運用情境訪談法評量幼兒教師的實用智能

Applying the Situational Interview Approach in Measuring Practical Intelligence of Preschool Teachers

10.6129/CJP.2007.4902.04

李新民(Hsing-Ming Lee)；陳密桃(Mi-Tao Chen)

視訊化情境訪談 ； 結構方程模式 ； 實用智能 ； 驗證性因素分析 ； confirmatory factor analysis ； practical intelligence ； structural equation modeling ； video-based situational interview

中華心理學刊

49卷2期（2007 / 06 / 01）

159 - 183

繁體中文

本研究旨在發展評量幼兒教師實用智能的視訊化情境訪談評量工具，透過主題專家研擬情境訪談的評量題目與計分標準。在全台進行實地施測的過程中，以兩階段抽樣的1200名幼兒教師構成本研究的正式分析樣本。研究者以預試實證資料，進行視訊化情境訪談的題目分析，刪除專家組和生手組差異考驗未達顯著水準，以及評分者信度不佳的題目。接著研究者以第一次施測200名樣本實證資料，進行視訊化情境訪談的探索性分析，產生12個情境訪談題目。最後研究者以第二次施測取得1000名樣本實證資料，進行驗證性因素分析與結構方程模式分析。巢狀模式因素結構驗證性因素分析結果顯示，視訊化情境訪談的評量內涵包含「適應情勢」、「塑造情勢」、「選擇情勢」三個特殊因素，以及「實用智能」一般因素，特殊因素的解釋變異量大於一般因素的變異量。以「適應情勢」、「塑造情勢」、「選擇情勢」三種特質，視訊化情境訪談與情境判斷量表兩種方法為多項特質多項方法基礎，積差相關矩陣和驗證性因素分析結果顯示聚斂效度、區別效度存在。結構方程模式分析顯示視訊化情境訪談得分顯著影響幼兒教師的工作表現。根據主要研究發現，研究者針對視訊化情境訪談的應用，以及未來研究努力方向研提相關建議。

The main purpose of the present study was to video-based situational interview approach to measure preschool teacher's practical intelligence. Face to face questionnaire survey was conducted with preschool teachers from Taiwain aera. 1200 preschool teachers was sampled by the way of two-stage sampling. According to the item analysis, exploratory analyses, video-based situational interview for preschool teacher's practical intelligence is reduced to 12 items. Confirmatory factor analysis of nested factor structure show that measurement of video-based situational interview for preschool teachers' practical intelligence include general and specific factors. Specific factors are adaptive, shaping, and selective situation, general factor is practical intelligence (GP). And the amount of specific variance is more than GP. The validity of evaluating indicators for preschool teacher's practical intelligence is investigated through the construction of a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. The three sections of the indicators, including adaptive, shaping, and selective situation, are treated as distinct traits. While, video-based situational interview and situational judgment inventory are treated as distinct methods. Results from MTMM matrix provide support for the convergent validity, discriminant validity of the indicators. The result of structural equation modeling indicate that job performance of preschool teachers can be captured by video-based situational interview. Those findings will give helpful information to apply video-based situational interview and future study.

