大學生對新聞資訊的詮釋研究

Toward an Understanding of Undergraduate Students' Interpretation of News

10.6120/JoEMLS.200806_45(4).0235.RS.BM

葉乃靜(Nei-Ching Yeh)

訊息設計 ； 資訊詮釋 ； 接收分析 ； 詮釋社群 ； 閱聽人研究 ； Information interpretation ； Reception analysis ； Interpretative community ； Audience research ； Message design

教育資料與圖書館學

45卷4期（2008 / 06 / 01）

443 - 460

繁體中文

鑑於資訊詮釋與資訊設計息息相關，本研究試圖了解大學生與新聞資訊的互動現象，期望研究結果有助於在系統或文本資訊設計時，由使用者角度出發，或以使用者需求和偏好包裝資訊，以達到與使用者或閱讀者溝通的最大效益。本研究以接收分析理論、詮釋學的教化、共通感及詮釋社群等概念為研究架構，採用質性研究設計法，應用大聲思考法和深度訪談法等工具，於2006年12月至2007年2月間蒐集12位受訪者資料。本研究發現：相關、聯想、傳統、教化、共通感、詮釋社群和權威等概念，可用以理解大學生的新聞資訊詮釋。大學生在閱讀並與新聞資訊的對話互動，可概念化為：直覺式回應和延遲性回應兩大特色。大學生在詮釋資訊是採用下列三個原則：直覺認知與情緒反射、價值判斷和移情式的詮釋與推理。

This article focuses on the probing of undergraduates' interpretation activities of news in Taiwan. Receiving theory, and the concepts of pre-understand, enlightenment, and interpretative community constitute a conceptual framework of this study. This research is an explorative study, and applies the qualitative research approach. The methods of thinking aloud and deep interview are used to collect data during the periods of December 2006 to February 2007. In total, there are 12 interviewees; four men and eight women. Ten participants are grade three, and two are grade four. The saturation theory decides when to stop the work of data collection. This study adopts methods of the ”hermeneutic circle” and ”double hermeneutic” to analyze data. The results indicate that undergraduates' interpretations of the news are multi-dynamic, participants' pre-understandings, personal experiences, attitudes, and the influences of the media, as well as the social norms, are reflected by their interpretative activities. This paper also discusses the difference between the findings of this study, theory, and concepts which guide this research to propose a model about undergraduates' news interpretative activities.

1. Adler, R. B.,Rodman, G.(2006).Understanding human communication.New York:Oxford University Press.
2. Attfield, S.,Blandford, A.,Dowell, J.(2003).Information seeking in the context of writing: A design psychology interpretation of the 'problematic situation'.Journal of Documentation,59(4),430-453.
3. Bijker, W. E.(1995).Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change.Cambridge, M.A.:MIT Press.
4. Conway, M.,Hassebrauck, M.(1997).The impact of mood on information use in judgments of relationship satisfaction.Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs,123(4),613-623.
5. Dahlgren, P.,P. Drummond,R. Paterson (Eds.)(1985).Television in transition.London:British Film Institute.
6. Fish, S.(1980).Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities.London:Harvard University Press.
7. Gadamer, Hans-George、洪漢鼎譯(1999)。真理與方法。上海市:上海譯文。
8. Grabowski, B. L.,D. H. Jonassen,Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Eds.)(2004).Handbook of research on educational communications and technology.Mahwah, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Information Research
10. Jdanko, A.(1994).An evolutionary and entropic interpretation of information.Kybernetes,23(9),37-47.
11. Lash, S.(2002).Critique of information.London:Sage.
12. Littlejohn, S. V.、陳德民譯(1999)。傳播理論。北京市:中國社會科學。
13. Maibach, E.,Parrott, R. L.(1995).Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice.Thousand Oaks, CA.:Sage.
14. Ogden, C. K.,Richard, I. A.(2001).The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science symbolism.New York:Routledge.
15. Phillips, P. L.(2004).Creating the perfect design brief: How to manage design for strategic advantage.New York:Allworth Press.
16. Pylar, J.,Wills, C. E.,Lillie, J.,Rovner, D. R.,Kelly-Blake, K.,Holmes-Rovner, M.(2007).Men's interpretations of graphical information in a videotape decision aid.Health Expectations,10,184-193.
17. Ruben, B. A.,Zunde, Pranas (Ed.)(1974).Human communication, semiotics, and general systems: Personal and social communication.Information utilities: Proceedings of the American society for information science annual meeting,Washington, DC:
18. S. Hall (Eds.)(1980).Culture, Media, Language.London:Hutchisnson.
19. Information Research
20. Sears, A.,Jacko, J. A. (Eds.)(2008).The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications.New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Wood, B.(2000).Gender and the creation, structuring and interpretation of knowledge.Equal Opportunities International,19(2/3/4),46-55.
22. Zhang, M. J.(2007).Information systems (IS) connectivity as a moderator of the effects of IS support for information interpretation on firm performance: An empirical study.International Journal of Management,24(2),263-275.
23. 吳慧卿(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立清華大學社會人類學研究所。
24. 周華山(1997)。同志論。香港:香港同志研究社。
25. 林芳玫(1996)。女性與媒體再現：女性主義與社會建構論觀點。台北市:巨流。
26. 洪漢鼎(2001)。理解的真理：解讀伽達默爾的「真理與方法」。濟南市:山東人民。
27. 翁秀琪(1992)。大眾傳播理論與實證。台北市:三民。
28. 張茂桂、蕭蘋(1994)。「族群」議題的新聞詮釋：兼論報紙與公共領域問題。台大新聞論壇，1，98-122。
29. 賀建平(2006)。理解與解釋：新聞文本的詮釋學意義。社會科學研究，3，191-195。

1. 葉乃靜、戚栩僊(2017)。社交網聯情境下的健康體適能學習與知識建構—臉書社群媒體介入研究。資訊社會研究，32，151-194。
2. (2018)。高校生新聞資訊接受之研究：以上海 211 工程高校為例。傳播管理學刊，19(2)，1-39。