题名 |
《碧琳琅館叢書》本《金氏尚書注》著者考疑 |
并列篇名 |
An Investigation into the Authenticity of the Bi-Lin-Lang-Guan Version of Jin Lu-Xiang's Shang Shu Zhu |
DOI |
10.6281/NTUCL.2011.34.06 |
作者 |
許育龍(Yu-Lung Hsu) |
关键词 |
金履祥 ; 尚書 ; 碧琳琅館 ; Jin Lu-Xian ; Shang Shu ; Bi-Ling-Lang-Guan |
期刊名称 |
臺大中文學報 |
卷期/出版年月 |
34期(2011 / 06 / 01) |
页次 |
229 - 262 |
内容语文 |
繁體中文 |
中文摘要 |
金履祥爲宋、元之際經學大家,據載金氏關於《尚書》的作品有《尚書表注》一卷、《尚書注》十二卷,乂嘗以《尚書》爲主,旁採經子諸說,作《通鑑前編》十二卷。近人蔡根祥曾考證其十二卷《尚書注》,當是由《通鑑前編》中將關於《尚書》部份的文字輯出而成,乃後人僞作。不過,事實上今日傳世的金履祥《尚書注》有兩種版本,一爲陸心源《十萬卷樓叢書》本,此爲流行本,一本則收入清人方功惠《碧琳琅館叢書》當中。兩書內容完全不同,然大部份學者均未詳加分別,以爲同本。本文試圖就此一發現,由既有文獻資料,整理關於金履祥《尚書注》的歷來著作情形,並對《碧琳琅館叢書》本《金氏尚書注》內容作詳細的探討。經研究後,發現此書的思想、內容均與金履祥時代不合,再進一步考察,得知此本亦是僞作,爲後人取元人陳師凱《書蔡傳旁通》爲主,並用及相關資料作爲〈序〉、〈跋〉、〈附錄〉拼湊而成,當是清代中葉之後的人所爲作。 |
英文摘要 |
Jin Lu-Xiang is an important scholar in the Sung and the Yuan Dynasties. Allegedly, he is the author of Shang Shu Biao Zhu (Commentaries on the Chronicle in Shang Shu), Shang Shu Zhu (Commentaries on Shang Shu), and Zi Zhi Tong Jian Qian Bian (The History before Zi Zhi Tong Jian). Recently, Tsai Ken-Hsian has found out that Shang Shu Zhu is a fake: it is actually a part of Zi Zhi Tong Jian Qian Bian.We currently have 2 versions of Jin's Shang Shu Zhu, one of which is in Lu Xin-Yuan's Shi-1Van-Juan-Lou Series and the other one is in Fang Gong-Hui's Bi-Ling-Lang-Guan Series. These 2 versions are totally different, but few scholars have discovered this fact.With a detailed investigation into all the documents related to Jin's writing process of Shang Shu Zhu, this study proves that the Bi-Ling-Lang Guan version is also a fake, because the thoughts that it includes do not exist in Jin's time. This version is actually Chen Shi-Kai's Shu Tsai Zhuan Pang Tong in the Yuan Dynasty, combined with related information as its preface, postscript, and appendix. It has been fabricated in the middle period of the Qing Dynasty. |
主题分类 |
人文學 >
語言學 人文學 > 中國文學 |
参考文献 |
|
被引用次数 |