题名

伊朗加入巴黎和會與英伊關係

并列篇名

British Policy Regarding Iran's Entrance into the Paris Peace Conference

DOI

10.6253/ntuhistory.202306_(71).0005

作者

陳立樵(Chen, Li-Chiao)

关键词

巴黎和會 ； 民族自決 ； 維蘇克道拉 ； 穆夏維爾馬馬雷克 ； 喬治．寇松 ； Paris Peace Conference ； Self-Determination ； Vosuq al-Dowleh ； Moshaver al-Mamalek ； George Curzon

期刊名称

臺大歷史學報

卷期/出版年月

71期（2023 / 06 / 01）

页次

197 - 237

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

第一次世界大戰結束後，戰勝國於1919年年初召開巴黎和會，以安排往後的國際秩序。伊朗在大戰之前，受到英國自南方、俄國自北方的壓迫，本就致力於擺脫兩強權的束縛，在戰爭時期也宣示中立；但其西部領土卻受到英國、俄國與鄂圖曼帝國交戰的波及。此時俄國因蘇維埃革命，新成立的蘇維埃政府退出伊朗，戰勝的英國得以在伊朗成為單一霸權。此外，美國總統威爾遜（Woodrow Wilson, 1856-1924）提倡的「民族自決」原則，讓伊朗藉機爭取自我權益。是故，伊朗籌組代表團前往巴黎，欲參與和平會議，希望能獲得賠償以及國際承認伊朗的獨立地位。不過，英國稱伊朗為中立國，不得進入巴黎和會，而且唯有英國能夠協助處理伊朗問題。伊朗首相維蘇克道拉（Vosuq al-Dowleh, 1868-1951）評估時局後，認為與英國達成共識，或許是改善現狀的唯一方案。1919年8月，維蘇克道拉與英國駐伊公使考克斯（Percy Cox, 1864-1937）簽署《1919年英伊條約》，英國承認伊朗為主權獨立與領土完整的國家，也協助伊朗改革軍事與財政。儘管伊朗代表團最終未能進入巴黎和會，原先的要求卻透過該條約而達成，而英國藉由主導伊朗的軍事與財政改革，得以維持在伊朗的絕對優勢。該條約雖然招致伊朗國內外輿論的批判，卻是兩國各自尋求最大利益之下的產物。
英文摘要

