校園的空間配置對兒童身體活動量影響之研究

The Effect of Schoolyard Arrangement on Children's Physical Activity Level

10.6130/JORS.2013.26(3)3

曾慈慧(Tzu-Hui A. Tseng)；丁志堅(Tsu-Jen Ding)；黎俊彥(Alex J. Y. Lee)；呂明心(Ming-Hsin Lu)

校園配置 ； 身體活動量 ； 地理資訊系統 ； 全球定位系統 ； Schoolyard space arrangement ； Physical activity ； GIS ； GPS

戶外遊憩研究

26卷3期（2013 / 09 / 01）

69 - 102

繁體中文

兒童每天在校園中停留最久也進行許多活動，然現今學童身體活動量不夠，運動不足造成肥胖比例增加。國內的校園研究很少探討空間對兒童身體活動量產生的影響，本研究選擇具有全球定位系統與心跳的運動手錶為測量儀器，並搭配自我填答式問卷，紀錄兒童的基本資料、下課時間的活動以及身體活動習慣。依照班級數目及校地面積抽取新竹市都市計畫區四等級的國小各一間學校進行抽樣調查，共有90位學生樣本填答問卷、72位學生樣本提供GPS數據。並以gMapmaker製作符合World Geodetic System 84座標系統之校園地圖，結合樣本資料進行統計分析校園空間配置與樣本身體活動量及空間使用情況之關係。主要研究結果如下：一、兒童下課時偏好在運動場及建築物中停留，廣場的停留人數最多但停留時間卻不長。二、兒童的體能活動多在學校中產生，但下課時的身體活動量仍嫌不足。三、建築物及運動場較能引發高身體活動量，兒童偏好在運動空間從事球類運動與跑步，在建築物中從是追逐遊戲。四、不同的校園空間對兒童下課的身體活動量程度與停留時間形成顯著差異，運動場能使兒童產生較久的中度以上身體活動量。五、總身體活動量時間長、體育課參與程度高、上學時活動參與高者的下課平均心跳也較高，而其輕－中度與中－激烈度的身體活動量累積時間也較長。六、坐車通勤者的輕－中度身體活動量累積時間高於走路通勤者，上學時低活動參與者的輕度與輕－中度身體活動量累積時間均高於高活動參與者，顯示較不好動的兒童的身體活動量累積，也是以輕度或者輕－中度為主。

Children spend most of their day in school, carrying out various activities, however, today's children do not do enough physical activity, and this lack of exercise has caused an increase in obesity. Domestic schoolyard studies seldom focus on the impact of space on children's physical activity level. This study uses watches with GPS and heart rate monitor functions as measuring instruments, as well as self-answering surveys to record children's background information, measure recess activity, and physical activity habits. Elementary schools in four levels of the urban planning districts in Hsinchu are selected by class number and school area, and one school from each area was chosen for sampling, including 90 sample surveys and 72 pieces of GPS data. Schoolyard maps were created by gMapmaker using the World Geodetic System 84 coordination system, and were integrated with sample data for analysis, to examine the relationships between schoolyard space arrangement, sample's physical activity level, and the use of space.Study results are as follows:1. Children prefer staying on athletic fields and in buildings; the largest numbers of people were recorded in plaza areas but the length of peoples stay in these areas was short.2. Children's physical activity mostly occurred in school, but their physical activity level during recess is still not high enough.3. Buildings and athletic fields are places that induced high levels of physical activity; children prefer playing ball and running in athletic areas and chasing each other in the buildings.4. Different schoolyard spaces show significant differences in children's physical activity level and staying time during recess; children have longer MVPA (moderate to vigorous physical activity) and higher physical activity levels on the athletic field.5. Children with longer total physical activity periods, who have high participation in physical education classes and school activities have higher average heart rates during recess, and have longer LMPA (light to moderate physical activity) level and MVPA levels of accumulated physical activity time.6. Children commuting by car have higher mid-mild levels of accumulated physical activity time then those commuting by foot; during school, LPA (light to moderate physical activity) level and LMPA levels of low activity children's accumulated physical activity time are higher than high activity childrens. This indicates that the physical activity levels of less active children mainly are from LPA or LMPA.

