题名

Encoding Fluency and the Mere Exposure Effect

并列篇名

登錄流暢性與曝光效果

DOI

10.6129/CJP.20120615

作者

汪曼穎(Man-Ying Wang)；李冠吾(Kuan-Wu Lee)

关键词

負向促發 ； 重複促發 ； 流暢性 ； 曝光效應 ； fluency ； mere exposure effect ； negative priming ； repetition priming

期刊名称

中華心理學刊

卷期/出版年月

54卷4期（2012 / 12 / 01）

页次

561 - 577

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

重複呈現本身就足以增加對於物體的喜好（Zajonc, 1968），但目前對於與伴隨刺激曝光或登錄而出現的情境是否及如何影響曝光效應之研究很有限。過去研究發現，登錄作業的注意力狀況會影響偏好判斷（Griffiths &Mitchell, 2008; Raymond et al., 2003; Yagi et al., 2009），本研究則檢視曝光時的處理流暢性是否能影響曝光效應。學習階段以flanker方式呈現中性的線條輪廓物體，要求參與者念名，測驗階段則需作偏好判斷。學習階段若在忽略的狀況下重複呈現，則產生負向促發（negative priming, NP）以及不流暢的處理，並且無法在測驗階段產生顯著的曝光效應，注意狀況下的重複呈現則出現與控制組相同幅度的曝光效應（實驗一）。當促發與偵測項呈現時的空間型態變動時，忽略重複狀況下的負向促發效果消失而曝光效果恢復（實驗二）。實驗三以受試者內設計操弄空間型態相似性，其結果複驗前兩個實驗的發現。這些發現支持登錄流暢性的確影響曝光效應，而且登錄流暢性是直接與偏好連結而造成曝光效應的改變。
英文摘要

