華人強暴迷思概念與測量工具

Development of Chinese Rape Myths Concept and Scale

10.6129/CJP.20170406

黃軍義(Jiun-Yih Huang)；林旖旎(Yii-nii Lin)

他人取向 ； 自省取向 ； 家庭取向 ； 貞潔取向 ； 華人強暴迷思 ； other-orientation ； reflection orientation ； family orientation ； chastity orientation ； Chinese rape myths

中華心理學刊

59卷2期（2017 / 06 / 01）

63 - 87

繁體中文

強暴迷思的概念與測量具有在地性、變遷性，並與社會文化特色密切相關，因此不能僅移植西方的概念或使用西方的量表。本研究從傳統華人社會文化角度出發，提出華人的強暴迷思概念，並據以建立測量工具。華人重視家庭、關係、修身、德性、他人評價，故作者從這些面向思考並整合過去的研究經驗，提出華人家庭取向、貞潔取向、他人取向、與自省取向的強暴迷思特徵。本研究以無記名自陳式問卷調查法蒐集資料，研究對象包括5所公立、7所私立大學的學生，經剔除廢卷後得有效問卷969份。結果發現，上述華人強暴迷思的特徵中，家庭取向迷思可分為被害延伸與加害延伸兩項迷思，貞潔與他人取向迷思可合併為一個構念，而得到四項構念或分量表：被害延伸迷思、加害延伸迷思、貞潔與他人迷思、自省迷思。整體量表具備良好的內部一致性信度與組合信度，並具備構念效度、複合效度、與效標關聯效度。文末討論研究結果的理論意涵、實務應用、研究限制、與未來研究方向。

Rape myths related concepts and measurements are region-oriented, change-oriented, and are highly associated with sociocultural characteristics, as a result, western concepts and measurement scales may not apply to Chinese society. This study proposed concepts of rape myths from the Chinese point of view and established measurement tool suitable for Chinese society accordingly. Researchers of this study proposed family orientation, chastity orientation, other-orientation, and reflection orientation as the characteristics of Chinese rape myths based on Chinese traditional values and past research findings. The study collected data through anonymous self-report questionnaires surveying students of five public and seven private universities. The number of valid questionnaires was 969. The results of this study showed that the characteristic of family orientation could be further divided into rape victim extension and rapist extension. The characteristics of chastity orientation and other-orientation could be combined into one construct. The revised attributes of the measurement scale included four subscales: rape victim extension myths, rapist extension myths, chastity and other-oriented myths, and reflection myths. The resulted measurement scale was sufficient in internal consistency and composite reliability, and was validated through construct validity, cross-validation validity, and criteria-related validity. Theoretical implications, practical applications, research limitations, and directions for future research were also discussed in the study.

