改進修正型德菲式卡片分類法探討大學圖書館網站尋獲度之研究

A Study on the Findability of a University Library Website by the Refined Modified-Delphi Card Sorting

10.6120/JoEMLS.201003_47(3).0295.RS.AM

謝建成(Jiann-Cherng Shieh)；吳怡青(Yi-Ching Wu)

卡片分類法 ； 修正型德菲式卡片分類法 ； 尋獲度 ； Card sorting ； Modified-Delphi card sorting ； Findability

教育資料與圖書館學

47卷3期（2010 / 03 / 01）

245 - 281

繁體中文

利用網站獲取資訊已成為現代人經常從事的行為，有些網站提供了具邏輯性的架構幫助使用者方便找到資訊；但缺乏組織性的網站架構會讓使用者受挫並離開網站。值此電子化時代，網站成了遠端使用者與單位組織溝通的最佳橋樑，如何讓使用者能方便、有效率地從網站取用所需資訊，使網站資訊發揮應有價值，是網站設計者必須深思的問題。本研究以大學圖書館網站使用者為中心，提出改進修正型德菲式卡片分類法，以了解使用者如何組織網站中的網站標籤，以及對於各項網站標籤的命名方式，進而建立符合使用者需求之大學圖書館網站架構。在經由於不同資訊架構網站之任務導向尋獲度測試及變異數分析，證實本研究所提出之改進德菲式卡片分類法，確能有效提昇大學圖書館網站尋獲度。

Modern people use websites to access information frequently. Some websites provide logical structures that help users find information. Others without intelligible organization may frustrate users' attempts to navigate through them. In the digital age, websites have become the best communication channels for the remote users and the institutes. How to make users access the required information from the websites conveniently and efficiently to bring the values of them, website designers must seriously take the problem into consideration. Based on the understanding of users' demand to organize information and to name the labels of the websites, in this study we propose the refined modified- Delphi card sorting to redesign the university library website that practically meets the users' requirements. By using task-oriented findability testing and analysis on various websites' information architectures, we apply analysis of variance to definitely verify that the proposed refined card sorting method can effectively enhance the websites findability.

