题名

證據概念──從高中歷史課綱到教學問題探析

并列篇名

The Concept of Evidence: From National Curriculums to Historical Teaching

DOI

10.6253/ntuhistory.2016.58.06

作者

林慈淑(Lin, Tzu-shu)

关键词

證據概念 ; 歷史課綱 ; 歷史教學 ; Evidence ; national curriculum ; history teaching

期刊名称

臺大歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

58期(2016 / 12 / 01)

页次

249 - 286

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文旨在探討證據概念與歷史課綱、歷史教學之關係。證據是歷史知識賴以建構的基礎,也是重要的歷史學科概念,而臺灣自1996 年頒布「高級中學課程暫行綱要(九五):歷史」(「95 暫綱」)以來,「史料證據」便列入其中,是學生必須獲得的四個「核心能力」之一。然初步調查,培養學生證據概念這點,並未出現在一般教師於課堂中引介資料的期待和考慮中,顯示課綱所載和實際教學間存在極大落差。為了解教師在落實資料證據教學上可能面臨的困難,本文以英國1970 年以來證據教學的經驗與瓶頸為對照,凸顯教學者掌握資料和證據之別,以及證據之意義是首要之事。最後,本文也由英美歷史教育學者的反思和討論闡明:教師使用資料、培養學生對證據的認知,必須透過探究模式的教學,始有可能。

英文摘要

The present article sets out to explore the concept of evidence in the perspective of high school's national curriculums and school's history classes. History is a matter of interpretating evidence. Therefore the concept of evidence is an important element in historical thinking that children should learn in history classrooms. Indeed, "sources as evidence" have been written in the official documents on Taiwan's National Curriculum for High School history since 1996. But, according to my research, teachers in general seem to lack any idea of using sources to inspire students' understanding of evidence. This means there is a huge gap between ideal and reality. In order to comprehend the possible reasons for this discrepancy, this article reviews the development of teaching evidence in historical education in the UK since the 1970's, and reveals that teachers first need to realize what evidence is and then to realize the difference between "source" and "evidence" if they want to help students to learn the concept of evidence. This article concludes that the most effective way to teach evidence is through classroom activities of historical enquiry.

