恐懼的變數：日夜變化對眺匿平衡的影響

Controlling Factors of Fear: The Effect of Day-and-Night Changing on Prospect- Refuge Balance

10.6130/JORS.2015.28(3)4

施景堯(Jing-Yao Shih)；周紓帆(Shu-Farn Chou)；鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng)

眺匿理論 ； 恐懼感 ； 眺望 ； 藏匿 ； Fear ； Prospect ； Prospect-Refuge Theory ； Refuge

戶外遊憩研究

28卷3期（2015 / 09 / 01）

93 - 120

繁體中文

Appleton（1975）的眺匿理論基於生物「偵測威脅」與「迴避威脅」本能，認為提供眺望及藏匿特性的環境應較受偏好。眺匿理論雖有多方研究，卻經常有解釋與脈絡不一的問題，特別是Appleton所提出眺匿於日間夜間主客反轉的戲劇效果以及直接與間接的觀點並沒有受到太多實証研究的重視。本研究目的即檢視Appleton的眺匿理論及相關學說，以釐清眺匿理論對恐懼感及偏好的效果。本研究採照片問卷法進行，針對大學校園中6個地點的日夜照片進行眺望、藏匿、偏好及恐懼的評估。結果顯示景觀的眺望特質可增進景觀偏好、減少恐懼；而藏匿特質反之。儘管受測者對直接和間接無法明顯的區分，但部分驗證Appleton的日夜反轉效果，在日夜間各評價有顯著差異，夜間較日間更偏好眺望特質而較不偏好藏匿特質。本結果可補充相關之文獻並應用於景觀規劃。

The prospect-refuge theory is based on the human nature of detecting and avoiding threats and believing that environment with the characters of ＂prospect＂ and ＂refuge＂ preferred. Appleton suggested that the value of ＂prospect＂ and ＂refuge＂ changes from the shifting of day and night. The theory is widely cited, but there were often problems caused by differences in the interpretations and context, especially as regards the issue of day and night. This study examines the effects of prospect-refuge factors on emotional assessment and the changes caused by the shifting of day and night as proposed by Appleton. A photo-based survey was conducted for this study. Six locations on a university campus were selected and photographed during the day and the night. On-site respondents were requested to record their feelings as regards prospect, refuge, preference, and fear towards the scenes in the pictures. Results showed that prospect characteristics can increase landscape preference and reduce fear, whereas refuge characteristics evoked exactly the opposite feelings. Alternatively, these effects were observed to be stronger at night. However, the differences between primary and secondary perspectives of prospect-refuge factors were obvious, which suggests it may be difficult for people to differentiate between these two perspectives. We also have partially confirmed that the day-night switching effect proposed by Appleton. Differences were found between day and night for the research variables. At night, in particular, subjects were found to prefer ＂prospect＂ characteristics rather than ＂refuge＂ characteristics. The study suggests landscape design projects need to be careful of lighting environments at night as well as to consider the double-edged features of refuge characteristics.

