非戰之罪：研究評鑑制度下台灣社會學學術專書論著之困境

An Unfair Game: The Dilemmas Posed by Academic Research Evaluation to Sociology Monograph Writing in Taiwan

10.6120/JoEMLS.2017.542/0007.RS.BM

張天心(Tien-Hsin Chang)；林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin)

研究評鑑 ； 學術專書 ； 學術寫作與出版 ； 台灣社會學 ； Research evaluation ； Scholarly monographs ； Scholarly writing and publishing ； Sociology in Taiwan

教育資料與圖書館學

54卷2期（2017 / 07 / 01）

135 - 160

繁體中文

人文與社會科學向來重視學術專書，但近年因研究評鑑大幅強調期刊論文，對人社學科的專書生產已經造成壓抑。本研究以深度訪談來了解14位有專書論著經驗的社會學學者對專書及研究評鑑的看法，包含專書對社會學的價值與貢獻、期刊導向的評鑑制度對社會學造成的影響、專書寫作可能遭遇的問題與困難，以及可能的改善之道。基於受訪者意見，本文也深入討論了專書寫作歷程考核與專書評鑑的本質性問題，期能作為未來評鑑制度改善之參考。

Scholarly books, or scholarly monographs, are an important form of research output in humanities and social sciences. However, the current research evaluation practices in Taiwan highly emphasize journal articles and have thereby suppressed the production of scholarly books. This study employed in-depth interviews with 14 Taiwanese sociologists who had written and published scholarly books to understand the problems and challenges facing scholarly monograph production in the contemporary research evaluation culture. Interview topics included the values and contributions of scholarly books to the studies of sociology, the negative influences of journal-focused research evaluations on the sociology discipline, problems and challenges facing book-writing sociologists, and possible solutions to those problems. Based on the findings, the authors discuss on the proposed research review approach that monitors an author's book-writing progress rather than focusing on the end-product, as raised in the interviews, as well as the problems and reliability issues with the pre-publishing anonymous review requirement that has become a mandate for scholarly book publishing in Taiwan.

1. Huang, M. H.(2011).A comparison of three major academic rankings for world universities: From a research evaluation perspective.Journal of Library & Information Studies,9(1),1-25.
   連結：
2. 黃厚銘(2011)。台灣社會科學學術評鑑制度的理想與現實：以社會學為例。台灣社會研究季刊，82，267-279。
   連結：
3. 黃慕萱、張郁蔚(2006)。人文社會學者學術評鑑指標之探討。圖書資訊學刊，4(1/2)，17-47。
   連結：
4. 孟祥傑（2003年10月21日）。論文篇數台大最多　長庚第5政大排48。聯合報，A6版。【Meng, Hsiang-Chieh (2003, October 21). Lunwen pianshu taida zuiduo changgeng di 5 zhengda pai 48. United Daily News, A6. (in Chinese)】
5. 國立政治大學社會科學學院（2014b）。國立政治大學社會科學學院教師聘任升等評審作業要點（103 年3 月14 日第106 次院務會議修正通過）。台北市：國立政治大學。【College of Social Sciences, National Chengchi University. (2014b). College of Social Sciences, National Chengchi University jiaoshi pinren shengdeng pingshen zuoye yaodian (103 nian 3 yue 14 ri di 106 ci yuanwu huiyi xiuzheng tongguo). Taipei: National Chengchi University. (in Chinese)】。
6. 國立政治大學社會科學學院（2014a）。國立政治大學社會科學學院獎勵學術著作發表及出版辦法（103 年2 月10 日第47 次研究發展會議通過）。台北市：國立政治大學。 【College of Social Sciences, National Chengchi University. (2014a). College of Social Sciences, National Chengchi University jiangli xueshu zhuzuo fabiao ji chuban banfa (103 nian 2 yue 10 ri di 47 ci yanjiu fazhan huiyi tongguo). Taipei: National Chengchi University. (in Chinese)】。
7. Chodorow, S.(1999).Specialized scholarly monograph in crisis or how can i get tenure if you won't publish my book?.Washington, DC:Association of Research Libraries.
8. Cronin, B.,La Barre, K.(2004).Mickey Mouse and Milton: Book publishing in the humanities.Learned Publishing,17(2),85-98.
9. Huang, M. H.,Chang, Y. W.(2008).Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,59(11),1819-1828.
10. Nederhof, A. J.(2006).Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review.Scientometrics,66(1),81-100.
11. Williams, P.,Stevenson, I.,Nicholas, D.,Watkinson, A.,Rowlands, I.(2009).The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research.Aslib Proceedings,61(1),67-82.
12. 反思會議工作小組編(2006)。全球化與知識生產—反思台灣學術評鑑。台北市=Taipei: Taiwan:台灣社會研究季刊社=Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies。
13. 吳紹群(2010)。台北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library and Information Science, National Taiwan University。
14. 黃厚銘(2005)。SSCI、TSSCI與臺灣社會科學學術評鑑制度。圖書館學與資訊科學，31(1)，34-44。
15. 鄧育仁(2012)。必須走的路—國科會人文處「人文行遠專書寫作計畫」。人文與社會科學簡訊，13(4)，3-10。
16. 蘇國賢編、呂妙芬編、章英華編、黃寬重編(2013)。學術自主與控管之間：臺灣人文與社會科學的學術專業化。台北市=Taipei:國立臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan University Press。