唐文新變論稿（一）－記體的成立與開展

The Revolution of Prose Writing in Tang Dynasty (1): The Reinvention and Development of Ji Prose

10.6281/NTUCL.2008.28.03

何寄澎(Chi-Peng Ho)

記體 ； 公領域 ； 客觀 ； 私領域 ； 主觀 ； 敘事 ； 抒情 ； 議論 ； ji prose ； public sphere ； objectivity ； private sphere ； subjectivity ； narrative ； lyricism ； discursive reasoning

臺大中文學報

28期（2008 / 06 / 01）

69 - 91

繁體中文

本文旨在論述記體至唐代始明確獨立成體的發展脈絡。方法上，略承吳訥、徐師曾觀點，細密檢索自先秦以迄唐代的記敘文字、篇章，考察其由本然單純客觀性、公場域的書寫舊格，漸次形構爲新體的表現。文中逐層確切的論證，由於李華以下唐代古文家的發揚，記體終快速開展，復更加「有我化」，各家各自形塑其卓然之自家面貌，且不時達到兼融敘事、抒情、議論三大散文傳統的境界，充分證明了唐文「新」「變」的意義。

This essay investigates the context and development of the chronicle-type (ji, or account-type) prose up to the point of Tang dynasty, when it mutured into a distinct form of its own. Methodologically, the author has largely followed the works of Wu Na and Hsu Shizeng, tracking c10sely how narrative forms and techniques have evolved between the pre-Qin era and Tang dynasty. He proposes that chi prose was originally an ancient literary form concerned with factual data and public matters, but over time it gradually chrystallized into a novel kind of writing. Careful assessment of the literature shows that, due to the widely known attempts of Li Hua and later masters of the ancient style prose (guwenjia), ji prose gathered momentum for rapid development: the subject matter has since on become more ”self-saturated” or ”self-involved,” thus more expressive of the writer's distinctive personal style. Sometimes, it even incorporates the three traditional prose modes (narrative, lyricism and discursive reasoning) for its own use. This breakthrough of the ji prose testifies to the novelty and revolution of prose writing in Tang.

1. 唐元結(1975)。元次山集。臺北:河洛圖書出版社。
2. 唐李華(1983)。四庫全書：李遐叔文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
3. 唐柳宗元(2000)。柳宗元集。北京:中華書局。
4. 唐獨孤及(1983)。四庫全書：毘陵集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
5. 唐韓愈(2002)。韓昌黎文集校注。臺北:世界書局。
6. 唐顏真卿(1965)。四部叢刊：顏魯公文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
7. 清董誥編(1979)。全唐文。臺北:大通書局。
8. 清嚴可均編(1997)。全上古三代秦漢三國六朝文。石家莊:河北教育出版社。
9. 葛曉音(1995)。漢唐文學的嬗變。北京:北京大學出版社。

1. 蓋琦紓(2015)。論宋人題跋之文體新變─從歐陽脩至蘇門文人。高雄師大國文學報，21，111-132。
2. 周永蕙(2017)。唐代文士的歷史寫作─以韓愈為中心的考察。史原，復刊8期=29期，1-74。
3. (2004)。韓非子法治思想述評。文與哲，5，115-154。