網路多元學生出題策略對國小學生認知策略與學習成就之影響

Effects of Online Student Question-Generation with Multiple Procedural Guides on Elementary Students' Use of Cognitive Strategies and Academic Achievement

10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.514/0609.RS.CM

于富雲(Fu-Yun Yu)；賴奕嬛(Yi-Shiuan Lai)

認知策略 ； 網路學習系統 ； 學生出題策略 ； 學習成就 ； Academic achievement ； Online learning system ； Student question-generation ； Use of cognitive strategies

教育資料與圖書館學

51卷4期（2014 / 09 / 01）

525-560 - 33

繁體中文

考量不同學生出題策略在明確度、難度與學科單元適用性上各有不同，而現有研究皆鎖定單一學生出題策略學習成效之探討，本研究旨在探討網路多元學生出題策略配合國小學科教學對認知策略與學習成就的影響。本研究選定國語科和自然科，採前後測控制組準實驗研究法，以南部一所國小五年級二個班級學生為樣本，採用具出題鷹架設計的線上學生出題系統，進行八週的實驗教學活動。資料以單因子共變數分析發現：多元學生出題策略組對國小國語科與自然科認知策略運用有顯著優於傳統自習組的影響；另，相對於傳統自習組，多元學生出題策略組有較佳的國語科與自然科學習成就表現，唯差異未達顯著水準。文末，根據研究結果與發現提出教學實施及未來研究建議。

Student question-generation (SQG) procedural guides differ in terms of level of concreteness, demands on cognitive skills and appropriateness for respective instructional units. Because existing studies exclusively examine the effects of individual guides, this study was aimed at an investigation of the effects of online SQG with multiple guides intended to promote elementary students' use of cognitive strategies and to improve academic performance while learning Chinese and science. A quasi-experimental research method and an online learning system with dynamic scaffolding designs were adopted to support student learning of Chinese and science via the SQG approach. Two fifth-grade classes (N=56) participated for eight weeks. Twice per week, in accordance with the instructors' schedules, students engaged in online SQG or self-study activities in their randomly assigned groups. The results of the analysis of covariance indicated significant differences between the two treatment groups in their use of cognitive strategies while learning Chinese and science, with students in the SQG group scoring significantly higher than those in the comparison group. However, academic achievement between the two groups did not differ significantly. Suggestions for instructional implementations and future studies are provided.

