台灣欒樹引來之椿象對公園不同使用者造成的困擾及其解決方式之影響

The Effect of Scentless Bugs and the Golden-Rain Tree: Problems and Solutions for Different Park

10.6130/JORS.2014.27(2)3

蔡宛潔(Wan-Chie Tsai)；章錦瑜(Chin-Yu Chang)

混植 ； 多樣性 ； 厭惡 ； 爭議 ； 使用意願 ； Mixed planting ； Diversity ； Disgust ； Controversy ； Willingness to use

戶外遊憩研究

27卷2期（2014 / 06 / 01）

63 - 91

繁體中文

本土且觀賞性高之臺灣欒樹，近年來種植數量頗多，當其周邊聚集大量紅姬緣椿象（簡稱椿象）時，因困擾民眾，以致年年要求移樹之聲不斷，且與另群不贊同者形成爭議。本研究針對台中市栽植臺灣欒樹較多之舊社、潮洋環保以及公2-2公園，就其使用者進行問卷調查，有效問卷回收520份。研究結果發現民眾對椿象的認知普遍不足。且年齡越低者越厭惡，但61歲以上、男性、以及幾乎每日使用公園者多不以為意，也較不會降低使用公園的意願。另外，隨年齡以及來公園頻率遞增，越不希望移植現有樹木，也不希望噴灑藥劑防治，於椿象集聚時，建議清除椿象即可。本研究結果可做為現有臺灣欒樹之處理與管理、以及提供未來為降低椿象群聚之植栽設計之參考。

The golden-rain tree (＂Koelreuteria formosana＂) is a native Taiwanese species with beautiful flowers and fruit that changes seasonally. In an unbalanced ecosystem, there may be a massive gathering of scentless plant bugs (Leptocoris augur) around the trees that causes distress among the park’s visitors. Further, this may lead to visitor demands to remove the trees. A questionnaire was distributed in three neighboring parks in Taichung City. There were 520 valid questionnaires. The results revealed that the majority of the respondents lack sufficient knowledge about scentless plant bugs. Younger respondents expressed higher levels of distress. Older people and daily park visitors were not influenced by the bugs and were not discouraged to revisit the parks even when massive amount of bugs gathered around the trees. They were less likely to agree that the golden-rain tree should be removed. Our findings show that when large amounts of scentless plant bugs appeared, frequent removal of the bugs was the most efficient solution. This research provides park administrators with some potential solutions to dealing with this issue.