1. 高旭繁、陸洛(2006)。夫妻傳統性／現代性的契與婚姻適應之關聯。本土心理學研究，25，47-100。
   連結：
2. 陳若璋、劉志如、林烘煜(2007)。比較強暴犯與兒童性侵害犯接受團體治療之療效評估。中華輔導學報，22，1-31。
   連結：
3. 黃軍義(2014)。敵視女性態度、強暴迷思、與強暴行為。教育心理學報，45，393-412。
   連結：
4. Aosved, A. C.,Long, P. J.(2006).Co-occurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, and religious intolerance.Sex Roles,55,481-492.
5. Basow, S. A.,Minieri, A.(2011)."You owe me": Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,26,479-497.
6. Baugher, S. N.,Elhai, J. D.,Monroe, J. R.,Gray, M. J.(2010).Rape myth acceptance, sexual trauma history, and posttraumatic stress disorder.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,25,2036-2053.
7. Bohner, G.,Jarvis, C. I.,Eyssel, F.,Siebler, F.(2005).The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men.European Journal of Social Psychology,35,819-828.
8. Bohner, G.,Pina, A.,Viki, G. T.,Siebler, F.(2010).Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups.Psychology, Crime & Law,16,671-693.
9. Brownmiller, S.(1975).Against our will: Men, women and rape.New York, NY:Simon & Schuster.
10. Burt, M. R.(1980).Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38,217-230.
11. Busching, R.,Lutz, J.(2016).The impact of visual stereotypes on judgments about rape: A reversecorrelation approach.Swiss Journal of Psychology,75,133-140.
12. Chapleau, K. M.,Oswald, D. L.(2010).Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity.Journal of Sex Research,47,66-78.
13. Chapleau, K. M.,Oswald, D. L.,Russell, B. L.(2008).Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,23,600-615.
14. Chen, F. F.(2007).Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling a Multidisciplinary,14,464-504.
15. Drieschner, K.,Lange, A.(1999).A review of cognitive factors in the etiology of rape: Theories, empirical studies, and implications.Clinical Psychology Review,19,57-77.
16. Field, H. S.(1978).Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36,156-179.
17. Foubert, J. D.,Brosi, M. W.,Bannon, R. S.(2011).Pornography viewing among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance and behavioral intent to commit sexual assault.Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity,18,212-231.
18. Franiuk, R.,Seefelt, J. L.,Cepress, S. L.,Vandello, J. A.(2008).Prevalence and effects of rape myths in print journalism: The Kobe Bryant case.Violence Against Women,14,287-309.
19. Franiuk, R.,Shain, E. A.(2011).Beyond Christianity: The status of women and rape myths.Sex Roles,65,783-791.
20. Gerger, H.,Kley, H.,Bohner, G.,Siebler, F.(2007).The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English.Aggressive Behavior,33,422-440.
21. Gilmartin-Zena, P.(1987).Attitudes toward rape: Student characteristics as predictors.Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology,15,175-182.
22. Grubb, A.,Turner, E.(2012).Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming.Aggression and Violent Behavior,17,443-452.
23. Hammond, E. M.,Berry, M. A.,Rodriguez, D. N.(2011).The influence of rape myth acceptance, sexual attitudes, and belief in a just world on attributions of responsibility in a date rape scenario.Legal & Criminological Psychology,16,242-252.
24. Haywood, H.,Swank, E.(2008).Rape myths among Appalachian college students.Violence and Victims,23,373-389.
25. Kahlor, L.,Eastin, M. S.(2011).Television's role in the culture of violence toward women: A study of television viewing and the cultivation of rape myth acceptance in the United States.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,55,215-231.
26. Klein, C.,Kennedy, M. A.,Gorzalk, B. B.(2009).Rape myth acceptance in men who completed the Prostitution Offender Program of British Columbia.International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology,53,305-315.
27. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford.
28. Lee, J.,Kim, J.,Lim, H.(2010).Rape myth acceptance among Korean college students: The roles of gender, attitudes toward women, and sexual double standard.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,25,1200-1223.
29. Lonsway, K. A.,Fitzgerald, L. F.(1995).Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68,704-711.
30. Lonsway, K. A.,Fitzgerald, L. F.(1994).Rape myths: In review.Psychology of Women Quarterly,18,133-164.
31. Malamuth, N. M.(Ed.),Donnerstein, E.(Ed.)(1984).Pornography and sexual aggression.Orlanda, FL:Academic Press.
32. McCauley, J.(Ed.),Berkowitz, L.(Ed.)(1970).Altruism and helping behavior.New York, NY:Academic Press.
33. McDaniel, E.(1994).Understanding educational measurement.Madison, WI:WCB Brown & Benchmark.
34. McMahon, S.(2010).Rape myth beliefs and bystander attitudes among incoming college students.Journal of American College Health,59,3-11.
35. McMahon, S.,Farmer, G. L.(2011).An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths.Social Work Research,35,71-81.
36. Newcombe, P. A.,Van Den Eynde, J.,Hafner, D.,Jolly, L.(2008).Attributions of responsibility for rape: Differences across familiarity of situation, gender, and acceptance of rape myths.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,38,1736-1754.
