「意義的追尋與歷程的建構」：休閒研究的典範衝突與爭辯

"Exploring the Meanings, Constructing the Process": The Paradigms Conflict and Debate in Leisure Studies

10.6130/JORS.2009.22(1)1

陳渝苓(Yu-Ling Chen)

質性研究 ； 方法論 ； 方法學 ； 質量方法辯論 ； Qualitative research ； methodology ； method ； QQB

戶外遊憩研究

22卷1期（2009 / 03 / 01）

1 - 19

繁體中文

在休閒領域中，質性方法策略的興起與應用提供了異於以往的研究視角，並重新解釋了許多傳統的研究命題，甚至與許多社會理論結合，對目前的社會現象與行爲脈絡提出有別以往的解釋。但在質性研究作品大量出現的同時，也引起了許多學術上的爭辯與質疑，尤其是在質性研究方法的典範與學術社群普遍所接受的方法常模有衝突時，對研究成果的質疑聲浪更加明顯。早期學者對於此種爭辯時通常會落入傳統質量爭執(QQB)的窠臼，對方法典範間的不一致性加以提出答辯或修正。由於許多學者對質性研究的真正典範精神與所秉持的科學哲學基礎並未深究，因而造成許多方法使用上的限制與假性辯論。本研究的目的乃是從社會視角重構的觀點，論證質性研究方法在這個時代興起的正當性，並試圖釐清質性方法在休閒領域中運用的層次與影響的命題類型，進而討論學術界對質性相關研究的批判與質疑，以瞭解質性典範在休閒相關領域的應用潛能。

The rise of qualitative methodology has contributed different research perspectives in leisure studies and endowed traditional social issues with new thinking approaches. It not only sheds light on the social theory, but also further provides the in-depth explanation toward the multiplicity of social phenomenon and behaviors. However, there are many academic critiques and discussion regarding the utilization of qualitative strategy in leisure-related researches, especially when some major concerns of qualitative methods contradict the quantitative method that has been regarded as the dominant scientific approach in the past few decades. Scholars who intend to resolve this confusion in early period usually fell into the trap of traditional qualitative-quantitative debate (QQB) and only focused on the inconsistency occurred in the instrumental level of methodology. The unawareness of the methodological paradigm thus resulted ineffectual debates among scholars with opposite views. Due to this reason, this study aimed to justify the crucial role of qualitative methodology in this postmodern age, elucidate how qualitative approach was adopt in leisure-related studies, and further clarify the argument of QQB occurred in the current academic society of Taiwan.

