台灣地區大學教師與館員協作文化和發展現況之研究

Faculty-Librarian Collaborative Culture and Current Development in the Colleges and Universities in Taiwan

10.6120/JoEMLS.2018.551/0031.RS.AM

于第(Ti Yu)；陳昭珍(Chao-Chen Chen)

教師 ； 館員 ； 協作 ； 協作文化 ； 大學 ； 台灣 ； Faculty ； Librarian ； Collaboration ； Collaborative culture ； Colleges and universities ； Taiwan

教育資料與圖書館學

55卷1期（2018 / 03 / 01）

5 - 37

繁體中文;英文

本研究從文化觀點探究大學教師與館員的協作，其研究目的為：（一）發掘建構大學教師與館員協作文化概念的元素；（二）探究台灣地區大學教師和館員對大學教師與館員協作文化的評價程度；（三）檢驗大學教師和館員對大學教師與館員協作文化評價的差異性；（四）了解台灣地區大學教師與館員協作之發展現況；（五）探討大學教師與館員協作文化對二者協作發展的影響。本研究依Schein的三層次文化理論概念設計大學教師與館員調查問卷，其研究結果萃取出建構大學教師與館員協作文化的七個元素構面為：「組織的協作環境」、「協作中的相互利益與責任」、「相互了解與溝通」、「協作的承諾」、「協作的領導力」、「相互尊重與信任」，及「協作的關係與互動」。

This study explored the concept of faculty-librarian collaboration from the perspective of culture. Five research purposes are proposed in this study. They are: 1. to discover the elements that can be utilized to construct the concept of faculty-librarian collaborative culture; 2. to explore the value levels of faculty-librarian collaborative culture in the colleges and universities of Taiwan; 3. to measure the differences in the value levels of faculty-librarian collaborative culture between faculty members and librarians; 4. to understand the current development of faculty-librarian collaboration in the colleges and universities of Taiwan; and 5. to examine the impact relationship between faculty-librarian collaborative culture and the current development of faculty-librarian collaboration. This study adopted Schein’s three-level model of organizational culture as the conceptual structure to explore the dimensions and factors that are utilized to construct collaborative culture between librarians and faculty members and to develop a questionnaire. An online survey tool, Survey Monkey, was used to collect data via internet in this study. In order to obtain as many replies as possible, the researchers adopted the purposive sampling approach and the snowball sampling approach to actively ask colleagues, friends and friends’ friends for helping to distribute the questionnaires. As a result, 279 respondents answered the online questionnaire in total from December 2015 to May 2016. However, 88 responses were highly incomplete. This resulted in 191 valid responses, for an overall valid response rate of 68.5%. This study finally explored seven key elements that can represent and construct the content and concept of faculty-librarian collaborative culture of Taiwan. The seven elements are: 1. Organizational Collaborative Environment, 2. Mutual Benefit and Responsibility in Collaboration, 3. Mutual Understanding and Communication, 4. Collaborative Commitment, 5. Collaborative Leadership, 6. Mutual Respect and Trust, and 7. Collaborative Relationship and Interaction.

