题名 |
論淩廷堪的《禮經釋例》 |
并列篇名 |
On Ling Tingkan's Lijing shili |
DOI |
10.6281/NTUCL.2008.28.06 |
作者 |
葉國良(Kuo-Liang Yeh) |
关键词 |
淩廷堪 ; 禮經釋例 ; 禮例 ; 以禮代理 ; Ling Tingkan ; Lijing shili ; lili ; yili daili |
期刊名称 |
臺大中文學報 |
卷期/出版年月 |
28期(2008 / 06 / 01) |
页次 |
177 - 196 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
清儒凌廷堪的《禮經釋例》,是研究《儀禮》的專書,近代討論學術史發展的學者,每視之爲乾嘉時期反理學的代表著作之一,其說固是;但該書在學術上還有一個重要面向,即繼承以禮例研究《儀禮》的舊法並企圖總結,而其是非曲直卻極少有人加以檢討。如此一來,凌書兩個重要面向的研究便缺少其中之一。本文寫作的宗旨,即在分析淩氏對禮例的研究有何貢獻,存在什麼缺點,以及缺點應如何補足,另附帶討論今人用「以禮代理」一詞概括凌氏之學是否恰當。 |
英文摘要 |
Lijing shili is a monograph on the Yili (Book of Etiquette and Ceremonial) by the Qing Confucian scholar Ling Tingkan. Modem scholars in discussing the academic history of Qing Dynasty often focus on the significance of Ling's monograph as one of the representative works of anti-lixue trend in the Qianlong-Jiaqing periods. Without discounting the value of this perspective, one is better reminded of another equally significant aspect of the monograph, namely, its adoption of the traditional approach to study Yi1i in terms of lili (ritual rules and regularities) as well as its attempt at a conc1usive study. This second aspect of Ling's monograph has long been neglected by scholars; as a resu1t, it remains yet to be brought under critical investigation. To fill the gap, this paper concentrates on analyzing Ling's contribution to the study of lili. It discusses the disadvantages of his approach and explores their possible amendments. On the basis of the discussion, the paper also raises the question of whether it is appropriate to characterize Ling's thought in terms of the concept of ”yili dai1i” (rituals in substitution for metaphysical principles). |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
語言學 人文學 > 中國文學 |
参考文献 |
|