領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行爲：權力距離之調節效果

Leader's Vertical-Relational Identity and Subordinate Prosocial Behavior: The Moderating Effects of Power Distance

10.6129/CJP.2009.5101.07

蔡松純(Sung-Chun Tsai)；鄭伯壎(Bor-Shiuan Cheng)；周麗芳(Li-Fang Chou)；姜定宇(Ding-Yu Jiang)；鄭弘岳(Hung-Yueh Cheng)

工具性認定 ； 利社會組織行爲 ； 情感性認定 ； 領導者－部屬關係認定 ； 權力距離 ； expressive identity ； instrumental identity ； leader's vertical relational identity ； power distance ； prosocial organizational behavior

中華心理學刊

51卷1期（2009 / 03 / 01）

121 - 138

繁體中文

上下屬對彼此關係的認定如何影響雙方的行為，近年來雖然頗受研究者重視，但大多聚焦於雙方對關係品質的知覺上，而忽略了當事人對此關係所存有的先成之見。本研究有別於以往採取上下關係的類別互動觀點，特別關注領導者對上下關係本質的認定，將領導者對上下關係的認定區分為情感性關係認定與工具性關係認定，再探討主管之上下關係認定對部屬三種利社會組織行為包括（利主管、利同事及利組織）的影響；且進一步探討部屬權力距離的調節效果。在蒐集795對主管與部屬之對偶資料並進行分析之後，發現：(1)主管之上下情感性關係認定，與部屬之利主管、利同事及利組織行為均具有顯著的正相關；(2)上下工具性關係認定則對部屬之利主管與利同事行為具有顯著的負相關，但對利組織行為則無相關；(3)部屬權力距離在上述關係中具有顯著的調節效果：權力距離弱化了領導者情感性關係認定對利主管行為的正向影響、以及領導者之工具性關係認定的負向影響；但卻強化了領導者情感性關係認定對利同事、利組織的正向影響。最後，討論本研究的貢獻、限制及未來的研究方向。

Leader's vertical relational identity was classified into expressive and instrumental identity in this study. We explored the effects of supervisor's vertical relational identity upon subordinate's prosocial organizational behavior (POB) toward leader, coworker and organization; and further probed into the moderating effect of subordinates' power distance on the relationship between leader's vertical relational identity and prosocial organizational behavior. Results from a sample of 795 leader-subordinate dyads showed that (1) expressive relational identity was positively related to all the prosocial organizational behaviors; (2) instrumental relational identity was negatively related to subordinate’s POB-leader and POB-coworker, but not to POB-organization; (3) subordinate's powder distance had significant moderating effects on the relationships between the leader's vertical relational identity and POB. The implications, limitations and possible directions for future research were also indicated.

