迷信思考中的解釋效果

Explanation Effect in Superstitious Thinking

10.6129/CJP.2005.4701.04

王震武(Jenn-Wu Wang)；林文瑛(Wen-Ying Lin)

理性 ； 靈異 ； 迷信式思考 ； 解釋效果 ； 預測 ； rationality ； supernatural ； superstitious thinking ； explanation effect ； prediction

中華心理學刊

47卷1期（2005 / 03 / 01）

39 - 60

繁體中文

本研究的目的在探討：「迷信中的理性」是否存在？怎樣的思考缺陷才是迷信的基礎？希望藉此初步釐清迷信式思考的特質。研究的具體焦點集中於探究，在與「靈異觀點」有關的思考中，「具預測力的說法」是否比「單純的事後解釋」更有說服力？實驗一讓受試者閱讀幾個可用靈異觀點來解釋的故事，然後讓他評定某一靈異觀點成立的可能性。控制組讀到的故事版本，僅有故事情節的描述；預測組的版本除該故事外，幷叙述事前有人根據某種靈異觀點，成功地預告了事態的發展；解釋組的版本除故事情節外，幷說明有人事後提出訴諸某種靈異觀點的解釋。實驗的結果顯示，在受試者的思考上，有一種「解釋效果」存在－單純的事後解釋即能擁有不低於（甚至高於）具預測力說法的說服力。實驗二用類似的方式進行實驗，以加進一個「內隱預測組」來澄清，「應驗的預言」之說服力之所以不高於事後解釋，幷不是因爲該預言被受試者視爲「自我應驗的預言」。內隱預測組的故事版本包含一個正確但不爲人知（也因此不可能有暗示效果）的預言。實驗三採用一些與「靈異觀點」無關的故事，結果顯示，「解釋效果」不僅是關於「靈異觀點」的思考之特有現象，在非關靈異的思考上也存在。

The purpose of the present research is to find out if there is ”rationality' in superstitious thinking and to explore the thinking deficit of superstition. The main focus of the research lies in the effect of a supernatural explanation when it is offered as ”predictive” or ”post-hoc explanation” views. In Experiment 1, the subjects read five stories and were asked to rate how likely the supernatural explanation stands as the cause of the events. The control group read the stories with mere event description. The ”predictive group” read the stories with supernatural views successfully predict the events, while the ”post-hoc explanation group” with supernatural views offered after the events occurred. The results indicated that there is Post hoc Explanation Bias in responses. That is, contrary to scientific thinking, subjects did not prefer predictions to post hoc explanations. In Experiment 2, another ”implicit predictive group” was added in order to dispel the possibility that the ”predictive views” was taken as self-fulfilling prophecy. Experiment 3 was designed to examine the explanation effect in non-supernatural thinking. The results demonstrated that the explanation effect may be a thinking deficit for most people which makes superstitious thinking inevitable.

