正義與情理：偏袒與重才的人事決定對主管的公正及人情評價之影響

Justice and Qing-Li: The Influence of Favoritism-Based Versus Competence-Based Personnel Decisions on the Evaluations of Leader's Impartiality and Renqing

10.6129/CJP.2011.5303.06

張滿玲(Maan-Ling Chang)；鍾昆原(Kuen-Yung Jone)

人情／事理 ； 內團體 ； 分配正義 ； 程序正義 ； distributive justice ； ingroup ； procedural justice ； renqing/shili

中華心理學刊

53卷3期（2011 / 09 / 01）

349 - 370

繁體中文

本研究是探討主管依關係和能力做出的人事決定對其公正及人情評價之影響。研究者採取情境故事法，故事中院長在兩位總住院醫師中選擇一位升遷，其中一人能力佳，被設定為與院長無私交也非校友；另一人能力差，他與院長的關係依私人關係和類別內團體被操弄為「無私交的校友」、「有私交的非校友」、或「無私交的非校友」。另外操弄升遷決定的結果為「棄能」或「選能」。根據操弄的兩個獨變項，共設計6個情境故事，173位醫學系學生被隨機分派閱讀其中一個故事。在公正評價上，研究假設程序正義對分配正義有強化效果：符合／不符合程序正義（不偏袒／偏袒決定）會強化符合／不符合分配正義（選能／棄能決定）對主管公正評價的正／負面影響，預期有「選能下的棄私／棄同效果」和「棄能下的偏私／偏同效果」，結果只發現「選能下的棄私效果」和「棄能下的偏私效果」。在人情評價上，基於華人情理合一，假設偏私（合情決定）對棄能（不合理決定）的負面影響有和緩效果，以及棄私（不合情決定）對選能（合理決定）的正面影響有減損效果，結果發現有「棄能下的偏私效果」，但未發現「選能下的棄私效果」；而且未發現任何「同」的效果，此顯示人情的概念並不適用於類別內團體。最後從正義觀和情理觀討論公正與人情，並區別私和同兩種自己人基礎，以及提出理論及實務意涵。

The study aimed to examine the influence of favoritism-based vs. competence-based personnel decisions on evaluations of leader's impartiality and renqing. The study designed a scenario about personnel promotion in the context of hospitals. Two chief residents were candidates for a visiting staff. While the excellent candidate was described as not having a relationship with the superintendent, either as his alumnus or as his close friend, the other was incompetent, and his relationship with the superintendent was manipulated, according to guanxi and category group, as the ”alumnus and non-friend,” ”non-alumnus and friend,” or ”non-alumnus and non-friend.” The decision to promote either the excellent or the incompetent candidate was manipulated. Totally, 173 students of medicine school were randomly assigned to one of the six conditions: 2 (excellent vs. incompetent) x 3 (”alumnus and non-friend,” ”non-alumnus and friend,” or ”non-alumnus and non-friend”). It was hypothesized that procedural justice (PJ) intensified the effect of distributive justice (DJ) on the impartiality evaluation. High/low PJ (impartial/partial decision) was predicted to enhance the positive/ negative effect of high/low DJ (promoting the competent/the incompetent candidate) on the impartiality evaluation. As predicted, the ”promote-competence and reject-guanxi” effect and the ”reject-competence and favor-guanxi” effect on the impartiality evaluation were found, but the ”promote-competence and reject-category” effect and the ”reject-competence and favor-category” effect were not confirmed. Furthermore, because of the unity of ”qing and li,” it was hypothesized that the ”favor-guanxi” (he qing) effect of the decision can moderate the negative effect of the ”reject-competence” (bu he li) on the renqing evaluation and that the ”reject-guanxi” (bu he qing) effect can decrease the positive effect of the ”promote-competence (he li).” As predicted, the ”reject-competence and favor-guanxi” effect on the renqing evaluation was found, but the hypothesized ”promote-competence and reject-guanxi” effect was absent. Category group effect on the renqing evaluation was not found, which implied that the concept of the ”renqing” was not suitable for the category group. The study concluded with the discussions on impartiality and renqing from justice and ”qing and li” perspectives, differentiation of guanxi and category, and the theoretical and practical implications.

