論杜甫自秦入蜀紀行詩的成就與其文學史地位

Du Fu's Poetic Records of His Joureny from Qin to Shu and Their Place in Chinese Literary History

10.6258/bcla.2002.56.09

黃奕珍(Yi-Jen Huang)

杜甫 ； 紀行詩 ； 山水詩 ； 自然觀 ； 隱喻 ； Du fu ； poetic records of journey ； nature poetry ； naturalism ； metaphor

臺大文史哲學報

56期（2002 / 05 / 01）

249 - 251+253-283

繁體中文

本文以杜甫自秦入蜀紀行詩二十四首為範圍，析論其文學成就計有以下數項：開闢嶄新的描寫領域，白描入蜀道中之山水實景與真情實感；使用類似組詩的形式及變幻莫測的筆力，提供來回玩賞的閱讀可能；運用鮮明的形象與多重之感官摹寫，營造「身歷其境」的效果，並以隱喻的形式寄寓深沈的人生感慨，多方詮解人與自然的關係。而其文學史之地位則可由幾個脈絡來把握：以其自身創作的系統而言，可視為秦州詩的延續，若與草堂詩合觀，則可見其多元豐富的自然觀。他向紀行賦汲取養分，開創了紀行詩的體式，而整組紀行詩與山水詩之形成有關之各類詩體也有一定的關係。至於在山水詩的傳統中，則是比較偏向謝靈運的路線而堪與王、孟詩派分庭抗禮的。如果忽略了此類詩作存在的事實與其真正的價值，而逕以王、孟澄靜澹美的詩風作為中國山水詩的代表，將造成文學史研究的重大損失。

This paper discusses the literary accomplishments of 24 poems written by Du Fu to record his journey from Qin to Shu in terms of the following: the development of a new descriptive endeavor by directly describing the natural scenery (mountain and streams) seen on his trip to Shu and the poet's feelings at the time; the use of a formalistic style similar to a poetic set and an ever-changing descriptive voice to provide the reader with a group of works that lends themselves to intertextual readings; the use of clear, direct images and multi-leveled sensory descriptions to give the reader the impression of actually having made the trip himself; and the veiled encoding in the texts of profound reflections on human life to provide a richly textured interpretation of the relation between man and nature. Likewise, these poems are important with respect to literary history. In terms of Du Fu's own poetic opus, they can be seen as an extension of works written during his stay in Qin. Meanwhile, taken together with his caotang (literally ”grass hut”, a reference to the type of a hermit-like dwelling) poems, they show Du Fu's multi-faceted and complex naturalism. In terms of literary traditions, Du Fu on the one hand drew from the tradition of writing fu to record journeys while on the other creating a new poetic form: poetic records of a journey. At the same time, this group of poems can be discussed in relation to the various poetic styles that make up the tradition of nature (mountain and water) poems. Du Fu's poetic record is not just stylistically closer to Xie Lingyun, but can also be seen as standing in opposition to the poetic style that developed around the poets Wang Wei and Meng Haoran. As such, it would be a great loss if we, as literary historians, overlook the importance and value of this style of poetry and instead simply take the beautific quietism of Wang and Meng to be representative of classical Chinese nature poetry.

1. 唐代交通圖考。
2. 讀杜心解。
3. (1971)。全唐詩。
4. 唐杜甫(1947)。宋本杜工部集。
5. 唐杜甫(1984)。杜詩詳註。
6. 梁蕭統(1971)。文選。
7. 清吳瞻泰(1974)。杜詩提要。
8. 清沈德潛(1970)。唐詩別裁集。
9. 清楊倫(1978)。杜詩鏡銓。
10. 清錢謙益(1967)。錢牧齋箋注杜詩。
11. 王輝斌(1999)。藝術轉型：杜甫秦州詩的文學特質。河北大學學報，24(2)，16-20。
12. 李濟阻(1997)。杜甫在秦州的生活及其對創作的影響。杜甫研究學刊，53
13. 林文月。中國古典文學論叢（一）。
14. 林文月(1985)。中國文學史論文選集續編。
15. 馬曉光(1985)。論杜甫入蜀詩對山水詩的貢獻。山西大學學報，75。
16. 高友工(1996)。北美中國古典文學研究名家十年文選。
17. 陳尚君(1997)。唐代文學叢考。
18. 陳鵬翔(1991)。中英山水詩理論與當代中文山水詩的模式。中外文學，20(6)=234，96-135。
19. 章尚正(1997)。中國山水文學研究。
20. 曾明男(1997)。杜甫山水詩中的人文主義精神。杜甫研究學刊，53，34-38。
21. 逯欽立(1988)。先秦漢魏晉南北朝詩。
22. 楊世明(1996)。唐詩史。
23. 葉維廉(1983)。比較詩學。
24. 葛曉音(1993)。山水田園詩派研究。
25. 顏家安(1999)。高．大．深．奇．神─杜甫山水詩審美意境探微。海南大學學報：社科版，17(1)

1. 王達甫(2021)。舉業行旅與自我辯證：李流芳科舉生涯與〈南歸詩〉。靜宜中文學報，19，19-50。
2. (2023)。女貞之歌：論駱綺蘭〈擬玉溪生燕臺四首〉對李商隱的承變及其意義。中國文學研究，56，207-251。