题名

教師和圖書教師高層次協作教學模式建構及其對五年級學生主題探究報告和月考成績的影響

并列篇名

The Effects of Teacher and Teacher-librarian High-end Collaboration on Inquiry-based Project Reports and Monthly School Test Scores of Fifth-grade Students

DOI

10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.523/0660.RS.CM

作者

陳海泓(Hai-Hon Chen)

关键词

社會領域教師 ; 圖書教師 ; 高層次協作教學 ; 主題探究報告 ; 月考成績 ; Social studies teacher ; Teacher-librarian ; High-end collaboration ; Inquiry-based project report ; Monthly school test scores

期刊名称

教育資料與圖書館學

卷期/出版年月

52卷3期(2015 / 09 / 01)

页次

299 - 336

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

本研究係以大學教授和國小社會領域教師、圖書教師協作教學,藉著教學實務,教師反思、討論、修改教學活動和流程,建構出高層次的協作教學模式,並進一步探討此教學模式對國小五年級學生主題探究以及月考成績的影響。實驗組學生28位,進行教師協作教學;控制組27位,教師各自教學。以「主題探究學習紀錄表」和「主題探究報告評量規準」為研究工具。以t檢定和相關分析統計資料。研究結果顯示:(一)教師和圖書教師高層次協作教學模式是可行的;(二)教師高層次協作教學,增進實驗組學生個人和小組主題探究報告的成績,且實驗組班級學生的社會月考成績較控制組學生成績高。研究建議提供教師高層次協作教學及未來研究之參考。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study was twofold. The first purpose was to establish an integrated instruction model with a high level of collaboration between social studies teacher and teacher-librarian. The second purpose was to investigate the effects of high-end collaboration on the inquiry-based project reports of individuals and groups, as well as monthly test scores of fifth-grade students. A quasi-experimental method was adopted, and two classes of elementary school fifth graders in Tainan City, Taiwan were used as samples. Students were randomly assigned to experimental conditions by class. The twenty eight students in the experimental group were taught by the collaboration of a social studies teacher and teacher-librarian; while the 27 students in the control group were taught separately by a teacher using a didactic teaching method. The Inquiry-Based Project Record, Inquiry-Based Project Rubrics, and monthly school test scores were used as instruments for collecting data. A t-test and correlation were used to analyze the data. The results indicate that: (1) High-end collaboration model between the social studies teacher and teacher-librarian was established and implemented well in the classroom. (2) There was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in the inquiry-based project reports of individuals and groups. Students that were taught by the collaborative method got higher inquiry-based project reports scores than those that were taught separately by a teacher. The experimental group's students got higher monthly school test scores than did the control group students as well. Suggestions about high-end collaboration for teachers and future researchers are provided in this paper.

