臺灣人文學文獻引用類型分析研究

Citation Type Analysis on Humanity Literature of Taiwan

10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.513/0594.RS.AM

蔡明月(Ming-Yueh Tsay)；邱琦茹(Chi-Ju Chiu)

人文學 ； 引用類型 ； 期刊論文結構 ； 引用位置 ； 引用文獻分析 ； Humanity ； Citation type ； Classification of citation ； Citation analysis

教育資料與圖書館學

51卷3期（2014 / 04 / 01）

a1 - 37

繁體中文

本研究利用引用文獻分析法，針對國內人文學各學科頂尖期刊，其2011年所出版的研究性文章為樣本，探討其論文結構與引用文獻出現在文章中的位置。再者，進一步採用Frost模式，分析各學科引用類型以及國內外引用類型的異同。本研究結果發現國內文史哲藝術四門人文學科以論述型文獻為主，語言學以結構型文獻為主。論述型文章的引用文獻以本文部分最多，結論最少；結構型文章之引用文獻則是緒論部分最多，研究方法次之。人文學大多引用作品原著的首次作品，引用類型以支持作者意見或事實描述為主。整體而言國內外引用類型分布大致相似，不同之處各學科略有差異。本研究結果可以了解人文學學者的引用特性與資訊需求，進而提升圖書館相關服務。再者，亦可增進人文學者對引用文獻本質的認識，並期望為未來相關實證研究提供參考。

Using informetrics and citation analysis, the present study explores and compares characteristics and types of citations in the humanity journal articles that published in Taiwan. Research articles published in 2011, from top humanity journals, assessed by the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Science Council in Taiwan, were collected and analyzed. The analysis was done by structure of journal article and location of citations. In addition to citations appearing in the text, the phenomena of citation type will be compared and discussed in the latter part. The results of this study revealed articles of literature, history, philosophy and arts were mostly argumentative, while linguistic articles tended to comply with IMRAD (Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, And Discussion) formats. Introducing primary materials from original works, humanity scholars tended to cite for factual descriptions or to support authors' perspectives. Secondary materials, such as later studies on the original works by other scholars, were seen the most in the disciplines of linguistics while the least in that of history. In general, the distribution of citation types is similar between articles in domestic and foreign journals; merely minor differences occurred among disciplines. While citing characteristics and information needs of humanities scholars revealed in this study may contribute to collection development of libraries or refinement of information services to researchers, suggestions based on analysis of research results may also serve as reference for standardization of writing and publication of journal articles in Taiwan. Aiming at further exploration of citations, this study is expected to provide a better understanding of the nature of citations and to serve as a foundation for future empirical studies.

1. 陳光華(2009)。臺灣地區文學研究之引用分析。圖書資訊學刊，7(1/2)，1-36。
   連結：
2. 蔡明月、李旻嬑(2013)。臺灣社會科學引用文獻分析研究。教育資料與圖書館學，50(3)，293-318。
   連結：
3. 人文學科（無日期）。在大英百科全書。檢索自http://daying.wordpedia.com/content.aspx?id=035604
4. Humanities. (n.d.). In Encyclopeida Americana. Retrieved from http://ea.grolier.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/article?id=0208690
5. Archambault, E.,Gagné, E. V.(2004).,Quebec, Canada:Science-Metrix.
6. Brittain, J. M.(1970).Information and its users: A review with special reference to the social science.Bath, UK:Bath University Press.
7. Frost, C. O.(1989).The literature of online public access catalogs, 1980-85: An analysis of citation patterns.Library Resources and Technical Services,33(4),344-357.
8. Frost, C. O.(1979).The use of citations in library research: A preliminary classification of citation functions.The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy,49(4),399-414.
9. Goffman, J. W.(1985).Cleveland, Ohio,Case Western Reserve University.
10. Hellqvist, B.(2010).Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(2),310-318.
11. Knievel, J. E.,Kellsey, C.(2005).Citation analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities fields.The Library Quarterly,75(2),142-168.
12. Liu, M.(1993).A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists.Journal of Information Science,19(1),13-23.
13. McCarthy, C. A.(2000).Journal of the century in library and information science.The Serials Librarian: From the Printed Page to the Digital Age,39(2),121-138.
14. Rowe, M. E.(1985).Denton, Texas,North Texas University.
15. Smith, L. C.(1981).Citation analysis.Library Trends,30(1),83-106.
16. Sollaci, L. B.,Pereira, M. G.(2004).The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survey.Journal of the Medical Library Association,92(3),364-371.
17. 行政院國家科學委員會編(2000)。中華民國人文社會科學白皮書。台北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
18. 余寶琳(2011)。多個偉大社會、一個渺小世界：高等教育界中的人文。人文與社會科學簡訊，12(2)，150-159。
19. 崔燕慧(1997)。臺灣地區文史哲研究者文獻使用特性調查分析。國家圖書館館刊，2，43-67。
20. 教育大辭書編纂委員會編(2000)。教育大辭書。台北市:文景。

1. 劉任昌、葉馬可(2015)。引用錯誤、二次引用與對「臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫」之建議。圖書館學與資訊科學，41(1)，57-80。