1. 李新民、陳密桃(2006)。中華心理學刊。
   連結：
2. 李新民、陳密桃、莊鳳茹(2004)。高雄師大學報。
   連結：
3. 李新民、陳密桃、陳鳳玉(2005)。測驗學刊。
   連結：
4. Bar-on, R.(1997).Bar--on Emotional Quoient Inventory (EQ -i): Technical manual.Toronto, Canada:Multi-Health Systems.
5. Bar-On, R.,Handley, R.(1999).Optimizing people: A practical guide for applying emotional intelligence to improve personal and organizational effectiveness.New Braunfels, TX:Pro-Philes Press.
6. The relationship of entrepreneur`s learning orientations and practical intelligence to new venture performance
7. Baum, J. R.,Bird, B. J.,Chardavoyne, N. A.(2004).Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research.Babson Park, MA:Babson College Center.
8. Bereiter, C.,Scardamalia, M.(1993).Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise.La Salle, IL:Open Court.
9. Bruno, K.,England, E.,Chambliss, C.(2002).Social and emotional learning program for elementary school student: A pilot study.
10. Campbell, D.T.,Fiske, D.(1959).Psychological Bulletin.
11. Conway, J. M.,Jako, R. A.,Goodman, D. F.(1995).Journal of Applied Psychology.
12. Gardner, H.(1993).Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice.New York:Basic Books.
13. Gardner, H.(1999).Refrmaing intelligence.NY:Basic Books.
14. Gatewood, R. D.,Field, H. S.(2001).Human resource selection.Orlando:Harcourt.
15. Goleman, D.(1995).Emotional intelligence.NY:Bantam Books.
16. Grotzer, T. A.,Perkings, D. N.(2000).Handbook of intelligence.Cambridge:Cambridge University.
17. Gustafsson, J.-E.(1989).Abilities, motivation, and methodology: The Minnesota symposium on learning and individual differences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
18. Gustafsson, J.-E.,Balke, G.(1993).Multivariate Behavioral Research.
19. Huffcutt, A. I.,Roth, P.,McDaniel, M. A.(1996).Journal of Applied Psychology.
20. Huffcutt, A.I.(1992).An empirical investigation of the relationship between multidimensional degree of structure and the validity of the employment interview.
21. Hunter, J. E.,Hunter, R. F.(1984).Psychological Bulletin.
22. Jansen, P.,de Jongh, F.(1997).Assessment centers: A practical handbook.Chichester, England:John Wiley & Sons.
23. Janz, J.T.,Hellervik, L.,Gilmore, D.C.(1986).Behavior description interviewing: New, accurate and cost effective.Newton, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
24. Jensen, A. R.(1998).The g factor: The science of mental ability.Westport, CT:Praeger/Greenwood.
25. Johns, G.(1993).Personnel Psychology.
26. Jones, K.,Day, J. D.(1997).Journal of Educational Psychology.
27. Klehe, U-C.(2003).Towards an understanding of the constructs underlying the situational interview and the patterned behavior description interview in predicting typical versus maximum performance.
28. Kobak, K. A.,Greist, J. H.,Jefferson, J. W.,Katzelnick, D. J.(1996).Psychopharmacology.
29. Latham, G. P.(1989).The employment interview: Theory, research and practice.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
30. Latham, G. P.,Saari, L. M.,Pursell, E. D.,Campion, M. A.(1980).The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology.
31. Latham, G. P.,Sue-Chan, C.(1999).Canadian Psychology.
32. Lenert, L. A.,Morss, S.,Bergen, M. R.,Goldstein, M. K.,Garber, A. M.(1997).Medical Care.
33. Maurer, S. D.(2002).Personnel Psychology.
34. Mayer, J. D.,Salovey, P.(1993).Intelligence.
35. Mayer, J. D.,Salovey, P.,Caruso, E.(2000).Handbook of intelligence.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
36. McDaniel, M. A.,Whetzel, D. L.,Schmidt, F. L,Maurer, S.(1994).Journal of Applied Psychology.
37. Nestor-Baker, N. S.,Hoy, W. K.(2001).Educational Administration Quarterly.
38. Noar, S. M.(2003).Structural Equation Modeling.
39. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J.Y.,Podsakoff, N. P.(2003).Journal of Applied Psychology.
40. Quinones, M. A.,Ford, J. K.,Teachout, M. S.(1995).Personnel Psychology.
41. Schmidt, F. L.,Hunter, J. E.,Outerbridge, A. N.(1986).Journal of Applied Psychology.
42. Shae, W. C.,Yeung, K. C.(2001).Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences.
43. Sternberg, R. J.(2005).International Journal of Leadership in Education.
44. Sternberg, R. J.,Forsythe, G. B.,Hedlund, J.,Horvath, J. A.,Wagner, R. K.,Williams, W. M.,Snook, S.,Grigorenko, E. L.(2000).Practical intelligence in everyday life.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
45. Sternberg, R. J.,Hedlund, J.(2002).Human Performance.
46. Sternberg, R. J.,Horvath, J. A.(1999).Tacit knowledge in professional practice.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Taylor, P. J.,Small, B.(2002).Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
48. Van Rooy, D. L.,Viswesvaran, C.(2004).ournal of Vocational Behavior.
49. Wagner, R. K.(1987).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
50. Wagner, R. K.,Sternberg, R. J.(1990).Measures of leadership.West Orange, NJ:Leadership Library of America.
51. Wagner, R. K.,Sternberg, R. J.(1991).Tacit knowledge inventory for managers: User manual.San Antonio, TX:The Psychological Corporation.
52. Wagner, R. K.,ternberg, R. J.(1985).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
53. Weekley, J. A.,ones, C.(1997).Personnel Psychology.
54. Whetzel, D. L.,Baranowski, E.,Petro, J.M.,Curtin, P. J.,Fisher, J. L.(2003).Applied H.R.M. Research.
55. Wiesner, W. H.,Cronshaw, S. F.(1988).Journal of Occupational Psychology.
56. 李新民(2004)。幼兒教師實用智能與工作表現之相關研究。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。
57. 莊雯心(2001)。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
58. 戴瓊瑩(2001)。國立高雄師範大學英語學系。

1. 陳密桃、李新民(2007)。台灣地區國小教師的實用智能、緣分信念、內團體偏私與心理健康、工作表現之潛在關聯。教育學刊，29，37-72。
2. 陳密桃、李新民(2009)。寬恕的測量及其與焦慮的潛在關聯。教育心理學報，41(1)，1-27。
3. 高旭繁(2013)。通往華人幸福之路：性格特質與文化價值的雙重作用。本土心理學研究，39，165-214。
4. 黃文三、沈碩彬(2017)。高中職教師情緒勞務與學校生活適應之關聯模式探析。教育理論與實踐學刊，36，47-73。
5. (2010)。身心障礙學童主要照顧者的寬恕信念及相關影響因素探析。樹德科技大學學報，12(1)，111-131。