1. 王淑華、李建明(2006)。電子計步器之應用效益。大專體育，82，55-60。
   連結：
2. 李亞珊、朱真儀、林貴福(2010)。台灣地區身體活動量表之應用研究。運動生理暨體能學報，11，1-12。
   連結：
3. 曾慈慧、丁志堅、黎俊彥、呂明心(2012)。學童的校園空間移動模式與身體活動量關係之初探。健康促進與衛生教育學報，38，27-48。
   連結：
4. 陳文錦、凌德麟(1999)。臺北市國小遊戲場之設施準則。台北：台北市政府教育局。Chen, W. C., & Ling, D. L. (1999). Taipei city elementary school playground facilities guidelines. Taipei: Department of Education, Taipei City Government。
5. (2001).Research protocol for the 2001/2002 survey.Edinburgh, UK:University of Edinburgh.
6. 教育部（2007）。快活計畫─促進學生身體活動，帶給學生健康、活力與智慧，下載日期：2012/12/16，取自：http://140.122.72.62/policy/index?id=5e039fe52c41ba4595168aa08bc5575f4726b1e853ec8 Ministry of Education of Taiwan (2007). Happy plan- to promote students' physical activity, bring student health, vitality and wisdom, Retrieved December 16, 2012, from http://140.122.72.62/policy/index?id=5e039fe52c41ba4595168aa08bc5575f4726b1e853ec8
7. Armstrong, N.(Ed.)(1990).New directions in physical education.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
8. Baranowski, T.,Dworkin, R. J.,Cieslik, C. J.,Hooks, P.,Clearman, D. R.,Ray, L.(1984).Reliability and validity of self-report of aerobic activity: Family health project.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,55(4),309-317.
9. Carson, V.,Kuhle, S.,Spence, J. C.,Veugelers, P. J.(2010).Parents' perception of neighbourhood environment as a determinant of screen time, physical activity and active transport.Canadian Journal of Public Health,101(2),124-127.
10. Caspersen, C. J.,Powell, K. E.,Christenson, G. M.(1985).Physical fitness: Definition and distictions for health related research.Public Health Reports,100(2),126-131.
11. Dishman, R. K.(1991).Increasing and maintaining exercise and physical activity.Behavior Therapy,22(3),345-378.
12. Dober, R. P.(2000).Campus landscape: Functions, forms, features.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
13. Earthman, G. I.(1986).Research needs in the field of education facilities planning.the Edusystems 2000 Intenational Congress on Education Facilities, Values & Contents,Jerusalem, Isreal:
14. Fjørtoft, I.(2004).Play as playscape: The effects of natural environment on children's play and motor development.Children, Youth and Environments,14(2),21-44.
15. Fjørtoft, I.,Kristoffersen, B.,Sageie, J.(2009).Children in schoolyards: Tacking movement patterns and physical activity in schoolyards using global positioning system and heart rate monitoring.Landscape and Urban Planning,93(3-4),210-217.
16. Golledge, R. G.(1999).Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and the other spatial processes.Baltimore, MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Haskell, W. L.(1985).Physical activity and health: Need to define the required stimulus.The American Journal of Cardiology,55(10),D4-D9.
18. Haug, E.,Torsheim, T.,Sallis, J. F.,Samdal, O.(2010).The characteristics of the outdoor school environment associated with physical activity.Health Education Research,25(2),248-256.
19. Hayward, D. G.,Rothenburg, M.,Beasley, R. R.(1974).Children's play and urban playground environments: A comparison of traditional, contemporary, and adventure playground types.Environment and Behavior,6(2),131-168.
20. Herrington, S.,Studtmann, K.(1998).Landscape interventions: New directions for the design of children's outdoor play environments.Landscape and Urban Planning,44(2-4),191-205.
21. Hoogendoorn, S. P.,Bovy, P. H. L.(2004).Pedestrain route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models.Transportation Research part B: Methodological,38(2),169-190.
22. LaPorte, R. E.,Montoye, H. J.,Caspersen, C. J.(1985).Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: Problems and prospects.Public Health Reports,100(2),131-146.
23. Lilley, H. E.(1986).Student control as a planning and design factor in education facilities.the Edusystems 2000 International Congress on Education Facilities, Values & Contents,Jerusalem, Israel:
24. Lindholm, G.(1995).Schoolyards: The significance of place properties to outdoor activities in schools.Environment and Behavior,27(3),259-293.
25. Malone, K.,Tranter, P.(2003).Children's environmental learning and the use, design and management of schoolgrounds.Children, Youth and Environments,13(2),87-137.
26. McCurdy, L. E.,Winterbottom, K. E.,Mehta, S. S.,Roberts, J. R.(2010).Using nature and outdoor acticity to improve children's health.Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care,40(5),102-117.
27. Norwood, S.(2007).Validity of self-reports of psychopathology from children of 4-11 years of age.Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies,2(2),89-99.
28. Odoy, H. A. D.,Foster, S. H.(1997).Creating play crates for the outdoor classroom.Young Children,9,12-16.
29. Parfitt, G.,Eston, R. G.(2005).The relationship between children's habitual activity level and psychological well-being.Acta Paediatrica,94(12),1791-1797.
30. Pellegrini, A. D.,Bohn, C. M.(2005).The role of recess in children's cognitive performance and school adjustment.Educational Researcher,34(1),19-19.
31. Puhl, J.,Greaves, K.,Hoyt, M.,Baranowski, T.(1990).Children's activity rating scale (CARS): Description and calibration.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,61(1),26-36.
32. Ridgers, N. D.,Stratton, G.,Fairclough, S. J.,Twisk, J. W.(2007).Long-term effects of a playground makings and physical structures on children's recess physical activity levels.Preventive Medicine,44(5),393-397.
33. Sallis, J. F.,Owen, N.(1999).Physical activity and behavioral medicine.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
34. Samborski, S.(2010).Biodiverse or barren school grounds: Their effects on children.Children, Youth and Environments,20(2),67-115.
35. Stratton, G.(2000).Promoting children's physical activity in primary school: An intervention study using playground markings.Ergonomics,43(10),1538-1546.
36. Welk, G. J.(2002).Physical activity assessment for health-related research.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
37. Zask, A.,Van Beurden, E.,Barnett, L.,Brooks, L. O.,Dietrich, U. C.(2001).Active school playgrounds-myth or reality? Results of the "move it groove it" project.Preventive Medicine,33(5),402-408.
38. 中華民國學校建築研究學會編(2002)。優質的學校環境。台北=Taipei:中華民國學校建築研究學會=Building Research Association。
39. 王元亨(1994)。台北=Taipei，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所=Graduate Institute of Building and Planning, National Taiwan University。
40. 呂金榮(2009)。台北=Taipei，國立臺北教育大學體育學研究所=Department of Physical Education, National Taipei University of Education。
41. 沈瑞琳(2009)。台中=Taichung，私立逢甲大學景觀與遊憩碩士學位學程=Master Program of Landscape and Recreation, Feng Chia University。
42. 侯錦雄、張筱雲、莊怡凱(2003)。學童的環境認知與環境學習機會關係研究─以台中市國小校園景觀設施為例。造園學報，9(1)，89-112。
43. 高忠敬(1991)。台南=Tainan，國立成功大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, Cheng Kung University。
44. 張俊彥、張蓉真(1998)。國小校園景觀對學童學習效益影響之研究。中國園藝，44(4)，479-489。
45. 許柏仁(2009)。桃園=Taoyuan，國立體育大學適應體育學系=Department of Adapted Physical Education, National Taiwan Sport University。
46. 湯志民(2002)。臺灣的學校建築。台北=Taipei:五南圖書出版=Wu-Nan。
47. 湯志民(1991)。台北=Taipei，國立政治大學教育研究所=Department of Education, National Chengchi University。
48. 黃芳利(1997)。台北=Taipei，淡江大學建築學研究所=Department of Architecture, Tamkang University。
49. 劉鶴珣、蔡美文、李淑貞(2008)。學齡前兒童身體活動日誌同時效度檢驗：前驅研究。物理治療，33(6)，381-389。
50. 盧盈智(2006)。新竹=Hsinchu，國立新竹教育大學體育系體育教學碩士班=Department of Physical Education, National Hsinchu University of Education。
51. 盧娟娟(2007)。新竹=Hsinchu，國立新竹教育大學社會學習領域碩士班=Graduate school of Social Studies, National Hsinchu University of Education。
52. 謝振東(2005)。台中=Taichung，國立台灣體育學院體育研究所=Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan University of Physical Education and Sport。

1. 曾慈慧,郭雅芳,張芸甄(2022)。步行促進因素對兒童身體活動量和生活品質影響之研究。建築學報，121，81-104。
2. 董娟鳴、曾慈慧、莊明霞(2017)。都市鄰里公園的友善兒童環境指標建構。建築學報，99，55-77。
3. 廖進安,祁崇溥,林學宜,余思賢(2019)。新北市小學球類運動設施與學生課餘身體活動之關聯性。大專體育學刊，21(3)，258-270。