主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. 臺灣高級中學歷史學科中心,http://history.csghs.tp.edu.tw/xoops2/.
  2. 英國中學歷史課程網站,https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum.
  3. Ashby, Rosalyn(2011).Understanding Historical Evidence: Teaching and Learning Challenges.Debates in History Teaching,Oxon:
  4. Barton, Keith(2005).Primary Sources in History: Breaking Through the Myths.The Phi Delta Kappan,86(10),745-753.
  5. Bourdillon, Hilary(Edited)(1994).Teaching History.London:Routledge.
  6. Bruner, Jerome S.(1975).Towards a Theory of Instruction.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  7. Burke, Peter、楊豫譯(2008)。圖像證史。北京:北京大學出版社。
  8. Burston, W. H.(edited),Green, C. W.(edited)(1970).Handbook for History Teachers.London:Methuen Educational.
  9. Byrom, Jamie(1998).Working with sources: scepticism or cynicism? Putting the story back together again.Teaching History,91,32-35.
  10. Carr, E. H.(1990).What is History?.London:Penguin Books.
  11. Cooper, Hilary(1992).The Teaching of History: Implementing the National Curriculum.London:David Fulton Publishers.
  12. Davies, Ian(ed.)(2011).Understanding Historical Evidence: Teaching and Learning Challenges.Debates in History Teaching,Oxon:
  13. Department of Education(1995).History in the National Curriculum.London:
  14. Department of Education and Science(1991).History in the National Curriculum.London:HMSO.
  15. Dickinson, A. K.(edited),Lee, P. J.(edited)(1978).History Teaching and Historical Understanding.London:Heinemann Educational Books Ltd..
  16. Dickinson, A. K.(edited),Lee, P. J.(edited),Rogers, P. J.(edited)(1984).Learning History.London:Heinemann Educational Books Ltd..
  17. Elton, G. R.(1987).The Practice of History.London:Fontana Press.
  18. Evans, Richard J.(2000).In Defense of History.London:W. W. Norton & Company Ltd..
  19. Haydn, Terry(ed.),Arthur, James(ed.),Hunt, Martin(ed.)(1997).Learning to Teach History in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience.London:Routledge.
  20. Hinton, Chris(1996).What is Evidence?.London:John Murray Publishers Ltd..
  21. Husbands, Chris(1998).What is History Teaching? language, ideas and meaning in learning about the past.Buckingham:Open University Press.
  22. Husbands, Chris,Kitson, Alison,Steward, Susan(2011).Teaching & Learning History 11-18: Understanding the Past.Berkshire:Open University Press.
  23. Jenkins, Keith、賈士蘅譯(1996)。歷史的再思考。臺北:麥田出版社。
  24. Jones, R. B.(Edited)(1973).Practical Approaches to the New History.London:Hutchinson.
  25. Jordanova, L.(2000).History in Practice.London:Arnold.
  26. Lang, S.(1993).What is bias.Teaching History,72,9-13.
  27. LeCocq, Heidi(2000).Beyond bias: making source evaluation meaningful to year 7.History Teaching,99,50-54.
  28. Lomas, T.(1990).Teaching and Assessing Historical Understanding.London:Historical Association.
  29. McAleavy, Tony(1998).The use of Sources in school history 1910-1998: a critical perspective.Teaching History,91,10-16.
  30. Mulholland, Marget(1998).Framework for linking pupils' evidential understanding with growing skill in structured, written argument: the 'evidence sandwich'.Teaching History,91,17-19.
  31. Phillips, Ian(2011).Highlighting Evidence.Debates in History Teaching,Oxon:
  32. Phillips, Ian(2008).Teaching History: Developing as a Reflective Secondary Teacher.London:SAGE Publications Ltd.
  33. Pickles, Elisabeth(2011).Assessment of students' uses of evidence: shifting the focus from processes to historical reasoning.Teaching History,143,52-59.
  34. Riley, Claire(1999).Evidential understanding, period knowledge and the development of literacy: a practical approach to 'layers of inference for key stage 3'.Teaching History,97,6-12.
  35. School Council History 13-16 Project(1976).A New Look at History.Edinburgh:Holmes Mcdougall.
  36. Seixas, P.,Morton, Tom(2013).The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts.Toronto:Nelson Education Ltd..
  37. Tholfsen, Trygve R.(1967).Historical Thinking.New York:Harper & Row, Publishers, Incorporated.
  38. Thompson, Paul(1988).The Voice of the Past.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  39. Tosh, John、趙干城譯、鮑世奮譯(2001)。史學導論。臺北:五南出版社。
  40. Wineburg, Sam(2009).Unnatural and essential: the nature of historical thinking.Teaching History,129,6-12.
  41. Wineburg, Sam(2001).Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
  42. Wineburg, Sam、Martin, Daisy、Monte-Sano, Chauncey、宋家復譯(2016)。像史家一般閱讀:在課堂裡教歷史閱讀素養。臺北:臺大出版中心。
  43. 王健文(2008)。圖像是另外一種文本─歷史教科書中的圖文關係。翰林社會天地,13,2-8。
  44. 布洛克、周婉窈譯(1991)。史家的技藝。臺北:遠流出版公司。
  45. 艾什比、劉城譯(1993)。歷史課堂的史料教學。清華歷史教學,2,109-113。
  46. 李稚勇(2012)。中英美中學歷史課史料教學比較研究。上海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),41(2),125-136。
  47. 林慈淑(2010)。歷史,要教什麼?英、美歷史教育的爭議。臺北:學生書局。
  48. 林慈淑(1999)。歷史與歷史教育的目的─試析倫敦大學兩位學者的爭議。東吳歷史學報,5,179-204。
  49. 林慈淑、劉靜貞(1998)。英國中學歷史教科書的編寫及其理念試析。「方法論:歷史意識與歷史教科書的分析編寫」國際學術研討會論文集,新竹:
  50. 朗格諾瓦、瑟諾博司、李思純譯(2011)。歷史研究導論。北京:中國人民大學出版社。
  51. 陳冠華(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹,清華大學歷史研究所。
  52. 陳冠華(2001)。追尋更有意義的歷史課:英國中學歷史教育改革。臺北:龍騰出版社。
  53. 檔案管理局(2010)。,臺北:檔案管理局。
被引用次数
  1. 李仰桓(Yang-Huan Li);李涵鈺(Han-Yu Li)(2022)。南非高中歷史教科書中的轉型正義及以資料為本的編寫策略。教科書研究。15(3)。81-115。