1. Yu, F.-Y.,Wu, C.-P.(2012).Student question-generation: The learning processes involved and their relationships with students' perceived value.Journal of Research in Education Sciences,57(4),135-162.
   連結：
2. 林宜篇、于富雲(2011)。學生網路出題教學策略對國小學生生命教育學習成效之影響。新竹教育大學學報，28(2)，29-56。
   連結：
3. 林原宏、許淑萍(2002)。乘除擬題能力測驗編製及其實證研究。測驗統計年刊，10，135-171。
   連結：
4. 邱廷榮、于富雲(2011)。網路學生出題策略應用於國小古典詩課程其成效之研究。教育科學研究期刊，56(4)，99-128。
   連結：
5. Barak, M.,Rafaeli, S.(2004).On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,61(1),84-103.
6. Behrend, J. L.,Mohs, L. C.(2006).From simple question to powerful connections: A twoyear conversation about negative numbers.Teaching Children Mathematics,12(5),260-264.
7. Boekaerts, M.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.),Zeidner, M.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
8. Brown, S. I.,Walter, M. I.(2005).The art of problem posing.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Cai, J.,Hwang, S.(2003).A perspective for examining the link between problem posing and problem solving.Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA,Honolulu, HI:
10. Carry, L. R.,Wilson, J. W.(1968).Item analysis procedures used in the development of tests for NLSMA.Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education,Chicago, IL.:
11. Chang, K.-E.,Wu, L.-J.,Weng, S.-E.,Sung, Y.-T.(2012).Embedding game-based problemsolving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning.Computers & Education,58(2),775-786.
12. Chin, C.,Brown, D. E.(2002).Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science.International Journal of Science Education,24(5),521-549.
13. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35,982-1003.
14. Dermody, M.(1988).Metacognitive strategies for development of reading comprehension for younger children.Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education,New Orleans, LA.:
15. Dick, W.,Carey, L.,Carey, J. O.(2011).The systematic design of instruction.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
16. Dori, Y. J.,Herscovitz, O.(1999).Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,36(4),411-430.
17. Dreher, M. J.,Gambrell, L. B.(1985).Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository prose.Reading Improvement,22,2-7.
18. Ebel, R. L.,Frisbie, D. A.(1991).Essentials of educational measurement.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
19. Ediger, M.(2006).Present day philosophies of education.Journal of Instructional Psychology,33(3),179-182.
20. King, A.(1989).Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures.Contemporary Educational Psychology,14(4),366-381.
21. King, A.(1992).Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning.Educational Psychology,27(1),111-126.
22. King, A.(1990).Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy.Applied Educational Psychology,5(4),331-346.
23. Knudson, R. E.(1988).The effects of highly structured versus less structured lessons on student writing.Journal of Educational Research,81(6),365-368.
24. Labercane, G.,Battle, J.(1987).Cognitive processing strategies, self-esteem, and reading comprehension of learning disabled students.Journal of Special Education,11(2),167-185.
25. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1995).Assessment standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
27. Nolte, R. Y.,Singer, H.(1985).Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement.The Reading Teacher,39(1),24-31.
28. Perez, J. A.(1985).New York, NY.,Columbia University.
29. Raphael, T. E.,Pearson, P. D.(1985).Increasing students' awareness of sources of information for answering questions.American Educational Research Journal,22,217-235.
30. Reigeluth, C. M.(Ed.)(1983).Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Ritchie, P.(1985).The effects of instruction in main idea and question generation.Reading-Canada-Lecture,3(2),139-146.
32. Rosenshine, B.,Meister, C.,Chapman, S.(1996).Teaching students to generate questions: A review of intervention studies.Review of Educational Research,66(2),181-221.
33. Schoenfeld, A. H.(Ed.)(1987).Cognitive science and mathematics educatio.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Short, E. J.,Ryan, E. B.(1984).Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training.Journal of Educational Psychology,76,225-235.
35. Silver, E. A.(1994).On mathematical problem posing.For The Learning of Mathematics,14(1),19-28.
36. Smith, N. J.(1977).Athens, GA.,University of Georgia.
37. Stoyanova, E.,Ellerton, N. F.(1996).A framework for research into student's problem posing in school mathematics.Technology in mathematics education,Melbourne, Australia:
38. Toluk-Uçar, Z.(2009).Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing.Teaching and Teacher Education,25(1),166-175.
39. Yeh, H.-C.,Lai, P.-Y.(2012).Implementing online question generation to foster reading comprehension.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,28(7),1152-1175.
40. Yelon, S. L.(1996).Powerful principles of instruction.While Plains, NY:Longman.
41. Yu, F. Y.,Hung, C.-C.(2006).An empirical analysis of online multiple-choice questiongeneration learning activity for the enhancement of students' cognitive strategy development while learning science.Recent progress in computational sciences and engineering: Lectures presented at the International Conference of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2006 (ICCMSE 2006),Netherlands:
42. Yu, F.-Y.(2012).Learner-centered pedagogy + adaptable and scaffolded learning space design-online student question-generation.The 20th international conference on computers in education (ICCE 2012),Singapore:
43. Yu, F.-Y.(2009).Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system.Computers in Human Behavior,25(5),1129-1138.
44. Yu, F.-Y.,Liu, Y.-H.(2005).Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice questionconstruction for physics experimentation instruction.International Journal of Science Education,27(11),1319-1335.
45. Yu, F.-Y.,Liu, Y.-H.(2005).Student generated questions as a form of formative evaluation.First International Conference on Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment,Hong Kong:
46. Yu, F.-Y.,Tsai, H.-C.,Wu, H.-L.(2013).Effects of online procedural scaffolds and the timing of scaffolding provision on elementary Taiwanese students' question-generation in a science class.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,29(3),416-433.
47. 于富雲(2012)。,台南市=Tainan, Taiwan:國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University Institute of Education。
48. 于富雲、劉祐興(2008)。學生出題策略與傳統練習策略對大學生學習成就、認知與後設認知策略使用之影響。教育與心理研究，31(3)，25-52。
49. 尤慶吉(2012)。台中市=Taichung, Taiwan，中興大學資訊管理學系所=Department of Management Information System, National Chung Hsing University。
50. 方文鋒(2009)。台南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學數學教育學系=Department of Mathematics Education, National University of Tainan。
51. 王俐文(2008)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Changhua University of Education。
52. 吳念周、于富雲(2011)。學生出題策略融入國小閱讀課程之行動研究。中小學教師專業發展學術研討會，高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:
53. 吳進寶(2005)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立中山大學教育研究所=Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University。
54. 坪田耕三(1987)。いきいき算数子どもの問題づくり：1 • 2 • 3年。日本:?土社。
55. 林慶宗(2005)。嘉義市=Chiayi, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所=Graduate Institute of Educational Technology, National Chiayi University。
56. 洪琮琪(2002)。台南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University Institute of Education。
57. 翁聖恩(2008)。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系=Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education, National Taiwan Normal University。
58. 張育綾(2008)。台南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University Institute of Education。
59. 張春興(1996)。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:東華書局=Tunghua。
60. 莊美蘭(2003)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立中山大學教育研究所=Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University。
61. 陳怡君(2010)。台南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University Institute of Education。
62. 陳金章(2007)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Pingtung University of Education。
63. 陳淑芳(2007)。屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Pingtung University of Education。
64. 陳錦芬、曾泓璋(2006)。小組電腦擬題活動對英語字彙學習成就與學習情意之影響。國立臺北教育大學學報，19(1)，89-118。
65. 程炳林、林清山(2000)。,台中市=Taichung, Taiwan:逢甲大學教育學程中心=Center for Teacher Education, Feng Chia University。
66. 楊惠如(2000)。嘉義市=Chiayi, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Elementary and Secondary Education, National Chiayi University。
67. 臺灣省國民學校教師研習會編(1994)。國民小學數學科新課程概說（低年級）。台北縣=Taipei, Taiwan:省國教師研習會=Provincial Elementary School Teachers Workshop。
68. 蕭景文(2005)。嘉義市=Chiayi, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所=Graduate Institute of Educational Technology, National Chiayi University。
69. 鍾雅琴(2002)。台中市，國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Elementary and Secondary Education, National Taichung Teachers College。

1. 劉思嫻(2016)。運用教師提問教學法、學生出題策略提升國中八年級學生閱讀素養之行動研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班學位論文。2016。1-131。