题名

圖書資訊領域期刊引用影響之結構方程模式分析

并列篇名

The Structural Equation Analysis on the Journal Citation Impact in the Field of Library and Information Science

DOI

10.6120/JoEMLS.200704_44(3).0167.RS.AM

作者

黃元鶴(Yuan-Ho Huang)

关键词

期刊引用 ; 結構方程模式 ; 期刊評鑑 ; Journal citations ; Structural equation modeling ; Journal evaluation

期刊名称

教育資料與圖書館學

卷期/出版年月

44卷3期(2007 / 04 / 01)

页次

259 - 273

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究提出一個測量期刊引用影響的整合式概念模型,並應用結構方程模式方法在圖書資訊學相關領域的50種期刊資訊進行以「期刊屬性」、「期刊易取性」及「期刊多樣性」等三項為「期刊引用」的前置因素理論模型的實證。整體模型的可解釋變異量為39.4%,其中測量模型的結果:以文獻篇數測量「期刊屬性」,以文件獲取性測量「期刊易取性」,及主題多樣化來測量「期刊多樣性」具顯著效果;而影響係數、立即指數及全部引用數來測量「期刊引用」,則均具顯著效果。結構模型的結果:「期刊引用」受到「期刊多樣性」的影響,但「期刊屬性」與「期刊易取性」則不具顯著性影響。

英文摘要

The study proposes an integrated conceptual model to assess the journal citation impact. The antecedent factors include journal attributes, journal accessibility, and journal diversity. The structural equation modeling (SEM) with partial least square (PLS) is applied to conduct the empirical study within the fifty journals in the field of library and information science. The result shows that the antecedent factors account for 39.4% of the variance in journal citation. The result of measurement model shows that the number of articles is a good indicator for journal attributes; document availability is a good indicator for journal accessibility; and subject variety is a good indicator for journal diversity. As for the journal citation, three indicators include impact factor, immediacy index, and total citations are all good indicators. Moreover, the result of structural model shows that journal citation is significantly influenced by journal diversity, while there is no significant effect of journal attributes and journal accessibility.

主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. 王明妤(2005)。專利組合分析方法之建構:以磁阻性隨機存取記憶體為例。科技管理學刊,10(3),7-120。
    連結:
  2. 蔡明月(2001)。引用文獻分析與引用動機研究。教育資料與圖書館學,38(4),385-406。
    連結:
  3. Blalock, H. M.(1964).Causal inferences in nonexperimental research.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.
  4. Bollen, J.,Van de Somel, H.(2006).Mapping the structure of science through usage.Scientometrics,69(2),227-258.
  5. Braun, T.,Glanzel, W.,Schubert, A.(2005).A Hirsch-type index for journals.The Scientist,19(22),8-10.
  6. Brody, T.,Harnad, S.,Carr, L.(2006).Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,57(8),1060-1072.
  7. Chin, W. W.(1998).Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling.MIS Quarterly,22(1),7-16.
  8. Chin, W. W.,G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.)(1998).Modern methods for business research.Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Chin, W. W.,Newsted, P. R.,R. Hoyle (Ed.)(1999).Statistical strategies for small sample research.Thousand Oaks, California:Sage.
  10. Cooper, R. B.,Blair, D.,Pao, M.(1993).Communicating MIS research: A citation study of journal influence.Information Processing & Management,29,113-117.
  11. Eom, S. B.(1996).Mapping the intellectual structure of research in decision support systems through author cocitation analysis (1971-1993).Decision Support Systems,16(4),315-338.
  12. Fornell, C. R.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18,39-50.
  13. Bibliometrics as a research field
  14. Hirsch, J. D.(2005).An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,102,16569-16572.
  15. Huang, Y. H.,Lee, C. M.(2005).Knowledge production and flow of Taiwan, Hong Kong, China Innovation system.IAMOT 14th International Conference on Management of Technology,Vienna, Austria:
  16. Kameoka, A.,Yokoo, Y.,Kuwahara, T.(2004).A challenge of integrating technology foresight and assessment in industrial strategy development and policymaking.Technological Forecasting & Social Change,71,579-598.
  17. Kostoff, R. N.(2005).The structure and infrastructure of Mexico's science and technology.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,72,798-814.
  18. McMillan, G. S.,Hamilton, R. D.(2000).Using bibliometrics to measure firm knowledge: An analysis of the US pharmaceutical industry.Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,12(4),465-475.
  19. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  20. Rai, A.,Patnayakuni, R.,Seth, N.(2006).Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities.MIS Quarterly,30(2),225-246.
  21. Rinia, E. J.,Van Leeuwen,Th. N.,Van Vuren, H. G.,Van Raan, E J.(1998).Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands.Research policy,27(1),95-107.
  22. Sambamurthy, V.,Chin, W. W.(1994).The effects of group attitudes toward alternative GDSS designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups.Decision Sciences,25,215-241.
  23. Sandstrom, A.,Pettersson, I.,Nilsson, A.(2000).Knowledge production and knowledge flows in the Swedish biotechnology innovation system.Scientometrics,48(2),179-201.
  24. Steele, T. W.,Stier, J. C.(2000).The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental science: A forestry case study.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,51(5),476-484.
  25. Subramani, M.(2004).How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?.MIS Quarterly,28(1),45-73.
  26. Tonta, Y.,Unal, Y.(2005).Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,56(1),84-94.
  27. Tsay, M. H.(1999).Library journal use and citation age in medical science.Journal of Documentation,55(5),543-555.
  28. Van Leeuwen, Th. N.,Moed, H. F.(2005).Characteristics of journal impact factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors.Scientometrics,63(2),357-371.
  29. Wilson, C. S.(1999).Informetrics.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,34,107-247.
  30. Yue, W.,Wilson, C. S.(2004).Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: A structural equation modeling analysis.Scientometrics,60(3),317-332.
  31. Zhao, D.(2005).Challenges of scholarly publications on the web to the evaluation of science: A comparison of author visibility on the web and in print journals.Information Processing and management,41,1403-1418.
  32. 林明緯(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。桃園縣,元智大學管理研究所。
  33. 邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(一):研究設計與資料處理。台北市:雙葉。
  34. 邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式。台北市:雙葉。
  35. 黃慕萱、蔣禮芸、陳達仁(2002)。我國資訊電子業專利引用網路之研究:1998年至2000年。在2002年科技管理研討會論文集
  36. 詹麗萍、中興大學圖書資訊學研究所編(2006)。引文分析與電子期刊使用評鑑。數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集,台中市:
  37. 蔡明月(2005)。引用索引與引用分析之探討。圖書館學與資訊科學,31(1),45-53。
  38. 蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市:國立編譯館。
被引用次数
  1. 陳密桃、李新民(2009)。緣分信念與心理幸福感的關係—聚合構念爲因與果的結構方程模式分析初探。測驗學刊,56(4),457-487。
  2. 李新民(2009)。大學回饋環境的裡子與面子層面分析及其與大學生學習表現之潛在關聯:形成性測量模式的應用。屏東教育大學學報,33,425-458。
  3. 謝仁瑋、徐茂洲(2016)。2013 年美國職棒大聯盟影響勝場數之魔球模式探索。運動教練科學,41,9-22。