题名

網路計量學新指標Altmetrics

并列篇名

An Introductory Review of Altmetrics

DOI

10.6120/JoEMLS.2014.51S/0655.OR.AM

作者

蔡明月(Ming-Yueh Tsay)；曾苓莉(Ling-Li Tseng)

关键词

網路計量學 ； 學術傳播 ； 學術評鑑 ； 社群網站 ； Altmetrics ； Webometrics ； Scholarly communication ； Academic evaluation ； Social network

期刊名称

教育資料與圖書館學

卷期/出版年月

51卷特刊（2014 / 12 / 01）

页次

91 - 120

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

網際網路與資訊通信科技的先進與蓬勃，致使網路資訊尋求與使用行為日趨頻繁，社群媒體網站的多元化發展，造成學術傳播模式的轉變，傳統以引用次數為主的學術評鑑方式，已無法全然反映數位時代網路環境之下真正的學術影響力，結合傳統與創新的學術評鑑方式因而誕生，在開放取用、數位出版與大數據的衝擊下開啟新型網路計量學Altmetrics的興起。本文探討Altmetrics源起與歷史發展，針對Altmetrics的特性、資料指標、資料來源及分析工具加以介紹，說明Altmetrics目前遭遇的困難與挑戰，並進一步反思Altmetrics對於圖書資訊學研究與圖書館經營帶來的衝擊與影響，希望藉由本文引發更多的研究者投入Altmetrics之探索，以發展出更多具有參考價值的相關研究。
英文摘要

