認真性休閒與休閒阻礙關係之研究：以高爾夫運動者爲例

The Relationships between Serious Leisure and Leisure Constraints-A Case Study on Golfers

10.6130/JORS.2004.17(3)4

林佑瑾(You-Jin Lin)；李英弘(Ying-Hung Li)；葉源鎰(Yuan-I Eric Yeh)

休閒阻礙 ； 認真性休閒 ； 高爾夫活動 ； Serious leisure ； leisure constraints ； golf activity

戶外遊憩研究

17卷3期（2004 / 09 / 01）

51 - 79

繁體中文

休閒阻礙過去多集中於社經背景之探究，鮮少研究認真性休閒特質從事者。本研究以高爾夫活動爲例，目的在探討具認真性休閒特質參與者與非認真休閒特質參與者在休閒阻礙、認真休閒特質上之差異；以及認真性休閒特質與休閒阻礙間之關係。以台中興農球場高爾夫活動參與者爲研究對象，立意抽樣發出550份結構式問卷，回收276份。不完整問卷計56份，有效問卷爲224份。研究發現（一）具認真性休閒特質參與者與非認真休閒特質參與者在休閒阻礙上存在顯著差異，尤其在『個人阻礙』與『人際協調與合作阻礙」具認真性休閒特徵參與者遭受阻礙之感受度明顯低於非認真休閒特徵參與者；（二）具認真性休閒特質參與者與非認真休閒特質參與者在認真性休閒上存在顯著差異，具認真性休閒特徵參與者對認真性休閒特徵之認同度明顯高於非認真休閒特徵參與者；（三）典型相關分析發現認真性休閒與休閒阻礙間有三組顯著的線性組合關係。本研究建議業者針對結構性阻礙部分作經營與改善球場之參考，並根據認真性休閒受訪者及所需球場環境界定其目標市場並規劃適合其行銷方案。後續研究建議可選擇不同類型或技巧需求性高的活動，進行認真性休閒特質者研究。以及研擬適合台灣本土之認真性休閒判定標準。

The research of leisure constraints focused on demographic background in past years. Little research to date has attempted to the participants of particular activities. The study is an explored research: a case of golf activity. The purpose of the study was to investigate the differences in leisure constraints, serious leisure between serious leisure participants and non-serious leisure participants. The relationships of leisure constraints and serious leisure were also analyzed. On-site structured questionnaires and the purposive sampling were used to gather data. In the study, 550 questionnaires were distributed to partaking parties in Xing-nong golf course. 276 forms were obtained. Since 56 of them are imperfect questionnaires, there were 224 usable forms. The finding showed that: (1) There is significant difference on leisure constraints of t-test between serious leisure participants and non-serious leisure participants. The serious leisure participants experienced constraints lower than non-serious leisure participants especially in intrapersonal constraints and interpersonal constraints. (2) There is significant difference on serious leisure of t-test between serious leisure participants and non-serious leisure participants. The serious leisure participants experienced constraints higher than non-serious leisure ones. (3) Canonical correlation analysis was utilized to inspect the relationships between serious leisure and leisure constraints. There are three significant linear relationships between serious leisure and leisure constraints. The results of the structure constraints provide ideas of managing and improving golf course to managers. The marketing segmentation plans are based on the data of serious leisure participants which need golf course environments to target markets and map out suitable marketing programs. The researchers can choose other activities with distinct types or skills to analyze the serious leisure participants to aim at whether the causal relationships are between serious leisure and leisure constraints in follow-up studies. The researchers also can make sure the gauge of serious leisure at the same time in Taiwan.

