题名

《往年紀事》在近代俄國通史編著的意義

并列篇名

Povest vremennykh let in Modern Russian Historiography

DOI

10.6253/ntuhistory.2009.43.04

作者

陳仁姮(Jen-Heng Chen)

关键词

往年紀事Povest vremennykh let ; 俄國史 ; 俄國歷史學 ; 東斯拉夫民族 ; 索洛維約夫S. M. Soloviev ; Povest Vremennykh Let ; Russian History ; Russian Historiography ; East Slavs ; S. M. Soloviev

期刊名称

臺大歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

43期(2009 / 06 / 01)

页次

151 - 186

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

完成於十二世紀初的俄國史學經典《往年紀事》(Povest vremennykh let),其重要性除了歷史最悠久,並對近代俄國的史學影響深遠。本文旨在探討《往年紀事》與近代俄國通史編著的關連及其意義。 歷代對《往年紀事》的研究,多專注在其來源和內容的考證,至於它在史學史上的意義,則侷限於該書是十八世紀以前的編年史。十八世紀之後的俄國,因西化改革,學術興起,歷史撰寫的體例隨之轉變,由國內各地方獨立撰修的編年紀事體史籍,轉為概括全國整體的通史著作。 在如此轉變下,《往年紀事》不僅提供國家歷史文化根源的一手史料,編著方法上也給予歷史學家無形的啟發。即使近代俄國歷史學家編寫國家史,早已脫離舊有的編年史方法,卻對《往年紀事》所敘述的民族起源的問題,持續深化探究,因而形成了新的方法和視野。雖然如此的新方法和視野,在二十世紀後隨著蘇聯歷史學的興起而消失,卻在境外為外國歷史學家繼續採用,讀者也因此能夠接觸到這部古老的中世紀史籍-《往年紀事》。