Mere repetition is sufficient to increase one's liking towards an object (Zajonc, 1968), yet it is not clear whether and how conditions accompanying item exposure or encoding may impact the mere exposure effect (MEE). Previous studies showed that attentional conditions in the encoding task can influence affective judgments (Griffiths & Mitchell, 2008; Raymond, Fenske, & Tavassoli, 2003; Yagi, Ikoma, & Kikuchi, 2009). This study examines whether the fluency of processing during encoding may mediate the mere exposure effect. Line-drawn, affectively neutral objects were presented in flanker displays that required naming responses in the study phase, followed by a test phase of liking judgments. Items that underwent ignored repetition in the study phase exhibited negative priming (NP) and thus disfluent processing, and they failed to produce reliable mere exposure effects in the test phase. Equivalent MEEs were found for items in the attended repetition and control conditions (Experiment 1). Altering the display layouts between the prime and the probe trials diminished the NP effect and recovered the MEE in the ignored repetition condition (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 manipulated contextual similarity in a within-subject design and the results replicated findings of previous experiments. These findings support that encoding fluency does affect the MEE and it is directly linked to liking, which impacts the resultant MEE.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
参考文献
  1. Alter, A. L.,Oppenheimer, D. M.(2009).Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.Personality and Social Psychology Review,13,219-235.
  2. Barbot, A.,Landy, M. S.,Carrasco, M.(2011).Exogenous attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity.Vision Research,51,1086-1098.
  3. Bornstein, R. F.(1989).Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.Psychological Bulletin,106,265-289.
  4. Bornstein, R. F.,D''Agostino, P. R.(1992).Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63,545-552.
  5. Bornstein, R. F.,D''Agostino, P. R.(1994).The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect.Social Cognition,12,103-128.
  6. Butler, L. T.,Berry, D. C.,Helman, S.(2004).Dissociating mere exposure and repetition priming as a function of word type.Memory & Cognition,32,759-767.
  7. Castel, A. D.,McCabe, D. P.,Roediger, H. L.(2007).Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence from judgments of learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,14,107-111.
  8. Chao, H. F.(2009).Revisiting the prime-probe contextual similarity effect on negative priming: The impact of cue variability.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,21,484-500.
  9. Chao, H. F.,Yeh, Y. Y.(2008).Attentional demand and memory retrieval in negative priming.Psychological Research,72,249-260.
  10. Chen, Y. F.,Yen, Y. C.,Tsai, M. H.,Yeh, Y. Y.(2001).Norms for 105 object contours.Chinese Journal of Psychology,43,103-113.
  11. Egly, R.,Driver, J.,Rafal, R. D.(1994).Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123,161-177.
  12. Eriksen, B. A.,Eriksen, C. W.(1974).Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16,143-149.
  13. Fenske, M. J.,Raymond, J. E.,Kunar, M. A.(2004).The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11,1055-1061.
  14. Fitzgeorge, L.,Buckolz, E.,Khan, M.(2011).Recently inhibited responses are avoided for both masked and nonmasked primes in a spatial negative priming task.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,73,1435-1452.
  15. Fox, E.,De Fockert, J. W.(1998).Negative priming depends on prime-probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5,107-113.
  16. Goolsby, B. A.,Shapiro, K. L.,Silvert, L.,Kiss, M.,Fragopanagos, N.,Taylor, J. G.(2009).Feature-Based inhibition underlies the affective consequences of attention.Visual Cognition,17,500-530.
  17. Griffiths, O.,Mitchell, C. J.(2008).Negative priming reduces affective ratings.Cognition and Emotion,22,1119-1129.
  18. Hertzog, C.,Dunlosky, J.,Robinson, A. E.,Kidder, D. P.(2003).Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,29,22-34.
  19. Jacoby, L. L.,Whitehouse, K.(1989).An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118,126-135.
  20. Kramer, A. F.,Strayer, D. L.(2001).Influence of stimulus repetition on negative priming.Psychology and Aging,16,580-587.
  21. Kunst-Wilson, W. R.,Zajonc, R. B.(1980).Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.Science,207,557-558.
  22. Lee, A. Y.(1994).The mere exposure effect: Is it a mere case of misattribution?.Advances in consumer research,Provo, UT:
  23. Lee, A. Y.(2001).The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27,1255-1266.
  24. Liu, T.,Abrams, J.,Carrasco, M.(2009).Voluntary attention enhances contrast appearance.Psychological Science,20,354-362.
  25. Malley, G. B.,Strayer, D. L.(1995).Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming.Perception & Psychophysics,57,657-667.
  26. May, C. P.,Kane, M. J.,Hasher, L.(1995).Determinants of negative priming.Psychological Bulletin,118,35-54.
  27. McKone, E.,French, B.(2001).In what sense is implicit memory "episodic"? The effect of reinstating environmental context.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8,806-811.
  28. Montagna, B.,Pestilli, F.,Carrasco, M.(2009).Attention trades off spatial acuity.Vision Research,49,735-745.
  29. Neill, W. T.(1997).Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23,1291-3105.
  30. Neill, W. T.,Valdes, L. A.(1992).Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18,565-576.
  31. Neill, W. T.,Valdes, L. A.,Terry, K. M.,Gorfein, D. S.(1992).Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18,993-1000.
  32. Posner, M. I.,Snyder, C. R.,Davidson, B. J.(1980).Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109,160-174.
  33. Raymond, J. E.,Fenske, M. J.,Tavassoli, N. T.(2003).Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli.Psychological Science,14,537-542.
  34. Raymond, J. E.,Fenske, M. J.,Westoby, N.(2005).Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: A consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,31,1404-1415.
  35. Reber, R.,Schwarz, N.,Winkielman, P.(2004).Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?.Personality and Social Psychology Review,8,364-382.
  36. Reber, R.,Winkielman, P.,Schwarz, N.(1998).Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments.Psychological Science,9,45-48.
  37. Seamon, J. G.,Williams, P. C.,Crowley, M. J.,Kim, I. J.,Langer, S. A.,Orne, P. J.(1995).The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21,711-721.
  38. Snodgrass, J. G.,Vanderwart, M.(1980).A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,6,174-215.
  39. Stolz, J. A.,Neely, J. H.(2001).Taking a bright view of negative priming in the light of dim stimuli: Further evidence for memory confusion during episodic retrieval.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,55,219-230.
  40. Strayer, D. L.,Grison, S.(1999).Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,25,24-38.
  41. Tipper, S. P.(1985).The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology,37,571-590.
  42. Tipper, S. P.,Cranston, M.(1985).Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology,37,591-611.
  43. Wang, M. Y.(1997).The evaluation of perceptual and semantic characteristics for a set of object contour pictures.Chinese Journal of Psychology,39,157-172.
  44. Wang, M. Y.,Chang, H. C.(2004).The mere exposure effect and recognition memory.Cognition & Emotion,18,1055-1078.
  45. Whittlesea, B. W. A.,Leboe, J. P.(2003).Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart).Journal of Memory and Language,49,62-79.
  46. Whittlesea, B. W. A.,Williams, L. D.(1998).Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity.Acta Psychologica,98,141-165.
  47. Whittlesea, B. W. A.,Williams, L. D.(2000).The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,26,547-565.
  48. Willems, S.,Dedonder, J.,Van der Linden, M.(2010).The mere exposure effect and recognition depend on the way you look!.Experimental Psychology,57,185-192.
  49. Winkielman, P.,Cacioppo, J. T.(2001).Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81,989-1000.
  50. Winkielman, P.,Halberstadt, J.,Fazendeiro, T.,Catty, S.(2006).Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.Psychological Science,17,799-806.
  51. Winkielman, P.,Huber, D. E.(2009).Dynamics and evaluation: The warm glow of processing fluency.Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science,New York:
  52. Yagi, Y.,Ikoma, S.,Kikuchi, T.(2009).Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,35,1403-1410.
  53. Zajonc, R. B.(1968).Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,9(2, Pt. 2),1-27.
  54. Zajonc, R. B.(1980).Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist,35,151-175.
print cancel