整合相對效率與準則權重之觀點於圖書館電子資料庫使用效益分析

A Study on Using Performance of Electronic Databases with Combination of Relative Efficiency and Criteria Weighting Perspectives

10.6120/JoEMLS.2013.504/0545.RS.AM

張珈進(Chia-Chin Chang):劉培林(Pei-Leen Liu)；蔡政憲(Cheng-Hsien Tsai)

績效評估 ； 電子資料庫 ； 模糊層級分析 ； 差額變數 ； 資料包絡分析 ； Performance evaluation ； Electronic database ； Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process ； Slack-based measure ； Data envelopment analysis

教育資料與圖書館學

50卷4期（2013 / 09 / 01）

527 - 563

繁體中文;英文

過去圖書館績效評估之研究多以探討其實體資源利用為主，然網路普及化致使現今圖書館對電子資料庫的需求與投入與日俱增，績效評估也更顯重要。本研究應用可同時評估多項投入產出之資料包絡分析法，並導入模糊層級分析求取各投入產出項之相對權重，以進行某軍事學校圖書館2011－2012年所購買電子資料庫之使用績效評估。結果發現，造成整體技術無效率之原因，來自純技術之管理無效率；生產力變動部分，發現ASME等三個資料庫呈現衰退趨勢，分析原因主要為規模效率衰退所致。相較過去評量方式，本研究整合了相對效率與準則權重的概念評估模式，將可提供更多元且客觀之評估資訊予決策者參考。

Past studies on library performance evaluation mainly investigate the physical resource utilization. However, the popularization of the internet has increased the deed and investment in electronic database day by day, as well as the need for assessment on the usage efficiency of electronic database. This study took a military university library for example, and used the data envelopment analysis (DEA) where multiple inputs and outputs can be concurrently assessed to introduce Fuzzy AHP to obtain the relative weights of various input and outputs, in order to assess the usage performance of library electronic database. This study found that the cause for the overall technical inefficiency was pure technical inefficiency. To improve the inefficiency, it is necessary to adjust the management and allocation of resources. In terms of the change in total productivity in a longitudinal aspect, a declining trend was observed in the databases, such as ASME, SDOL and EBSCO that the main cause was the decline in technical efficiency change. The research model with combination of relative efficiency and criteria weighting perspectives can be provided as reference to libraries for the practical assessment and modification of databases.