英文摘要

Povest vremennykh let, is a Russian historical classic. Besides its longstanding importance, it has exerted deep influences on modern Russian historiography. This article discusses the significance of PVL as well as the connection between PVL and the compilation of Modern Russian history. Previous researches on PVL mostly focused on verifying its origin and content, while the researches on its significance in the history of historiography existed in chronicles only up to the eighteenth century. After the eighteenth century, because of westernization, academic researches sprang up in Russia. Historical writings also changed, from local chronological style into national general researches. With this change, PVL provides the first source for the origin of national history cultures, and also inspires historians by its writing method. Even if modern Russian historians don’t follow old chronicle methods anymore, they still investigate the ethnic origins in PVL, thereby new methods and horizons are formed. Such new methods and views disappeared in Soviet historiography of the twentieth century, but they are still used abroad by foreign historians. Therefore, nowadays readers can read the medieval historical classic, Povest vremennykh let.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. Adrianovoi-Perets, V. P. (ed)(1996).Povest vremenykh let.St. Petersburg:Nauka.
  2. Aksakov, K. S.(1861).Polnoe sobranie sochinenii.Moscow:P. Bakhmetev.
  3. Alexandrov, V. A.,B. L. Yanin.Predislovie.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,1
  4. Alpatov, M. A.(1985).Russkaja istoricheskaja mysl i zapadhaja evropa (XVIII-pervaja polovina XIX v.).Moscow:Nauka.
  5. Barber, John.(1981).Soviet Historians in Crisis, 1928-1932.London:Macmillan Press.
  6. Bezobrazov, P. V..S. M. Soloviev: Ego zhizn i nauchno-literaturnaja dejatelnost.Drevnjaja Rossija.
  7. Breisach, Ernst.(1994).Historiography: Ancient, Medieval & Modern.University of Chicago Press.
  8. Cross, Samuel H.(1935).Mediaeval Russian Contacts with the West.Speculum,10(2)
  9. Cross, Samuel H. (eds./trans.),Olgerd P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor (eds./trans.)(1953).The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text.Cambridge, MA:Mediaeval Academy of Sciences.
  10. Cross, Samuel H.,Olgerd P. Sherbowitz-Wetzor.Introduction.The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text.
  11. Dmytryshyn, Basil. (ed.)(1991).Medieval Russia, A Source Book, 850-1700.Fort Worth:The Dryden Press.
  12. Franklin, Simon.(2002).Writing, Society and Culture in Early Rus, c. 950-1300.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Franklin, Simon.(1985).Literacy and Documentation in Early Medieval Russia.Speculum,60(1)
  14. Frojanov, I. Y.(2001).Nachala russkoi istorii.Moscow:Parad.
  15. Frojanov, I. Y.(2001).Kievskaja Rus: Ocherki otechestvennoi istoriografii (1990), Nachala russkoi istorii.Moscow:Parad.
  16. Ger''e, V. I.(1989).Sergei Mikhailovich Soloviev.Soloviev S. M. Sochinenija,XXIII
  17. Grekov, B. D.(2004).Kievskaja rus.Moscow:AST.
  18. Istoriko-arkheograf. komissia (ed)(1926).Povest vremenykh let po Lavrent'evskomu spisku.Leningrad:AN SSSR.
  19. Karamzin, N. M.(2001).Istorija gosudarstva rossiiskogo.Moscow:Ripol Klassik.
  20. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1989).Lektsija po russkoi istoriografii.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,7
  21. Kljuchevsky, V. O..Kurc russkoi istorii.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,1
  22. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1990).Istoricheskie portrety.Moscow:Pravda.
