認知調適對健行步道擁擠感受之影響

The Effect of Cognitive Coping on Crowding Perceptions on a Hiking Trail

10.6130/JORS.2018.31(1)1

呂怡君(Yi-Ching Lu)；林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin)

調適行為 ； 社會容許量 ； 視覺評估法 ； 產品轉移 ； 合理化 ； Coping behavior ； Recreation carrying capacity ； Visual approach ； Product shift ； Rationalization

戶外遊憩研究

31卷1期（2018 / 03 / 01）

1 - 21

繁體中文

遊客人數會影響擁擠感受，然而遊客面臨遊憩壓力時可能會透過調適行為來緩和心理壓力。本研究目的在於探討認知調適在步道遊客人數與擁擠感受關係間之影響效果，研究地點為陽明山國家公園二子坪遊憩區之步道，擁擠感受以不同遊客人數之模擬相片進行測量，而認知調適程度分別以產品轉移和合理化問項評斷。研究結果顯示步道遊客人數顯著正向影響擁擠感受，已有來訪經驗者、遊憩目的為運動社交者之擁擠感受較低，而認知調適則顯著負向影響擁擠感受，表示認知調適程度愈高者，愈不容易感到擁擠，證實認知調適會影響受訪者對於遊憩區現況之評估標準，因此，建議管理單位在評估容許量時，應將認知調適之影響效果納入考量。

Visitor numbers influence crowding perception. However, visitors may use coping to ease their experience of recreation stress. This study aimed to discuss the effects of cognitive coping on the relationship between hiking trail visitor numbers and crowding perceptions. The hiking trail at Erzihping Recreation Area in Yangmingshan National Park was used as the study site. A series of hiking trail photos with different use levels were used as the stimuli to measure respondents' crowding perceptions. Cognitive coping was measured by questions describing product shifts and rationalizations. The results suggested that visitor numbers had a significant positive effect on crowding perception. Respondents who were revisit visitors or whose purpose was to exercise or socialize had lower crowding perceptions. Cognitive coping had a significant negative effect on crowding perceptions; as the degree of cognitive coping increased, the perception of crowding decreased. The research findings validated the prediction that cognitive coping influences respondents' evaluation criteria for recreation use in recreation areas. Therefore, administrators should consider the effects of cognitive coping when evaluating recreation carrying capacity.

