露營者露營行為模式－應用計畫行為理論

Campers' Participation Behavior Model -Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior

10.6130/JORS.201912_32(4).0003

郭彰仁(Chang-Jen Kuo)

露營 ； 遊憩專門化 ； 環境支應性 ； 南北差異 ； Camping ； Recreational specialization ； Environmental affordances ； North-south differences

戶外遊憩研究

32卷4期（2019 / 12 / 01）

55 - 89

繁體中文

台灣近年來露營人口大幅成長，露營的型態、場地空間與用品設備也不斷的轉變與發展，國內目前已有許多不同型態的露營場地供露營者選擇，在從事露營活動時，場地空間、設施、周邊自然環境及景點往往會影響民眾與環境的互動行為及感受。過去的研究中較少針對露營者遊憩專門化程度、露營場地之環境支應性感知做探討。因此本研究透過問卷調查，修正計畫行為理論模式後提出適當之露營活動參與行為模式，並以南北露營場地差異之角度驗證之。研究結果將根據行為模式給予不同之建議，以提升露營場地規劃之完善性。並提供相關業者及在管理與行銷方面之建議。

In Taiwan, the population participating in camping activities has increased in recent years. The style, space, commodities, and equipment for camping activities continues to evolve and develop in different ways. Nowadays, there are many types of campsites from which the camper can choose. The space, infrastructure, natural environment, and tourist resorts are factors that influence our perceptions, feelings, and interactive behavior towards the environment when it comes to camping activities. Past research has discussed the recreational specialization for the camper and the environment affordance perception of camping sites. However, this study analyses how the participant behavior of the camper is influenced by the affordance perception of campsites based on the differences between the south and north of Taiwan. Furthermore, we examine whether the camper with different recreational specializations produces non-identical affordance perceptions. Last, we establish the participant behavior of the camper in relation to the Theory of Planned Behavior to compare the difference between the people in the south and north of Taiwan. Via a questionnaire survey and modification theory, we also verified the behavior model of camping activity participation to show the differences between southern and northern Taiwan. The behavior model provides suggestions on how to improve the quality of campsites and to advise relevant industries regarding their management and marketing strategies.