1. 黃崑山(2007)。校園規劃的遠景與機制：一個都市設計範型。建築學報，59，189-202。
   連結：
2. Andrews, M.,Gatersleben, B.(2010).Variations in perceptions of danger, fear and preference in a simulated natural environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology,30(4),473-481.
3. Appleton, J.(1984).Prospects and refuges re-visited.Landscape Journal,3(2),91-103.
4. Appleton, J.(1975).The experience of landscape.London:Wiley.
5. Baum, A.(Ed.),Singer, J. E.(Ed.)(1985).Advances in environmental psychology: Methods and environmental psychology.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bixler, R.,Floyd, M. F.(1997).Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable.Environment and Behavior,29(4),443-467.
7. Blöbaum, A.,Hunecke, M.(2005).Perceived danger in urban public space: The impacts of physical features and personal factors.Lighting Research and Technology,37(4),465-486.
8. Clamp, P.,Powell, M.(1982).Prospect-refuge theory under test.Landscape Research,7(3),7-8.
9. Daniel, T. C.,Boster, R. S.(1976).Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method.Fort Collins, CO:USDA Forest Service.
10. de Vries, M. W.(Ed.)(1992).The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Fischer, M. A.,Shrout, P. E.(2006).Children's liking of landscape paintings as a function of their perceptions of prospect, refuge, and hazard.Environment and Behavior,38(3),373-393.
12. Fisher, B. S.,Nasar, J. L.(1992).Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge, and escape.Environment and Behavior,24(1),35-65.
13. Gabriel, U.,Greve, W.(2003).The psychology of fear of crime. Conceptual and methodological perspectives.The British Journal of Criminology,43(3),600-614.
14. Geer, J. H.(1965).The development of a scale to measure fear.Behavior Research and Therapy,3(1),45-53.
15. Hagerhall, C. M.(2000).Clustering predictors of landscape preference in the traditional Swedish cultural landscape: Prospect-refuge, mystery age and management.Journal of Environmental Psychology,20(1),83-90.
16. Herzog, T. R.,Bryce, A. G.(2007).Mystery and preference in within-forest settings.Environment and Behavior,39(6),779-796.
17. Herzog, T. R.,Kropscott, L. S.(2004).Legibility, mystery, and visual access as predictors of preference and perceived danger in forest settings without pathways.Environment and Behavior,36(5),659-677.
18. Herzog, T. R.,Kutzli, G. E.(2002).Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings.Environment and Behavior,34(6),819-835.
19. Herzog, T. R.,Smith, G. A.(1988).Danger, mystery and environmental preference.Environment and Behavior,20(3),320-344.
20. Jorgensen, L. J.,Ellis, G. D.,Ruddell, E.(2012).Fear perceptions in public parks: Interactions of environmental concealment, the presence of people recreating, and gender.Environment and Behavior,45(7),803-820.
21. Kaplan, R.,Kaplan, S.(1989).The experience of nature: A psychological perspective.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
22. Loewen, L. J.,Steel, G. D.,Suedfeld, P.(1993).Perceived safety from crime in the urban environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology,13(4),323-331.
23. Menzies, R. G.,Clarke, J. C.(1995).Danger expectancies and insight in acrophobia.Behaviour Research and Therapy,33(2),215-221.
24. Mumcu, S.,Düzenli, T.,Özbilen, A.(2010).Prospect and refuge as the predictors of preference for seating areas.Scientific Research and Essays,5(11),1123-1233.
25. Nasar, J. L.,Jones, K.(1997).Landscapes of fear and stress.Environment and Behavior,29(3),291-323.
26. Rapee, R.(1997).Perceived threat and perceived control as predictors of the degree of fear in physical and social situations.Journal of Anxiety Disorders,11(5),455-461.
27. Schaller, M.,Park, J. H.,Mueller, A.(2003).Fear of the dark: Interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereotypes.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,29(5),637-649.
28. Stamps III, A. E.(2005).Visual permeability, locomotive permeability, safety, and enclosure.Environment and Behavior,37(5),587-619.
29. Stokols, D.(Ed.),Altman, I.(Ed.)(1989).Handbook of Environmental Psychology.New York:John Wiley.
30. Um, S.,Crompton, J. L.(1986).The importance of testing for a significant difference between two pearson pruduct-moment correlation coefficients.Journal of Leisure Research,18(3),206-209.
31. Van den Berg, A. E.,ter Heijne, M.(2005).Fear versus fascination, an exploration of emotional responses to natural threats.Journal of Environmental Psychology,25(3),261-272.
32. Vaske, J. J.,Donnelly, M. P.,Williams, D. R.,Jonker, S.(2001).Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management.Society & Natural Resources,14(9),761-776.
33. Wilson, E. O.(1984).Biophilia.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
34. 王彥力(2008)。台中=Taichung，私立逢甲大學景觀與遊憩碩士學位課程=Department of Landscape and Recreation, Feng Chia University。
35. 江彥政(2009)。台中=Taichung，國立中興大學園藝學研究所=Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University。
36. 施景堯(2013)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學園藝暨景觀學系=Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, National Taiwan University。
37. 柯嘉鈞(2011)。台中=Taichung，國立中興大學園藝系=Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University。
38. 段義孚、潘桂成譯(2008)。恐懼。新北市=New Taipei:立緒文化=New Century Publishing。

1. 謝怡倩,黃宣霈,李素馨(2020)。城市夜未眠－眺望夜景空間特性與景觀偏好、療癒知覺關係研究。造園景觀學報，24(3)，13-36。
2. 張淑貞(2019)。大學校園不同時段的空間安全感知：空間特質和個人因素之影響。建築學報，109，93-110。
3. (2024)。不同環境類型與威脅對感知危險之影響。造園景觀學報，27(1)，16-31。