahola, S. E.(1980).The social psychology of leisure and recreation.Dubuque, IA:William C. Brown Publishers.
11. Iwasaki, Y.,Mannell, R. C.(1999).Situational and personality influences on intrinsic motivation leisure behavior: Interaction effects and cognitive processes.Leisure Sciences,21,287-306.
12. Losier, G. F.,Bourque, P. E.,Vallerand, R. J.(1993).A motivational model of leisure participation in the elderly.The Journal of Psychology,127,153-170.
13. Mannell, R. C.(1989).Understanding leisure and recreation: Mapping the past, charting the future.State College, PA:Venture.
14. Mannell, R. C.,Bradley, W.(1986).Does greater freedom always lead to greater leisure? Testin a person × environment model of freedom and leisure.Journal of Leisure Research,18,215-230.
15. Manning, R. E.(1986).Studies in outdoor recreation.Corvallis:Oregon State University.
16. Murray, H. A.(1938).Explorations and personality.New York:Oxford University Press.
17. Nour, K.,Desrosiers, J.,Gauthier, P.,Carbonneau, H.(2002).Impact of a home leisure educational program for older adults who have had a stroke (Home leisure educational program).Therapeutic Recreation Journal,36,48-64.
18. Ragheb, M. G.,Griffith, C. A.(1982).The contribution of leisure participation and leisure satisfaction to life satisfaction of older persons.Journal of Leisure Research,14,295-306.
19. Romsa, G.,Bondy, P.,Blenman, M.(1985).Modeling retirees` life satisfaction levels: The role of recreational, life cycle and socio-environmental elements.Journal of Leisure Research,17,29-39.
20. Schulz, R.(1976).Effects of control and predictability on the physical and psychological well-being of the institutionalized aged.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,33,563-573.
21. Sneegas, J. J.(1986).Components of life satisfaction in middle and later life adults: Perceived social competence, leisure participation, and leisure satisfaction.Journal of Leisure Research,18,248-258.
22. Voelkl, J. E.(1990).The challenge skill ratio of daily experience among older adults residing in nursing home.Therapeutic Recreation Journal,24,7-17.
23. Voelkl, J. E.,Ellis, G. D.(1998).Measuring flow experience in daily life: An examination of the item used to measure challenge and skill.Journal of Leisure Research,30,380-389.
24. Weissinger, E.,Bandalos, D. L.(1995).Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measure intrinsic motivation in leisure.Journal of Leisure Research,27,379-400.
25. 王文科(1993)。教育研究法。台北:五南圖書。
26. 王震宇(1996)。台北，臺灣大學森林學研究所。
27. 朱柔弱、Neuman(2002)。社會研究方法－質化與量化取向。台北:揚智文化。
28. 吳清吉(1997)。鼓勵民間經營公共體育設施之研究。國立臺灣體育學院學報，1，59-75。
29. 苗延威、張君玫、Argyle(1998)。社會互動。台北:巨流圖書。
30. 孫得雄(1997)。社會及行爲科學研究法。台北:東華書局。
31. 張玉玲、余嬪(1999)。大學生休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙、休閒無聊感與自我統合之關係研究。彰化師大輔導學報，20，83-111。
32. 張春興(1997)。社會及行爲科學研究法。台北:東華書局。
33. 張樑治(2003)。花蓮，東華大學觀光暨遊憩管理研究所。
34. 張樑治(1999)。遊憩活動企劃影響遊憩體驗的研究。國家公園學報，9，97-111。
35. 張樑治、余嬪、宋秉明(2004)。安養機構老人休閒滿意研究：需求理論之驗證。教育與心理研究，27
36. 塗三賢、汪大雄、林振榮(2000)。扇平森林生態科學園區遊憩滿意度分析：LISREL模型之應用。台灣林業科學，15，189-200。
37. 楊文燦、鄭琦玉(1995)。遊憩衝擊認知及其與滿意度關係之研究。戶外遊憩研究，8(2)，109-132。
38. 楊國樞(1997)。社會及行爲科學研究法。台北:東華書局。

1. 蔡志堅、劉吉川、張樑治、余嬪(2006)。運用迴歸作用機制圖重探老人勝任感、自我決定感與休閒滿意關係之研究。戶外遊憩研究，19(4)，65-81。
2. 許建民、高俊雄(2006)。青少年休閒參與動機模式之研究。大專體育學刊，8(3)，51-63。
3. 許義忠、莊麗君(2007)。以增進復原力為目標之BBM模式進行休閒教育之實驗。中華輔導學報，21，71-98。
4. (2006)。墾丁國家森林遊樂區遊客遊憩需求與滿意度之研究。樹德科技大學學報，8，271-284。