生物醫學領域研究人員投稿開放近用期刊經驗之研究

A Case Study of Biomedical Researchers' Publishing Experiences with Open Access Journals

10.6120/JoEMLS.201112_49(2).0410.RS.AM

徐華玉(Hua-Yu Hsu)；林奇秀(Chi-Shiou Lin)

開放近用 ； 開放近用期刊 ； 學術傳播 ； 生醫期刊 ； Open access ； Open access journal ； Scholarly communication ； Biomedical journals

教育資料與圖書館學

49卷2期（2011 / 12 / 01）

241 - 264

繁體中文;英文

開放近用期刊（open access journals，簡稱OA期刊）因圖書館期刊危機而崛起。這種新型態的學術期刊經營模式強調在網路平台上提供大眾免費下載全文，企圖去除期刊價格和使用的限制，讓研究成果更容易被使用者使用。作者對OA期刊的看法與投稿意向對OA期刊之發展具有舉足輕重之影響力。因此本研究以不同投稿OA期刊經驗之生物醫學領域研究人員為個案，利用開放式深入訪談法，探討影響其投稿OA期刊之個人與社會因素、得知管道，以及促成與阻礙投稿之狀況。本研究發現受訪者在投稿時會考量論文與目標期刊之間的契合程度、目標期刊的內容或刊務等表現，以及當下的個人與情境狀況。在選擇OA期刊時，個人因素（如對OA期刊的經驗與評價）及社會因素（如學科領域的資源豐沛程度與行政單位的投稿鼓勵制度）均可能會促成或阻礙受訪者投稿給OA期刊。研究發現可供OA推廣單位如圖書館或大學研究機構等參考，基於學者的角度，提供客製化之推廣與服務。

Open access (OA) journals emerged in response to library budget cuts and the journal price crisis due to the monopoly of a few major publishers. Today, more and more OA journals have appeared in the landscape of scholarly publishing. However, how do authors who serve an important role in the chain of scholarly communication understand and perceive open access? This study used a multiple case study design to understand twelve biomedical researchers' publishing experiences with OA journals, i.e., how they chose a journal to submit their papers, and how the personal and situational factors influence their selection of OA journals. The major findings include that: 1. the interviewee selected journals based on whether the target journal and the paper to be submitted was a good match, the overall performance of the target journal, and their past experience; 2. interviewees' selection of OA journals could be reinforced or hampered by complicated individual (personal preference or experiences with OA journals) and social factors (subject disciplines or reward mechanism). The findings may shed lights on the promotion of OA journals to scholars in Taiwan.

1. 吳紹群、吳明德(2007)。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響。圖書資訊學研究，2(1)，21-54。
   連結：
2. 陳亞寧(2006)。開放式資訊取用對館藏發展與服務的衝擊。圖書與資訊學刊，57，61-73。
   連結：
3. Association of Research Libraries. (2004). Open Access. Retrieved November 5, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm~doc/openaccess.pdf
4. Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2009). Budapest Open Access Initiative Frequently asked questions. Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm#openaccess
5. Morrison, H. (2009). The Dramatic Growth of Open Access — June 30, 2009. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rz-5IhC4cgjvMde2AQtsHXg&pli=1
6. Poynder, R. (2009). Open access in 2009: The good, the bad and the ugly. Retrieved December 31, 2009, from http://poynder.blogspot.com/2009/12/open-access-in-2009-good-bad-andugly.html
7. Open Access Directory. (2008b) Timeline of the open access movement. Retrieved December 26, 2009, from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Timeline
8. Directory of Open Access Journals. (2011). Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved January 19, 2011, from http://www.doaj.org/
9. Open Access Directory. (2008a) Research questions. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Research_questions
10. Albanese, A.(2009).Honorable mentions: The LJAN top ten stories of 2008, 4-10.Library Journal,January 6
11. EBSCO(2009).,EBSCO.
12. Goodman, D.(2004).The criteria for open access.Serials Review,30(4),258-270.
13. Hernández-Borges, A. A.,Cabrera-Rodríguez, R. l.,Montesdeoca-Melián, A. n.,Martínez-Pineda, B. a.,Arcaya, M. L. T.-A. l. d.,Jiménez-Sosa, A.(2006).Awareness and attitude of Spanish medical authors to open access publishing and the "author pays" model.Journal of the Medical Library Association,94(4),449-451.
14. Nicholas, D.,Huntington, P.,Rowlands, I.(2005).Open access journal publishing: The views of some of the world's senior authors.Journal of Documentation,61(4),497-519.
15. Park, J.-H.,Qin, J.(2007).Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach.Journal of Scholarly Publishing,38(2),55-84.
16. Research Information Network, & Consortium of Research Libraries(2007).,Research Information Network, & Consortium of Research Libraries.
17. Schroter, S.,Tite, L.(2006).Open access publishing and author-pays business models: A Survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,99,141-148.
18. Swan, A.,Brown, S.(2004).Authors and open access publishing.Learned Publishing,17(3),219-224.
19. Warlick, S. E.,Vaughan, K.(2007).Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access.Biomedical Digital Libraries,4(1)
20. Wust, M. G.(2006).University of Alberta.
21. 巴頓、吳芝儀譯、李奉儒譯(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。台北縣=Taipei:桂冠=Guiguan。
22. 邱炯友、蔣欣樺(2005)。學術出版傳播之Open Access模式。中華民國圖書館學會會報，74，165-183。
23. 黃勵立(2008)。台中市=Taichung，中興大學圖書資訊學研究所=Graduate Institute of Library & Information Science, National Chung Hsing University。

1. 歐俐伶(2017)。開放取用期刊投稿推廣：以BioMed Central為例。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，26，55-66。
2. 温燕鈴、謝吉隆(2014)。生醫類開放近用期刊中的高產量作者發表論文之資訊計量研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51(2)，199-224。