人類學與歷史學的對話？一點反省與建議

Dialogue between Anthropology and History?-Comments and Suggestions

10.6258/bcla.2003.59.02

林開世(Kai-Shyh Lin)

殖民主義 ； 歷史編撰學 ； 歷史人類學 ； 檔案 ； Colonialism ； historiography ； historical anthropology ； archive

臺大文史哲學報

59期（2003 / 11 / 01）

11 - 29

繁體中文

所謂「歷史與人類學的對話」是建立在我們認為這兩個學科各具有一些知識上本質，可以透過對話來達到互惠互補的效果，這樣的假設之上。然而我們從這兩個學科的歷史發展與互相採借的成果來看，我們會發現他們引起的問題上比解決的問題更多更複雜。因此，我建議應當問的問題是為什麼歷史學與人類學會被置於這個對話的地位？它們在知識系譜學上的地位為何？特別是他們與近代殖民主義脈絡中的權力運作之間的關係為何？這樣的問題，將打破傳統的學科界限，挑戰我們習以為常的分析範疇，進而警覺到各種知識與權力的形式如何構成改變社會現實。

The so-called ”dialogue between History and Anthropology” assumes that each discipline occupies its own epistemological space and that the exchange between historians and anthropologists will result in a more well-rounded understanding of historical phenomena. I find this assumption highly questionable, and suggest that the exchange often create more problems than intended. Thus, I believe we should question the existing disciplinary boundaries and trace the genealogies of History and Anthropology to their modern formations, particularly in their colonial contexts. This new investigation will reveal traces of power/knowledge maneuvers in the consolidation of colonial order, and render the established division of knowledge domains problematic.

1. Amselle, Jean-Loup(1993).Anthropology and Historicity.History and Theory,32,12-31.
2. Axel, Brian Keith(2002).From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and Its Futures.
3. Braudel、 Fernand(1980).On History.
4. Clifford, James(1988).The Predicament of Culture.
5. Cohn, Bernard S.(1996).Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge : The British in India.
6. Cohn, Bernard S.(1987).An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays.
7. Comaroff, Jean(1992).Ethnography and the Historical Imagination.
8. Dirks, Nicholas B.(1995).Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China.
9. Dirks, Nicholas B.(1993).Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia.
10. Dirks, Nicholas B.(1996).The Historic Turns in the Social Science.
11. Dirks, Nicholas B.(1999).Colonial Subjects: Essays on the Practical History of Anthropology.
12. Dirks, Nicholas B.(2002).From the Margins: Historical Anthropology and Its Futures.
13. Dirks, Nicholas B.(1993).The Hollow Crown: Ethnohistory of an Indian Kingdom.
14. Donovan, Mark(1999).Writing National Histories: Western Europe Since 1800.
15. Duara、 Prasenjit(2001).A History of Anthropology.
16. Evans-Prichard, E. E.(1962).Essays in Social Anthropology.
17. Fabian, Johannes(1983).Time and the Other.
18. Faubion, James D.(1993).History in Anthropology.Annual Review of Anthropology,22,35-54.
19. Furet, Francois(1984).In the Workshop of History.
20. Guha, Ranjit(1988).Selected Subaltern Studies.
21. Hanks, William F.(1989).Text and Textuality.Annual Review of Anthropology,18,95-127.
22. Kopytoff, Igor(1987).The African Frontier.
23. Mathur, Saloni(2000).History and Anthropology in South Asia: Rethinking the Archive.Annual Review of Anthropology,29,89-106.
24. Obeyesekere, Gananath(1992).The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking in the Pacific.
25. Ranger, T.(1983).The Invention of Tradition.
26. Richards, Thomas(1993).The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire.
27. Rosaldo, Renato(1980).Ilongot Headhunting 1883-1974: a Study in Society and History.
28. Roseberry, William(1989).Anthropologies and Histories: Essays in Culture, History, and Political Economy.
29. Sahlins, Marshall(1981).Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities.
30. Sahlins, Marshall(1991).Clio in Oceania: Toward a Historical Anthropology.
31. Sahlins, Marshall(1985).Islands of History.
32. Sewell Jr., William H.(1996).The Historic Turn in The Human Sciences.
33. Wolf、 Eric R.(1982).Europe and the People Without History.
34. 臺灣原住民文教基金會(2001)。原住民部落重大歷史事件：大港口事件。

1. 白皇湧(2008)。歷史的詭跡─關於秀姑巒溪出海口（Cepo'）地方的歷史事件與再現研究。台灣原住民族研究季刊，1(4)，111-39。
2. 郭祐慈(2007)。戰後台灣與日本阿美族研究之評析：以相關學院期刊研究取向為中心的討論。民族學報，26，101-141。
3. 李仁淵(2018)。在田野中找歷史：三十年來的中國華南社會史研究與人類學。考古人類學刊，88，109-140。
4. 林瑋嬪(2018)。導言 與人類學共舞。考古人類學刊，88，1-7。
5. (2008)。殖民檔案與帝國形構：論清朝滿文奏摺中對臺灣熟番的表述。臺灣史研究，15(3)，25-55。
6. (2018)。臺灣社會變遷研究的歷史轉向：對整體觀與貶抑歷史敘事的一點反思。臺灣社會學刊，63，1-62。
7. (2019)。「蕃地」開發、「蕃人」控制及臺灣原住民族群性的展現：以蘭陽溪中上游地域為中心（上篇）。考古人類學刊，90，1-44。