  23. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1987).Sochinenija v 9 tomakh.Moscow:
  24. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1989).Metodologija russkoi istorii.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,6
  25. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1997).Istorija russkogo samosoznanija po istoricheskim pamjatnikam i nauchnym sochinenijam.Minsk:Luchi Sofii.
  26. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1996).Povest vremennykh let.SPb.:Nayka.
  27. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1989).Sergei Mikhailovich Soloviev.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,7
  28. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1989).Pamjat S. M. Soloviev.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,7
  29. Kljuchevsky, V. O.(1989).V. N. Tatishev.Sochinenija v 9 tomakh,7
  30. Likhachev, D. S.(1987).Velikie nasledie. Klasicheskie proizvedenija literatury Drevnei Rus.Leningrad:Khudozhestvennaja literatura.
  31. Likhachev, D. S.(1947).Russkie letopisi i ikh kulturno-istoricheskoe znachenie.M., L.:Akademia Nauk.
  32. Likhachev, D. S.(1987).Povest vremennykh let.Velikoe nasledie,2
  33. Likhachev, D. S. (ed.)(1980).Istorija russkoi literatury X-XVII vekov.Moscow:Prosveshenie.
  34. Likhachev, D. S. (ed./trans.)(1950).Povest vremenykh let.M.-L.:AN SSSR.
  35. Biblioteka Literatury Drevnei Rusi
  36. Likhachev, D. S. (eds.),L. A. Dmitriev (eds.),A. A. Alexseev (eds.),N. V. Ponyrkov (eds.)(2000).Biblioteka Literatury Drevnei Rusi.St. Petersburg:Nauka.
  37. Likhachev, D. S. (eds.),L. A. Dmitriev (eds.),A. A. Alexseev (eds.),N. V. Ponyrkov (eds.)(1997).Biblioteka Literatury Drevnei Rusi.St. Petersburg:Nauka.
  38. Likhachev, D. S.,O. V. Tvorogov(1991).Povest vremenykh let.Karelia:Peterozavodsk.
  39. Lunt, Horace G.(1995).What the Rus' Primary Chronicle Tells Us about the Origin of the Slavs and of Slavic Writing.Harvard Ukrainian Studies,19
  40. Lur''e, Ya. S.(1997).Rossija Drevnjaja i Rossija Novaja: Izbrannye.SPb.:Dmitrii Bulanin.
  41. Lur''e, Ya. S.(1985).O putjakh dokazatelstva pri analize istochnikov.Voprosy istorii,5
  42. Lur''e, Ya. S.(1997).Rossija Drevnjaja i Rossija Novaja: Selected.SPb.:Dmitrii Bulanin.
  43. Malingudi, Yana.(1995).Russko-vizantiiskie svjazi v X veke s tochki zrenija diplomatiki.Vizantiiskii vremennik,56
  44. Malinov, A. V.(2001).Filosofija istorii v Rossii.SPb.:Letnii sad.
  45. Mavrodin, V. V.(1949).Borba s normanizmom v russkoi istoricheskoi nauke.Leningrad:Vsesojuznoe obshestvo.
  46. Mazour, Anatole G.(1997).Modern Russian Historiography.The Journal of Modern History,9(2)
  47. Mazour, Anatole. G.(1975).Modern Russian historiography.Cambridge, MA:Greenwood Press.
  48. Miljukov, P. N.(1913).Glavnye techenija russkoi istoricheskoi mysli.St. Peterburg:
  49. Miljukov, P. N.(1993).Ocherki po istorii russkoi kultury v 3 tomakh.Moscow:Progress.
  50. Miller, G. F.(1996).Sochinenija po istorii.Moscow:Nauka.
  51. Miller, G. F.(1999).Avtobiografija.Istorija Sibiri,1
  52. Niderle, L.(2001).Slavjanskie drevnost. Translated of Czech.Moscow:Ateleina.
  53. Ostrowski, Donald.,David J. Birnbaum. (ed.)(2003).Povest vremennykh let: An interlinear collation and paradosis.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  54. Petrukhin, V. Y.(2004).Drevniaia Rossiia.Moscow:Vyschaja schkola.
  55. Platonov, S. F.(1922).A. A. Schakhmatov kak istorik.Izvestija Otdelenija russogo jazyka i slovesnosti Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk,15
  56. Platonov, S. F..Ocherk russkoi istoriografii.Polnyi kurs lektsii po russkoi istorii.
