雙元自主性的共存與範疇優勢性運作機制：以訊息區辨表現降低共同方法變異

The Coexistence and Domain Superiority Processing of Dual Autonomy: Decreasing Common Method Variance with Message Discernment

10.6129/CJP.2011.5301.04

吳志文(Chih-Wen Wu)；葉光輝(Kuang-Hui Yeh)

共存 ； 訊息區辨表現 ； 範疇優勢性 ； 雙元自主 ； coexistence ； domain-superiority ； dual autonomy model ； message

中華心理學刊

53卷1期（2011 / 03 / 01）

59 - 77

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在於以訊息區辨表現作為非自陳式的效標變項，透過不同情境操弄的兩個研究，再次驗證雙元自主性模型提出的共存性觀點，並且進一步探討雙元自主性各自有其優勢作用範疇的運作機制。首先，兩個研究的結果顯示：個體的個體化自主性功能主要發揮在與個人範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上；而其關係自主性功能主要作用在與人際範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上。其次，個體唯有已經發展出高度的雙元自主性，才能夠在強調獨立或和諧價值情境的促發下，有效地交互提取身上的個體化自主性與關係自主性，以因應情境需求而發揮相應優勢的訊息區辨表現，支持了模型主張雙元自主性可以共存在單一個體身上的理論觀點（研究二之一和研究二之二）；換言之，即便個體在情境下經驗到明確的目標需求，但如果個體缺乏對應目標需求的高自主性能力時，仍無法展現良好的訊息區辨表現（研究二之二）。也就是說，個體的訊息區辨表現是透過情境需求與個體自主性強度兩者共同作用的結果。

By using objective dependent variables (performances on messages discernment) as criteria, the aims of this article are to reexamine the coexistence and domain-superiority claims of dual autonomy model (DAM) in two successive studies. The results showed that (1) all two studies reconfirmed the domain-superiority claim of DAM by manifesting that individuating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in intrapersonal domain situation, however relating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in interpersonal domain situation; (2) the effects of situation manipulations could be found only within the adolescents who have higher corresponding autonomous capacity; this means that individuating autonomy and relating autonomy could be coexisting within an individual and an individual is capable of switching these two autonomy in different situations appeal (in study 2A and study 2B); (3) even under the situations in activating the pursuing of individuating/relating related goal, if the adolescences who do not hold the corresponding autonomous capacity, when compare to the adolescents of control group, they still cannot perform higher messages discernment significantly in the task (in study 2B). That is, the extent of performance on messages discernment was the outcome of the interacting effect between situational activation and individual's autonomous capacity.

