電子資源整合查詢系統使用者接受度與使用行為之研究

A Study on the User Acceptance and Usage Behavior of Federated Search Systems

10.6120/JoEMLS.201204_49(3).0434.RS.BM

李靜宜(Ching-Yi Lee)；柯皓仁(Hao-Ren Ke)

整合查詢 ； 科技接受模式 ； 使用者研究 ； Federated search ； Technology acceptance model ； User study

教育資料與圖書館學

49卷3期（2012 / 03 / 01）

30 - 62

繁體中文

本研究探討使用者對電子資源整合查詢系統的認知情形、系統接受度與使用行為。本研究以科技接受模式為框架，發展適用於評量使用者對整合查詢系統之接受度與使用行為的問卷，繼而以交大圖書館之MetaLib系統為個案，探討該館讀者使用整合查詢系統的接受程度與使用行為，探討影響整合查詢系統使用行為的相關因素，分析本研究所提出之科技接受模式外部變項「教育訓練認知」和該模式之「易用性認知」、「有用性認知」、「態度」、「使用意願」及「使用行為」等變項間的關係。研究結果發現，整合查詢系統有助於使用者找尋所需的資源，使用者對於整合查詢系統功能的認同程度頗高，絕大多數會推薦他人使用該系統，但在系統功能、介面設計與使用者教育訓練方面仍有改善空間。結果證實教育訓練認知、有用性認知、易用性認知、態度、使用意願確實會影響使用者對整合查詢系統之認知情形、系統接受度與使用行為。

This study aims at investigating the perceptions, acceptance and usage behavior of users on federated search systems. The research method involved the development of a questionnaire on users' satisfaction and acceptance of federated search systems based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The federated search system implemented in National Chiao Tung University (NCTU) was used as a case system. In addition to the six constructs of TAM, i.e. perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, behavioral intention, and actual use, the construct user training is proposed as the external variable.After the development of the questionnaire was finished, an online survey was conducted. 403 effective responses were collected. Through Pearson-product moment correlation and structural equation modeling, the correlation and causal relationships between factors which influence the acceptance of library SMS services were identified.The results show that federated search systems are helpful to obtain needed resources for users. Users recognize the functions of systems and most of them will recommend it to others. But there are still great improvements to be done on functions, interface design and user training. It is proved that user training, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes and intentions affect the perceptions, acceptance and usage behavior of federated search systems indeed.

1. 林佳穎、吳明德(2011)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統之好用性評估：以國立臺灣大學圖書館MUSE 電子資源整合查詢系統為例。大學圖書館，15(2)，1-18。
   連結：
2. 姜義臺(2010)。圖書館電子資源整合檢索系統優使性之研究－以靜宜大學為例。圖書與資訊學刊，74，25-36。
   連結：
3. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1980).Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
4. Breeding, M.(2011).Automation marketplace 2011: The new frontier.Library Journal,136(6)
5. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Cox, C.(2006).An analysis of the impact of federated search products on library instruction using the ACRL standards.Portal: Libraries and the Academy,6(3),253-267.
7. Davis, F. D.(1986).Cambridge,MIT Sloan School of Management.
8. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,13(3),319-340.
9. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35(8),982-1003.
10. Efron, B.(1979).Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife.The Annals of Statistics,7(1),1-26.
11. George, C. A.(2008).Lessons learned: Usability testing a federated search product.The Electronic Library,26(1),5-20.
12. Goodhue, D. L.,Thompson, R. L.(1995).Task-technology fit and individual performance.The MIS Quaraterly,19(2),213-236.
13. Haya, G.,Nygren, E.,Wildmark, W.(2007).Metalib and Google Scholar: A user study.Online Information Review,31(3),365-375.
14. Helfer, D. S.,Wakimoto, J. C.(2005).Metasearching：The good, the bad, and the ugly of making it work in your library.Searcher,13(2),40-41.
15. Highsmith, A. L.,Ponsford, B. C.(2006).Notes on MetaLib implement at Texas A&M University.Serials Review,32(3),190-194.
16. Igbaria, M.,Guimaraes, T.,Davis, G. B.(1995).Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model.Journal of Management Information Systems,11(4),87-114.
17. Jasco, P.(2004).Thoughts about federated searching.Information Today,21(9),17-20.
18. Jin, Y.,Peng, J.(2009).Information portal development and practice at Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library.Online Information Review,33(3),537-547.
19. Korah, A.,Cassidy, E. D.(2010).Students and federated searching: A survey of use and satisfaction.Reference & User Services Quarterly,49(4),325-332.
20. Labelle, P. R.(2007).Initiating the learning process: A model for federated searching and information literacy.Internet Reference Services Quarterly,12(3),237-252.
21. Leinhardt, S.(ed.)(1982).Sociological Methodology.SanFrancisco:JosseyBass.
22. Luther, J.(2003).Trumping Google: Metasearching' s promise.Library Journal,128(16),36-39.
23. Spacey, R.,Goulding, A.,Murray, I. R.(2004).The power of influence: What affects public library staff's attitudes to the Internet.Library Management,25(6/7),270-276.
24. Thong, J. Y. L.,Hong, W.,Tam, K. Y.(2002).Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,57(3),215-242.
25. 吳明隆(2008)。SPSS 操作與應用問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
26. 吳樹華(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
27. 黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
28. 羅嵐(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。

1. 蔡慧貞、徐茂洲(2016)。陽岱鋼粉絲專頁使用行為模式之實證研究。運動教練科學，43，47-66。