1. 臺北市政府工務局公園路燈工程管理處(2013)。四季風情畫-臺灣欒樹。下載日期：2013/09/12，取自：http://www.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=34836737&ctNode =8957&mp=106011Parks and Street Lights Office, Public Works Department, Taipei City Government(2013). Four seasons graffiti- Taiwan Golden-Rain Tree. Retrieved September 12, 2013, from http://www.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=34836737&ctNode=8957&mp=106011
2. 高雄市政府工務局( 2 0 0 8 ) 。臺灣欒樹秋天展風華， 下載日期：2014/06/03，取自：http://www.unju.com.tw/03_news/03_news_02_detail.php?mid=1&mid1=928&P=68&zno=193Public Works Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government. (2008). Beautiful autumn exhibition of Taiwan Golden-Rain, Retrieved June 3, 2014, from http://www.unju.com.tw/03_news/03_news_02_detail.php?mid=1&mid1=928&P=68&zno=193
3. 國立自然科學博物館(2013)。昆蟲取食行為，下載日期：2013/09/12，取自：http://web2.nmns.edu.tw/PubLib/NewsLetter/87/132/09.html National Museum of Natural Science. (2013). Insect feeding behavior, Retrieved September 12, 2013, from http://web2.nmns.edu.tw/PubLib/NewsLetter/87/132/09.html
4. 鄭文正(2000)。路樹佈滿紅椿象。聯合報，1月6日，17版。Cheng, W. C. (2000). Road tree covered with Scentless Plant Bugs. United Daily News,January 6, p.17.
5. Davis, R. L.(1993).Street tree trends in Kansas and the influence of community factors.Journal of Arboriculture,19(4),201-208.
6. DeCandido, R.(2004).Recent changes in plant species diversity in urban Pelham Bay Park, 1947-1998.Biological Conservation,120,129-136.
7. Ducatillion, C.,Dubois, E.(1997).Diversification des plantes ornementales mediterraneennes: Estimation des besoins qualitatifs des villes en arbres et arbustes.La plante dans la ville, Angers,Paris:
8. Dwyer, J. F.,McPherson, E. G.,Schroeder, H.W.,Rowntree, R. A.(1992).Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest.Journal of Arboriculture,18(5),227-234.
9. Dwyer, J. F.,Schroeder, H. W.,Gobster, P. H.(1991).The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values.Journal of Arboriculture,17(10),276-284.
10. Elmendorf, W.(2008).The importance of trees and nature in community: A review of the relative literature.Journal of Arboriculture,34(3),152-156.
11. Endress, A. G.(1990).The importance of diversity in selecting trees for urban areas.Journal of Arboriculture,16(6),143-147.
12. Galvin, M. F.(1999).A methodology for assessing and managing biodiversity in street tree populations: A case study.Journal of Arboriculture,25(3),124-128.
13. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A.,Öhrström, E.(2007).Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas.Landscape and Urban Planning,83,115-126.
14. Gorman, J.(2004).Residents' opinions on the value of street trees depending on tree location.Journal of Arboriculture,30(1),36-44.
15. Heimlich, J. E.,Sydnor, T. D.,Bumgardner, M.,O'Brien, P.(2008).Attitudes of residents toward street trees on four streets in Toledo, Ohio, U.S. before removal of ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) from Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis).Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,34(1),47-53.
16. Hull, R. B.(1992).How the public values urban forests.Journal of Arboriculture,18(2),98-101.
17. James, M. B.(1985).Tree problems in Ireland.Journal of Arboriculture,11(4),122-124.
18. Kendal, D.,Williams, N. S. G.,Williams, K. J. H.(2012).Drivers of diversity and tree cover in gardens, parks and streetscapes in an Australian city.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,11(3),257-265.
19. Kirkpatrick, J. B.,Davison, A.,Daniels, G. D.(2012).Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of trees in eastern Australian cities.Landscape and Urban Planning,107(2),147-158.
20. Kuo, F. E.(2001).Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city.Environment and Behavior,33(1),5-34.
21. Lohr, V. I.,Pearson-Mims, C. H.(2002).Childhood contact with nature influences adult attitudes and actions towards trees and gardening.Interaction by design: Bringing people and plants together for health and well-being: An international symposium,Ames, IA:
22. Lohr, V. I.,Pearson-Mims, C. H.,Tarnai, J.,Dillman, D. A.(2004).How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities.Journal of Arboriculture,30(1),28-35.
23. Moskell, C.,Allred, S. B.(2013).Residents'beliefs about responsibility for the stewardship of park trees and street trees in New York City.Landscape and Urban Planning,120,85-95.
24. Obua, J.,Harding, D. M.(1996).Visitor characteristics and attitudes towards Kibale National Park, Uganda.Tourism Management,17(7),495-505.
