台江國家公園黑面琵鷺保育與志工導覽服務的遊憩效益分析之研究

Evaluating the Economic Benefits of Recreation Related to the Black-Faced Spoonbill Conservation and Docent Guided Tour Services in Taijiang National Park

10.6130/JORS.202412_37(4).0001

龎雅文(Arwin Pang)；郭彥廉(Yen-Lien Kuo)

非市場財貨效益分析 ； 旅遊成本法 ； 卜瓦松模型 ； 黑面琵鷺 ； Non-market valuation ； Travel cost model ； Poisson model ； Black-faced Spoonbill

戶外遊憩研究

37卷4期（2024 / 12 / 01）

1 - 30

繁體中文;英文

自從1995年制訂了黑面琵鷺保育行動綱領與2002年臺南縣曾文溪口北岸被列為黑面琵鷺野生動物保護區，臺灣臺南已成為黑面琵鷺全球最大的度冬棲息地。本研究運用旅行成本法中考慮截斷與內生分層的卜瓦松模型，對現場取樣的樣本資料進行估計，得出代表性遊客對台江國家公園黑面琵鷺生態保育區的遊憩需求，再利用遊憩需求函數估計黑面琵鷺保育與志工導覽服務為遊客所帶來的遊憩效益，結果發現遊客多見到一隻黑面琵鷺，將為他帶來相當於3.75元的貨幣效益，另外若遊客增加使用一次志工導覽服務則會為他帶來447.73元的效益。估計黑面琵鷺保育在整個2021年鳥季帶來的最大總遊憩效益為2億多元。

In 1995, Taiwan established the Action Plan for the Black-Faced Spoonbill Platalea minor. In 2002, the Zengwun Estuary North Bank was set as the Black-Faced Spoonbill Reserve. As a result, Tainan is the world's largest habitat for the Black-Faced Spoonbill. This study collects on-site feedback of tourists in Taijiang National Park and uses the truncated and endogenous Poisson model to estimate tourists' recreational demand for the Black-Faced Spoonbill Reserve. Moreover, the recreation benefits of the Black-Faced Spoonbill conservation and docent guided tour services are estimated based on the demand. The results show that the recreation benefits of watching one or more Black-Faced Spoonbill is NT $3.75 and the recreation benefits of having one or more docent guided tours is NT $447.73. The total maximum recreational value of the entire bird season from Black-Faced Spoonbill conservation in 2021 was about NT $200 million.