1. 尚憶薇(2001)。花蓮地區老年人休閒動機與休閒阻礙之研究。體育學報，31，183-192。
   連結：
2. 張孝銘、高俊雄(2001)。休閒需求與休閒阻礙間之相關研究－以彰化市居民爲實證。體育學報，30，143-152。
   連結：
3. 謝淑芬(2001)。已婚職業婦女與全職家庭主婦對休閒活動參與阻礙與阻礙協商策略差異之研究。戶外遊憩研究，14(2)，63-84。
   連結：
4. Aas, K. L.(1995).Constraints on sport fishing and effect of management actions to increase participation rates in fishing.North American Journal of Fisheries Management,15,631-638.
5. Alexandris, K.,Carroll, B.(1997).An analysis of leisure constraints based on different recreation sport participation levels: Results, from a study in Greece.Leisure sciences,19(1),1-15.
6. Backman, S. J.,Wright, B. A.(1993).An exploratory study of the relationship of attitude and the perception of constraints to hunting.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,11,1-16.
7. Boothby, J.,Tungatt, M. F.,Townsend, A. R.(1981).Ceasing participation in sports activity: Reported reasons and their implication.Journal of Leisure Research,13(1),1-25.
8. Chubb, M.,Chubb, H. R.(1981).One third of our time: An introduction to recreation behavior and resource.New York:John, Wiley & Sons.
9. Crawford, D.,Godbey, G.(1987).Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure.Leisure Sciences,9,119-127.
10. Francken, D. A.,Van Raaij, W. R.(1981).Satisfaction with leisure time activities.Journal of Leisure Research,13(4),337-352.
11. Huang, C. C.(1994).PA. USA,State College.
12. Iso-Ahola, S. E.(1980).The social psychology of leisure and recreation.Dubuque, Iowa:W. C. Brown Company Publishers.
13. Jackson, E. L.(1991).Special issue introduction: Leisure constraints/ constrained leisure.Leisure sciences,13(4),273-278.
14. Jackson, E. L.(1988).Leisure constraints: A survey of past research.Leisure Sciences,10,203-215.
15. Jackson, E. L.(2000).Will research on leisure constraints still be relevant in the twenty-first century?.Leisure Sciences,32(1),62-68.
16. Jones, I.(2000).A model of serious leisure identification: The case of football fandom.Leisure Studies,19(4),283-298.
17. Jones, I.,Symon, G.(2001).Lifelong learning as serious leisure: Policy, practice and potential.Leisure Studies,20,269-283.
18. Kenneth, N.,Whitfield, B.,Larry, D.(1987).A golf skill test battery for college males and females.Research Quarterly,58,72-76.
19. MiGill, R. A.(1980).Motor learning-concepts and applications.Dubuque, Iowa:W. C. Brown. Company Publishers.
20. Petrick, J. F.,Backman, S. J.,Bixler, R.,Norman, W. C.(2001).Analysis of golfer motivations and constraints by experience use history.Journal of Leisure Research,33(1),6-70.
21. Siegenthaler, K. L.,Gonzalez, G. L.(1997).Youth sports as serious leisure: A critique.Journal of Sport and Social Issues,21(3),298-314.
22. Stebbins, R. A.(1993).Social world, life-style, and serious leisure: Toward a mesostructural analysis.Quebec:McGill-Queen`s University Press.
23. Stebbins, R. A.(1982).Serious leisure: A conceptual statement.Pacific Sociological Review,25,251-272.
24. Stebbins, R. A.(1992).Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure.Montreal, Quebec:McGill-Queen`s University Press.
25. Stebbins, R. A.(1994).The liberal arts hobbies: A neglected subtype of serious leisure.Quebec:McGill-Queen`s University Press.
26. Stebbins, R. A.(1992).Hobbies as marginal leisure: The case of barbershop singers.Society and Leisure,15,375-386.
27. Torkildsen, G. E.,Spon, F. N.(1983).Leisure and recreation management.London and New York:E. & F. N. Spon.
28. Yoder, D. G.(1997).A model for commodity intensive serious.Journal of Leisure Research,29(4),407-429.
29. 行政院體委會(2000)。高爾夫。全民運動週報，35，1-2。
30. 行政院體委會(1999)。運動安全手冊－高爾夫運動篇。台北:行政院體委會。
31. 李素馨(1994)。典型相關分析－專業程度、遊憩動機和基地屬性認知關係之探討。戶外遊憩研究，7(3)，36-92。
32. 李素馨(1997)。都市女性休閒類型與阻礙。戶外遊憩研究，10(1)，43-62。
33. 張紹勳(2001)。研究方法。台中:滄海書局。
34. 陳南琦(2000)。青少年休閒阻礙因素之探討。台灣體育，106，29-32。
35. 楊宏志(1989)。台北，國立台灣大學森林研究所。
36. 鄭天爵(1994)。青少年學生常假日（寒假、春假）自家外休閒活動特徵研究－以宜蘭農工專校五專低年級學生爲例。戶外遊憩研究，7(1)，1-17。
37. 錢釧灯(1992)。高爾夫球場經營業。產業金融季刊，77，41-45。
38. 魏玉珍(1995)。台灣高爾夫球場演進史（下）。高爾夫文摘中文版，6，36-41。

1. Li, Ying-Hung,Kao, Yu-Yun(2014).Model Validation and Comparison of Serious Leisure and Leisure Constraints between Golfers and Windsurfers.大專體育學刊,16(2),125-135.
2. 蔡必焜、陳美芬、李曉婷(2011)。志工休閒參與與心理健康關係之研究。運動與遊憩研究，5(3)，1-14。
3. 陳薇如、莊御祥、余家斌(2015)。認真休閒、流暢體驗與休閒滿意度之研究－以自行車活動為例。運動休閒餐旅研究，10(3)，53-73。
4. 高育芸、李英弘(2009)。風浪板及高爾夫遊憩活動參與者認真性休閒與休閒阻礙之研究。休閒與遊憩研究，3(2)，31-67。
5. 李明儒,何詩婷(2023)。肢體障礙者參與水域活動的需求與阻礙之研究－以澎湖為例。島嶼觀光研究，14(3)，70-91。
6. 梁英文、曹勝雄(2007)。認眞性休閒與場所依戀之關係：遊憩專門化扮演的角色。戶外遊憩研究，20(3)，1-24。
7. 歐典灝、歐人豪、陳寬裕(2009)。認真休閒特質與幸福感之研究：兼論配偶支持的干擾效果。觀光休閒學報，15(2)，113-140。
8. 蘇文瑜、魏芷彤、掌慶琳(2012)。志工休閒特質及其滿意：以世界宗教博物館志工為例。餐旅暨觀光，9(4)，179-197。
9. 蕭漢森,陳寅全,紀光陽(2020)。休閒行為研究－系統決策實證分析（II）。發展與前瞻學報，27，1-26。
10. 謝琦強、黃文雄、連啟伶、林永森(2016)。解說志工休閒涉入預測分析之跨層次研究。戶外遊憩研究，29(4)，37-65。
11. 顏家芝、薛雅丹、黃文卿(2006)。從深度休閒理論探討太魯閣國家公園解說志工對解說服務之投入程度與其深度休閒特質之關係。戶外遊憩研究，19(1)，51-75。
12. 鍾隆文(2015)。籃球運動者的深度休閒特質在動機、阻礙、滿意度之間的角色扮演。休憩管理研究，2(1)，53-65。
13. 鍾政偉、蔡禮宇、陳桓敦(2013)。水肺潛水參與者認真性休閒、遊憩專門化、心流體驗與休閒效益關係之研究。島嶼觀光研究，6(4)，1-22。
14. 鍾政偉、林澄宇(2014)。認真性休閒、心流體驗、自我認同與生活滿意度關係之研究─以衝浪活動為例。休閒與遊憩研究，6(2)，115-140。