After the First World War, the Paris Peace Conference, convened in early 1919, has the mission of establishing a new world order. Iran, which had been pressured by Britain and Russia since the nineteenth century, declared its neutrality. Nevertheless, the wars between the Russians, the Ottomans, and the British, which took place in West Iran, had caused famine in Iran in 1917. After the Soviet Revolution in 1917, the newly formed Soviet government withdrew from the Iranian territory, which left Britain as the hegemon in Iran. In the meantime, "self-determination," an ideal stressed by the US President, Woodrow Wilson, inspired Iran to press for its independence and integrity. Consequently, Iran decided to send a delegation to Paris to participate in the Peace Conference, in order to submit their claims for the losses caused from the war. However, it was difficult for the delegation from Iran to gain admission to the peace conference because it had been a neutral state during the war. Additionally, Britain did not want Iran to participate in the peace conference because they wanted to have full control over Iran. The Americans did not supply any useful and practical help, either. America had no special interests in Iran and its neighbourhoods owing to their isolation policy. The Iranian Prime Minister, Vosuq al-Dowleh, was aware that the country was in a difficult time. In other words, Iran needed immediate helps. Britain was the only foreign power that could provide assistance to Iran, even though it was well known that Britain's purpose was to be the overwhelming power in Iran, in particular, and West Asia, in general. Eventually, Vosuq and the British Minister at Tehran, Percy Sykes, signed Anglo-Iranian Treaty of 1919, which stipulated that Britain recognized Iran's independence and integrity, and Britain provided advisors and experts to help carry out economic and military reforms in Iran. The leader of the Iranian delegation, Moshaver al-Mamalek, disagreed with Vosuq's decision. The treaty also strongly criticized. Nevertheless, Iran at least had reached its goal, which could not be claimed in Paris, while Britain maintained its supremacy in Iran.
主题分类 人文學 > 歷史學
参考文献
  1. 陳立樵(2018)。1916 年英俄與伊朗的結盟交涉。興大歷史學報，32，35-56。
    連結：
  2. 陳立樵(2018)。第一次世界大戰初期英國—伊朗關係（1914-1915）。成大歷史學報，54，163-187。
    連結：
  3. 陳立樵(2014)。石油開採與英伊關係（1901-1914）。東吳歷史學報，32，203-240。
    連結：
  4. The New York Times.
  5. Iran (Persia): Records of the U.S. Department of State, 1883-1949, National Archives, Untied States.
  6. “Rules of the Preliminary Peace Conference at Paris, 1919.” The American Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (April 1919, Washington, DC), pp. 109-112.
  7. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919, Vol. 1. Edited by Joseph V. Fuller. Washington: United States Government Office, 1942.
  8. Iran (Persia): Records of the U.S. Department of State, 1950-1959, National Archives, Untied States.
  9. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919, Vol. 2. Edited by Joseph V. Fuller. Washington: United States Government Office, 1942.
  10. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919, Vol. 5. Edited by Joseph V. Fuller. Washington: United States Government Office, 1946.
  11. Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, The Paris Peace Conference, 1919, Vol. 4. Edited by Joseph V. Fuller. Washington: United States Government Office, 1943.
  12. The Times.
  13. Adelson, Roger(1995).London and the Invention of the Middle East: Money, Power, and War, 1902-1922.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  14. Afkhami, Amir(2003).Compromised Constitutions: The Iranian Experience with the 1918 Influenza Pandemic.Bulletin of the History of Medicine,77(2),367-392.
  15. Ahmad, Ishtaq(1974).Anglo-Iranian Relations 1905-1919.New York:Asia Publishing House.
  16. Alexander, Yonah(ed.),Nanes, Allan(ed.)(1980).The United States and Iran: A Documentary History.Lanham, Maryland:University Publications of America.
  17. Amirahmadi, Hooshang(2012).The Political Economy of Iran under the Qajars: Society, Politics, Economics and Foreign Relations 1796-1926.London:I. B. Tauris.
  18. Ansari, Ali M.(2019).Modern Iran since 1797: Reform and Revolution.Abingdon:Routledge.