1. 呂怡君、林晏州(2016)。步道上遊客人數對擁擠感受之影響。戶外遊憩研究，29(1)，57-77。
   連結：
2. 林晏州(2000)。社會遊憩容許量評估方法之比較。戶外遊憩研究，13(1)，1-20。
   連結：
3. Booth, K. L.,Cessford, G. R.,McCool, S. F.,Espiner, S. R.(2011).Exploring visitor experiences, crowding perceptions and coping strategies on the Milford Track New Zealand.Wellington, New Zealand:New Zealand Department of Conservation.
4. Graefe, A. R.,Vaske, J. J.,Kuss, F. R.(1984).Social carrying capacity: An integration and synthesis of twenty years of research.Leisure Sciences,6(4),395-431.
5. Gramann, J. H.,Burdge, R. J.(1984).Crowding perception determinants at intensively developed outdoor recreation sites.Leisure Sciences,6(2),167-186.
6. Hall, T. E.,Cole, D. N.(2007).Changes in the motivations, perceptions, and behaviors of recreation users: Displacement and coping in wilderness.Collins, CO:U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
7. Heberlein, T. A.,Kuentzel, W. F.(2002).Too many hunters or not enough deer? Human and biological determinants of hunter satisfaction and quality.Human Dimensions of Wildlife,7(4),229-250.
8. Heberlein, T. A.,Proudman, S. C.(1986).Declining canoe use and social carrying capacity: A 1975-1985 comparison of a northwoods river.First National Symposium on Social Science in Resource Management,Corvallis, OR:
9. Heberlein, T. A.,Vaske, J. J.(1979).The Apostle Island visitor in 1975.Madison, WI:Center for Resource Policy Studies, The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
10. Heberlein, T. A.,Vaske, J. J.(1977).Crowding and visitor conflict on the Bois Brule River.Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Water Resources Center.
11. Hoss, A. F.,Brunson, M. W.(2000).Meanings and implications of acceptability judgements for wilderness use impacts.Wilderness science in a time of change, vol.4,Ogden, Utah:
12. Iwasaki, Y.,Schneider, I. E.(2003).Leisure, stress and coping: An evolving area of inquiry.Leisure Sciences,25(2-3),107-113.
13. Johnson, A. K.,Dawson, C. P.(2004).An exploratory study of the complexities of coping behavior in Adirondack Wilderness.Leisure Sciences,26(3),281-293.
14. Kuentzel, W. F.,Heberlein, T. A.(1992).Cognitive and behavioral adaptations to perceived crowding: A panel study of coping and displacement.Journal of Leisure Research,24(4),377-393.
15. Laven, D. N.,Manning, R. E.,Krymkowski, D. H.(2005).The relationship between visitor-based standards of quality and existing conditions in parks and outdoor recreation.Leisure Sciences,27(2),157-173.
16. Lazarus, R. S.,Folkman, S.(1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York:Springer Publishing Company.
17. Manning, R. E.(2007).Parks and carrying capacity: Commons without tragedy.Washington, DC:Island Press.
18. Manning, R. E.(1999).Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction.Corvallis, OR:Oregon State University Press.
19. Manning, R. E.,Ciali, C. P.(1980).Recreation density and user satisfaction: A further exploration of the satisfaction model.Journal of Leisure Research,12(4),329-345.
20. Manning, R. E.,Valliere, W. A.(2001).Coping in outdoor recreation: Causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents.Journal of Leisure Research,33(4),410-426.
21. Miller, T.,McCool, S. F.(2003).Coping with stress in outdoor recreational settings: An application of transactional stress theory.Leisure Sciences,25(2-3),257-275.
22. Peden, J. G.,Schuster, R. M.(2004).Stress and coping in the High Peaks Wilderness: An exploratory assessment of visitor experiences.Proceedings of the 2004 northeastern recreation research symposium,Newtown Square, PA:
23. Schneider, I. E.,Hammitt, W. E.(1995).Visitor response to outdoor recreation conflict: A conceptual approach.Leisure Sciences,17(3),223-234.
24. Schuster, R. M.,Hammitt, W. E.,Moore, D.(2003).A theoretical model to measure the appraisal and coping response to hassles in outdoor recreation settings.Leisure Sciences,25(2-3),277-299.
25. Schuster, R.,Hammitt, W. E.,Moore, D.(2006).Stress appraisal and coping response to hassles experienced in outdoor recreation setting.Leisure Sciences,28,97-113.
26. Shelby, B.,Bregenzer, N.,Johnson, R.(1988).Displacement and product shift: Empirical evidence from Oregon rivers.Journal of Leisure Research,20(4),274-288.
27. Shelby, B.,Heberlein, T. A.(1987).Carrying capacity in recreation settings.Corvallis, OR:Oregon State University Press.
28. Shelby, B.,Vaske, J. J.,Heberlein, T. A.(1989).Comparative analysis of crowding in multiple locations: Results from fifteen years of research.Leisure Sciences,11(4),269-291.
29. Shindler, B.,Shelby, B.(1995).Product shift in recreation settings: Findings and implications from panel research.Leisure Sciences,17(2),91-107.
30. Stewart, W. P.,Cole, D. N.(2001).Number of encounters and experience quality in Grand Canyon Backcountry: Consistently negative and weak relationships.Journal of Leisure Sciences,33(1),106-120.
31. Vaske, J. J.,Donnelly, M. P.(2002).Generalizing the encounter-norm-crowding relationship.Leisure Sciences,24(3-4),255-269.
32. Vaske, J. J.,Shelby, L. B.(2008).Crowding as a descriptive indicator and an evaluative standard: Results from 30 years of research.Leisure Sciences,30(2),111-126.
33. 林晏州(1998)。,臺北=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
34. 林晏州、蘇愛媜(2012)。,臺北=Taipei:陽明山國家公園管理處=Yangmingshan National Park Headquarters。

1. 王偉琴(2022)。氣候變遷對溯溪活動之衝擊與業者調適因應策略。戶外遊憩研究，35(4)，1-34。
2. 顏宏旭,張峻豪(2019)。運用實景情境模擬影片探討都會區自行車道之衝突管理。都市與計劃，46(1)，61-85。