以FRBR模式及DOI編碼建立期刊書目關係之研究

Constructing Bibliographic Relationships of Journal Collections through FRBR and DOI

10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.522/0004.RS.AM

張慧銖(Huei-Chu Chang)

期刊 ； 書目關係 ； 書目紀錄功能需求 ； 數位物件辨識碼 ； Serials ； Bibliographic relationship ； Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records ； FRBR ； Digital Object Identifier ； DOI

教育資料與圖書館學

52卷2期（2015 / 04 / 01）

101 - 126+i

英文

本研究利用文獻分析法與內容分析法進行，首先整理出期刊所涵蓋的書目關係，之後導入三筆具改名、分衍、合併等複雜關係之期刊樣本，以MARC 21為其著錄格式，分析為建立期刊各種書目關係所需之欄位，再將其與FRBR第一組實體和現有期刊註冊DOI所需之核心元素對照，檢視FRBR與DOI是否能清楚呈現期刊的書目關係？進而探討期刊於申請DOI辨識碼的同時即能建置其書目關係的可行性。期能運用供應鏈的概念，將期刊書目家族的辨識與建置工作推至資訊處理的上游，以減輕圖書館期刊管理的負擔，增進期刊的連結關係，進而提升其使用效率。

The study adopts citation checking and content analysis method. First of all, the study organizes the bibliographic relationships among journals, and continue to induct journal sample with three complex relations: rename, split, merge. Using MARC21 as its description format, the study analyzes elements necessary for constructing bibliographic relationships among journals, and compare it to the current kernel elements needed for journal registering, DOI. With the above method, this research goes on to examine the pros and cons of the current way of constructing bibliographic relationships, that is, adopting the essential metadata of national journal registration; then, to further explore the feasibility of carrying out applying recognition code and constructing the bibliographic relationships of journals simultaneously. The goal is to draw on the concept of supply chain and advance the identification and construction of bibliographic family to information processing upstream; so as to increase its efficiency by alleviating the burden of managing library journals and enhancing the connection between individual journals.

1. Delsey, T. (2003). FRBR and serials. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/wgfrbr/papers/delsey.pdf
2. American Library Association. (2003). ALA conference call notes. Retrieved from http://www.fcla.edu/~pcaplan/jwp/min021103.htm
3. CrossRef/PILA. (2003). Unique identification of journals using DOIs. (Revision 1.0). Retrieved from http://www.fcla.edu/~pcaplan/jwp/ DOI_1.pdf
4. International Standard Serial Number. (2013). The ISSN-L for publications on multiple media. Retrieved from http://www.issn.org/2-22637-What-is-an-ISSN-L.php
5. Bilder, G. (2010). Does a CrossRef DOI identify a “work?” Retrieved from http://crosstech.crossref.org/2010/02/does_a_crossref_doi_identify_a.html
6. The National Library of Korea. (2010). ISBN: International standard book number. Retrieved from http://www.nl.go.kr/chinese2/c3/page8.jsp
7. Pisanski, J., & Zumer, M. (2010). Identifiers: Bridging language barriers. Retrieved from http://conference.ifla.org/conference/past/ifla76/93-pisanski-en.pdf
8. Rosenberg, F., & Hillman, D. (2004). An approach to serials with FRBR in mind. Retrieved from http://www.lib.unc.edu/cat/mfh/serials_approach_frbr.pdf
9. Le Boeuf, P., & Pelegrin, F.-X. (2014). FRBR and serials: The PRESSoo model. Retrieved from http://library.ifla.org/838/1/086-leboeuf-en.pdf
10. Allgood, J. E.(2007).Serials and multiple versions, or the inexorable trend toward worklevel displays.Library Resources & Technical Services,51(3),160-178.
11. Bean, C. A.(Ed.),Green, R.(Ed.)(2001).Relationships in the organization of knowledge.Boston, MA:Kluwer.
12. Caplan, P.(2004).NISO EDItEUR joint working party on the exchange of serials subscription information (JWP).CONSER Summit on Serials in the Digital Environment,Alexander, VA:
13. Coyle, K.(2004).Future considerations: The functional library systems record.Library Hi Tech,22(2),166-174.
14. Dunham, B.(2002).Different formats: Linking serial titles for display through bibliographic relationships. Is it possible?.Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services,26(1),3-17.
15. Espley, J. L.,Pillow, R.(2012).The VTLS implementation of FRBR.Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,50(5/6/7),369-386.
16. Geisler, L.,Simpson, E.,Mayo, J.(2010).Electronic serials cataloging workshop (SCCTP).Serials Librarian,58(1/2/3/4),14-19.
17. Hirons, J.(2002).Displays from multiple versions from MARC 21 and FRBR: A brief review for serials.CONSER Operations Committee Meeting
18. International DOI Foundation(2013).DOI® handbook.
19. International DOI Foundation(2014).DOI® handbook.
20. Krier, L.(2012).Serials, FRBR, and library linked data: A way forward.Journal of Library Metadata,12(2/3),177-187.
21. Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control(2008).On the record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic ControlOn the record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control,未出版
22. Oliver, C.(2004).FRBR is everywhere, but what happened to the format variation issue?.The Serials Librarian: From the Printed Page to the Digital Age,45(4),27-36.
23. Picco, P.,Ortiz Repiso, V.(2012).The Contribution of FRBR to the identification of bibliographic relationships: The new RDA-based ways of representing relationships in catalogs.Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,50(5/6/7),622-640.
24. Riva, P.(2003).Defining the boundaries: FRBR, AACR and the serial.Serials Librarian,45(3),15-21.
25. Riva, P.(2004).Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships.Library Resources and Technical Services,48(2),130-143.
26. Shadle, S.(2006).FRBR and serials.The Serials Librarian: From the Printed Page to the Digital Age,50(1-2),83-103.
27. West, W. L.,Miller, H. S.(2011).Electronic journals: Cataloging and management practices in academic libraries.Serials Review,37(4),267-274.
28. 高紅(2006)。書目關係的綜合研究。圖書情報工作，50(9)，108-112。
29. 國立中興大學圖書館(2012)。數位物件識別碼DOI之內涵與應用研討會會議手冊，台中市=Taichung:
30. 張慧銖(2011)。圖書館電子資源組織：從書架到網路。新北市=New Taipei City:Airiti Press。
31. 張慧銖(2003)。圖書館目錄發展研究。台北市=Taipei:文華= FlySheet Information Services。

1. 張慧銖(2016)。以DOI 及FRBR 探索數位物件之關聯性。大學圖書館，20(1)，1-25。