主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. 陳海泓(2014)。教師和圖書教師協作量表之編制與協作模式之初探。教育資料與圖書館學,51(3),411-444。
    連結:
  2. Lance, K. C., Rodney, M. J., & Schwarz, B. (2009). The Idaho school library impact study-2009: How Idaho librarians, teachers, and administrators collaborate for student success. Retrieved from http://libraries.idaho.gov/doc/idaho-school-library-impactstudy-2009
  3. 教育部國民教育司(2010)。試辦國小專責圖書館閱讀推動教師,營造校園閱讀氛圍。教育部綠色學校伙伴網絡,441。檢索自http://www.greenschool.moe.edu.tw/system/news_item.aspx?key=120【Department of Elementary Education, Ministry of Education. (2010). Shiban guoxiao zhuan ze tushuguan yuedu tuidong jiaoshi, yingzao xiaoyuan yuedu fenwei. jiaoyubu luse xuexiao huoban wangluo, 441. Retrieved from http://www.greenschool.moe.edu.tw/system/news_item.aspx?key=120 (in Chinese)】
  4. 國民教育社群網(2012)。九年一貫課程與教學。檢索自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/brief/brief1.php【Guomin jiaoyu shequn wang. (2012). Jiunian yiguan kecheng yu jiaoxue. Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/brief/brief1.php (in Chinese)】
  5. American Association of School Librarians,Association for Educational Communications and Technology(1998).Information power: Building partnerships for learning.Chicago, IL:American Library Association.
  6. Bainbridge, J.,Carbonaro, M.,Wolodko, B.(2002).Teacher professional development and the role of the teacher librarian.International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning,6(12)
  7. Blatchford, P.,Martin, C.(1998).The effects of class size on classroom processes: It's a bit like a treadmill-working hard and getting nowhere fast!.British Journal of Educational Studies,46(2),118-137.
  8. Bush, G.(2002).The school buddy system: The practice of collaboration.Chicago, IL:American Library Association.
  9. Callison, D.(2006).Project-based learning.School Library Media Activities Monthly,22(5),42-45.
  10. Callison, D.(2003).Key words, concepts and methods for information age instruction: A guide to teaching information inquiry.Baltimore, MD:LMS Associates.
  11. Callison, D.(1997).Expanding collaboration for literacy promotion in public and school libraries.Journal of Youth Services in Libraries,11,37-48.
  12. Callison, D.(1999).Inquiry.School Library Media Activities Monthly,15(6),38-42.
  13. Chu, K. W. S.(2009).Inquiry project-based learning with a partnership of three types of teachers and the school librarian.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(8),1671-1686.
  14. Chu, S. K. W.,Tse, S. K.,Loh, E. K. Y.,Chow, K.(2011).Collaborative inquiry project based learning: Effects on reading ability and interests.Library & Information Science Research,33(3),236-243.
  15. Cooper, O. P.,Bray, M.(2011).School library media specialist-teacher collaboration: Characteristics, challenges, opportunities.TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning,55(4),48-54.
  16. Dawson, M.(1988).Establishing partnership.Establishing partnership, teacher-librarians and teachers working together: Proceedings of a seminar, a cooperative venture, teachers and teacher-librarians working together, held August 8, 1987 at Burwood Public School, Sydney,ULTIMO, NSW:
  17. Donham, J.(1999).Collaboration in the media center: Building partnerships for learning.NASSP Bulletin,83(605),20-26.
  18. Forman, E. A.(Ed.),Minick, N.(Ed.),Stone, C. A.(Ed.)(1993).Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  19. Francis, B. H.,Lance, K. C.(2011).The impact of library media specialists on students and how it is valued by administrators and teachers: Findings from the latest studies in Colorado and Idaho.TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning,55(4),63-70.
  20. Friend, M. P.,Cook, L.(2000).Interactions: Collaborative skills for school professionals.New York, NY:Longman.
  21. Immroth, B.,Lukenbill, W. B.(2007).Promoting collaboration through a human information behavior study.Texas Library Journal,83(2),66-67.
  22. Ivey, R.(2003).Information literacy: How do librarians and academics work in partnership to deliver effective learning programs?.Australian Academic & Research Libraries,34(2),100-113.
  23. Johnson, D. W.,Johnson, R. T.(2009).An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning.Educational Researcher,38(5),365-379.
  24. John-Steiner, V.,Weber, R. J.,Minnis, M.(1998).The challenge of studying collaboration.American Educational Research Journal,35(4),773-783.
  25. Kuhlthau, C. C.(2010).Guided inquiry: School libraries in the 21st century.School Libraries Worldwide,16(1),17-28.
  26. Kuhlthau, C. C.,Maniotes, L. K.,Caspari, A. K.(2007).Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century.Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited.
