笑話的逆溯推論歷程：以眼動資料為證

The Backward Inference Processing of Jokes: Evidence from Eye Movement

10.6129/CJP.20130410b

蘇雅靜(Ya-Ching Su)；鄭昭明(Chao-Ming Cheng)；陳學志(Hsueh-Chih Chen)

反向合意模式 ； 回視 ； 笑話理解 ； 逆溯推論歷程 ； opposition-coherence theory ； regression ； joke comprehension ； backward inference process

中華心理學刊

56卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

83 - 95

繁體中文

「反向合意模式」（陳學志、鄭昭明、卓淑玲，2001）是當代幽默理論中，對幽默理解歷程描述最為具體的理論，然而除了閱讀完整則笑話後的主觀評定外，仍缺乏更直接的實徵證據。本研究旨在檢驗反向合意模式的「逆溯推論距離」與「解困與否」對幽默閱讀在眼動軌跡上的差異。當讀者閱讀逆溯推論較多的幽默語句時，會產生較多往返於發笑語句和營造語句的眼動歷程。故而，「回視」和「總凝視時間」會有增加的現象。實驗一將發笑語句操弄成「複雜逆溯推論」、「簡單逆溯推論」和「提供逆溯推論」三種條件，結果發現，「複雜逆溯推論」笑話比「提供逆溯推論」笑話有較多的「回視次數」與「總凝視時間」，表示參與者會經歷「逆溯推論歷程」，且逆溯推論步驟多寡會影響「回視次數」與「總凝視時間」。實驗二操弄發笑語句為「失諧解困」組與「失諧未解困」組。結果發現「失諧未解困」組比「失諧解困」組有較多的「總凝視時間」與「回視次數」，表示參與者會先進行逆溯推論，但並非無止盡的回視，通常在回視一定次數後會選擇放棄。本研究除了支持「反向合意模式」對「逆溯推論歷程」的假設外，更透過眼動歷程表徵不同的幽默處理階段，提供幽默理解的眼動模式。

All jokes contain incongruity between set-up sentences and punch lines. People who read jokes that require more inferences will spend more time resolving the incongruity by making connections between the set-up sentences and the punch line. The opposition-coherence theory of humor (Chen, Cheng, & Cho, 2001) proposes backward inference, defined as the inference directed to parts of text preceding the inference, as an important component of humor processes. The present study examined how backward inference processing affects humor comprehension in two eye-tracking experiments with participants reading jokes at difficult levels. In experiment 1, we examined effects of each of three difficulty levels on humor comprehension. We compared eye movements with provided inference, simple inference, and complex inference jokes with differing punch lines and of varying difficulty. The participants spent a longer time for total viewing and made more regressions for the complex condition than for the provided condition. Results are consistent with the prediction regarding backward inference, suggesting that readers literally revisit aspects of the prior context while apprehending jokes. In experiment 2, we examined effects of resolution on humor comprehension by investigating whether the punch line can resolve the incongruity in incongruity-resolution and incongruity-irresolution conditions. Results showed that participants made more regressions and needed longer total viewing time for the incongruity-irresolution condition than for the incongruity-resolution condition. This finding suggested that participants searched for and took 4 regressions before terminating comprehension. The results mentioned above support the process of backward inferences and provide information about eye movement patterns of joke comprehension.

1. 陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠(2010)。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55(4)，39-68。
   連結：
2. 鄭昭明、陳學志、詹雨臻、蘇雅靜、曾千芝(2013)。台灣地區華人情緒與相關心理生理資料庫—中文笑話評定常模。中華心理學刊，55，555-569。
   連結：
3. 鄭昭明、陳學志、詹雨臻、蘇雅靜、曾千芝(2013)。台灣地區華人情緒與相關心理生理資料庫—中文笑話評定常模。中華心理學刊，55，555-569。
   連結：
4. 鄭昭明、陳學志、詹雨臻、蘇雅靜、曾千芝(2013)。台灣地區華人情緒與相關心理生理資料庫—中文笑話評定常模。中華心理學刊，55，555-569。
   連結：
5. Attardo, S.(1997).The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor.Humor,10,395-420.
6. Chapman, A. J.(Ed.),Foot, H. C.(Ed.)(1976).Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications.London, UK:Wiley.
7. Coulson, S.,Kutas, M.(1998).Technical. Report No. 98.03Technical. Report No. 98.03,San Diego, CA:Department of Cognitive Science.
8. Coulson, S.,Urbach, T. P.,Kutas, M.(2006).Looking back: Joke comprehension and the space structuring model.Humor,19,229-250.
9. Coulson, S.,Williams, R. F.(2005).Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension.Neuropsychologia,43,128-141.
10. Deckers, L.,Avery, P.(1994).Altered joke endings and a joke structure schema.Humor: International Journal of Humor Research,7,313-321.
11. Goldstein, J. H.(Ed.),McGhee, P. E.(Ed.)(1972).The psychology of humor: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues.New York:Academic Press.
12. Goldstein, J. H.(Ed.),McGhee, P. E.(Ed.)(1972).The psychology of humor.New York:Academic Press.
13. Just, M. A.,Carpenter, P. A.(1980).A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87,329-354.
14. Koestler, A.(1964).The act of creation.London, UK:Hutchinson.
15. Li, X.,Liu, P.,Rayner, K.(2011).Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location?.Vision Research,51,1146-1156.
16. Rayner, K.(1998).Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124,372-422.
17. Rayner, K.,Pollatsek, A.(1989).The psychology of reading.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Reichle, E. D.,Pollatsek, A.,Fisher, D. L.,Rayner, K.(1998).Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.Psychological Review,105,125-157.
19. Reingold, E. M.,Reichle, E. D.,Glaholt, M. G.,Sheridan, H.(2012).Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.Cognitive Psychology,65,177-206.
20. Schultz, T. R.,Horibe, F.(1974).Development of the appreciation of verbal jokes.Development Psychology,10,13-20.
21. Sereno, S. C.,Rayner, K.(2003).Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7,489-493.
22. Strick, M.,Holland, R. W.,Baaren, R. V.,Knippenberg, A. V.(2010).Humor in the eye tracker: Attention capture and distraction from context cues.The Journal of General Psycholigy,137,37-48.
23. Underwood, G.(Ed.)(1998).Eye guidance in reading and scene perception.New York:Elsevier.
24. Vaid, J.,Hull, R.,Heredia, R.,Gerkens, D.,Martinez, F.(2003).Getting a joke: The time course of meaning activation in verbal humor.Journal of Pragmatics,35,1431-1449.
25. Wyer, R. S., Jr.,Collins, J. E., II(1992).A theory of humor elicitation.Psychological Review,99,663-688.
26. 陳學志(1991)。國立台灣大學心理學研究所=Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University。
27. 陳學志、鄭昭明、卓淑玲(2001)。笑話中幽默因子的訊息整合歷程研究。中華心理學刊，43，137-153。

1. 詹雨臻,陳學志,呂昕頤(2019)。笑話中歧義與推論歷程之眼動分析。教育心理學報，50(4)，587-609。