Advancements in the Internet and information communication technology have motivated researchers to frequently seek and use online information. In addition, the diverse development of social network has substantially changed the methods of scholarly communication. Therefore, in the current digital age, the use of the traditional citation-based academic evaluation can no longer reflect the true academic influences. Consequently, conventional and innovative metrics have been combined to create new academic evaluation indicators, recently. In response to the development of open access, digital publishing, and big data, novel indicators for scholarly communication in the Web 2.0 called ＂Altmetrics＂ is emerged. In this study, we explore the origin and development of Altmetrics, focusing on the characteristics, indicator types, data sources, and analytical tools. Furthermore, we describe the current challenges in Altmetrics and examined the effects of Altmetrics on library and information science research and library management. This study may provide researchers insight into the research domain of Altmetrics to facilitate the development of related studies in the future.
主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. D-Scholarship@Pitt. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/17829/
  2. SlideShare. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/competency modeling for e-learning
  3. Tananbaum, G. (2013). Article-level metrics: A SPARC primer. Retrieved from http://www.sparc.arl.org/resource/sparc-article-level-metrics-primer
  4. Dyrad. (n.d.). Files in this package. Retrieved from http://datadryad.org/resource/doi:10.5061/dryad.848cc
  5. Research Portal, National Taiwan University College of Medicine. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://research.mc.ntu.edu.tw/web/Teacher!one.action?tid=442
  6. Altmetric. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.altmetric.com/badges.php
  7. CrossRef. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://det.labs.crossref.org/articles/info:doi/10.5194/essd-6-69-2014
  8. Mendeley. (2014). Readership statistics. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/electrocorticographic-brain-interface-individual-tetraplegia/
  9. PLoS. (2014). Overview: Article-level metrics measure the dissemination and reach of published research articles. Retrieved from http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/alm-info/
  10. CiteUlike. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.citeulike.org/user/wamserma/article/13110779
  11. Howard, J. (2013). Rise of 'altmetrics' revives questions about how to measure impact of research. The Chronicle of High Education Technology. Retrieved from https://research.missouri.edu/about/files/Rise%20of%20'Altmetrics'%20Revives%20Questions%20About%20How%20to%20Measure%20Impact%20of%20Research%20-%20Technology%20-%20The%20Chronicle%20of%20Higher%20Education.pdf
  12. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
  13. Priem, J. [jasonpriem] (2010, September 28). I like the term #articlelevelmetrics, but it fails to imply diversity of measures. Lately, I'm liking #altmetrics [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/#!/jasonpriem/status/25844968813
  14. F1000. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://f1000.com/prime/717971507
  15. Buschman, M.,Michalek, A.(2013).Are alternative metrics still alternative?.Bulletin of the Association for Information Science & Technology,39(4),35-39.
  16. Cave, R.(2012).Overview of the altmetrics landscape.Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference,West Lafayette, IN:
  17. Galligan, F.,Dyas-Correia, S.(2013).Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure.Serials Review,39(1),56-61.
  18. Ingwersen, P.(2012).Scientometric indicators and webometrics - and the poly representation principle information retrieval.New Delhi, India:Ess Ess.
  19. Kjellberg, S.(2004).What is digitometrics? An interview with Tim Brody.Sciecominfo,1(2)
  20. Konkiel, S.(2013).Altmetrics: A 21st-century solution to determining research quality.Online Searcher,37(4),11-15.
  21. Konkiel, S.,Scherer, D.(2013).New opportunities for repositories in the age of altmetrics.Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,39(4),22-26.
  22. Lagace, N.(2013).NISO awarded Sloan Foundation grant to develop standards or recommended practices for altmetrics.Information Standards Quarterly,25(2),40.
  23. Lapinski, S.,Piwowar, H.,Priem, J.(2013).Riding the crest of the altmetrics wave: How librarians can help prepare faculty for the next generation of research impact metrics.College & Research Libraries News,74(6),292-300.
  24. Lin, J.,Fenner, M.(2013).Altmetrics in evolution: Defining & redefining the ontology of article-level metrics.Information Standards Quarterly,25(2),20-26.
  25. Liu, J.,Adie, E.(2013).Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective.Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,39(4),31-34.
  26. Mounce, R.(2013).Open access and altmetrics: Distinct but complementary.Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,39(4),14-17.
  27. Neylon, C.,Wu, S.(2009).Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact.PLoS Biology,7(11)
  28. Piwowar, H.(2013).Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where?.Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,39(4),8-9.
  29. Piwowar, H.(2013).Altmetrics: Value all research products.Nature,493(7431),159.
  30. Piwowar, H.,Priem, J.(2013).The power of altmetrics on a CV.Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,39(4),10-13.
  31. Priem, J.,Hemminger, B. H.(2010).Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web.First Monday,15(7)
  32. Roemer, R. C.,Borchardt, R.(2012).From bibliometrics to altmetrics A changing scholarly landscape.College & Research Libraries News,73(10),596-600.
  33. Roemer, R. C.,Borchardt, R.(2013).Institutional altmetrics and academic libraries.Information Standards Quarterly,25(2),14-19.
  34. Rousseau, R.,Ye, F. Y.(2013).A multi-metric approach for research evaluation.Chinese Science Bulletin,58(26),3288-3290.
  35. Shema, H.,Bar-Ilan, J.(2011).Characteristics of ResearchBlogging.org, ScienceBlogs and Bloggers [v0].altmetrics11: Tracking Scholarly Impact on The Social Web: An ACM Web Science Conference 2011 Workshop,Koblenz, Germany:
  36. Thelwall, M.,Haustein, S.,Larivière, V.,Sugimoto, C. R.(2013).Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services.PloS one,8(5)
  37. 江玲(2010)。引用鏈接技術CrossRef研究。武漢理工大學學報，32(8)，156-159。
  38. 邱均平(2010)。網絡計量學。北京=Beijing:科學出版社=Science Press。
  39. 邱均平、余厚強(2013)。替代計量學的提出過程與研究進展。圖書情報工作，57(19)，5-12。
  40. 陳銘(2014)。期刊利用統計與Altmetric的興起。圖書與情報，2014(1)，12-17。
  41. 劉春麗(2012)。Web2.0環境下的科學計量學：選擇性計量學。圖書情報工作，56(14)，52-56。
  42. 蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:國立編譯館=National Translation and Compilation Center。
  43. 顧立平(2013)。開放數據計量研究綜述：計算網路用戶行為和科學社群影響力的Altmetrics計量。現代圖書情報技術，2013(6)，1-8。
被引用次数
  1. 黃元鶴(2019)。社會企業文獻計量統合分析與替代計量探索研究。圖資與檔案學刊，95，37-77。
print cancel