1. 王榮春、陳彰儀(2003)。部屬觀點之領導互動論─初探部屬對主管領導行為的知覺因素，與其對主管互動的內涵。應用心理研究，20，181-215。
   連結：
2. 李美枝、董興邦、陳貽照、楊建銘(2010)。嬰幼兒睡眠安排形式：「一心二態」文化意涵的解析。中華心理學刊，52，221-241。
   連結：
3. 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍(2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本土心理學研究，18，51-94。
   連結：
4. 鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導：三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究，14，3-64。
   連結：
5. Hu, H. C. (1949). Emotions, real and assumed, in Chinese society. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Intercultural Studies, Columbia University, New York.
6. Aron, A.,Aron, E. N.,Tudor, M.,Nelson, G.(1991).Close relationships as including other in the self.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,241-253.
7. Barry, B.(1995).Justice as impartiality.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
8. Bierhoff, H.(ed.),Cohen, R. L.(ed.),Greenberg, J.(ed.)(1986).Justice in social relations.New York:Prenum Press.
9. Brewer, M. B.(1999).The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?.Journal of Social Issues,55,429-444.
10. Brewer, M. B.,Gardner, W.(1996).Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71,83-93.
11. Brockner, J.,Siegel, P. A.,Daly, J. P.,Tyler, T.,Martin, C.(1997).When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability.Administrative Science Quarterly,42,558-583.
12. Brockner, J.,Wiesenfeld, B. M.(1996).An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.Psychological Bulletin,120,189-208.
13. Brown, M. E.,Treviño, L. K.(2006).Ethical leadership: A review and future directions.Leadership Quarterly,17,595-616.
14. Brown, M. E.,Treviño, L. K.,Harrison, D. A.(2005).Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,97,117-134.
15. Chasteen, A. L.(2005).Seeing eye-to-eye: Do intergroup biases operate similarly for younger and older adults?.International Journal of Aging & Human Development,61,123-139.
16. Chen, C. C.,Chen, Y. R.,Xin, K.(2004).Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective.Organization Science,15,200-209.
17. Choi, Y.,Mai-Dalton, R. R.(1998).On the leadership function of self-sacrifice.Leadership Quarterly,9,475-501.
18. Cropanzano, R.,Byrne, Z. S.,Bobocel, D. R.,Rupp, D. E.(2001).Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice.Journal of Vocational Behavior,58,164-209.
19. Davey, L. M.,Bobocel, D. R.,Son Hing, L. S.,Zanna, M. P.(1999).Preference for the merit principle scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preference.Social Justice Research,12,223-240.
20. De Hoogh, A. H. B.,Den Hartog, D. N.(2008).Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study.Leadership Quarterly,19,297-311.
21. Den Hartog, D. N.,De Hoogh, A. H. B.(2009).Empowering behaviour and leader fairness and integrity: Studying perceptions of ethical leader behaviour from a levels-of-analysis perspective.European Journal of Wor k & Organi zat ional Psychology,18,199-230.
22. Deutsch, M.(1975).Equity, equality, and need: What determines which values will be used as the basis of distributive justice?.Journal of Social Issues,31(3),137-149.
23. Feltham, B.(ed.),Cottingham, J.(ed.)(2010).Partiality and impartiality: Morality, special relationships, and the wider world.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
24. Gibson, K. J.,Zerbe, W. J.,Franken, R. E.(1993).The influence of rater and ratee age on judgments of work-related attributes.Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied,127,271-280.
25. Gilliland, S. W.(ed.),Steiner, D. D.(ed.),Skarlicki, D. P.(ed.)(2002).Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice.Greenwich, CT:IAP.