1. 王梅玲(2006)。電子計量應用在電子期刊評鑑。圖書與資訊學刊，57，1-18。
   連結：
2. 李勅毅、陳昭珍、楊智晶(2010)。圖書館電子資源投資報酬率評量研究：以南台科技大學為例。大學圖書館，14(2)，174-188。
   連結：
3. 曾繁絹、李宗翰(2008)。圖書館電子資源整合查詢系統評估之研究。圖書資訊學刊，6(1/2)，111-142。
   連結：
4. 黃明居、謝建成、謝志佳(2012)。資料包絡分析法應用於圖書館電子資料庫使用績效之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，49(3)，343-368。
   連結：
5. 葉譓歆(2006)。從電子資源統計問題看COUNTER計畫之發展與應用。教育資料與圖書館學，43(4)，453-469。
   連結：
6. COUNTER (2003), Release 1 of the COUNTER code of practice for journals and databases. Retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.projectcounter.org/code_practice_r1.html
7. COUNTER (2008). The COUNTER code of practice for journals and databases: Release 3. Retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.projectcounter.org/r3/Release3D9.pdf.
8. COUNTER (2005). The COUNTER code of practice for journals and databases: Release 2. Retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://www.projectcounter.org/r2/COUNTER_COP_Release_2.pdf.
9. Flynn, A. (2004). Performance indicators for electronic library services. Retrieved May 14, 2012, from http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/2100/16/Performance_Indicators_2004.pdf?sequence=1
10. 行政院主計總處[Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan] （2012）。101年度中央政府總預算案[2012 Central government final accounting and subsidiary agencies final accounting]。台北市[Taipei]：行政院主計總處[[Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan]。
11. Aida, K.,Cooper, W. W.,Pastor, J. T.,Sueyoshi, T.(1998).Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: A range-adjusted measure of inefficiency.Omega,26(2),207-232.
12. Alidi, A. S.(1996).Use of the analytic hierarchy process to measure the initial viability of industrial projects.International Journal of Project Management,14(4),205-208.
13. Banker, R. D.,Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.(1984).Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis.Management Science,30,1078-1092.
14. Bowlin, W. F.(1998).Measuring performance: An introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA).The Journal of Cost Analysis,15(2),3-27.
15. Bowlin, W. F.(1985).Use of data envelopment analysis in cost analysis and estimating.Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH:School of Systems and Logistics, Air Force Institute of Technology.
16. Buckley, J. J.(1985).Fuzzy hierarchical analysis.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(3),233-247.
17. Charnes, A.,Clark, C. T.,Cooper, W. W.,Golany, B.(1985).A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air forces.Annals of Operations Research,2(1),95-112.
18. Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.(1962).Programming with Linear Fractional Functionals.Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,9(3/4),181-186.
19. Charnes, A.,Cooper, W. W.,Rhodes, E.(1978).Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444.
20. Choi, J.-H.,Kwak, S.-J.,Kim, J.-T.(2007).Application of performance indicators for digital library services focusing on the analysis of ISO/DIS 11620: 2007.Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science,41(3),81-102.
21. Cooper, W. W.,Park, K. S.,Pastor, J. T.(1999).RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA.Journal of Productivity Analysis,11(1),5-42.
22. Cooper, W. W.,Seiford, L. M.,Tone, K.(2006).Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software.New York, NY:Springer.
23. Färe, R.,Grosskopf, S.,Knox Lovell, C. A.(1994).Production Frontiers.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
24. Färe, R.,Knox Lovell, C. A.(1978).Measuring the technical efficiency of production.Journal of Economic Theory,19(1),150-162.
25. Galagedera, D. U. A.,Silvapulle, P.(2002).Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis.Managerial Finance,28(9),60-73.
26. Huang, M. C.(1989).University of Wisconsin-Madison.
27. Jaguszewski, J. M.,Probst, L. K.(2000).The impact of electronic resources on serial cancellations and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries.Library Trends,48(4),799-820.
28. Kim, J.-T.,H., B.-H.(2008).A study on the relative weights for the development of university library performance indicator model.Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science,39(4),71-96.
29. Lee, J. W.,Kim, S. H.(2000).Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection.Computers & Operations Research,27(4),367-382.
30. Noh, Y.(2010).A Study on Developing Evaluation Criteria for Electronic Resources in Evaluation Indicators of Libraries.The Journal of Academic Librarianship,36(1),41-52.
31. Noh, Y.(2012).A study measuring the performance of electronic resources in academic libraries.Aslib Proceedings,64(2),134-153.
32. Reichmann, G.(2004).Measuring university library efficiency using data envelopment analysis.Libri. International Journal of Libraries and Information Services,54(2),136-146.
33. Reichmann, G.,Sommersguter-Reichmann, M.(2010).Efficiency measures and productivity indexes in the context of university library benchmarking.Applied Economics,42(3),311-323.
34. Revilla, E.,Sarkis, J.,Modrego, A.(2003).Evaluating performance of public-private research collaborations: A DEA analysis.Journal of the Operational Research Society,54(2),165-174.
35. Russell, R. R.(1985).Measures of technical efficiency.Journal of Economic Theory,35(1),109-126.
36. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
37. Tone, K.(2001).A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis.European Journal of Operational Research,130(3),498-509.
38. Tzeng, G.-H.,Teng, J.-Y.(1993).Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multiobjectives.Transportation Planning and Technology,17(2),91-112.
39. van Laarhoven, P. J. M.,Pedrycz, W.(1983).A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory.Fuzzy sets and systems,11(1/2/3),199-227.
40. Yoon, H.-Y.(2001).A study on the development of comprehensive evaluation model for Korean university libraries.Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science,32(4),45-75.
41. Yoon, H.-Y.(2001).Multiplicity of meaning and directivity of evaluation indicators for the academic libraries.Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science,32(3),91-115.
42. Zadeh, L. A.(1965).Fuzzy sets.Information and Control,8(3),338-353.
43. 王怡心、賴郁蕙、文惠瓊(2009)。電子資源之效益評估。中華圖書資訊館際合作協會通訊，51/52，2-13。
44. 吳萬益、林清河(2001)。企業研究方法。台北市=Taipei:華泰書局=Hwatai。
45. 吳濟華、何柏正(2008)。組織效率與生產力評估：資料包絡分析法。台北市=Taipei:前程文化=Future Career Management Corporation。
46. 林巧敏(2008)。台北市=Taipei，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Department and Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
47. 林呈潢(2009)。圖書館統計標準（CNS13151）使用手冊。台北市=Taipei:國家圖書館=National Central Library。
48. 高強(1998)。由非營利單位之效率評估談圖書館績效評量。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，1，2-9。
49. 高強、黃旭男、Sueyoshi, T.(2003)。管理績效評估：資料包絡分析法。台北市=Taipei:華泰文化=Hwatai。
50. 國家圖書館輔導組編(2011)。中華民國一百年圖書館年鑑。台北市=Taipei:國家圖書館=National Central Library。
51. 詹麗萍(2005)。電子資源與圖書館館藏發展。台北市=Taipei:麥田=Rye Field Publishing Co.。
52. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上）。中國統計學報，27(6)，13707-13724。
53. 謝寶煖(2000)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,台北市=Taipei:國立臺灣大學圖書館學系=Department of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。