網路閱讀策略量表之測量恆等性檢驗

A Study of Measurement Invariance on E-Reading Strategy Scale

10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.524/0024.RS.BM

洪兆祥(Chao-Hsiang Hung)；陳柏霖(Po-Lin Chen)；余民寧(Min-Ning Yu)

網路閱讀策略 ； 測量恆等性 ； 多群組結構方程式模式 ； E-reading strategy ； Measurement invariance ； Multi-group structural equation modeling

教育資料與圖書館學

52卷4期（2015 / 12 / 01）

389 - 415

繁體中文

本研究透過多樣本結構方程式模型進行年齡恆等性檢驗，探討國小、國中與高中職五專學生在網路閱讀策略上的現況及年齡差異。資料以分層隨機抽樣取自全國共計3,908人，包含國小1,122人、國中1,601人，及高中職五專1,185人。本測驗為「搜尋與擷取」、「分析與理解」、「使用與溝通」及「反思與應用」四因素結構，共計11題的Likert四點量表。研究結果顯示，網路閱讀策略量表的因素結構符合理論假設，具備良好的信度與效度。在恆等性檢驗部分，國小及國中階段具有形貌與因素負荷量恆等，但在國中及高中職五專、國小及高中職五專僅有形貌恆等。題目的權重在高中職五專階段出現較大變化。研究結果為網路閱讀策略測驗強化年齡比較的效度基礎與推廣應用性，並提出相關建議。

The study tested age invariance of the E-Reading Strategy Scale (ERSS) with multi-group structural equation modeling (MG-SEM) to compare age differences among the pupils, junior high, and senior high students in terms of e-reading strategy status. Data collected from Taiwan by stratified random sampling whose final sample size was 3,908, including 1,122 pupils, 1,601 junior high students, and 1,185 senior high students. The theoretical model of ERSS was a four-factor structure (searching and capturing, analyzing and understanding, using and communicating, reflecting and applying) with 11 Likert's scale items. The results showed that the ERSS had good fit index, acceptable reliability and validity. In the tests of invariance, there was factor loading invariance existed between pupils and junior high school students. However, just configuration invariance was existed between junior and senior high school students, and between pupils and senior high school students. The weights of item changed a lot on the junior high school students. In overall, all level student performance well on basic e-reading strategy, but still had much room to improve on advanced e-reading strategy. The results of the study increased the validity of age comparisons of ERSS and its applications. Further results and implications were discussed and proposed.