26. Graves, L. M.,Powell, G. N.(1996).Sex similarity, quality of the employment interview and recruiters' evaluation of actual applicants.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,69,243-261.
27. Greenberg, J.(1990).Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow.Journal of Management,16,399-432.
28. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
29. Hu, H. H.,Hsu, C. T.,Lee, W. R.,Chu, C. M.(2007).A policy-capturing approach to comparing the reward allocation decisions of Taiwanese and U.S. managers.Social Behavior & Personality,35,1235-1250.
30. Hu, H. H.,Hsu, W. L.,Cheng, B. S.(2004).Reward allocation decisions of Chinese managers: Influence of employee categorization and allocation context.Asian Journal of Social Psychology,7,221-232.
31. Hui, C. H.,Triandis, H. C.,Yee, C.(1991).Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?.British Journal of Social Psychology,30,145-157.
32. Hwang, K. K.(1987).Face and favor: The Chinese power game.American Journal of Sociology,92,944-974.
33. Kraiger, K.,Ford, J. K.(1985).A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology,70,56-65.
34. Kwong, J. Y. Y.,Leung, K.(2002).A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,87,278-299.
35. Lerner, M. J.(1975).The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction.Journal of Social Issues,31,1-19.
36. Leung, K.,Bond, M. H.(1984).The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47,793-804.
37. Lewis, A. C.,Sherman, S. J.(2003).Hiring you makes me look bad: Social-identity based reversals of the ingroup favoritism effect.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,90,262-276.
38. Li, J. T.(ed.),Tsui, A. S.(ed.),Weldon, E.(ed.)(2000).Management and organizations in the Chinese context.London:Macmillian.
39. Lin, T. R.,Dobbins, G. H.,Farh, J. L.(1992).A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology,77,363-371.
40. Lin, T. Y.(ed.),Tseng, W. S.(ed.),Yeh, Y. K.(ed.)(1995).Chinese societies and mental health.Hong Kong:Oxford University Press.
41. Lin, X. W.,Che, H. S.,Leung, K.(2009).The role of leader morality in the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,39,1536-1561.
42. Ling, W.,Chia, R. C.,Fang, L.(2000).Chinese implicit leadership theory.Journal of Social Psychology,140,729-739.
43. Michelbach, P. A.,Scott, J. T.,Matland, R. E.,Bornstein, B. H.(2003).Doing Rawls justice: An experimental study of income distribution norms.American Journal of Political Science,47,523-539.
44. Mikula, G.(ed.)(1980).Justice and social interaction: Experimental and theoretical contributions from psychological research.New York:Springer-Verlag.
45. Ng, S. H.(1984).Equity and social categorization effects on intergroup allocation of rewards.British Journal of Social Psychology,23,165-172.
46. Platow, M. J.,Hoar, S.,Reid, S.,Harley, K.,Morrison, D.(1997).Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations.Journal of Social Psychology,27,465-494.
47. Rawls, J.(1971).A theory of justice.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
48. Rozin, P.,Royzman, E. B.(2001).Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion.Personality and Social Personality Review,5,296-320.
49. Rupp, D. E.,Bell, C. M.(2010).Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self-regulation in third-party responses to injustice.Business Ethics Quarterly,20,89-106.
50. Rusbult, C. E.,Insko, C. A.,Lin, Y. W.(1995).Seniority-based reward allocation in the United States and Taiwan.Social Psychology Quarterly,58,13-30.