  19. Ansari, Ali M.(2012).The Politics of Nationalism in Modern Iran.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  20. Bast, Oliver(2013).Duping the British and Outwitting the Russians? Iran’s Foreign Policy, the ‘Bolshevik Threat’, and the Genesis of the Soviet-Iranian Treaty of 1921.Iranian-Russian Encounters: Empires and Revolutions since 1800,London:
  21. Bast, Oliver(2001).Iran va Konferans-e Solh-e 1919: Amidha-ye Barbadrafte va Sarmashq-e Chini.Iran va Jang-e Jahani-ye Avaal,Tehran:
  22. Bast, Oliver(2004).Putting the Record Straight: Vosuq al-Dowleh’s Foreign Policy in 1918/19.Men of Order: Authoritarian Modernization under Atatürk and Reza Shah,London:
  23. Bayat, Kaveh va Reza Azari Shahrezayei(2013).Amal-e Iran: Az Konferans-e Paris tal Qarardad-e 1919 Iran va Engelis.Tehran:Siraz-e Ketab.
  24. Bennett, G. H.(1995).British Foreign Policy during the Curzon Period, 1919-24.New York:St. Martin’s Press.
  25. Bonakdarian, Mansour(2015).Iranian Nationalism and Global Solidarity.Iran in the Middle East: Transnational Encounters and Social History,London:
  26. Curry, George(1961).Woodrow Wilson, Jan Smuts, and the Versailles Settlement.The American Historical Review,66(4),968-986.
  27. Dashtaki, Khodabakhsh Oorbabpur(2010).Inqlis va Bakhtiyari 1896-1925 Miladi.Tehran:Mo‘aseseh-ye Motale‘at-e Tarikh-e Mo‘aser-e Iran.
  28. DeNovo, John A.(1963).American Interests and Policies and the Middle East, 1900-1939.Minneapolis:The University of Minnesota Press.
  29. Ehsani, Kaveh(2015).Oil, State and Society in Iran in the Aftermath of the First World War.The First World War and its Aftermath: The Shaping of the Middle East,London:
  30. Ettehadiyyeh, Mansoureh(2006).The Iranian Provisional Government.Iran and the First World War: Battleground of the Great Powers,London:
  31. Fatemi, Nasrollah Saifpour(1952).Diplomatic History of Persia 1917-1923: Anglo-Russian Power Politics in Iran.New York:Russell F. Moore Company.
  32. Fenwick, Charles G. “Organization and Procedure of the Peace Conference.” The American Political Science Review 13, no. 2 (May 1919, New York), pp. 199-212.
  33. Ferrier, R. W.(1982).The History of the British Petroleum Company, Vol. 1: The Developing Years 1901-1932.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  34. Finch, Geo A. “The Peace Conference of Paris, 1919.” The American Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (April 1919, Washington, DC), pp. 159-186.
  35. Fisher, John(1998).Syria and Mesopotamia in British Middle Eastern Policy in 1919.Middle Eastern Studies,34(2),129-170.
  36. Foreign Office (FO), The National Archives of the UK.
  37. Frechtling, L. E. “The Reuter Concession in Persia.” The Asiatic Review 34, no. 117-120 (January-October, 1938, London), pp. 518-531.
  38. Ghaneabassiri, Kamyar(2002).U.S. Foreign Policy and Persia, 1856-1921.Iranian Studies,35(1/3),145-175.
  39. Ghani, Cyrus(1998).Iran and the Rise of the Reza Shah: From Qajar Collapse to Pahlavi Power.London:I. B. Tauris.
  40. Ghazvinian, John(2021).America and Iran: A History, 1720 to the Present.New York:Alfred A. Knopf.
  41. Ghods, M. Reza(1989).Iran in the Twentieth Century: A Political History.London:Adamantine Press.
  42. Gökay, Bülent(1997).A Clash of Empires: Turkey between Russian Bolshevism and British Imperialism, 1918-1923.London:Tauris Academic Studies.
  43. Grobien, Philip Henning(2021).Iran and Imperial Nationalism in 1919.Middle Eastern Studies,57(2),292-309.
  44. Grobien, Philip Henning(2022).The Origins and Intentions of the Anglo-Persian Agreement 1919: A Reassessment.Iran,1-16.
  45. Heravi, Mehdi(1969).Iranian-American Diplomacy.New York:Theo. Gau’s Sons.
  46. Hurewitz, J. C.(1956).Diplomacy in the Near and Middle East, Vol. 2: A Documentary Record, 1914-1956.Princeton:D. Van Nostrand Company.
  47. Hurewitz, J. C.(1956).Diplomacy in the Near and Middle East, Vol. 1: A Documentary Record, 1535-1914.Princeton:D. Van Nostrand Company.
  48. Katouzian, Homa(1998).The Campaign against the Anglo-Iranian Agreement of 1919.British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies,25(1),5-46.
  49. Katouzian, Homa(2006).State and Society in Iran: The Eclipse of the Qajars and the Emergence of the Pahlavis.London:I. B. Tauris.