1. 唐燕娟, Y. J.,林瑩昭, Y. Z.(2014)。家庭露營者遊憩專門化與休閒效益之研究。運動與遊憩研究，8(4)，1-26。
   連結：
2. 張簡仕傑, S. J.,李介祿, C. L.,柳婉郁, W. Y.(2018)。遊憩專門化程度、環境態度與環境行為關係之研究：以登山與攀岩為例。地理研究，69，83-123。
   連結：
3. 歐聖榮, S. J.,鄭佳美, J. M.,黃郁琇, Y. X.,林建堯, J. Y.(2010)。以支應性理論探討環境屬性與使用者行為之關係 － 以國家美術館前開放空間為例。戶外遊憩研究，23(4)，79-109。
   連結：
4. 歐雙磐, S. P.,侯錦雄(2007)。登山者遊憩專門化與登山類型偏好。戶外遊憩研究，20(4)，51-74。
   連結：
5. Ajzen, I.(1988).Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior.Chicago: IL:Dorsey.
6. Anderson, L. E.,Loomis, D. K.(2012).Normative standards for coral reef conditions: A comparison of SCUBA divers by specialization level.Journal of Leisure Research,44(2),257-274.
7. Bollen, K. A.,Stine, R. A.(1992).Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.Sociological Methods and Research,21,205-229.
8. Brewer, H.(Ed.),Jalongo, M. Renck(Ed.)(2018).Physical activity and health promotion in the early Years: Effective strategies for early childhood educators.Cham, Switzerland:Springer, Springer Nature.
9. Bryan, H.(1977).Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen.Journal of Leisure Research,9(3),174-187.
10. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),233-255.
11. Clark, C.,Uzzell, D. L.(2002).The affordances of the home, neighbourhood, school and town centre for adolescents.Journal of environmental psychology,22(1-2),95-108.
12. Davis, F. D.(1993).User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts.International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,38(3),475-487.
13. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
14. Dishaw, M. T.,Strong, D. M.(1999).Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs.Information & Management,36(1),9-21.
15. Ditton, R. B.,Loomis, D. K.,Choi, S.(1992).Recreation specialization: Re- coneceptualization from a social worlds perspective.Journal of Leisure Research,24(1),33-51.
16. Galloway, S.(2012).Recreation specialization among New Zealand river recreation users: A multiactivity study of motivation and site preference.Leisure Sciences,34(3),256-271.
17. Gibson, J. J.(1986).The ecological approach to visual perception.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Heft, H.(1988).Affordances of children's environments: A functional approach to environmental description.Children's Environments Quarterly,29-37.
19. Igbaria, M.,Schiffman, S. J.,Wieckowski, T. J.(1994).The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology.Behaviour & Information Technology,13(6),349-361.
20. Kline, R.B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford Press.
21. Kuentzel, W. F.,Heberlein, T. A.(1992).Does specialization affect behavioral choices and quality judgments among hunters?.Leisure Sciences,14(3),211-226.
22. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action-control: From cognition to behavior.Heidelberg:Springer.
23. Lerstrup, I.,Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C.(2016).Affordances of outdoor settings for children in preschool: Revisiting heft's functional taxonomy.Landscape Research,42(1),47-62.
24. Little, T. D.(1997).Mean and covariance structures (Macs) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues.Multivariate Behavioral Research,32(1),53-76.
25. MacCallum, R. C.,Roznowski, M.,Mar, C. M.,Reith, J. V.(1994).Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models.Multivariate Behavioral Research,29(1),1-32.
26. Mathieson, K.(1991).Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior.Information System Research,2(3),173-191.
27. McFarlane, B.(2004).Recreational specialization and site choice among vehicle-based campers.Leisure Sciences,26(3),309-322.
28. McGrenere, J.,Ho, W.(2000).Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept.Graphics interface
29. McIntyre, N.,Pigram, j. j(1992).Recreational specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers.Leisure Sciences,14(1),3-15.
30. Norman, D.(1999).Affordance, conventions, and design.Interactions,6(3),38-43.