51. Schminke, M.(ed.)(1998).Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Scott, J. T.,Matland, R. E.,Michelbach, P. A.,Bornstein, B. H.(2001).Just deserts: An experimental study of distributive justice norms.American Journal of Political Science,45,749-767.
53. Skarlicki, D. P.,Kulik, C.(2005).Third party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective.Research in Organizational Behavior,26,183-229.
54. Smith, E. R.,Henry, S.(1996).An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22,635-642.
55. Smither, J. W.(ed.)(1998).Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
56. Van den Bos, K.,Vermunt, R.,Wilke, H. A. M.(1997).Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72,95-104.
57. Vanhoomissen, T.,Van Overwalle, F.,Brussel, V. U.(2010).Me or not me as source of ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: A connectionist perspective.Social Cognition,28,84-109.
58. Zhang, Z.,Yang, C. F.(1998).Beyond distributive justice: The reasonableness norm in Chinese reward allocation.Asian Journal of Psychology,1,253-269.
59. Zhou, J.,Martocchio, J. J.(2001).Chinese and American manager's compensation award decisions: A comparative policy-capturing study.Personnel Psychology,54,115-145.
60. Zogmaister, C.,Arcuri, L.,Castelli, L.,Smith, E. R.(2008).The impact of loyalty and equality on implicit ingroup favoritism.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,11,493-512.
61. 田佳禾(2009)。國立台灣大學國家發展研究所=National Taiwan University。
62. 危芷芬、黃光國(1998)。積極義務與消極義務：台美大學生道德判斷的文化比較研究。中華心理學刊，40，137-153。
63. 朱真茹、楊國樞(1976)。個人現代性與相對作業量對報酬分配行為的影響。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，41，79-95。
64. 何友暉、彭泗清、趙志裕(2006)。世道人心：對中國人心理的探索。香港=Hong Kong:三聯=Joint。
65. 李美枝(1992)。內團體偏私的文化差異─中美大學生的比較。中研院民族所集刊，73，153-190。
66. 李美枝(1993)。從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限。本土心理學研究，1，267-300。
67. 李美枝、許正聖(1995)。從台灣大學生內團體偏私基礎之解析看社群意識發展的可能性。本土心理學研究，4，150-182。
68. 林宗鴻(1992)。Taipei, Taiwan，輔仁大學應用心理學系=Fu Jen Catholic University。
69. 林淑萍(1999)。Taipei, Taiwan，國立台灣大學心理學系=National Taiwan University。
70. 馬慶強(1997)。中國人之感性與認知方面的道德發展：一個七階段發展理論。本土心理學研究，7，166-212。
71. 張老師月刊主編(1990)。中國人的心理遊戲。台北=Taipei:張老師月刊編輯部=Living Psychology。
72. 張志學(2001)。人情在中國人社會互動中的表現：一項關鍵事件的研究。中國人的人際關係、情感與信任：一個人際交往的觀點，台北=Taipei:
73. 張志學、楊中芳(2001)。關於人情概念的一項研究。中國人的人際關係、情感與信任：一個人際交往的觀點，台北=Taipei:
74. 張滿玲(2000)。Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學心理學系=National Chengchi University。
75. 陳曦、馬劍虹、時勘(2007)。績效、能力、職位對組織分配公平觀的影響。心理學報，39，901-908。
76. 彭泗清(1997)。中國人真的對人不對事嗎？。本土心理學研究，7，340-356。
77. 黃光國主編(1988)。中國人的權力遊戲。台北=Taipei:巨流=Chuliu。
78. 黃光國(2009)。儒家關係主義：哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究。台北=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
79. 楊中芳(2001)。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。中國人的人際關係、情感與信任：一個人際交往的觀點，台北=Taipei:
80. 楊中芳(2008)。中庸實踐思維研究─邁向建構一套本土心理學知識體系。本土心理研究取徑論叢，台北=Taipei:
81. 楊宜音(1991)。中學生友人間執行「分享分擔」規範的研究。心理學報，23，325-333。
82. 楊國樞主編(1988)。中國人的心理。台北=Taipei:桂冠=Kui-Kuan Books。
83. 楊國樞主編、黃光國主編、楊中芳主編(2005)。華人本土心理學。台北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan-Liou。
84. 楊國樞主編、黃光國主編、楊中芳主編(2005)。華人本土心理學（下）。台北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan-Liou。
85. 趙志裕(1991)。義：中國社會的公平觀。中國人‧中國心：傳統篇，台北=Taipei:
86. 鄭伯壎(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究，3，142-219。
87. 賴志超、黃光國(2000)。程序正義與分配正義：台灣企業員工的正義知覺與工作態度。中華心理學刊，42，171-190。

1. 楊素卿、陳嵩、林伶瑾(2018)。上司信任部屬的前因及對領導行為之影響：上司信任傾向的調節角色。人力資源管理學報，18(1)，85-127。
2. 葉靜秀,黃賢哲,黃煜,許建民(2020)。職棒裁判判決與球迷知覺公平的關係：團體偏私的效果。臺灣運動心理學報，20(2)，1-17。
3. 鄭雯蔚,許建民(2021)。你們我們不一樣！論球迷的內團體偏私。大專體育，156，10-17。
4. 諸承明、莊祐菱、王永才(2014)。組織分配公正、組織程序公正與薪資滿足感之關聯性研究。管理研究學報，14(2)，81-103。
5. 諸承明、莊祐菱、王永才(2014)。組織分配公正、組織程序公正與薪資滿足感之關聯性研究。管理研究學報，14(2)，81-103。
6. (2018)。社交媒體上的人情運作：觀念、行動和結果。傳播與社會學刊，45，121-144。