1. Deaton, M. (2002). Sorting techniques for user-centered information design. Retrieved November 21, 2008, from http://www.mmdeaton.com/SortingTechniquesforInformationDesign.pdf
2. Nielsen, J., & Sano, D. (1994). 1994 design of SunWeb - Sun Microsystems' intranet. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://www.useit.com/papers/sunweb/
3. Fuccella, J., & Pizzolato, J. (1998). Creating web site designs based on user expectations and feedback. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://internettg.org/newsletter/june98/web_design.html
4. Hinkle, V. (2008). Card-sorting: What you need to know about analyzing and interpreting card sorting results. Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/102/cardsort.asp
5. Boulton, M. (2007). Card sorting. Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://v3.markboulton.co.uk/articles/detail/card_sorting_part_1/
6. Hawley, M. (2008). Extending card-sorting techniques to inform the design of web site hierarchies. Retrieved November 21, 2008, from http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000332.php
7. Maurer, D., & Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: A definitive guide. Retrieved November 21, 2008, from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide
8. Ahlstrom, V., & Allendoerfer, K. (2004). Information organization for a portal using a cardsorting technique. Retrieved November 24, 2008, from http://hf.tc.faa.gov/technotes/dotfaa-ct-tn04-31.pdf
9. Dick, D. (2007). Innovations in card sorting. Retrieved November 22, 2008, from http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0710-CardSorting.htm
10. Brophy, P.,Craven, J.(2007).Web accessibility.Library Trends,55(4),950-973.
11. Capra, M. G.(2005).Factor analysis of card sort data: An alternative to hierarchical cluster analysis.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting,Florida, USA.:
12. Courage, C.,Baxter, K.(2004).Understanding your users: A practical guide to user requirements methods, tools, and techniques.San Fransisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Coxon, A. P. M.(1999).Sorting data: Collection and analysis.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
14. Dickstein, R.,Mills, V.(2000).Usability testing at the university of arizona library: How to let users in on the design.Information Technology and Libraries,19(3),144-150.
15. Falks, A.,Hyland, N.(2000).Gaining user insight: A case study illustrating the card sort technique.College & Research Libraries,61(4),349-357.
16. Fincher, S.,Tenenberg, J.(2005).Making sense of card sorting data.Expert Systems,22(3),89-93.
17. Fox, R.(2008).Weaving the digital library web.OCLC Systems & Services,24(1),8-17.
18. Fuccella, J.(1997).Using user centered design methods to create and design usable web sites.ACM 15th International Conference on Systems Documentation,Utah:
19. Hudson, W.(2005).Playing your cards right: Getting the most from card sorting for navigation design.Interactions,12,56-58.
20. Liang, S. F. M.,Yang, C. T.(2008).Applying card sorting method to cluster products on shopping websites: A case study.The 2nd. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics,Las Vegas, Nevada:
21. Maiden, N. A. M.,Hare, M.(1998).Problem domain categories in requirements engineering.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,49(3),281-304.
22. Martin, S.,Kidwell, D. K.(2001).A case study in cluster analysis for intranet organization.2nd International Workshop on Engineering Management for Applied Technology
23. Morville, P.(2005).Ambient findability: Libraries at the crossroads of ubiquitous computing and the internet.Online,29(6),16-21.
24. Morville, P.,Rosenfeld, L.(2006).Information Architecture for the World Wide Web.Sebastopol, CA:O'Reilly Media.
25. Paul, C. L.(2007).A modified delphi approach to a new card sorting methodology.Journal of Usability Studies,4(1),7-30.
26. Simoens, S.(2006).Using the delphi technique in economic evaluation: Time to revisit the oracle?.Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics,31,519-522.
27. Upchurch, L.,Rugg, G.,Kitchenham, B.(2001).Using card sorts to elicit web page quality attributes.IEEE Software,18(4),84-89.
28. Walker, A.、Selfe, J.(1996)。The delphi method: A useful tool for the allied health researcher。International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation，3(12)，677-681。
29. 丁依玲(2007)。台北市=Taipei，國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies, National Taiwan Normal University。
30. 宋文娟(2001)。一種質量並重的研究法：德菲法在醫務管理學研究領域之應用。醫務管理期刊，2(2)，11-20。
31. 許嫚婷(2000)。一個新課題：圖書館網站之設計。國立台灣師範大學圖書館通訊，53，2-7。
32. 黃俊英(1994)。企業研究方法。台北市=Taipei:東華=Tunghua。

1. 黃郁婷、湯添進、陳昱文、李炳昭(2016)。運動社會學研究議題分類與指標建構。體育學報，49(3)，353-370。
2. 謝建成、廖婉竹(2013)。以徑路搜尋分析建構大學圖書館網站之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，50(4)，597-626。
3. 謝建成、林黃瑋(2012)。基於網站廣度與深度之網站尋獲度研究。教育資料與圖書館學，50(2)，1-30。
4. 謝建成、邱亦秀(2013)。首位卡片分類受試者對修正型卡片分類法影響之研究。圖書資訊學研究，8(1)，121-146。
5. 謝宗昊、劉宇瑄、楊千霆、林知穎(2015)。國立臺灣大學圖書館網站好用性測試研究：以非圖書資訊學系學生觀點為例。大學圖書館，19(1)，91-114。
6. (2012)。以知識結構表徵工具建構大學圖書館網站。圖書資訊學研究，7(1)，39-83。
7. (2014)。基於層面分類概念建構大學圖書館網站標籤之研究。圖書資訊學研究，8(2)，197-237。
8. (2019)。不同卡片分類法效益比較之研究。圖書資訊學研究，13(2)，119-143。