  50. Kayyali, Abdul-Wahab(1977).Zionism and Imperialism: The Historical Origins.Journal of Palestine Studies,6(3),98-112.
  51. Keddie, Nikki(1991).Iran under the Later Qajars, 1848-1922.The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol. 7: From Nadir Shah to the Islamic Republic,Cambridge:
  52. Khazeni, Arash(2009).Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran.Seattle:University of Washington Press.
  53. Lustig, Michael Jennings(1987).New York University.
  54. Majd, Mohammad Gholi(2003).Persia in World War I and its Conquest by Great Britain.Lanham:University Press of America.
  55. Majd, Mohammad Gholi(2013).The Great Famine & Genocide in Iran, 1917-1919.Lanham:University Press of America.
  56. Marks, Sally(1970).The Luxemburg Question at the Paris Peace Conference and After.Belgisch Tijdshrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis,1970(1),1-20.
  57. Mirfendereski, Guive(2001).A Diplomatic History of the Caspian Sea: Treaties, Diaries, and Other Stories.New York:Palgrave.
  58. Mujani, Seyyed ‘Ali(1996).Barresi-ye Munasabat-e Iran va Amerika (1851-1925).Tehran:Mu’aseseh-ye Chap va Entesharat-e Vezarat-e Omur Kharejeh.
  59. Neilson, Keith(2001).‘That Elusive Entity British Policy in Russia’: The Impact of Russia on British Policy at the Paris Peace Conference.The Paris Peace Conference, 1919: Peace without Victory?,London:
  60. Nicolson, Harold. Curzon: The Last Phase, 1919-1925: A Study in Post-War Diplomacy. London: Constable and Company, 1934.
  61. Nunan, Timothy(2019).Persian Visions of Nationalism and Inter-Nationalism in a World at War.Beyond Versailles: Sovereignty, Legitimacy, and the Formation of New Polites after the Great War,Bloomington:
  62. Olson, William J.(1984).Anglo-Iranian Relations during World War I.London:Frank Cass.
  63. Olson, William J.(1980).The Genesis of the Anglo-Persian Agreement of 1919.Towards a Modern Iran: Studies in Thought, Politics and Society,London:
  64. Paris, Timothy J.(2003).Britain, the Hashemites and Arab Rule 1920-1925: The Sherifian Solution.London:Frank Cass.
  65. Potter, Pitman B. “Origin of the System of Mandates under the League of Nations.” The American Political Science Review 16, no. 4 (November 1922, New York), pp. 563-583.
  66. Ramazni, Rouhollah K.(1966).The Foreign Policy of Iran: A Developing Nation in World Affairs.Charlottesville:University Press of Virginia.
  67. Rubin, Barry(1988).America as Junior Partner: Anglo-American Relations in the Middle East, 1919-1939.The Great Powers in the Middle East 1919-1939,New York:
  68. Sabahi, Houshang(1990).British Policy in Persia 1918-1925.London:Frank Cass.
  69. Shahnavaz, Shahbaz(2005).Britain and the Opening up of South-West Persia 1880-1914: A Study in Imperialism and Economic Dependence.London:RoutledgeCurzon.
  70. Shorrock, William I.(1972).The French Presence in Syria and Lebanon before the First World War, 1900-1914.The Historian,34(2),293-303.
  71. Shuster, W. Morgan. The Strangling of Persia. New York: The Century Co., 1912.
  72. Sicker, Martin(1988).The Bear and the Lion: Soviet Imperialism and Iran.New York:Prager Publishers.
  73. Strunk, William Theodore(1977).Indiana University.
  74. Temperley, H. W. V., ed. A History of the Peace Conference of Paris, Vol. 6. London: Henry Frowde and Hodder & Stoughton, 1924.
  75. Thompson, Charles T. The Peace Conference Day by Day: A Presidential Pilgrimage leading to the Discovery of Europe. New York: Brentano’s Publishers, 1920.
  76. Volodarsky, Mikhail(1994).The Soviet Union and its Southern Neighbours: Iran and Afghanistan, 1917-1933.Ilford:Frank Cass.
  77. Woodward, E. L.(ed.),Butler, Rohan(ed.)(1952).Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919-1939, First Series, Vol. 4, 1919.London:Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
  78. Yearwood, Peter J.(2009).Guarantee of Peace: The League of Nations in British Policy 1914-1925.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  79. Yeselson, Abraham(1956).United States-Persian Diplomatic Relations 1883-1921.New Jersey:Rutgers University Press.
  80. 埃雷斯．馬內拉, Erez,吳潤璿（譯）(2018).1919：中國、印度、埃及、韓國,威爾遜主義與民族自決的起點.新北:八旗文化.
  81. 徐中約, Immaneul C. Y.,屈文生（譯）(2018).中國加入國際大家庭：1858-1880 年間的外交.北京:商務印書館.
  82. 瑪格蕾特．麥克米蘭, Margaret,鄧峰（譯）(2019).巴黎．和會：締造和平還是重啟戰爭？重塑世界新秩序的關鍵 180 天.臺北:麥田出版.
print cancel