37. Niemi, L.,Young, L.(2014).Blaming the victim in the case of rape.Psychological Inquiry,25,230-233.
38. Payne, D. L.,Lonsway, K. A.,Fitzgerald, L. F.(1999).Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale.Journal of Research in Personality,33,27-68.
39. Peterson, R. A.,Kim, Y.(2012).On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability.Journal of Applied Psychology,98,194-198.
40. Polaschek, D. L. L.,Ward, T.(2002).The implicit theories of rapists: What our questionnaires tell us.Aggression and Violent Behavior,7,385-406.
41. Reed, K. M. P.,Hines, D. A.,Armstrong, J. L.,Cameron, A. Y.(2015).Experimental evaluation of a bystander prevention program for sexual assault and dating violence.Psychology of Violence,5,95-102.
42. Ross, L.(1977).The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,10,173-220.
43. Ryan, K. M.(2011).The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape.Sex Roles,65,774-782.
44. Seabrook, R. C.,Ward, L. M.,Giaccardi, S.(2016).Why is fraternity membership associated with sexual assault? Exploring the roles of conformity to masculine norms, pressure to uphold masculinity, and objectification of women.Psychology of Men & Masculinity
45. Shaw, J.,Campbell, R.,Cain, D.,Feeney, H.(2016).Beyond surveys and scales: How rape myths manifest in sexual assault police records.Psychology of Violence
46. Stewart, A. L.(2014).The Men's Project: A sexual assault prevention program targeting college men.Psychology of Men & Masculinity,15,481-485.
47. Süssenbach, P.,Bohner, G.,Eyssel, F.(2012).Schematic influences of rape myth acceptance on visual information processing: An eye-tracking approach.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48,660-668.
48. Tavrow, P.,Withers, M.,Obbuyi, A.,Omollo, V.,Wu, E.(2013).Rape myth attitudes in rural Kenya: Toward the development of a culturally relevant attitude scale and "blame index".Journal of Interpersonal Violence,28,2156-2178.
49. Uji, M.,Shono, M.,Shikai, N.,Kitamura, T.(2007).Rape myth scale: Factor structure and relationship with gender egalitarianism among Japanese professionals.Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences,61,392-400.
50. Velicer, W. F.,Huckel, L. H.,Hansen, C. E.(1989).A measurement model for measuring attitudes toward violence.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,15,349-364.
51. Ward, T.(2000).Sexual offenders' cognitive distortions as implicit theories.Aggression and Violent Behavior,5,491-507.
52. Wu, T. H.,Chang, C. C.,Chen, C. Y.,Wang, J. D.,Lin, C. Y.(2015).Further psychometric evaluation of the Self-Stigma Scale-Short: Measurement invariance across mental illness and gender.PLOS One,10,1-12.
53. Yeater, E. A.,Treat, T. A.,Viken, R. J.,McFall, R. M.(2010).Cognitive processes underlying women's risk judgments: Associations with sexual victimization history and rape myth acceptance.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,78,375-386.
54. 方嘉珩(2008)。台北=Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所=National Taiwan Normal University。
55. 王嵩音編(1995)。性、暴力、新聞眼。台北=Taipei:碩人=Shuo-Jen。
56. 向倩儀(2007)。台北=Taipei，國立政治大學新聞研究所=National Chengchi University。
57. 江宜靜(2009)。台北=Taipei，臺灣大學新聞研究所=National Taiwan University。
58. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。台北=Taipei:高等教育=Edubook。
59. 呂明坤(1996)。桃園，中央警察大學警政研究所=National Central Police University。
60. 李維娜(2001)。嘉義=Chiayi，國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所=National Chung Cheng University。
61. 林佩珊(2009)。台北=Taipei，國立臺北大學社會學研究所=National Taipei University。
62. 林淑梨(2001)。台南=Tainan，國立成功大學行為醫學研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
63. 邱皓政(2004)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北=Taipei:雙葉=Yeh-Yeh Book Gallery。
64. 邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan Culture Enterprise。
65. 卿盛瑛(2005)。台南=Tainan，國立成功大學護理學研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
66. 夏名慧(2009)。嘉義=Chiayi，國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所=National Chung Cheng University。
67. 許烺光、徐隆德譯(1988)。中國人與美國人。台北=Taipei:巨流=Chu-Liu。
68. 黃光國(2010)。國科會專題研究國科會專題研究,台北=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council。
69. 黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學─結構方程模式。台北=Taipei:五南=Wu-Nan。
70. 黃軍義(2000)。台北=Taipei，國立台灣大學心理學研究所=National Taiwan University。
71. 黃軍義、陳若璋(1997)。強暴犯罪成因及相關問題之研究。台北=Taipei:法務部=Ministry of Justice。
72. 楊國樞編、陸洛編(2008)。中國人的自我：心理學的分析。台北=Taipei:台大出版中心=National Taiwan University Press。
73. 楊國樞編、黃光國編、楊中芳編(2005)。華人本土心理學。台北=Taipei:遠流=Yuan-Liou。
74. 劉毓秀編(1995)。台灣婦女處境白皮書：1995年。台北=Taipei:時報文化=China Times。
75. 賴祥慶(2010)。新竹=Hsinchu，玄奘大學應用心理學研究所=Hsuan Chuang University。

1. 黃軍義,許得洋(2020)。遭遇性侵害經驗、強暴迷思、與性別偏見對男同志做出性侵害行為的影響。教育心理學報，52(2)，337-364。
2. 黃軍義,林耀盛,李嘉豐(2019).Effects of Impersonal-promiscuous Sex, Hostility toward Women,Acceptance of Violence, and Affective Empathy on Sexual Aggression.亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,15(1),1-22+24.
3. 黃軍義,吳俊翰(2020)。男／女性別角色刻板印象、性別偏見與強暴迷思的關聯。臺灣性學學刊，26(1)，31-63。
4. (2024)。華人敵視女性內涵與量表。本土心理學研究，61，45-114。