1. 周麗芳(2002)。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。本土心理學研究，18，175-228。
   連結：
2. 周麗芳、鄭伯壎、陳靜慧、任金剛、許金田(2005)。華人高階管理者網絡中的特殊連帶與人際情感：深層心理契合與正式工作關係的效果。本土心理學研究，23，201-257。
   連結：
3. A. J. Marsella (Eds.),G. DeVos (Eds.),F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.)(1985).Culture and self: Asian and Western perspectives.New York:Tavistock.
4. Aryee, S.,Chen. Z. X.,Sun, L.Y.,Debrah, Y. A.(2007).Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model.Journal of Applied Psychology,92,191-201.
5. Atkinson, S.(2004).Senior management relationships and trust: An exploratory study.Journal of Managerial Psychology,19,571-587.
6. Baldwin, M. W.(1992).Relational schemas and the processing of social information.Psychological Bulletin,112,461-484.
7. Baldwin, M. W.,Carrell, S. E.,Lopez, D. F.(1990).Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,26,435-454.
8. Bandura, A.(1977).Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, N J:Prentice-Hall.
9. Baruch, y.,O''Creevy, M. F.,Hind, P.,Vigoda-Gadot, E.(2004).Prosocial behavior and job performance on members' organizational identity and identification.Administrative Science Quarterly,46,399-411.
10. Baxter, L. A.(1987).Symbols of relationship identity in relationship cultures.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,4,261-280.
11. Begley, T. M.,Lee, C.,Fang, Y.,Li, J.(2002).Power distance as moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees.Journal of Managerial Psychology,17,692-711.
12. Bochner, S.,Hesketh, B.(1994).Power distance, individualism/collectivism, and job-related attitudes in a culturally diverse work group.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,25,233-257.
13. Brewer, M. B.,Gardner, W.(1996).Who is this "we"?: Levels of collective identity and self-representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71,83-93.
14. Brief, A. P.,Motowidlo, S. J.(1986).Prosocial organizational behaviors.Academy of Management Review,11,710-725.
15. Cheng, B. S.,Chou, L. F.,Huang, M. P.,Wu, T. Y.,Farh, J. L.(2004).Paternalistic leadership and subordinate reverence: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,7,89-117.
16. Cheng, B. S.,Huang, M. P.,Chou, L. F.(2002).Paternalistic leadership and its effectiveness: Evidence from Chinese organizational teams.Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,3,85-112.
17. Chiu, C.,Yang C. F.(1987).Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales.Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society,18,39-50.
18. Chou, L. F.,Cheng, B. S.,Jen, C. K.(2005).The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence.Paper pesented at the Annual Meeting of Academy of Management,Hawaii, USA.:
19. Clugston, M.,Howell, J. P.,Dorfman, P. W.(2000).Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment?.Journal of Management,26,5-30.
20. Coleman, V. I.,Borman, W. C.(2000).Investigating the underling structure of the citizenship performance domain.Human Resource Management Review,10,25-44.
21. Dansereau, F.,Graen G.,Haga, W. J.(1975).A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,13,46-78.
22. Dorfman, P. W.,Howell, J. P.(1988).Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited.Advances in International Comparative Management,3,127-150.
23. Farh, J. L.,Earley, P. C.,Lin, S. C.(1997).Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society.Administrative Science Quarterly,42,421-444.
24. Farh, J. L.,Hackett, R. D.,Liang, J.(2007).Individual-level cultural values as moderators of the perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality.Academy of Management Journal,50,715-729.
25. Fiske, A. P.,Haslam, N. F.,Susan T.(1991).Confusing one person with another: What errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,656-674.
26. Fiske, S. T.,Taylor, S. E.(1984).Social cognition.New York:Random House.
27. Flynn, F. J.(2005).Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations.Academy of Management Review,30,737-750.
28. George, J. M.,Brief, A. P.(1992).Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship.Psychological Bulletin,112,310-329.
29. Graen, G.(1976).Role-making process within complex organization and organizational psychology.Chicago:Rand McNally.
30. Graen, G. B.,Novak, M.,Sommerkamp, P.(1982).The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,30,109-131.
31. Ho, D. Y. F.(1995).Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Constructs with the West.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior,25,115-139.
32. Hofmann, D. A.(1997).An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models.Journal of Management,23,723-755.
33. Hofstede, G.(1980).Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage.
34. Hofstede, G.(1991).Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind.London:McGraw-Hill.