1. 何立德、羅柳墀、盧道杰、陳維立、徐嘉鴻(2012)。臺南縣曾文溪口北岸黑面琵鷺野生動物保護區經營管理效能評估。地理學報，65，1-26。https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.2012.65.01
   連結：
2. 吳守從(2006)。遊客環境態度與環境行為之研究－以七股黑面琵鷺保護區為例。運動休閒管理學報，3(1)，57-73。https://doi.org/10.6214/JSRM.200606_3(1).0004
   連結：
3. 吳忠宏(2001)。解說在自然保育上的應用。自然保育季刊，36，6-13。https://doi.org/10.29738/NCQ.201012.0005
   連結：
4. 吳珮瑛、鄧福麒(2003)。黑面琵鷺保護區生態旅遊規劃方案下居民參與和願付價值關係之檢視。戶外遊憩研究，16(4)，41-70。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.2003.16(4)3
   連結：
5. 李明聰、蘇秋君、王怡文(2006)。遊客對解說服務願付價格之研究－以七股黑面琵鷺保護區為例。觀光旅遊研究學刊，1，19-34. https://doi.org/10.29689/JTTR.200610.0002
   連結：
6. 李俊鴻、陳吉仲(2007)。節慶活動遊客旅遊需求及遊憩效益評估－以綠色博覽會爲例。農業與經濟，39，137-166。https://doi.org/10.6181/agec.2007.39.05
   連結：
7. 林俊昇、黃文琪(2000)。遊客參與生態活動保育認知之研究－結構方程式模型的應用。戶外遊憩研究，13(2)，45-65。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.2000.13(2)3
   連結：
8. 陳宛君、廖學誠(2007)。應用旅遊成本法分析宜蘭縣英士、玉蘭及崙埤社區的遊憩效益。中華林學季刊，40(3)，341-355。 https://doi.org/10.30064/QJCF.200709.0004
   連結：
9. 陳餘鋆、張文娟、陳冠宇(2009)。臺南縣黑面琵鷺保護區遊憩衝擊知覺與遊憩體驗關係之研究。運動與遊憩研究，3(4)，137-155。https://doi.org/10.29423/JSRR.200906_3(4).0010
   連結：
10. 曾芝慧、李明聰(2008)。遊客對解說服務願付價格之研究－以福山植物園爲例。商業現代化學刊，4(4)，29-49。https://doi.org/10.6132/JCM.2008.4.4.03
    連結：
11. 黃雅蘭、陳凱俐(2011)。專程與順道旅遊對遊憩效益之影響－以宜蘭縣休閒農業為例。農業經濟叢刊，16(2)，41-76。https://doi.org/10.6196/TAER.2011.16.2.2
    連結：
12. 黃錦煌、蕭柏勳、葉純菊(2006)。台灣咖啡節遊憩效益評估之研究。戶外遊憩研究，19(3)，1-21。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.2006.19(3)1
    連結：
13. 劉吉川(1997a)。黑面琵鷺棲息地之遊憩使用型態與限制。戶外遊憩研究，10(2)，43-65。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.1997.10(2)3
    連結：
14. 劉吉川(1997b)。黑面琵鷺棲息地遊憩使用之經濟價值。戶外遊憩研究， 10(4)，19-39。https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.1997.10(4)3
    連結：
15. 劉錦龍(2001)。應用非線性隨機效用模型探討臺灣森林資源的遊憩價值。農業與經濟，27，61-86。
    連結：
16. 鄭蕙燕、張偉祐、林政德(2000)。四草野生動物保護區遊客之遊憩效益與時間成本：截斷式波爾生模型之應用。農業經濟半年刊，67，161-179。https://doi.org/10.7086/JAE.200006.0161
    連結：
17. 蕭代基、鄭蕙燕、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、溫麗琪(2002)。環境保護之成本效益分析：理論、方法與應用。俊傑書局。
    連結：
18. 羅鳳恩、夏先瑜、徐承暘(2023)。遊客對高美濕地野生動物保護區及七股黑面琵鷺保護區生態旅遊認知、旅遊吸引力及旅遊阻礙之探討。環境與管理研究，24，1-14。https://doi.org/10.6725/JEM.202306_24.0001
    連結：
19. Alegre, J., & Cladera, M. (2009).   Analysing the effect of satisfaction and previous visits on tourist intentions to return. European Journal of Marketing, 43(5/6), 670-685. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910946990
    連結：
20. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free‐choice learning experiences: what is the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 281-295. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504620500081145
    連結：
21. Bartczak, A., Englin, J., & Pang, A. (2012). When are forest visits valued the most? An analysis of the seasonal demand for forest recreation in Poland. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52(2), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9527-1
    連結：
22. Bockstael, N. E., & Strand, I. E. (1987). The effect of common sources of regression error on benefit estimation. Land Economics, 63(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146652
    連結：
23. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of applied econometrics, 1(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950010104
    連結：
24. Clawson, M. (1959). Methods of measuring the demand for and value of outdoor recreation. In Resources for the Future (Ed.), Travel Research Bulletin, 10(3) (pp. 11-11). Resources for the Future. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728757201000331
    連結：
25. Creel, M. D., & Loomis, J. B. (1990). Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. American journal of agricultural economics, 72(2), 434-441. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242345
    連結：
26. Englin, J., & Shonkwiler, J. S. (1995). Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. The Review of Economics and statistics, 77(1), 104-112.   https://doi.org/10.2307/2109996
    連結：
27. Freeman III, A. M. (1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the future. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781936331826-10
    連結：
28. Gourieroux, C., Monford, A., & Trognon, A. (1984). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: application to poisson models. Econometrica, 52, 701-720. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913472
    連結：
29. Loomis, S. Y., Yorizane, S., & Larson, D. (2000). Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 29, 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500005311
    連結：
30. Loomis, J. B. (2006). A comparison of the effect of multiple destination trips on recreation benefits as estimated by travel cost and contingent valuation methods. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2006.11950068
    連結：
31. Mendelsohn, R. (2019). An examination of recent revealed preference valuation methods and results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(2), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez003
    連結：
32. Russell, C. L., & Hodson, D. (2002). Whalewatching as critical science education? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2, 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150209556537
    連結：
33. Shaw, D. (1988). On-site samples’ regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification. Journal of econometrics, 37(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(88)90003-6
    連結：
34. 翁義聰、邱彩綢、鄧伯齡、劉清榮(2017)。嘉義布袋鹽田設置太陽能光電與黑面琵鷺棲地保護的衝突。濕地學刊，6(1)，19-31。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20151104001-201712-201712200018-201712200018-19-31
35. 張明洵、林玥秀(1992)  。解說概論。太魯閣國家公園管理處。
36. 黑面琵鷺保育學會(2023)。黑面琵鷺簡介。https://www.bfsa.org.tw/tc/spoonbill-1.php
37. 經濟部能源署(2023)。油價資訊管理與分析系統。https://www2.moeaea.gov.tw/oil111/
38. 經濟部能源署(2022)。臺南市七股區養殖漁業經營結合綠能設施專案計畫。https://www.moeaea.gov.tw/ECW/populace/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=21970
39. Binkley, C. S., & Mendelsohn, R. O. (1987). Recreation user fees: II. an economic analysis. Journal of Forestry, 85(5), 31-35.
40. Brochu, L., & Merriman, T. (2008). Personal interpretation: connecting your audience to heritage resources. InterpPress.
41. Fix, P., & Loomis, J. (1997). The economic benefits of mountain biking at one of its meccas: An application of the travel cost method to mountain biking in Moab, Utah. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 342-352. https://10.1080/00222216.1997.11949800
42. Haab, T. C., & McConnell, K. E. (2002)  . Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
43. Ham, S. (1992). Environmental interpretation. A practical guide for people with big ideas. North American Press.
44. Hotelling, H. (1949). The economics of public recreation. The Prewitt report, Washington: National Parks Service.
45. Knudson, D. M., Cable, T. T., & Beck, L. (2003). Interpretation of culture and nature resources. Venture Publishing.
46. McNeely, J. A., Miller, K. R., & Reid, W. V. (1990). Conserving the world's biological diversity. Island Press.
47. U.S. Water Resources Council (1979). Procedures for evaluation of natural economic development (NED) benefits and costs in water resources planning: final rule. Water Resources Council.
48. U.S. Water Resources Council (1983). Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies. Water Resources Council.