  57. Platonov, S. F.(2002).Polnyi kurs lektsii po russkoi istorii.SPb.:Litera.
  58. Ponomarev B. N. (ed.)(1966).Istorija SSSR. C drevneishikh vremen do nashikh dnei.Moscow:Nauka.
  59. Priselkov, M. D.(1996).Istorija russkogo letopisanija XI-XV vv.SPb.:Dmitrii Bulanin.
  60. Pritsak, Omeljan.(1977).The Invitation to the Varangians.Harvard Ukrainian Studies,1(1)
  61. Riasanovsky, Nicholas V.(1977).A History of Russia.N. Y.:Oxford University Press.
  62. Rukavishnikov, Alexandr(2003).Tale of Bygone Years: the Russian Primary Chronicle as a family chronicle.Early Medieval Europe,12(1)
  63. Schakhmatov, A. A.(2003).Istorija russogo letopisanija.SPb.:Nauka.
  64. Schakhmatov, A. A.(1940).Povest vremennykh let i ee istochniki.Moscow: Leningrad:TODRL.
  65. Schakhmatov, A. A.(2002).Istorija russogo letopisanija.SPb.:Nauka.
  66. Skrynnikov, R. G.(1999).Rus, IX-XVII veka.SPb.:Piter.
  67. Istorija Rossii s drevneischikh vremen
  68. Istorija Rossii s drevneischikh vremen
  69. Soloviev, S. M.(2004).Drevnjaja Rossija.Moscow:Vyschaja schkola.
  70. Soloviev, S. M..Progress i religija.Drevnjaja Rossija.
  71. Soloviev, S. M.(2000).Gerard Fridrikh Miller.Sochinenija,XXIII
  72. Soloviev, S. M.(1995).Istoricheskia pis'ma.Sochinenija,XVI
  73. Soloviev, S. M.(1995).Pisateli russkoi istorii XVIII veka.Sochinenija,XVI
  74. Soloviev, S. M..Schlotser i antiistoricheskoe napravlenie.Drevnjaja Rossija.
  75. Soloviev, S. M.(1995).N. M. Karamzin, Istorija gosudarstva rossiiskogo.Sochinenija,XVI
  76. Istorija Rossii s drevneischikh vremen
  77. Soloviev, S. M..Vzgljad na istoriju ustanavlenija gosudarstvennogo v Rossii do Petra Velikogo.Drevnjaja Rossija.
  78. Istorija Rossii s drevneischikh vremen
  79. Tatishev, V. N.(2003).Istorija Rossiiskaja.Moscow:AST.
  80. Thaden, Edward C.(1999).The Rise of Historicism in Russia.New York:Peter Lang.
  81. Tikhamirov, M. N.(1995).Trudy V. N. Tatisheva.Ocherki istorii istoricheskoi naukiv SSSR,1
  82. Valk, S. N.(2000).Izbrannye trudy po istoriografii i istochnikovedeniju.SPb.:Nauka.
  83. Vernadsky, George.(1954).A Note on the Russian Čislo.Speculum,29(2)
  84. Vernadsky, George. V.(1969).Ancient Russia.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  85. Vernadsky, George. V.(1978).Russian Historiography.Belmont, Mass.:Nordland Publishing Company.
  86. Vernadsky, George. V.(1969).A History of Russia.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  87. Vernadsky, George. V.(1951).Kievan Russia.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  88. Waldron, Peter.(1997).The End of Imperial Russia, 1855-1917.St. Martin's Press.
  89. Walicki, Andrzej,A. Hilda. (Translated)(1979).A History of Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to Marxism.CA Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  90. Ziborov, V. K.(2002).Russkoe letopisanie XI-XVIII vekov.SPb.:Fil. faculty SPbGU.
  91. 于沛、戴桂菊、李銳(2001)。斯拉夫文明。北京:中國社會科學出版社。
  92. 王起亮(1996)。東斯拉夫人的起源初探。蘭州大學學報,24(1)
  93. 王鍼(1994)。往年紀事譯注。蘭州:甘肅民族出版社。
  94. 卡耳、王任光譯(1998)。歷史論集。臺北:幼獅公司。
  95. 白建才(2000)。俄羅斯帝國。西安:三秦出版社。
  96. 李邁先(1969)。俄國史。臺北:正中書局。
  97. 周雪舫(2003)。俄羅斯史:謎樣的國度。臺北:三民書局。
  98. 侯忠武、雷巴科夫著(1994)。書評:《基輔羅斯史前史新探》。蒲峪學刊,2
  99. 姚海(2005)。斯拉夫文化。上海:上海社會科學出版社。
  100. 馬龍閃(1998)。俄羅斯現代史近年研究綜述。世界歷史,3
  101. 勒華·博立約、劉增泉譯(2000)。帝俄和俄羅斯。臺北:國立編譯館。
  102. 陳啟能、于沛、黃立茀(1996)。蘇聯史學理論。北京:經濟管理出版社。
  103. 普列漢諾夫、孫靜工譯(1988)。俄國社會思想史。北京:商務印書館。
  104. 賀允宜(2004)。俄國史。臺北:三民書局。
  105. 楊隽(1995)。《古史記年》漢譯本簡評。外語學刊(黑龍江大學學報),4
  106. 劉德斌(2006)。從蘇聯到俄羅斯:歷史學科的變化與前景-專訪莫斯科大學歷史系主任卡爾波夫教授和副主任鮑羅德金教授(學者訪談)。史學集刊,4
  107. 謝春豔(2005)。從《古史紀年》看俄羅斯文化與文學。俄羅斯文藝,2
被引用次数
  1. 陳仁姮(2014)。俄國文本學發展探析。成大歷史學報,46,291-313。
  2. (2012)。從密留可夫的史觀探討俄國近代史學思想的轉變。新史學,23(2),107-154。