黑暗中的景觀凝視與敘事：賽德克巴萊下的清流

Gazes and Narratives in the Dark Spectacle: Alang Gluban after the Film of Seedliq Bale

10.6130/JORS.2014.27(3)3

趙芝良(Chih-Liang Chao)；全恆儀(Heng-Yi Chuan)；洪貝旬(Pei-Hsun Hung)

黑暗觀光 ； 景觀社會 ； 霧社事件 ； 賽德克巴萊 ； Dark tourism ； Society of the spectacle ； Wushe event ； Seediq Bale

戶外遊憩研究

27卷3期（2014 / 09 / 01）

57 - 82

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討「黑暗觀光」情境中的觀光凝視與解說敘事。研究分析資料乃以搜集部落觀光情境下的說與問的敘事文本進行分析，並輔以參與觀察及訪談。研究結果發現，霧社事件遺族居住地之清流部落，在受到電影賽德克巴萊的媒體影響下，觀光客凝視的層面摻雜著媒介化凝視及黑暗凝視；在媒體觀光熱潮影響下，部落有機會藉由在觀光舞台上陳述各人家族的生命經驗，進而在當代演譯歷史的本真，提供給外來者建構自身的景觀社會。

The purpose of this study is to explore the tourist gaze and local narrative in dark tourism and further explain the relationships between local narrative and stage narrative. Based on critical case sampling, participant observation and interviews and narrative inquiry were adopted as the methods of data gathering and analysis. The results showed that the tourist gaze mixed with mediatized gaze and dark gaze, which indicated that the tribe of Alang Gluban faced media effects from the movie, Seediq Bale. With this focus, many narrators have come out into the tourism stage. Many of these narrators are descendants of the surviving family of this event. When these narrators guide tourists, how do they face the past and introduce the history of this ethnic place, even to create the society of spectacle of themselves. The results of this study recognize that there are multiple contexts of the WuShe Event from different narrators and their narratives can enrich historical facts through the tourism stage.