1. 林珊如(2010)。數位時代的閱讀：青少年網路閱讀的爭議與未來。圖書資訊學刊，8(2)，29-53。
   連結：
2. 林淑惠、孟瑛如、吳東光(2006)。提升網路閱讀的影響力與可及性－以學習障礙學生為例。特教論壇，1，44-54。
   連結：
3. 孫劍秋、林孟君(2013)。從臺灣中學生PISA閱讀素養的表現談精進學生閱讀素養的教學策略。中等教育，64(3)，35-51。
   連結：
4. 張貴琳(2013)。青少年線上閱讀素養評量工具之發展。教育實踐與研究，26(2)，29-66。
   連結：
5. 張貴琳(2012)。國中學生線上閱讀素養發展現況調查。教育研究發展期刊，8(2)，87-117。
   連結：
6. 陳世娟、邵婉卿(2014)。臺灣民眾網路素養之調查研究。大學圖書館，18(1)，33-57。
   連結：
7. 陳柏霖、余民寧(2014)。新移民與非新移民子女家庭閱讀活動、閱讀策略及閱讀行為之研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，36，23-45。
   連結：
8. 陳柏霖、洪兆祥、余民寧(2013)。網路閱讀態度、網路閱讀行為及網路閱讀素養之橫斷面研究。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，23-50。
   連結：
9. 游森期、余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊，53(1)，103-127。
   連結：
10. 鄭宇君(2013)。從數位學習到新素養：電子書閱讀器對高中生社群的可能影響。新聞學研究，114，127-163。
    連結：
11. Liu, A. (2013). Transliteracies projects: Research in the technology, social, and cultural practices of online reading. Retrieved from http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/category/research-project
12. 林淑芳（2015）。【臺灣傳播調查】資料庫2014青少年資料研究成果分享（二）：青少年網路素養與使用調查。檢索自https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/920bf203-3235-4f66-9efc-0191c803fc78【Lin, Shu-Fang (2015). “Taiwan Chuanbo diaocha” ziliaoku 2014 qingshaonian ziliao yanjiu chengguo fenxiang (2): Qingshaonian wanglu suyang yu shiyong diaocha. Retrieved from https://www.most.gov.tw/most/attachments/920bf203-3235-4f66-9efc-0191c803fc78 (in Chinese)】
13. 教育部資訊及科技教育司（2014）。「聰明上網我不宅幸福學習我最愛」—103年中小學學生網路使用情形調查結果發表會。檢索自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=25047&wid=3ee9c9ee-f44e-44f0-a431-c300341d9f77&Index=1【Department of Information and Technology Education, Ministry of Education. (2014). “Congming shangwang wo buzhai, xingfu xuexi wo zuiai”: 103 nian zhongxiaoxue xuesheng wanglu shiyong qingxing diaocha jieguo fabiaohui. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=25047&wid=3ee9c9ee-f44e-44f0-a431-c300341d9f77&Index=1 (in Chinese)】
14. Arbuckle, J. L.(2011).IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 20 user's guide.Chicago, IL:IBM.
15. Byrne, B. M.(1994).Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
16. Cheung, G. W.,Rensvold, R. B.(2002).Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling,9(2),233-255.
17. Cheung, K. C.,Sit, P. S.(2008).Electronic reading assessment: The PISA approach for the international comparison and reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Research and Development,4(4),19-39.
18. Clyde, L. A.(2005).Electronic books.Teacher Librarian,32(5),45-47.
19. Coiro J.,Dobler, E.(2011).Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet.Reading Research Quarterly,42(2),214-257.
20. Coiro, J.(2011).Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge.Journal of Literacy Research,43(4),352-392.
21. Coiro, J.(2006).Storrs, CT,University of Connecticut.
22. Drasgow, F.,Kanfer, R.(1985).Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations.Journal of Applied Psychology,70(4),662-680.
23. Feather, J.(Ed.),Sturges, P.(Ed.)(1997).International encyclopaedia of information and library science.London, UK:Routledge.
24. Fornell, C.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
25. Goldman, S. R.,Braasch, J. L. G.,Wiley, J.,Graesser, A. C.,Brodowinska, K.(2012).Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners.Reading Research Quarterly,47(4),356-381.
26. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
27. Henry, L. A.(2006).Searching for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the internet.The Reading Teacher,59,614-627.
28. Henry, L. A.,Castek, J.,O'Byrne, W. I.,Zawilinski, L.(2012).Using peer collaboration to support online reading, writing, and communication: An empowerment model for struggling readers.Reading & Writing Quarterly,28(3),279-306.
29. Hu, L.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cut-off criteria for the fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus newalternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6(1),1-55.
30. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
31. Kurniawan, S. H.,Zaphiris, P.(2001).Reading online or on paper: Which is faster?.Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction,Mahwah, NJ:
32. Leu, D. J.(2007).Expanding the reading literacy framework of PISA 2009 to include online reading comprehension.Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Services.
33. Meredith, W.(1993).Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance.Psychometrika,58(4),525-543.
34. Milfont, T. L.,Fischer, R.(2010).Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross cultural research.International Journal of Psychological Research,3(1),111-121.
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2009).Assessing science, reading and mathematics literacy: A framework for PISA 2009.Paris, France:Author.
36. Prensky, M.(2001).Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1.On the Horizon,9(5),1-6.
37. Ruddell, R. B.(Ed.),Unrau, N.(Ed.)(2004).Theoretical models and processes of reading.Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
38. Zawilinski, L.(2009).HOT blogging: A framework for blogging to promote higher order thinking.Reading Teacher,62(8),650-661.
39. Zenotz, V.(2012).Awareness development for online reading.Language Awareness,21(1/2),85-100.
40. Zhang, S.,Duke, N. K.(2008).Strategies for internet reading with different reading purposes: A descriptive study of twelve good internet readers.Journal of Literacy Research,40(1),128-162.
41. 余民寧(2013)。他們透過網路閱讀，到底學到了什麼？。人文與社會科學簡訊，14(3)，120-126。
42. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。台北市=Taipei:高等教育=Edubook。
43. 李彥玫(2015)。台北市=Taipei，國立政治大學教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Education, National Chengchi University。
44. 林尹千、洪碧霞(2010)。國中學生社會領域線上閱讀素養評量工具之發展。人文社會學報，8(2)，157-188。
45. 邱皓政(2011)。結構方程式模型：LISREL/SIMPLIS的原理與應用。台北市=Taipei:雙葉書廊=Yehyeh。
46. 柯志恩、黃一庭(2010)。圖像優於文字？N世代學生認知發展之探究。教育研究月刊，193，15-23。
47. 洪碧霞(2011)。,台南市=Tainan:國立臺南大學=National University of Tainan。
48. 張貴琳(2014)。青少年線上閱讀素養表現之關聯變項探討。市北教育學刊，45，29-68。
49. 陳木金、許瑋珊(2012)。從PISA閱讀評量的國際比較探討閱讀素養教育的方向。教師天地，181，4-15。
50. 曾炫鈞(2010)。從PIRLS 2006淺談國小四年級學童閱讀策略學習。國教之友，61(1)，46-52。
51. 游仕偉(2000)。E世代出版—多媒體的結晶，超連結的閱讀。出版學刊，3，4-7。

1. 劉宜芳、柯華葳(2017)。線上閱讀研究之回顧與展望。教育科學研究期刊，62(2)，61-87。
2. (2023)。國小高年級學生本土語文核心素養量表之發展。教育學刊，60，51-93。