25. Poland, T. M.,McCullough, D. G.(2006).Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to north America's ash resource.Journal of Forestry,104,118-124.
26. Raupp, M. J.,Shrewsbury, P. M.,Holmes, J. J.,Davidson, J. A.(2001).Plant species diversity and abundance affects the number of arthropod pests in residential landscapes.Journal of Arboriculture,27(4),222-229.
27. Saebo, A.,Benedika, T.,Randrup, T. B.(2003).Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries.Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,2(2),101-114.
28. Schroeder, H. W.,Cannon, W. N.(1983).The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio.Journal of Arboriculture,9(9),237-243.
29. Schroeder, H. W.,Flannigan, J.,Coles, R.(2006).Residents' attitudes toward street trees in the U.K. and U.S. communities.Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,32(5),236-246.
30. Schroeder, H. W.,Ruffolo, S. R.(1996).Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb.Journal of Arboriculture,22(1),35-43.
31. Sjöman, H.,Gunnarsson, A.,Pauleit, S.,Bothmer, R.(2012).Selection approach of urban trees for inner-city environments: Learning from nature.Arboriculture & Urban Forestry,38(5),194-204.
32. Smardon, R. C.(1988).Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: Review of the role of vegetation.Landscape and Urban Planning,15,85-106.
33. Sommer, R.,Barker, P. A.,Guenther, H.,Kurani, K.(1989).Householder evaluation of two street tree species.Journal of Arboriculture,15(4),99-102.
34. Sommer, R.,Cecchettini, C. L.(1992).Street tree location and sidewalk management preference of urban householders.Journal of Arboriculture,18(4),188-191.
35. Sommer, R.,Cecchettini, C. L.,Guenther, H.(1992).Agreement among arborists, gardeners, and landscape architects in rating street trees.Journal of Arboriculture,18(5),252-256.
36. Sommer, R.,Learey, F.,Summit, J.,Tirrell, M.(1994).The social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting.Journal of Arboriculture,20(3),170-175.
37. Spellerberg, I. F.,Eriksson, N. E.,Crump, V. S. A.(2006).Silver Birch (Betula pendula) pollen and human health: Problems for an exotic tree in New Zealand.Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,32(4),133-137.
38. Sperry, C. E.,Chaney, W. R.,Shao, G.,Sadof, C. S.(2001).Effects of tree density, tree species diversity, and percentage of hardscape on three insect pests of honeylocust.Journal of Arboriculture,27(5),263-271.
39. Stevenson, T. R.,Gerhold, H. D.,Elmendorf, W. F.(2008).Attitudes of municipal officials toward street tree programs in Pennsylvania, U.S..Arboriculture and Urban Forestry,34(3),144-151.
40. Stiegler, J. H.(1990).Public perceptions of the urban forest.Make our cities safe for trees: Proceedings of the 4th urban forestry conference,Washington, DC:
41. Subburayalu, S.,Sydnor, T. D.(2012).Assessing street tree diversity in four Ohio communities using the weighted Simpson index.Landscape and Urban Planning,106,44-50.
42. Tello, M. L.,Redondo, C.,Mateo-Sagasta, E.(2000).Health status of plane trees (Platanus spp.) in Spain.Journal of Arboriculture,26(5),246-254.
43. Ware, G. H.(1994).Ecological basis for selecting urban trees.Journal of Arboriculture,20(2),98-103.
44. Weidhaas, J. A.(1981).The problem with insects is people.Journal of Arboriculture,7(5),117-122.
45. Williams, K.(2002).Exploring resident preferences for street trees in Melbourne, Australia.Journal of Arboriculture,28(4),161-170.
46. Young, R. F.(2011).Planting the living city.Journal of the American Planning Association,77(4),368-381.
47. Zhang, Y.,Hussain, A.,Deng, J.,Letson, N.(2007).Public attitudes toward urban trees and supporting urban tree programs.Environment and Behaviour,39,797-814.
48. 朱耀沂(2010)。地球溫暖化與森林昆蟲。臺灣昆蟲通訊，5，1-2。
49. 吳怡欣(2004)。昆蟲狂熱─誰能為生物多樣性代言。臺灣博物，23(4)，14-19。
50. 林政行譯、Price, W. P.(1982)。植物與昆蟲的共同演化。科學農業，30(9/10)，395-402。
51. 林秋芸、凌德麟(1998)。社區鄰里公園老年人休閒活動設施之調查。休閒理論與遊憩行為，臺北=Taipei:
52. 范義彬、楊平世(2005)。昆蟲在現代林業中之角色與重要性。臺灣林業，31(4)，40-46。
53. 張台聖(2003)。紅姬緣椿象—行道樹上的狠角色。大地地理雜誌，185，64-75。
54. 陳姿君(2009)。臺中=Taichung，東海大學景觀學研究所=Department of Landscape Architecture, Tunghai Unversity。
55. 章加寶(1997)。天敵昆蟲和生態保育。蠶蜂業專訊，革新第十九號=Innovation 19
56. 章錦瑜(2005)。論臺灣常見行道樹之問題（續）。林業研究季刊，27(2)，77-90。
57. 章錦瑜(2004)。論臺灣常見行道樹之問題。林業研究季刊，26(3)，83-102。
58. 章錦瑜(2009)。論臺灣常見之爭議性行道樹。造園景觀學報，15(1)，1-19。
59. 章錦瑜、陳依苓(2006)。探討木棉造成之困擾及其解決方式─以臺中縣民眾屬性為例。東海學報，47，127-135。
60. 章錦瑜、陳姿君、陳本睿(2009)。論掌葉蘋婆。林業研究季刊，31(2)，97-106。
61. 葉瑩(2009)。一物剋一物─害蟲天敵。科學發展月刊，444，6-13。
62. 詹典穎(2007)。臺南=Tainan，國立成功大學都市計劃學研究所=Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung Unversity。
63. 劉芳吟(2003)。臺中=Taichung，東海大學景觀學研究所=Department of Landscape Architecture, Tunghai Unversity。