题名

歷史與記憶之間:從大關山事件談起

并列篇名

Between History and Memory: Dakuanshan Event and Beyond

DOI

10.6258/bcla.2003.59.03

作者

楊淑媛(Shu-Yuan Yang)

关键词

布農人 ; 歷史 ; 記憶 ; 事件 ; 歷史意識 ; the Bunun ; history ; memory ; event ; historical consciousness

期刊名称

臺大文史哲學報

卷期/出版年月

59期(2003 / 11 / 01)

页次

31 - 63

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

過去對布農人歷史觀的研究,強調「意象」而非「事件」的重要性。本文則以臺東縣海端鄉地區日據時期的三大事件為主要的分析對象,來探討歷史與記憶之間的關係,以及最近興建雕像、紀念碑和舉辦尋根之旅等新的記憶形式的興起,如何造成其關係的轉變。透過對民族誌與歷史材料的對照使用,筆者主張事件的研究,對理解布農人如何以其獨特的文化觀念來認識與表徵過去是很重要的。同時,筆者也強調布農人的歷史觀並不是封閉的、靜態的傳統,而與他們被擁有文字與歷史書寫傳統的殖民政權統治的經驗,以及台灣大社會的政治和文化變遷,有密切的關係。

英文摘要

In the previous studies of Bunun perception of history, it is emphasized that the concept of 'image' rather than 'event' is of central importance. As a result, anthropologists have paid little attention to historical events. This article argues for the significance of the analysis of event in understanding how the Bunun perceive and represent the past in their culturally specific ways. Focusing on three main historical events in the Japanese colonial period in the area of Haituan Township, Taitung County, I use both ethnographic data and historical records to explore the relationships between memory and history, and to examine how such relationships are transformed after the recent emergence of new forms of commemoration, such as the construction of statue and monument, and the so-called 'root-searching trips' to the ancestral sites. It is stressed that the Bunun's senses of the past and their conceptualization of history should not be treated as a bounded, static tradition. Rather, they are closely related to the Bunun's experience of being ruled by colonial authorities equipped with literacy and written history, as well as the political and cultural changes in the wider Taiwanese society.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
人文學 > 歷史學
人文學 > 中國文學
参考文献
  1. (1998).Realms of Memory (Vol. 3).
  2. (1991).Culture and History in The Pacific.
  3. Abercrombie, T. A.(1998).Pathways of Memory and Power: Ethnography and History among an Andean People.
  4. Anderson, B.(1990).Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
  5. Bloch, M. E. F.(1998).How We Think They Think.
  6. Bloch, M. E. F.(1995).The Anthropology of Landscape.
  7. Carrier, P.(2000).Memory and Methology.
  8. Casey, Edward S.(2000).Remembering: A Phenomenological Study.
  9. Cole, J.(1998).Memory and Postcolony: African Anthropology and the Critique of Power.
  10. Cole, J.(2001).Forget Colonialism? Sacrifice and the Art of Memory in Madagascar.
  11. Connerton, P.(1989).How Societies Remember.
  12. Errington, S.(1979).Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia.
  13. Fentress, J.(1992).Social Memory.
  14. Gedi, Noa,Elam, Yigal(1996).Collective Memory-What Is It?.History and Memory,8(1),30-50.
  15. Halbwachs, Maurice(1980).The Collective Memory.
  16. Hoskins、 Janet, J.(1996).Headhunting and the Social Imagination in Southeast Asia.
  17. Hoskins、 Janet, J.(1987).The Headhunter as Hero: Local Traditions and Their Reinterpretation in National History.American Ethnologist,14(4),605-622.
  18. Hutton, P. H.(1993).History as an Art of Memory.
  19. Le Goff、 J.(1992).History and Memory.
  20. Middleton, D.(1997).The Social Organization of Conversational Remembering: Experience as Individual and Collective Concerns.Mind, Culture and Activity,4(2),71-85.
  21. Middleton, D.,Edwards, Derek(1990).Collective Remembering.
  22. Nora, Pierre(2001).Rethinking France: les Lieux de Memoire.
  23. Nora, Pierre(1989).Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire.Representations,26(1),7-25.
  24. Rosaldo, R.(1993).Culture and Truth.
  25. Roseman, S. R.(1996).‘How We Built the Road’: the Politics of Memory in Rural Galicia.American Ethnologist,23(4),836-860.
  26. Rowlands, M.(1999).The Art of Forgetting.
  27. Sahlins, M.(1981).Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities.
  28. Sahlins, M.(1985).Islands of History.
  29. Schieffelin, E. L.(1991).Like People You See in a Dream: First Contact in Six Pupuan Societies.
  30. Strathern, M.(1991).Culture in Practice: Selected Essays.
  31. Strathern, Marilyn(1990).Culture and History in The Pacific.
  32. Young, J. E.(1993).The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning.
  33. 方志榮(1998)。血、IS-ANG與布農族親屬的關係:以崙天為例
  34. 王家祥(1995)。關於拉馬達仙仙與拉荷阿雷
  35. 李敏慧(1997)。日治時期臺灣山地部落的集團移住與社會重建
  36. 李嘉鑫(1998)。拉馬達星星紀念碑的多種說法。中國時報。民國87年11月6日。
  37. 馬淵東一, Toichi(1974).Ethnology of the Southwestern Pacific.
  38. 淺野義雄(1988)。大關山蕃害事件始末(一-六)
  39. 黃應貴(1999)。時間、歷史與記憶
  40. 楊淑媛(1992)。兩性、親屬與人的觀念:以霧鹿布農人為例的研究
  41. 楊淑媛, Shu-Yuan(2001).Coping with Marginality: The Bunun in Contemporary Taiwan.
  42. 楊淑媛。過去如何被記憶與經驗:以霧鹿布農人為例的研究。臺灣人類學刊,2
  43. 楊淑媛。想像國家:一個民族誌的研究。臺灣人類學刊
  44. 葉家寧(2002)。臺灣原住民史.布農族史篇
  45. 葉家寧(1995)。臺灣原住民史料彙編(第1輯)
  46. 臺灣總督府警務局(1998)。日據時期原住民行政志稿(第三卷)
  47. 臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課(1933)。逢坂の蕃害事件。理蕃の友,2/3
  48. 臺灣總督府警察本署(1997)。日據時期原住民行政志稿(第一卷)
  49. 劉斌雄(1986)。臺灣土著社會與文化論文集
  50. 瀨野尾寧(1935)。臺灣蕃界稗史殉職秘話
被引用次数
  1. 顧玉玲(2021)。歷史的照妖鏡-從原住民抗爭探究紀念碑的轉型正義。臺灣民主季刊,18(1),39-81。
  2. 黃應貴(2005)。再談歷史與文化。東吳歷史學報,14,1-19。
  3. 台邦·撒沙勒(2008)。傳統領域的裂解與重構:kucapungane人地圖譜與空間變遷的再檢視。考古人類學刊,69,9-44。
  4. (2014)。歷史創傷與行旅記憶:吳濁流作品的戰亂敘事。臺灣文獻,65(2),251-294。
  5. (2023)。山中歲月與國家計畫的時空:試論拉庫拉庫溪布農族舊社石板屋修復的時間性與工作節奏。考古人類學刊,99,113-147。