1. 王金玲(2005)。質性研究中情景脈絡的理解和詮釋。婦研縱橫，76，11-21。
   連結：
2. 黃昱華、郭銘傑(2006)。科學研究綱領方法論在國際關係學門的誤用：重新檢視現實主義典範進步或退化的辯論。東吳政治學報，24，117-161。
   連結：
3. Aitchison, C.(2003).Gender and leisure.New York:Routledge.
4. Babble, E.(2003).The practice of social research.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
5. Bennett, T.,Watson, D.(2002).Understanding everyday life.Oxford:Blackwell.
6. Berger, P.,Luckman, T.(1966).The social construction of reality.New York:Anchor Books.
7. Burman, E.(1997).Minding the gap: Positivism, psychology, and the politics of qualitative methods.Journal of Social Issues,53(4),785-801.
8. Burr, V.(1995).An introduction to social constructionism.New York:Routledge.
9. Chen, Y. L.(2003).Champaign, Illinois,University of Illinois.
10. Chen, Y. L.,D. T. Cook (Ed.)(2008).Lived experiences of public consumption: Encounters with value in marketplaces on five continents.Paris:Palgrave MacMill.
11. Currie, J.(1996).Sydney,University of New South Wales.
12. deCerteau, M.(1984).The practice of everyday life.Berkeley:University of California Press.
13. deGrazia, S.(1964).Of time, work and leisure.New York:The Free Press.
14. Denzin, N.(1997).Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
15. Denzin, N.,Lincoln, Y.(1998).The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Denzin, N.,Lincoln, Y.(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
17. Dupuis, S. L.(1999).Naked truths: Towards a reflexive methodology in leisure research.Leisure Sciences,21(1),43-64.
18. Firat, A.,J. A. Costa (Ed.)(1994).Gender issues and consumer behavior.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
19. Green, E.(1998).Women doing friendship: An analysis of women's leisure as a site of identity construction, empowerment and resistance.Leisure Studies,17(3),171-185.
20. Guba, E.,Lincoln, Y.,N. K. Denzin (Eds.),Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(1998).The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
21. Henderson, K. A.(1996).One size doesn't fit all: The meanings of women's leisure.Journal of Leisure Research,28(3),139-154.
22. Henderson, K. A.(2000).False dichotomies, intellectual diversity, and the either/or world: Leisure research in transitions.Journal of Leisure Research,32(1),49-53.
23. Henderson, K. A.(1994).Broadening and understanding of women, gender, and leisure.Journal of Leisure Research,26(1),1-7.
24. Henderson, K. A.,Bedini, L. A.,Hecht, L.,Shuler, R.(1995).Women with physical disabilities and the negotiation of leisure constraints.Leisure Studies,14(1),17-31.
25. Henderson, K. A.,Bialeschki, M. D.(1991).A sense of entitlement to leisure as constraint and empowerment for women.Leisure Studies,13(1),51-65.
26. Henderson, K. A.,Bialeschki, M. D.,Shaw, S.,Freysinger, V.(1996).Both gains and gaps: Feminist perspectives on women's leisure.State College, PA, Venture Publishing, Inc..
27. Henderson, K. A.,Bialeschki, M. D.,Shaw, S.,Freysinger, V.(1989).A leisure of one's own: A feminist perspective on women's leisure.State College, PA, Venture Publishing, Inc..
28. Henderson, K. A.,Binsworth, B. E.(2001).Researching leisure and physical activity with women of color: Issues and emerging questions.Leisure Sciences,23(1),21-34.
29. Hibbler, D.(2000).Champaign, Illinois,University of Illinois.
30. James, K.(2001).I just gotta have my own space!: The bedroom as a leisure site for adolescent girls.Journal of Leisure Research,33(1),77-90.
31. Johnson, A. G.(2008).The forests and the trees: Sociology as life, practice and promise.Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press.
32. Kelly, J. R.(1983).Leisure identities and interactions.London:George Allen & Unwin.
33. Kelly, J. R.(1987).Freedom to be.New York:Macmillan Publishing Company.
34. Kelly, J. R.(1996).Leisure.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
35. Kelly, J. R.,Freysinger, V.(1999).Leisure in 21st century: Current issues.Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
36. Kline, S.,Dyer-Witheford, N.,de Peuter, G.(2003).Digital play: The interaction of technology, culture, and marketing.Quebec City, CA:McGill-Queen's University Press.
37. Kuhn, T. S.(1962).The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
38. Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.),Guba, E. G.,N. K. Denzin (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
39. McDowell, L.(1999).Genders identity and place: Understanding feminist geographies.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
40. Miller, S.,Nelson, M.,Moore, M.(1998).Caught in the paradigm: Qualitative researchers' lived experience and the politics of epistemology.American Educational Research Journal,35(3),377-341.
41. Olesen, V. L.,N. K. Denzin (Eds.),Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
42. O''Neill, W.(1991).Women: The unleisured majority.World Leisure and Recreation Journal,33(3),197-201.
43. Parry, D.,Shaw, S.(1999).The role of leisure in women's experiences of menopause and mid-life.Leisure Sciences,21(3),205-218.
44. Popper, K. R.(1959).The logic of scientific discovery.London:Hutchison.
45. Rabinowitz, V.,Weseen, S.(1997).Elu(ci)d(at)ing Epistemological Impasses: Reviewing the qualitative/quantitative debates in psychology.Journal of Social Issues,53(4),605-630.
46. Ruddell, J.,Shinew, K.(2006).The socialization process for women with physical disabilities: The impact of agents and agencies in the introduction to an elite sport.Journal of Leisure Research,38(3),421-444.
47. Samdahl, D.,E. Jackson (Eds.),T. Burton (Eds.)(1999).Leisure studies: Prospects for the 21st century.State College, PA, Venture Publishing, Inc..
48. Schwandt, T. A.(1997).Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
49. Schwandt, T. A.,N. K. Denzin (Eds.),Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(1998).The landscape of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
50. Schwandt, T. A.,N. K. Denzin (Eds.),Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
51. Sechrest, L.,Sidani, S.(1995).Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative?.Evaluation and Program Planning,18(1),77-87.
52. Shadish, W. R.(1995).The quantitative/qualitative debate: "Dekuhnifying" the conceptual context.Evaluation and Program Planning,18(1),47-49.
53. Shaw, S. M.(1992).Dereifying family leisure: An examination of women's and men's everyday experience and perceptions of family time.Leisure Sciences,14(4),271-286.
54. Shaw, S. M.(2001).Conceptualizing resistance: Women's leisure as political practice.Journal of Leisure Research,33(2),186-201.
55. Shaw, S.,Dawson, D.(2001).Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses of family activities.Leisure Sciences,23(4),217-231.
56. Smith, D. E.(1987).The everyday world as problematic.Boston:Northeastern University Press.
57. Stewart, W. P.,Parry, D. C.,Glover, T. D.(2001).Writing leisure: Values and ideologies of research.Journal of Leisure Research,40(3),360-384.
58. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park:Sage.
59. Taylor, C.(1971).Intexpretation and the sciences of man.Review of Metatphysics,25,3-51.
60. Wearing, B.(1998).Leisure and feminist theory.London:Sage.
61. Wearing, B.(1992).Leisure and women's identity in late adolescence.Society and Leisure,15(1),323-343.
62. Wearing, B.(1996).Gender: The pain and pleasure of difference.Melbourne:Longman.
63. 王雅各、謝臥龍編(2004)。質性研究。台北:心理出版社。
64. 范珮筠(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，國立台灣體育學院休閒運動管理研究所。
65. 孫智綺譯、Bonnewitz, P.著(2002)。布赫迪厄社會學的第一課。台北:麥田。
66. 高宣揚(1999)。後現代論。台北:五南。
67. 高宣揚(2002)。滸文化社會學。台北:揚智文化。
68. 畢恆達(1995)。生活經驗研究的反省：詮釋學的觀點。本土心理學研究，4，224-259。
69. 陳乃銓(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中，國立台灣體育學院休閒運動管理研究所。
70. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。
71. 陳渝苓(2004)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（報告編號：94-2413-H-028-001）行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（報告編號：94-2413-H-028-001）,未出版
72. 黃光國(2003)。社會科學的理路。台北:心理出版社。
73. 劉維公(2006)。風格社會。台北:天下雜誌出版社。
74. 蕭瑞麟(2006)。不用數字的研究。台北:培生集團。
75. 謝臥龍(2004)。知識型構中性別與權利的思想與辯證。台北:正港出版社。
76. 瞿海源(2007)。調查研究方法。台北:三民。

1. 陳敬曇,張佩湘,李宗鴻(2022)。家庭支持與阻礙協商對身心障礙照顧者持續性休閒涉入之影響分析。戶外遊憩研究，35(2)，33-57。
2. 黃東治、張力可、余家彥(2009)。族群、休閒運動與社會劃界：對中國大陸台商慢壘聯盟的分析。戶外遊憩研究，22(4)，55-80。