题名

以開放資料的教師學術專長彙整表為基礎之學科標準分類分析

并列篇名

Analyses of the Standard Classification of Fields Based on the Directory of Faculty Expertise Open Data

DOI

10.6120/JoEMLS.2017.541/0046.RS.AM

作者

林頌堅(Sung-Chien Lin)

关键词

學科標準分類 ; 開放資料 ; 教師學術專長彙整表 ; 輪廓試驗 ; Word2Vec ; The Standard Classification of Field ; Open data ; The Directory of Faculty Expertise ; Silhouette test ; Word2Vec

期刊名称

教育資料與圖書館學

卷期/出版年月

54卷1期(2017 / 03 / 01)

页次

69 - 95

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究以教育部提供的開放資料做為分析資料,利用學術專長文字資料的相似性,探討目前對大學校院系所進行分類所採用的學科標準分類,並提出改善的建議。使用的技術包括估計學術專長資料相似性的Word2Vec文字比對技術,以及分析分類性質的階層集群分析、多維尺度分析、輪廓試驗、近似學門分布和系所相似性統計等評估方法,並以資訊視覺化方法呈現研究的結果。研究結果指出目前的學科標準分類在分類結構、分類架構與資料品質上都必需要改善,才能符合教育統計、政策制訂與學術交流的需求。

英文摘要

This paper presents a series of analyses of the Standard Classification of Fields which was applied to the classification of all departments in universities based on measuring similarity between text data of the faculty expertise directory from open data provided by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan, and suggests some possible directions for improvement of the directory and the classification system. The analysis techniques included the Word2Vec text matching technique to estimate the similarity of faculty expertise, the methods to expose properties of the classification system such as hierarchical clustering analysis, multidimensional scaling analysis, silhouette testing, distribution of fields with similar expertise set, and statistics of the similarity between departments, and a variety of information visualizations to illustrate the analysis results. The results of this study show that in order to meet requirements from educational statistics, policy making, and academic exchanges, the organization structure, organization scheme, and data quality of the Standard Classification of Fields should be improved.

主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. 教育部統計處(2016)。教育程度及學科標準分類。檢索自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=77627C0EE4283293&s=85E1E406503C665B#【Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2016). Jiaoyu chengdu ji xueke biaozhun fenlei. Retrieved from http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=77627C0EE4283293&s=85E1E406503C665B# (in Chinese)】
  2. Boyack, K. W.,Klavans, R.,Börner, K.(2005).Mapping the backbone of science.Scientometrics,64(3),351-374.
  3. Chen, C.,Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.,Hou, J.(2010).The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,61(7),1386-1409.
  4. Chen, C.-M.(2008).Classification of scientific networks using aggregated journal-journal citation relations in the Journal Citation Reports.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(14),2296-2304.
  5. Chen, P.,Redner, S.(2010).Community structure of the physical review citation network.Journal of Informetrics,4(3),278-290.
  6. Glänzel, W.,Schubert, A.(2003).A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes.Scientometrics,56(3),357-367.
  7. Janssens, F.,Zhang, L.,De Moor, B.,Glänzel, W.(2009).Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes.Information Processing and Management,45(6),683-702.
  8. Klavans, R.,Boyack, K. W.(2006).Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,57(2),251-263.
  9. Kruskal, J. B.,Wish, M.(1978).Multidimensional scaling.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
  10. Le, Q. V.,Mikolov, T.(2014).Distributed representations of sentences and documents.Proceedings of the 31st international conference on machine learning
  11. Leydesdorff, L.,Rafols, I.(2009).A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(2),348-362.
  12. Mikolov, T.,Chen, K.,Corrado, G.,Dean, J.(2013).,未出版
  13. Newman, M. E.,Girvan, M.(2004).Finding and evaluating community structure in networks.Physical Review E,69(2),026113.
  14. Pudovkin, A. I.,Garfield, E.(2002).Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,53(13),1113-1119.
  15. Rousseeuw, P. J.(1987).Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,20,53-65.
  16. Thijs, B.,Zhang, L.,Glänzel, W.(2015).Bibliographic coupling and hierarchical clustering for the validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes.Scientometrics,105(3),1453-1467.
  17. Turney, P. D.,Pantel, P.(2010).From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,37(1),141-188.
  18. UNESCO(2013).ISCED Fields of Education and Training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013).
  19. Wang, Q.,Waltman, L.(2016).Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus.Journal of Informetrics,10(2),347-364.
  20. 教育部(2007)。中華民國教育程度及學科標準分類(第4次修正)
被引用次数
  1. 羅志勇、劉昆祐、陳武雄、徐振德(2018)。臺灣大專體育運動相關領域教師專長之現況分析。大專體育,146,1-12。
  2. 張益誠,張育傑,余泰毅(2021)。探討環境教育論文的文件自動分類技術-以2013-2018年環境教育研討會摘要為例。環境教育研究,17(1),85-128。