题名

知識組織之研究內容與發展：以Knowledge Organization期刊論文為例

并列篇名

The Research and Development of Knowledge Organization: A Review Study of the Journal, Knowledge Organization

DOI

10.6120/JoEMLS.201003_47(3).0306.RS.AM

作者

潘淑惠(Shu-Hui Pan)

关键词

知識組織 ； 分類系統 ； 索引典 ； Knowledge organization ； Classification systems ； Thesauri

期刊名称

教育資料與圖書館學

卷期/出版年月

47卷3期（2010 / 03 / 01）

页次

319 - 341

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文以期刊Knowledge Organization（知識組織）1993年至2008年論文215篇為研究對象，依據Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature（知識組織文獻分類系統）歸類其內容，分析16年間論文主題分佈。論文最多的五個主題依次是：理論基礎與一般問題、分類系統與索引典的結構與建構、語言與術語知識表達、國際分類系統與索引典、分類與索引方法論。本研究發現知識組織研究，已完成研究階段任務者為國際分類與索引典及字彙對映與互通性兩個主題，持續進行研究的包括理論基礎、分類與索引典結構、語言與知識表達等，而處於初始階段的研究包括應用分類與索引及知識組織環境研究。
英文摘要

In this paper, 215 articles published in the journal of Knowledge Organization between 1993 and 2008 were analyzed. ”Classification System for Knowledge Organization Literature” was used to classify the contents and themes of the above journal articles. The most investigated five themes are theoretical foundations and general problems, classification system and thesauri structure and construction, knowledge representation by language and terminology, on universal classification system and thesauri, and classification and indexing methodology. Among the above themes, two have already been thoroughly researched, which are universal classification and thesauri as well as vocabulary mapping and interoperability. Certain themes, continuously being researched, are theoretical foundations, classification system and thesauri structure and construction, knowledge representation by language and terminology, etc. Two themes, applied classing and indexing and knowledge organization environment, are still at the infancy stage and require further investigations.
主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. Bates, M. J.(1998).Indexing and access for digital libraries and the internet: Human, database, and domain factor.JASIS,49(13),1185-1205.
  2. Bates, M. J.(2003).,未出版
  3. Bosch, M.(2006).Ontologies, different reasoning strategies, different logics, different kinds of knowledge representation: Working together.Knowledge Organization,33(3),153-159.
  4. Dahlberg, I.(1993).Knowledge organization: Its scope and possibilities.Knowledge Organization,20(4),211-222.
  5. Gnoli, C.(2008).Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization.Knowledge Organization,35(2/3),137-149.
  6. Hjørland, B.(2002).Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science.JASIS,53(4),257-270.
  7. Hjørland, B.(2005).Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science.Journal of Documentation,61(1),130-155.
  8. Hjørland, B.(2002).Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative.Journal of Documentation,58(4),422-462.
  9. Hjørland, B.(2003).Fundamentals of knowledge organization.Knowledge Organization,30(2),87-111.
  10. Hjørland, B.,Albrechtsen, H.(1995).Toward a new horizon in information science: Domainanalysis.JASIS,46(6),400-425.
  11. Hsieh-Yee, I.(2002).,未出版
  12. Jacob, E. K.,Shaw, D.(1998).Sociocognitive perspectives on representation.ARIST,33,131-185.
  13. Mai, J. E.(2008).Actors, domains, and constraints in the design and construction of control vocabularies.Knowledge Organization,35(1),16-29.
  14. McIlwaine, I. C.(2003).Trends in knowledge organization research.Knowledge Organization,30(2),75-86.
  15. McIlwaine, I. C.,Williamson, N. J.(1999).International trends in subject analysis research.Knowledge Organization,26(1),23-29.
  16. Montesi, M.,Urdiciain, B. G.(2005).Recent Linguistic Research into author abstracts: Its value for information science.Knowledge Organization,35(2),64-78.
  17. Morgan, J.,Bawden, D.(2006).Teaching knowledge organization: Educator, employer and professional association perspectives.Journal of Information Science,32(2),108-115.
  18. Munk, T. B.,Mørk, K.(2007).Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort.Knowledge Organization,34(1),16-33.
  19. Noruzi, A.(2006).Folksonomies: (Un)Controlled vocabulary?.Knowledge Organization,33(4),199-203.
  20. Tennis, J. T.(2005).Experientialist epistemology and classification theory: Embodied and dimensional Classification.Knowledge Organization,35(2),79-92.
  21. Vizine-Goetz, D.,Hickey, C.,Houghton, A.,Thompson, R.(2004).Vocabulary mapping for terminology services.Journal of Digital Information,4(4)
  22. Wiggins, B.(2007).,未出版
print cancel