1. 洪維勵、周念潔(2011)。黑暗觀光動機之研究─以921地震教育園區為例。島嶼觀光研究，4(2)，1-17。
   連結：
2. 張靄珠(2012)。全球異／己的倫理轉折：《家寶／喀布爾》的言說倫理與族裔轉化。英美文學評論，20，1-34。
   連結：
3. Ashworth, G. J.(2002).Holocaust tourism: The experience of Krakow-Kazimierz.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,11(4),363-367.
4. Biran, A.,Hyde, K. F.(2013).New perspectives on dark tourism.International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research,7(3),191-198.
5. Butler, R.,Hinch, T.(1996).Tourism and indigenous people.London:International Thomson Business.
6. Dann, M. S.,Seaton, A. V.(2001).Slavery, contested heritage and thanatourism.International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Administration,2(3),1-29.
7. Elliott, J.(2005).Using narrative in social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.London:Sage.
8. Featherstone, M.(1992).Cultural production, consumption, and the development of the cultural sphere.Theory of culture,Berkley, CA:
9. Heidegger, M.(1962).Being and time.New York:Harper and Row.
10. Jencks, C. A.(1991).The language of post-modern architecture.New York:Rizzoli.
11. Kang, E. J.,Scott, N.,Lee, T. J.,Ballantyne, R.(2012).Benefits of visiting a 'dark tourism' site: The case of the Jeju April 3rd Peace Park, Korea.Tourism Management,33,257-265.
12. Laxson, J. D.(1991).How "we" see "them" tourism and native Americans.Annals of Tourism Research,18(3),365-391.
13. Lemelin, R. H.,Powys, K.,Johansen, K.,Desbiolles, F. H.,Hemming, S.(2013).Conflicts, battlefields, indigenous peoples and tourism: Addressing dissonant heritage in warfare tourism in Australia and North America in the twenty-first century.International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality,7(3),257-271.
14. Lennon, J. J.,Foley, M.(1996).JFK and dark tourism: A fascination with assassination.International Journal of Heritage Studies,2(4),198-211.
15. Lennon, J. J.,Foley, M.(2000).Dark tourism: The attraction of death and disaster.London:Continuum.
16. MacCannell, D.(1973).Staged authenticity: The arrangement of social space in tourist settings.American Journal of Sociology,79,589-603.
17. MacCannell, D.(1976).The tourist: A new theory of leisure class.New York:Schocken.
18. Maoz, D.(2006).The mutual gaze.Annals of Tourism Research,33(1),221-239.
19. O'Connor, E.(2007).Readers' beware: Doing business with a store(y) of knowledge.Journal of Business Venturing,22,637-648.
20. Pentland, B. T.(1999).Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation.Academy of Management Review,24(4),711-724.
21. Peperzak, A. T.(Ed.),Critchley, S.(Ed.),Bernasconi, R.(Ed.)(1996).Emmanuel Lévinas: Basic philosophical writings.Indianapolis, IN:Indiana University.
22. Raine, R.(2013).A dark tourism spectrum.International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research,7(3),242-256.
23. Ryan, C.(Ed.),Page, S.(Ed.),Aicken, M.(Ed.)(2005).Taking tourism to the limit: Issues, concepts and managerial perspectives.Oxford, England:Elsevier.
24. Seaton, A. V.(1996).Guided by the dark: From thanatopsis to thanatourism.International Journal of Heritage Studies,2(4),234-244.
25. Seaton, A. V.(1999).War and thanatourism: Waterloo 1815-1914.Annals of Tourism Research,26(1),130-158.
26. Sharpley, R.(Ed.),Stone, P. R.(Ed.)(2009).The darker side of travel: The theory and practice of dark tourism.Bristol, England:Channel View.
27. Stone, P. R.(2013).Dark tourism scholarship: A critical review.International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research,7(3),307-318.
28. Stone, P. R.(2006).A dark tourism spectrum: Towards a typology of death and macabre related tourist sites, attractions and exhibitions.Tourism: An Interdisciplinary International Journal,54(2),145-160.
29. Urry, J.(2002).The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies.London:Sage.
30. Walker, G. J.,Hull, R. B.,Roggenbuck, J. W.(1998).On-site optimal experiences and their relationship to off-site benefits.Journal of Leisure Research,30(4),453-471.
31. 久部良和子(1991)。臺北=Taipei，國立臺灣大學人類學研究所=Department of Anthropology, National Taiwan University。
32. 王昭風譯、Debord, G.(2007)。景觀社會。南京市，中國=Nanjing, China:南京大學=Nanjing University。
33. 利尚仁(2011)。理解創業者的意義編造歷程：敘說探究法。創業管理研究，6(4)，61-82。
34. 林易澄(2011)。川中島．清流部落的記憶─霧社事件八十周年紀念座談會。臺大歷史系學術通訊，10，13-15。
35. 邱建堂(2010)。台灣原住民餘生後裔眼中的霧社事件。臺灣與海洋亞洲研究通訊，4，41-47。
36. 張一兵(2004)。顛倒再顛倒的景觀世界─德波《景觀社會》的文本學解讀。南京大學學報（哲學、人文科學、社會科學版），2004(1)，5-17。
37. 梁虹譯、Debord, G.(2007)。景觀社會評論。廣西，中國=Guangxi, China:廣西師範大學=Guangxi Normal University。
38. 郭明正編(2011)。真相．巴萊：賽德克．巴萊的歷史真相與隨拍札記。臺北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan-Liou。
39. 郭明正(2010)。「霧社事件」是偶發事件嗎─結果論。霧社事件八十周年國際學術研討會，臺南=Tainan:
40. 陳向明(2002)。教師如何做質的研究。臺北=Taipei:洪葉文化=Hungyeh。
41. 陳貞吟(2009)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北=Taipei:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
42. 趙瑞鎖(2012)。歷史幻象下的囚徒─論貝爾特魯奇電影中的深層文化母題。山西大學學報（哲學社會科學版），35(6)，128-132。
43. 齊力編、林本炫編(2005)。質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義=Chiayi:南華大學=Nanhua University。
44. 鄧相揚(2011)。霧社事件。臺北=Taipei:玉山社=Taiwan Interminds。
45. 謝世忠(1994)。山胞觀光─當代山地文化展現的人類學詮釋。臺北=Taipei:自立晚報=Independent Evening Newspapers。