  27. Lance, K. C.(2002).What research tells us about the importance of school libraries.Supplement to Teacher Librarian,30(1),76-78.
  28. Lance, K. C.(1994).The impact of school library media centers on academic achievement.School Library Media Quarterly,22(3),167-172.
  29. Lance, K. C.,Hofschire, L.(2011).Something to shout about: New research shows that more librarians means higher reading scores.School Library Journal,57(9),28-33.
  30. Lance, K. C.,Hofschire, L.(2012).,Denver, CO:Library Research Service.
  31. Lance, K. C.,Russell, B.(2004).Scientifically based research on school libraries and academic achievement: What is it? How much do we have? How can we do it better?.Knowledge Quest,32(5),13-17.
  32. Lance, K. C.,Schwarz, B.(2012).,Washington, DC:Institute of Museum and Library Services.
  33. Mayer, R.(Ed.)(2010).Handbook of research on learning and instruction.London, UK:Routledge.
  34. Million, S. K.,Vare, J. W.(1997).The collaborative school: A proposal for authentic partnership in a professional development school.Phi Delta Kappan,78(9),710-713.
  35. Mokhtar, I. A.,Majid, S.(2006).An exploratory study of the collaborative relationship between teachers and librarians in Singapore primary and secondary schools.Library & Information Science Research,28(2),265-280.
  36. Montiel-Overall, P.(2005).A theoretical understanding of teacher and librarian collaboration (TLC).School Libraries Worldwide,11(2),24-48.
  37. Montiel-Overall, P.(2005).Toward a theory of collaboration for teachers and librarians.School Library Media Research,8
  38. Montiel-Overall, P.(2006).Teacher and teacher-librarian collaboration: Moving toward integration.Teacher Librarian,34(2),28-33.
  39. Montiel-Overall, P.(2008).Teacher and librarian collaboration: A qualitative study.Library & Information Science Research,30(2),145-155.
  40. Montiel-Overall, P.(Ed.),Adcock, D.(Ed.)(2007).Collaboration.Chicago, IL:American Association of School Librarians.
  41. Montiel-Overall, P.,Grimes, K.(2013).Teachers and librarians collaborating on inquirybased science instruction: A longitudinal study.Library & Information Science Research,35(1),41-53.
  42. Montiel-Overall, P.,Hernández, A. C. R.(2012).The effect of professional development on teacher and librarian collaboration: Preliminary findings using a revised instrument, TLC-III.School Library Research,15
  43. Muronago, K.,Harada, V.(1999).Building teaching partnerships: The art of collaboration.Teacher Librarian,27(1),9-14.
  44. Newell, T. S.(2009).Examining information problem-solving instruction: Dynamic relationship patterns mediated by distinct instructional methodologies.School Libraries Worldwide,15(2),49-76.
  45. Novak, J. D.,Gowin, D. B.(1984).Learning how to learn.London, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  46. Pederson, J.(Ed.),Digby, A.(Ed.)(1995).Secondary schools and cooperative learning: Theories, models, and strategies.New York, NY:Garland.
  47. Quintana, C.,Reiser, B. J.,Davis, E. A.,Krajcik, J.,Fretz, E.,Duncan, R. G.,Soloway, E.(2004).A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry.Journal of the Learning Sciences,13(3),337-386.
  48. Roth, W.-M.,Tobin, K.(2002).At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
  49. Russell, S.(2002).Teachers and librarians: Collaborative relationships.Teacher Librarian,29(5),35-38.
  50. Schultz-Jones, B.(2009).Collaboration in the school social network.Knowledge Quest,37(4),20-25.
  51. Sharan, S.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of cooperative learning methods.Westport, CT:Greenwood.
  52. Swan, E. A.(2003).Concept-oriented reading instruction: Engaging classrooms, lifelong learners.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
  53. Todd, R. J.,Gordon, C. A.,Lu, Y.-L.(2010).,Collingswood, NJ:New Jersey Association of School Librarians.
  54. U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science(2008).School libraries work.Washington, DC:Scholastic Library.
  55. Virkus, S.(2003).Information literacy in Europe: A literature review.Information Research,8(4)
  56. Webb, N.,Doll, C. A.(1999).Contributions of library power to collaborations between librarians and teachers.School Libraries Worldwide,5(2),29-44.
  57. 康木村、柳賢(2010)。教學相長:融入協作教學之實習輔導模式研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊,57,89-120。
  58. 陳昭珍、簡馨瑩、林菁、賴苑玲、陳海泓(2011)。圖書教師手冊。台北市=Taipei:教育部=Ministry of Education。
  59. 陳海泓(2004)。高中學校圖書館主任理想角色和實際角色知覺之調查研究。教育學誌,17,1-48。
  60. 陳海泓(2004)。高中學校圖書館人員理想角色和實際角色知覺差距之調查研究。南大學報:教育類,38(2),81-113。
  61. 陳海泓(2002)。中小學圖書館和圖書教師在教育改革中角色的探討。初等教育學報,15,123-154。
被引用次数
  1. 羅嘉雲、林巧敏(2018)。國小圖書教師與學科教師協作教學意見調查。圖書館學與資訊科學,44(1),69-94。
  2. (2018)。從「讀書」到「閱讀」:國中小國語文閱讀教育趨勢的流變。教育研究月刊,294,49-71。
  3. (2018)。國民中小學閱讀與資訊素養融入教學現況調查。圖書資訊學研究,13(1),1-50。