1. Braine, M. D. S.,Reiser, B. J.,Rumain, B.(1984).Some empirical justification for a theory of natural propositional logic.Psychology of Learning and Motivation,18,313-371.
2. Catania, A. C.,Cutts, D.(1963).Experimental control of superstitious responding in humans.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,6,203-208.
3. Chapman, L. J.,Chapman, J. P.(1969).Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,74,271-280.
4. Cheng, P. W.,Holyoak, K. J.(1985).Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Cognitive Psychology,17,391-416.
5. Edwards, W.(1954).The theory of decision making.Psychological Bulletin,51,380-417.
6. Evans J. St. B. T.,Over, D. E.(1996).Rationality and reasoning
7. Evans, J. St B. T.(1993).Bias and rationality.Psychological and philosophical perspectives,6-30.
8. Evans, J. St B. T.(1989).Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences
9. Evans, J. St. B. T.(2002).Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm.Psychological Bulletin,128,978-996.
10. Evans, J.,B. T.(1984).Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning.British Journal of Psychology,75,451-468.
11. Evans, J.,B. T.(1977).Linguistic factors in reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29,297-306.
12. Fischhoff, B.,Beyth-Marom, R.(1983).Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective.Psychological Review,3,239-260.
13. Gigerenzer, G.,Goldstein, D. G.(1996).Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.Psychological Review,103,650-669.
14. Gorman, M. E.(1989).Error, falsification and scientific evidence.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41,385-412.
15. Gorman, M. E.(1986).How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem solving.British Journal of Psychology,77,85-96.
16. Heider, F.(1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations
17. Hogarth, R. M.,Reder M. W.(1987).Introduction: Perspectives from economics and psychology.Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology,1-23.
18. Holyoak, K. J.,Nisbett, R. E.(1988).Induction.The Psychology of human thought,50-91.
19. Hunt, E.(1994).Theoretical models for the study of intelligence.Current topic in human intelligence: Theories of intelligence, Vol. 4,233-256.
20. Jonas, E.,Schulz-Hardt, S.,Frey, D.,Thelen, N.(2001).Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,80,557-571.
21. Kahneman, D.(2003).A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.American Psychologist,58,697-720.
22. Kahneman, D.,Slovic, P.,Tversky, A.(1982).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
23. Kelley, H. H.(1967).Attribution theory in social psychology.Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 15,192-240.
24. Klayman, J.,Ha, Y.(1987).Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.Psychological Review,94,211-228.
25. Kuhn, T. S.(1970).The structure of scientific revolutions
26. Lachter, G. D.,Cole, B. K.,Schoenfeld, W. N.(1971).Response rate under varying frequency of noncontingent reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,15,233-236.
27. Leem, F. C.,Blackwood, D.,Robinson, K. D.(1978).Instrumental learning in the presence of noncontingent reward.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,4,266-273.
28. Lefford, A.(1946).The influence of emotional subject matter on logical reasoning.Journal of General Psychology,34,127-151.
29. Markovits, H.(1988).Conditional reasoning, representation, empirical evidence on a concrete task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41,483-495.
30. Matute, H.(1995).Human reactions to uncontrollable outcomes: Further evidence for superstitions rather than helplessness.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48,142-157.
31. Morse, W. H.,Skinner, B. F.(1957).A second type of superstition in the pigeon.American Journal of Psychology,70,308-311.
32. Nickerson, R. S.(1998).Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises.Review of General Psychology,2,175-220.
33. Nisbett, R. E.,Krantz, D. H.,Jepson, D. H.,Kunda, Z.(1983).The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.Psychological Review,339-363.
34. Oakhill, J.,Johnson-Laird, P. N.,Garnham, A.(1989).Believability and syllogistic reasoning.Cognition,31,117-140.
35. Oaksford, M.,Chater, N.(1993).Reasoning theories and bounded rationality.Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives,31-60.
36. Ono, K.(1987).Superstitious behavior in humans.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,47,261-271.
37. Over, D. E.,Manktelow, K. I.(1993).Rationality, Utility and Deontic Reasoning.Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives,231-259.
38. Peterson, C. R.,Beach, L. R.(1967).Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin,68,29-46.
39. Pollard, P.,Evans, J. St B. T.(1980).The influence of logic on conditional reasoning performance.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32,605-624.
40. Rips, L. J.(1990).Reasoning.Annual Review of Psychology,41,321-353.
41. Shafir, E.,LeBoeuf, R. A.(2002).Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology,53,491-517.
42. Simon, H. A.(1987).Rationality in psychology and economics.Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology,25-40.
43. Simon, H. A.(1979).Rational Choice and the structure of the environment.Models of Thought,20-28.
44. Simon, H. A.(1979).A behavioral model of rational choice.Models of thought,7-19.
45. Skinner, B. F.(1948).`Superstition` in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38,168-172.
46. Smith, E. E.,Langston, C.,Nisbett, R. E.(1992).The case for rules reasoning.Cognitive Science,16,1-40.
47. Taylor, S. E.(1983).Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.American Psychologist,38,1161-1173.
48. Tetlock, Philip E.(2002).Social Functionalist Frameworks for Judgment and Choice: Intuitive Politicians, Theologians, and Prosecutors.Psychological Review,109,451-471.
49. Timberlake, W.,Lucas, G. A.(1985).The basis of superstitious behavior: Chance contingency, stimulus substitution, or appetitive brhavior?.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,44,279-299.
50. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1974).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science,185,1124-1131.
51. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1987).Rational choice and the framing of decisions.Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology,67-94.
52. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1973).Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology,5,207-232.
53. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1983).Extensional vs. Intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Psychological Review,90,293-315.
54. Tversky, A.,Kahneman, D.(1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science,211,453-458.
55. von Neumann, J.,Morgenstern, O.(1947).Theory of game and economic behavior (2nd ed.)
56. Wason, P. C.(1966).Reasoning.New horizons in psychology, Vol. 1.
57. Wason, P. C.(1960).On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12,129-140.
58. Wason, P. C.(1968).Reasoning about a rule.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20,273-281.
59. Wason, P. C.,Johnson-Laird, P. N.(1972).Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content
60. Wetherick, N. E.(1993).Human rationality.Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives,83-109.
61. Wildman, T, M.,Fletcher, H. J.(1977).Developmental increases and decreases in solutions of conditional syllogism problems.Developmental Psychology,13,630-636.
62. Zeiler, M. D.(1968).Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11,405-414.
63. Zuckerman, M.,Knee, C. R.,Hodgins, H. S.,Miyake, K.(1995).Hypothesis confirmation: The joint effect of positive test strategy and acquiescence response set.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,68,52-60.

1. 林慧慈、林文瑛、王震武(2017)。從局部統合到整體統合的發展─以道德思考為例。教育心理學報，48(3)，329-349。
2. 張郁雯、林文瑛、王震武(2011)。科學教育有助於消除迷信嗎？—從思考統整層面所做的觀察。教育心理學報，42(3)，467-490。