35. Hui, C.,Lee, C.,Rousseau, D. M.(2004).Employment relationships in China: Do workers relate to the organization or to people?.Organization Science,15,232-240.
36. Katz, D.(1964).The motivational basis of organizational behavior.Behavioral Science,9,131-146.
37. Kim, U.,Triandis, H. C.,Kagitcibasi, C.,Choi, S. C., Yoon, G.(1994).Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
38. Kline, J. B.,Sulsky, L. M.,Rever-Moriyama, S. D.(2000).Common method variance and specification errors: A practical approach to detection.The Journal of Psychology,134,401-421.
39. Konovsky, M. A.,Pugh, S. D.(1994).Citizenship behavior and social exchange.Academy of Management Journal,37,656-669.
40. LePine, J. A.,Erez, A.,Johnson, D. E.(2002).The nature and dimensionality of organization citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,87,53-65.
41. Levinson, H.(1965).Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization.Administrative Science Quarterly,9,370-390.
42. Liden, R. C.,Wayne, S. J.,Stilwell, D.(1993).A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges.Journal of Applied Psychology,78,662-674.
43. Lincoln, J. R.,Miller, J.(1979).Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks.Administrative Science Quarterly,24,181-199.
44. McNeely, B. L.,Meglino, B. M.(1994).The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,79,836-844.
45. Meglino, B. M.,Ravlin, E. C.,Adkins, C. L.(1989).A work values approach to corporate culture: A field test of the value congruence process and its relationship to individual outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology,74,424-432.
46. Organ, D. W.(1988).Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solidier syndrome.Lexington, MA:Lexington Books.
47. Organ, D. W.,Konovsky, M.(1989).Cognitive versus affective determinats of organizational citizenship behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology,74,157-164.
48. Peters, L. H.,O''Connor, E. J.,Wise, S. L.,T. S. Bateman(Eds.),G. R. Ferris (Eds.)(1984).Method and analysis in organizational research.Reston, VA:Reston.
49. Planalp, S.,R. Burnett(Eds.),P. McGhee(Eds.),D. D. Clarke (Eds.)(1987).Accounting for relatiobships.New York:Guilford Press.
50. Roerhlisberger, F. J.,Dickson, W. J.(1939).Management and the worker.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
51. Schein, E. H.(1991).Organizational culture and leadership.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
52. Shore, L. M.,Coyle-Shapiro, J.(2003).New development in employee-organizational relationship.Journal of Organizational Behavior,24,443-450.
53. Sluss, D. M.,Ashforth, B. E.(2007).Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships.Academy of Management Review,32,9-32.
54. Tsui, A. S.,O'' Reilly, C. A.(1989).Beyond simple demographic affects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads.Academy of Management Journal,32,402-423.
55. Tyler, T. R.,Lind, E. A.,Huo, Y. J.(2000).Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures.Psychology, Public Police, and Law,6,1138-1163.
56. Villa, J. R.,Howell, J. P.,Dorfman, P. W.,Daniel, D. L.(2003).Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderated multiple regressions.Leadership Quarterly,14,3-23.
57. Wat, D.,Shaffer, M. A.(2005).Equity and relationship quality influences on organizational citizenship behaviors.Personnel Review,34,406-422.
58. Weiss, H. M.(1978).Social learning of work values in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology,63,711-718.
59. Whittington, J. L.,Goodwin, V. L.,Murray, B.(2004).Transformational leadership, goal difficulty, and job design: Independent and interactive effects on employee outcomes.The Leadership Quarterly,15,593-606.
60. Wood, J. T.(1982).Communication and relational culture: Bases for the study of human relationships.Communication Quarterly,30,75-84.
61. Zenger, T. R.,Lawerence, B. S.(1989).Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distribution on technical communication.Academy of Management Journal,32,353-376.
62. 何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕、楊國樞主編、黃光國主編(1991)。中國人的心理與行爲。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
63. 姜定宇(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
64. 姜定宇主編、鄭伯壎主編、鄭弘岳主編(2003)。組織行爲研究在台灣。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
65. 黃光國(2001)。儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎。教育與社會研究，2，1-34。
66. 黃光國(1988)。中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流圖書公司。
67. 楊中芳主編(2001)。中國人的人際關係、情感與信任。台北:遠流出版公司。
68. 劉兆明(2003)。領導行爲與工作動機：情感關係的探討。輔仁學誌－理工類，37，133-146。
69. 鄭伯壎(2005)。華人領導：理論與實際。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
70. 鄭伯壎(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行爲。本土心理學研究，3，142-219。
71. 鄭伯壎、鄭紀瑩、周麗芳(1999)。效忠主管：概念構念、測量、及相關因素的探討。「第三屆華人心理學家學術研討會」（北京）宣讀論文
72. 賴志超、林純安、黃國隆、鄭伯壎編著、姜定宇編著(2006)。華人組織行爲：議題、作法及出版。台北:華泰出版社。

1. 李婉翠(2016)。不當督導前因後果之探討：以核心自我評價與知覺公平為干擾角色。淡江大學企業管理學系碩士班學位論文。2016。1-127。