31. Said, I.(2011).Affordances of nearby forest and orchard on children's performances.Asian Journal of Environment-Behavior Studies,2(3),13-23.
32. Storli, R.,Hagen, T. L.(2010).Affordances in outdoor environments and children's physically active play in pre-school.European Early Childhood Education Research Journal,18(4),445-456.
33. Veblen, T. (1912), The theory of the leisure class. New York: Macmillan.
34. Vyas, D.,Chisalita, C.M.,Veer, G. C.(2007).Affordance in Interaction.Proceedings of 13th European conference on cognitive ergonomics,New York:
35. Woolley, H.,Johns, J. R.(2001).Skateboarding: The city as a playground.Journal of Urban Design,6(2),211-230.
36. 王一芝, Y. Z.,江逸之, Y. J.(2004)。前進的動力：向南走向北走。遠見雜誌，215
37. 王稚絜, Z, J.,黃章展, C. C.(2012)。環境支應性在都市綠園道景觀設計之應用研究。2012 第十屆造園景觀學術研討會論文集，台北市=Taipei City:
38. 何嘉仁, C. J.,洪煌佳, H. C.(2012)。計畫行為理論探討自行車參與者行為意圖之研究。臺東大學體育學報，17，23-38。
39. 李素馨, S. H.(1994)。典型相關分析－專業程度、遊憩動機和基地屬性認知關係之探討。戶外遊憩研究，7(3)，39-62。
40. 官素珍, S. Z.(2008)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County，南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所=Department of Tourism Management, Nanhua University。
41. 林佳賢(2016)。南北平衡？社會均富？3張圖看台灣南北面積、人口和經濟發展的比較。下載日期：2016/3/3，取自：https://www.thenewslens.com/article/37346。Lin, G. S. (2016). North and South balance? The society is rich? A comparison of the area, population and economic development of Taiwan's north and south in three pictures. Retrieved March 3, 2016, from: https://www.thenewslens.com/article/37346
42. 邱皓政, H. J.(2003).結構方程模式：LISREL 的理論、技術與應用.台北市=Taipei:雙葉書廊=Yeh Yeh Book Gallery Ltd..
43. 侯錦雄, Tsai,蔡瑋庭, W. T.,歐雙磐, S. P.(2010)。攀岩者環境支應性感受典與心流體驗之關係。2010 年第 12 屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會論文集，台北=Taipei:
44. 柯文欣, W. X.(2009)。台南市=Tainan City，國立成功大學都市計畫學系研究所=Department of Urban Planning, National Cheng Kung University。
45. 紀光慎, G. S.(1993)。露營旅遊在台灣。戶外遊憩研究，6(1/2)，137-145。
46. 范紀朝, J. C.(2015)。桃園市=Taoyuan City，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所=Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics, Taoyuan City。
47. 唐燕娟, Y. J.(2014)。台南市=Tainan City，台南應用科技大學生活服務產業系應用科學研究所=Department of Living Services Industry, Tainan University of Technology。
48. 徐辜思維, S. W.(2009)。台中市=Taichung City，國立中興大學企業管理學系=Department of Business Administration, National Chung Hsing University。
49. 高漢瑞, H. R.(2016)。台中市=Taichung City，逢甲大學景觀與遊憩碩士學位學程=Master's Program of Landscape and Recreation, Feng Chia University。
50. 張月玲, Y. L.(2008)。台北市，中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所=Graduate Institute of Applied Living Science, Chinese Culture University。
51. 張偉豪, W. H.(2011).SEM 論文寫作不求人.高雄=Kaohsiung:鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司=Tingmao Publish Company.
52. 郭彰仁, C. J.,楊明青, M. C.,許崴傑, W. J.(2018)。不同專門化休閒潛水者環境支應性感知與場所依戀關係之研究。2018第20 屆休閒、遊憩、觀光國際論壇暨學術研討會論文集，台北=Taipei:
53. 郭彰仁, C. J.,蘇麗思, L. H.,韓耀期, Y. C.(2015)。公共藝術支應性知覺與觀賞者互動行為傾向關係之研究 － 以台中市綠園道周邊為例。建築學報，92，61-80。
54. 陳皆榮, J. R.(1997)。冒險性露營活動對於青少年自我實現之影響。體育學報，22，71-81。
55. 馮國豪, G. H.(2014)。台灣南北差距的成因和化解之道。《觀察》雜誌，10
56. 黃允薔, W. C.(2016)。新北市=New Taipei City，淡江大學國際企業學系碩士班=Department of International Business, Tamkang University。
57. 劉冠佑, K. Y.(2015)。台中市=Taichung City，嶺東科技大學觀光與休閒管理研究所=Graduate Institute of Tourism and Leisure Management, Ling Tung University。
58. 蔡彥輝, Y. H.(2015)。高雄=Kaohsiung City，私立義守大學管理學院=Postgraduate Programs in Management, I-Shou University。
59. 諸葛俊, C.(2013)。高雄市=Kaohsiung City，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所=Institute of Public Affairs Management, National Sun Yatsen University。
60. 鄭育雄, Y. H.,李英弘, Y. H.,葉源鎰, Y. I.(2005)。遊憩專門化衡量指標之研究 － 以自行車活動為例。旅遊管理研究，5(2)，173-194。
61. 鄭佳美, J. M.(2006)。台中市=Taichung City，國立中興大學園藝系研究所=Department of Horticulture, National Chung Hsing University。
62. 謝純安, C. A.(1994)。台中市=Taichung City，東海大學景觀學研究所=Department of Landscape Architecture, Tunghai University。

1. 謝文凱,許哲睿,林莉萍(2021)。影響『豪華露營場』露客忠誠度的決定因素探討。觀光旅遊研究學刊，16(2)，1-22。
2. 謝心慧,潘蕙綺,楊舒涵,陳昱安,李佳如(2023)。目的地意象、旅遊動機、體驗價值與行為意向之研究－以平溪老街為例。觀光旅遊研究學刊，18(1)，43-63。