1. 于第(2007)。教師與館員合作推廣學生利用圖書館資源之研究—以景文技術學院為例。大學圖書館，11(1)，53-72。
   連結：
2. 于第、黃久華(2009)。大學教師與館員合作推廣圖書館資源利用與服務之實例研究：以景文科技大學為例。教育資料與圖書館學，46(3)，297-321。
   連結：
3. 查天佑、謝寶煖(2009)。大學教師對圖書館員合作推動資訊素養融入課程之態度。教育資料與圖書館學，46(4)，441-467。
   連結：
4. Biggs, M.(1981).Sources of tension and conflict between librar ians and faculty.Journal of Higher Education,52(2),182-201.
5. Carpan, C.(2011).Library services in the age of Google: The importance of library liaison programs.College and Undergraduate Libraries,18(1),104-110.
6. Christiansen, L.,Stombler, M.,Thaxton, L.(2004).A report on librarian-faculty relations from a sociological perspective.Journal of Academic Librarianship,30(2),116-121.
7. Donham, J.,Green, C. W.(2004).Perspectives on ... developing a culture of collaboration: Librarian as consultant.Journal of Academic Librarianship,30(4),314-321.
8. Doskatsch, I.(2003).Perceptions and perplexities of the faculty-librarian partnership: An Australian perspective.Reference Services Review,31(2),111-121.
9. Elliott de Sáez, E.(2002).Marketing concepts for libraries and information services.London, UK:Facet.
10. Ellison, A. B.(2004).Positive faculty/librarian relationships for productive library assignments.Community & Junior College Libraries,12(2),23-28.
11. Farber, E.(1999).Faculty-librarian cooperation: A personal retrospective.Reference Services Review,27(3),229-234.
12. Gruenert, S. W.(1998).Columbia, MO,University of Missouri-Columbia.
13. Hardesty, L.(1991).Faculty and the library: The undergraduate experience.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
14. Hardesty, L.(1995).Faculty culture and bibliographic instruction: An exploratory analysis.Library Trends,44(2),339-367.
15. Huxham, C.(Ed.)(1996).Creating collaborative advantage.London, UK:Sage.
16. Ivey, R.(2003).Information literacy: How do librarians and academics work in partnership to deliver effective learning programs?.Australian Academic and Research Libraries,34(2)
17. Jenkins, P. O.(2005).Faculty-librarian relationships.Oxford, UK:Chandos.
18. Kaiser, H. F.(1974).An index of factorial simplicity.Psychometrika,39(1),31-36.
19. Kraat, S. B.(Ed.)(2005).Relationships between teaching faculty and teaching librarians.Binghamton, NY:Haworth Information Press.
20. Library Journal, & Gale. (2015). 2015 Bridging the librarian-faculty gap in the academic library. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/downloads/2015-bridging-thelibrarian-faculty-gap-in-the-academic-library/
21. Mees, G. W.(2008).Columbia, MO.,University of Missouri.
22. Muronaga, K.,Harada, K.(1999).The art of collaboration.Teacher-Librarian,27(1),9-14.
23. Nunnally, J. C.(1978).Psychometric theory.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
24. Raspa, D.(Ed.),Ward, D.(Ed.)(2000).The collaboration imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe.Chicago, IL:ACRL.
25. Rockman, I. F.(2001).Partnership: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Reference Services Review,29(3),93-94.
26. Rosen, E.(2007).The culture of collaboration: Maximizing time, talent and tools to create value in the global economy.San Francisco, CA:Red Ape.
27. Schein, E. H.(1992).Organizational culture and leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
28. Schill, N. I.(2014).Organization collaborative culture survey & report: A tool for fostering collaborative cultures and hiring the right people.Austin, TX:ExecIntel Solutions.
29. Schwartz, M. (2016). Top skills for tomorrow's librarians: Careers 2016. Library Journal. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/03/featured/top-skills-for-tomorrows-librarians-careers-2016/
30. Segal, J. A.(2001).Collaboration between theory and evidence-based practice-two cultures: Librarians and professors.IFLA Journal,27(1),24-27.
31. Southern, N. L.(2005).Creating cultures of collaboration that thrive on diversity: A organizations.American Sociological Review,76(2),207-233.
32. Srivastava, S. B.,Banaji, M. R.(2011).Culture, cognition, and collaborative networks in transformational prospective on building collaborative capital.Collaborative capital: Creating intangible value,London, UK:
33. Wagner, T.(1998).Changes as collaborative inquiry: A 'constructivist' methodology for reinventing schools.Phi Delta Kappan,79(7),512-517.
34. Wijayasundara, N. D.(2008).Faculty-library collaboration: A model for University of Colombo.International Information and Library Review,40(3),180-198.
35. Xia, J.,Wang, M.(2014).Competencies and responsibilities of social science data librarians: An analysis of job descriptions.College & Research Libraries,75(3),362-388.

1. (2022)。建立學校協作文化：校長與教師領導者應有作為之探討。教育研究月刊，342，62-79。