1. 吳佳煇、林以正(2005)。中庸思維量表的編製。本土心理學研究，24，247-300。
   連結：
2. Aaker, J. L.,Lee, A. Y.(2001)."I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion.Journal of Consumer Research,28,33-49.
3. Baltes, M. M.,Silverberg, S. B.(1994).The dynamics between dependency and autonomy: Illustrations across the life span.Life-span development and behavior,12,41-90.
4. Beyers, W.,Goossens, L.,Vansant, I.,Moors, E.(2003).A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,32,351-365.
5. Brewer, M. B.,Gardner, W.(1996).Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71,83-93.
6. Chen, S. W.,Chou, S. H.(2003).Effects and patterns of self-presentation in achievement events.Fifth Biennial Conference of Asian Association of Social Psychology,Manila, Philippines:
7. Chirkov, V.,Ryan, R. M.,Kim, Y.,Kaplan, U.(2003).Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and wellbeing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84,97-110.
8. Cross, S. E.,Madson, L.(1997).Models of the self: Self-construals and gender.Psychological Bulletin,122,5-37.
9. Erikson, E. H.(1962).Young man Luther: A study in psychoanalysis and history.New York:W. W. Norton.
10. Gardner, W. L.,Gabriel, S.,Lee, A. Y.(1999)."I" value freedom, but "we" value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment.Psychological Science,10,321-326.
11. Hong, Y. Y.,Morris, M. W.,Chiu, C. Y.,Benet-Martínez, V.(2000).Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition.American Psychologist,55,709-720.
12. Hwang, K. K..Life goals, achievement motivation and value of effort in Confucian society.Asian's educational miracle : Psychological , social and cultural perspectives,New York:
13. Kagitcibasi, C.(2005).Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,36,403-422.
14. Kwan, V. S.,Bond, M. H.,Singelis, T. M.(1997).Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73,1038-1051.
15. Liu, J.(Ed.),Ward, C.(Ed.),Bernardo, A. B. I.(Ed.),Karasawa, M.(Ed.),Fischer, & R.(Ed.)(2007).Progress in Asian social psychology series.Seoul, Korea:Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa.
16. Marcia, J. E.(1966).Development and validation of ego-identity status.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,3,551-558.
17. Markus, H. R.,Kitayama, S.(2003).Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action.Crosscultural differences in perspectives on the self,Lincoln, NE:
18. Miller, J. G.(2003).Culture and agency: Implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development.Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self,Lincoln, NE:
19. Mischel, W.,Shoda, Y.(1995).A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.Psychological Review,102,246-268.
20. Noller, P.(1994).Relationships with parents in adolescence: Process and outcome.Personal relationships during adolescence,Thousand Oaks, CA:
21. Petty, R. E.,Cacioppo, J. T.(1990).Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration.Psychological Bulletin,107,367-374.
22. Petty, R. E.,Cacioppo, J. T.(1986).The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion.Advances in experimental social psychology,19,123-205.
23. Petty, R. E.,Wegener, D. T.(1999).The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies.Dual-process theories in social psychology,New York:
24. Petty, R. E.,Wegener, D. T.(1993).Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for contextinduced contrast.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,29,137-165.
25. Ryan, R. M.(1995).Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes.Journal of Personality,63,397-427.
26. Silverberg, S. B.,Gondoli, D. M.(1996).Autonomy in adolescence: A contextualized perspective.Psychosocial development during adolescence,Thousand Oak, CA:
27. Stein, J. A.,Newcomb, M. D.,Bentler, P.(1992).The effect of agency and communality on self-esteem: Gender differences in longitudinal data.Sex Roles,26,465-483.
28. Trafimow, D.,Triandis, H. C.,Goto, S. G.(1991).Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,649-655.
29. Yeh, K. H.,Liu, Y. L.,Huang, H. S.(2003).Individuating and relating:Two autonomy orientations in Chinese adolescents.Fifth Conference of the Asian Association of Social Psychology,Manila, Philippines:
30. Yeh, K.-H.,Bedford, O.,Yang, Y.-J.(2009).A crosscultural comparison of the coexistence and domain superiority of individuating and relating autonomy.International Journal of Psychology,44,213-221.
31. Yeh, K.-H.,Yang, Y.-J.(2006).Construct validation of individuating and relating autonomy orientations in culturally Chinese adolescents.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,9,148-160.
32. 邱佳椿、廖芷妤、侯明賢(2003)。綜合高中學生生涯規劃輔導之探討。技術與職業教育，76，44-47。
33. 黃子騰(1998)。終生學習與全面品管。技術與職業教育，43，39-42。
34. 楊中芳(2001)。中國人的世界觀：中庸實踐思維初探。如何理解中國人：文化與個人論文集，台北=Taipei:
35. 楊國樞(1993)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存。中國人的價值觀―社會科學觀點，台北=Taipei:

1. 蔡美香,孫頌賢,施香如(2019)。家庭關係中親密與自主的平衡。中華輔導與諮商學報，56，1-15。
2. 李亭萱(2021)。臺灣無性戀於華人文化現身處境之探討。輔導與諮商學報，43(1)，1-20。
3. 林幸台、王智弘(2018)。台灣輔導與諮商專業的繼承與開展：本土輔導與諮商專業發展的回顧與探索。中華輔導與諮商學報，53，1-22。
4. 劉經偉,張晨光(2020)。親職化中的子女主體性：來自於「孝道」研究的啟示。輔導與諮商學報，42(2)，63-82。
5. 宋麗玉、吳嘉蓉(2018)。優勢觀點在軍隊社會工作應用之初探。臺灣社會工作學刊，20，75-107。
6. 田廣曉,王智弘(2020)。大陸地區大學諮商師涉及雙重關係倫理議題之本土化探討。本土心理學研究，54，113-176。
7. 徐少慧,王瑞霞(2016)。青少年自主性對糖尿病控制之影響與成效探討：系統性文獻回顧。慈濟科技大學學報，3期=總2，29-66。
8. 葉光輝,張仁和,孫蒨如(2019)。華人本土自我研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，51，3-31。
9. 葉光輝、吳志文(2015)。工作自主經驗與父母教養行為：雙元自主性促進因素的範疇優勢性檢證。本土心理學研究，43，3-54。
10. 葉光輝、吳志文、王敏衡(2016)。知覺滿足需求的教養與青少年的適應表現：雙元自主能力的跨時間中介效果檢驗。本土心理學研究，45，57-92。
11. (2017)。主編的話─文化脈絡中的危機、轉機與復原力：本土諮商心理學研究的方向、目標與策略。中華輔導與諮商學報，50，1-28。